<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Raena</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/ae461db06db9934c5ab5154d43353392/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 02:35:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Which of these campaigns is a failure?</title><link>http://atomiksoapbox.disqus.com/which_of_these_campaigns_is_a_failure/#comment-17709506</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, I saw the gang one as a poster in a railway station, and even with the benefit of being able to stop and look it took me awhile to find the text.  There are some &lt;a href="http://www.reconciliation.org.au/home/reconciliation-resources/advertising-campaign-portraits" rel="nofollow"&gt;video versions&lt;/a&gt; that I think do a heaps better job, but I haven't seen these on TV.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;There is no value in getting those of us without prejudice to agree that prejudice is bad. &lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm not so sure... if anything I feel like it's the kind of campaign that's *deliberately* preaching to the choir. It's reasonably well-known that people respond well to an ad for a product they've already bought -- strengthening the idea that the consumer *did* make the right decision.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is not to say that an ideological decision like acceptance or discrimination ought to be reduced to  the level of a product, just that advertising to your existing market doesn't have to be about changing somebody's mind.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course this is all moot when you can't see the bloody thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Raena</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 02:35:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>