<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for aceontech</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/aceontech/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/aceontech/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2017 10:34:32 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Analyst predicts iPhone 8 release date delayed until late October</title><link>https://9to5mac.com/2017/09/08/iphone-8-release-date-october/#comment-3508020715</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can something even be "delayed" if no date has been announced to begin with? 🤔&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2017 10:34:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Logitech brings back ergonomics with MX Ergo trackball mouse</title><link>https://9to5mac.com/?p=497506#comment-3504374576</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been using the Logitech M570 (previous gen) for years, and it's the only pointing device my wrist can endure. Depends on the individual of course.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 04:37:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Paul Thurrott's Short Takes: February 17 - Petri</title><link>https://www.petri.com/paul-thurrotts-short-takes-february-17?_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_s4r87WPnDjOCR_L-iao-of0pnxdcqBhFb3UY8lVwBsxPlbfx9-6_3vx8Tgrm6eIP-Jt-4sGKk6MWTZYsI9RSZpT4vLg&amp;_hsmi=42870973#comment-3160981462</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Do I detect a dash of grumpiness 😅&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:17:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: @weakify(self): A more elegant solution to weakSelf in Objective-C</title><link>http://aceontech.com/objc/ios/2014/01/10/weakify-a-more-elegant-solution-to-weakself.html#comment-1675547670</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The variable you've weakified (oftentimes 'self') will remain available till the end of the block if you've started said block with @strongify. If you omit @strongify, the variable -may- disappear if outside code causes it to. @strongify creates a strong reference to the variable from within the block without excessively retaining it (by referencing the previously weakified variable).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I hope that clarifies things a bit :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 07:03:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: @weakify(self): A more elegant solution to weakSelf in Objective-C</title><link>http://aceontech.com/objc/ios/2014/01/10/weakify-a-more-elegant-solution-to-weakself.html#comment-1471764100</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not sure, but I think the @ was added to be consistent with other ObjC constructs like @throw et al. &lt;br&gt;Have you found weakify(self) works equally well?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2014 03:30:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will Apple's Free Mac OS Model Hurt Microsoft Windows?</title><link>http://www.fastcompany.com/3020524/will-apples-free-mac-os-model-hurt-microsoft-windows#comment-1093118811</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Apple = hardware company vs. Microsoft = software &amp;amp; services company. Only recently did Microsoft start selling hardware, so it remains to be seen how they'll charge for Windows upgrades on those devices. Just a difference in business model, nothing earth shattering, really. I also think Apple's hands were tied in the light of MS's free 8.1 upgrade. So they one-upped MS, because it doesn't hurt them to do so - good for them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2013 01:28:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Goodbye Wordpress, Hello Octopress - Serge Jespers</title><link>http://sjespers.com/blog/2013/01/14/goodbye-wordpress-hello-octopress/#comment-768288451</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Funny how we're moving back to static HTML despite all the tech we have nowadays. Makes sense though. You should definitely try to import your old posts for posterity :-).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 01:14:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Six things to consider before you register a domain name</title><link>https://www.hover.com/blog/blog/six-things-to-consider-before-you-register-a-domain-name/#comment-589602569</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Hover!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I really like your service, so I wrote up a little review on my personal blog. It contains positive as well as some negative critique, so I hope you don't mind me posting it here for prospective customers to check out:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://aceontech.com/2012/07/16/hover-com-review/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://aceontech.com/2012/07/16/hover-com-review/"&gt;http://aceontech.com/2012/0...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Keep up the good work!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:08:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Nexus Q: Massive Misstep Or Misunderstood Science Experiment?</title><link>https://www.androidpolice.com/2012/06/30/the-nexus-q-massive-misstep-or-misunderstood-science-experiment/#comment-574008555</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Obviously a business card's shape has a practical purpose. A ball-shaped set-top box however..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 02:02:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Nexus Q: Massive Misstep Or Misunderstood Science Experiment?</title><link>https://www.androidpolice.com/2012/06/30/the-nexus-q-massive-misstep-or-misunderstood-science-experiment/#comment-573183217</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why is it shaped like a ball.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 18:18:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rogue Planets Could Drive By And Scoop Up Life</title><link>http://www.universetoday.com/95091/rogue-planets-could-drive-by-and-scoop-up-life/#comment-527675349</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Science-fiction, written in the '30, but still very timely.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 02:42:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rogue Planets Could Drive By And Scoop Up Life</title><link>http://www.universetoday.com/95091/rogue-planets-could-drive-by-and-scoop-up-life/#comment-525763991</link><description>&lt;p&gt;'When worlds collide' by Philip Wylie and Edwin Balmer is a book about just this topic (sci-fi). Just read it and it's quite okay :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 16:57:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 10 Reasons why HTML 5 is not ready to replace Silverlight</title><link>http://www.silverlighthack.com/post.aspx?id=4a4d27fa-ec17-4bb5-81e9-81723e2ecaec#comment-279086212</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm a Flash/AIR developer, but I agree wholeheartedly with every one of the points you make in this article.  Been looking into capturing the webcam in an HTML5 app, but right now it's an utter no-go.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 02:52:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook.com Closing down on 15th March 2012</title><link>https://www.followtechnology.com/social-media-news/facebook-com-closing-down-on-15th-march-2012-confirmed/#comment-270254256</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What a piece of crap of an article. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 06:11:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Chrome Gets a New Icon [PIC]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2011/03/21/google-chrome-icon/#comment-169224849</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As King Henry VIII once said: "I like it not!".&lt;br&gt;I dont.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:43:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How it Works &amp;#8211; Robotlegs &amp;#8211; Part 4</title><link>http://johnlindquist.com/2011/02/03/how-it-works-robotlegs-part-4/#comment-139327148</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for this. I think most advanced developers understand the concept of Injection, but it's very interesting to see a simple implementation of it! Great video.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 01:21:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows Phone Marketplace reaches 5,000 apps</title><link>http://www.liveside.net/2010/12/28/windows-phone-marketplace-reaches-5000-apps/#comment-120317025</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh I found a few fart apps just recently.. :P&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:06:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pairing Wine with Junk Food</title><link>http://munchcast.com/2009/04/15/184#comment-92909891</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Guys, what happened to MunchCast? Last episode was nearly three months ago :-(&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 01:58:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Sexy Details of How the iPad and MacBook Air Will Hook Up</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/10/30/the-sexy-details-of-how-the-ipad-and-macbook-air-will-hook-up/#comment-92004050</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This article is so biased toward Apple, kind of makes me queasy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:55:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Vista Setup Error: 0xE0000100. Huh?</title><link>http://aceontech.com/2008/03/22/vista-setup-error-0xe0000100-huh/#comment-75563866</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm glad you found a solution, Micho. Thanks for sharing :-). Repartitioning usually does it, weird enough.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gr,&lt;br&gt;Ace&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 15:37:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft&amp;#8217;s Kinect can get confused by other people and even inanimate objects</title><link>http://www.geek.com/articles/games/microsofts-kinect-can-get-confused-by-other-people-and-even-inanimate-objects-20100825/#comment-181098602</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Smells like link bait to me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:02:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free Checkered Web Design Pattern: Carbon Fiber</title><link>http://aceontech.com/2010/07/12/free-checkered-web-design-pattern-carbon-fiber/#comment-74125473</link><description>&lt;p&gt;True :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 01:25:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dell dropping Windows Phone 7 devices from its roadmap? (update: Dell responds, is definitely still in the game)</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/27/dell-dropping-windows-phone-7-devices-from-its-roadmap/#comment-72604495</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What's in it for Dell to drop WP7? I see HP's incentive with webOS, not Dell though. FUD.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:46:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Do Windows 7 Sales Compare To Other Top Sellers?</title><link>http://www.windows7news.com/2010/07/05/windows-7-sales-compare-top-sellers/#comment-60671172</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Aren't you comparing pears to apples..? That aside, nice nuggets of information, though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 16:27:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Contact</title><link>http://aceontech.com/contact/#comment-60643647</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for reporting, but I was able to open the aforementioned page without issues in Firefox 3.6. Which version did you use?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;br&gt;Ace&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 12:58:26 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>