<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Liz</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/af68c1363f374553fe369fd2b56774c7/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:22:56 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Why I Won&amp;#8217;t Follow You Back on Twitter</title><link>http://snipenet.disqus.com/why_i_won8217t_follow_you_back_on_twitter/#comment-20807489</link><description>You managed to hit everyone of the reasons I won't follow someone but you don't mention the main reason people don't follow me back...I Tweet too much for some people's tastes. I was even called "overwhelming" (pardon the quotes). Whatcha going to do, you have to be yourself.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;abbr&amp;gt;&lt;em&gt;Last blog post: &lt;a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpiralScratch/~3/ZuQ2bftt_00/thoughts-on-140conference.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Thoughts on #140Conference&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;/abbr&amp;gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:51:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Local Hospital To Tweet Baby&amp;#8217;s Delivery At Midnight.</title><link>http://tremendousnews09.disqus.com/local_hospital_to_tweet_baby8217s_delivery_at_midnight/#comment-17792786</link><description>People have been Tweeting the birth of their own kids for at least a year, probably more like two. I guess the news is that this time it's being done by a hospital rather than the expectant father.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:35:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Drew Carey Bids $25,000 for @Drew Twitter Name</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/drew_carey_bids_25000_for_drew_twitter_name/#comment-18527525</link><description>User names have already been sold in the past (I can provide examples) but this is a donation going to charity...that sounds like a cause that is for the good of humanity.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 20:13:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FTC to Fine Bloggers up to $11,000 for Not Disclosing Payments</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/ftc_to_fine_bloggers_up_to_11000_for_not_disclosing_payments/#comment-18569405</link><description>Given that there are millions of blogs and hundreds of them do product reviews, I wonder how exactly they plan to enforce this ruling and I look forward to seeing their examples on what is appropriate disclosure. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For example, I was given a book at a conference. I later decided to review the book. Since it was a freebie (although the author &amp; publisher were unaware I review books), do I need to disclose that I didn't pay for it? I know this is peanuts compared to people who get paid per post but my point is that just because I was given the product doesn't constitute an endorsement. In fact, they might not have given me the book if they'd known I was going to review it!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 11:58:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FTC to Fine Bloggers up to $11,000 for Not Disclosing Payments</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/ftc_to_fine_bloggers_up_to_11000_for_not_disclosing_payments/#comment-18569508</link><description>No. The FTC is a U.S. government agency so would only cover blogs published in the U.S. Although I guess that is sometimes difficult to determine. Maybe I should move my car, diamond &amp; watch review site to the Cayman Islands.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:01:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Get Your Email Answered</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/get_your_email_answered/#comment-18571242</link><description>My problems is that I subscribe to far too many email newsletters than is healthy for my Inbox. The ones that I receive monthly or twice/month I read while other sites send you several a day. It's hard to weed through them because they "might" contain useful information. It really helps if there is an appropriate subject line that describes the main topic. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If I got 600 personal email messages, I'd simply have multiple email addresses, one posted on my blog (for people I don't know but might want to), one for business interests (on business cards for people I'd met), and a separate one for close friends &amp; family. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's always a danger that you'll focus on one account &amp; miss regularly checking on the others but I've found having multiple addresses helps me not miss the email messages from people I really want to stay in touch with.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:25:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VIDEO: The Simpsons Do a Send-Up of Social Media</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/video_the_simpsons_do_a_send_up_of_social_media/#comment-18598872</link><description>Twitter gets mentioned a lot on Big Bang Theory, as early as last fall.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:22:56 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>