<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for sharpsburg</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/aea779f884d1997813e5f83885bbbdcc/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 13:54:46 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Web &amp;#8212; not democratic, but open</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/the_web_8212_not_democratic_but_open/#comment-1293907</link><description>&lt;i&gt;"...profit motive drives innovation, and let’s take a wait-and-see before legislating the issue.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is spot on.  Thanks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sharpsburg</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 13:47:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mind the Spin</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/mind_the_spin/#comment-1445793</link><description>Jim is exactly right.  We'd do well to foster competition--it's the road to innovation, better services and better prices.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sharpsburg</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 17:36:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Communications and Media Markets Will Probably Never Be Deregulated</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/why_communications_and_media_markets_will_probably_never_be_deregulated/#comment-1445718</link><description>I stand for freedom, dammit! :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And I agree with Love2Box that regulation in moderation has it's time and place.  In this case, however, it's unnecessary, burdensome and without merit.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sharpsburg</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 19:23:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The poison pill bill</title><link>http://bennettblog.disqus.com/the_poison_pill_bill/#comment-2134106</link><description>I don't think the guys in the garage need worry about tiered access, they need worry about burndensome regulations imposed on an industry that few of the intending regulators understand.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sharpsburg</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 12:22:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hardware firms speak truth to hysteria</title><link>http://bennettblog.disqus.com/hardware_firms_speak_truth_to_hysteria/#comment-2134085</link><description>I like the second part of the quote too...&lt;i&gt;Legislating in the absence of real understanding of the issue risks both solving the wrong problem and &lt;b&gt;hobbling the rapidly developing new technologies and business models of the Internet with rigid, potentially stultifying rules.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sharpsburg</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 12:25:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wall St. Journal gets it</title><link>http://bennettblog.disqus.com/wall_st_journal_gets_it/#comment-2134071</link><description>The NYT doesn't "get" it.  The WSJ clearly does.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sharpsburg</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 12:34:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The poison pill bill</title><link>http://bennettblog.disqus.com/the_poison_pill_bill/#comment-2134111</link><description>And let's not forget that a tiered internet already exists.  Wi-Fi, dial-up, and different speeds and prices of broadband...I don't understand why the sky is falling all of a sudden.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sharpsburg</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 19:28:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Christian Coalition wants some of that ole time Innernet</title><link>http://bennettblog.disqus.com/christian_coalition_wants_some_of_that_ole_time_innernet/#comment-2134079</link><description>Holy crap.  Blogs re: NN don't have me laughing out loud that often.  "Gimme that snake to handle"...*snort*</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sharpsburg</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 19:40:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Adam Cohen drinks the Kool Aid</title><link>http://bennettblog.disqus.com/adam_cohen_drinks_the_kool_aid/#comment-2134190</link><description>Doesn't current FCC authority already protect consumers from the "evil" telcos?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sharpsburg</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 13:54:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Democratic Web Has Always Been An Illusion</title><link>http://publishing20.disqus.com/the_democratic_web_has_always_been_an_illusion/#comment-13566579</link><description>I think that asking members of Congress to regulate is akin to asking Pandora to open her box...no good can come of it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sharpsburg</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 13:27:58 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>