DISQUS

DISQUS Hello!  The comments on this profile are unclaimed and thus are unverified.

Do they belong to you? Claim these comments.

Richard Stacpoole's picture

Unregistered

Feeds

aliases

  • Richard Stacpoole
  • Stackers

Richard Stacpoole

4 months ago

in Paul Thurrott Opens Mouth, Unbridled Idiocy Pours Forth on The Angry Drunk
Sorry, obviously didn't read what you wrote, only what I thought you wrote.  Doh.As for relicensing, Microsoft see ActiveSync as a propriety protocol they want to maximise control not necessarily revenue.

4 months ago

in Paul Thurrott Opens Mouth, Unbridled Idiocy Pours Forth on The Angry Drunk
I would guarantee that the ActiveSync license includes a clause that Apple could not re-license the protocol.  Microsoft would not want to loose control of the ActiveSync protocol.
1 reply
The Angry Drunk Who said anything about re-licensing EAS? Apple licenses Active Sync to allow the iPhone to sync with Exchange Server. I haven't seen any proof that Apple is using EAS for MobileMe sync.

2 years ago

in Grab that Invocation on toxicsoftware.com
Thanks,

I have just started using NSInvocation, and this will be useful.

Also there is a bug in your first code box, you have &firstArgument twice.
Returning? Login