<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for RichardfromHB</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/ac77ba23b8a0e6cd48d0b005fce09607/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:13:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Palin Cleared Of Wrongdoing!</title><link>http://jedreport.disqus.com/palin_cleared_of_wrongdoing/#comment-2990242</link><description>Sarah may have given Mr. Monegan a cause of action for damages for wrongful termination.  It is enough to make out a case for Monegan if the refusal to terminate the trooper was a "substantial" or "motivating factor" in her descision to terminate him. Methlin v. Bartholomew (Alaska 1998) 971 P.2d 151 at page 154. And there are lots of similar cases.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RichardfromHB</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:36:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Looming Marxist Menace (Or Not)</title><link>http://jedreport.disqus.com/the_looming_marxist_menace_or_not/#comment-3325741</link><description>Paulson just GAVE mortgage co. PNC $7.7 Billion to do mortgage modifications whithout requiring that ANY mortgages acually BE modified.  Talk about wealth redistribution.  By the way, did you know that bancruptcy judges already have the power to modify the repayment terms of second, vacation, and investment homes (and luxury boat loans), just no power for primary residence nodifications.  It is not socialism to have the same "perks" apply to all folk.  The elites already see the "bottom up" help on the way in the new administration, versus the current "top down" approach of Paulson.  &lt;a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/101965-hedge-funds-threaten-to-block-mortgage-modifications" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://seekingalpha.com/article/101965-hedge-fu...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RichardfromHB</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:13:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Troopergate Investigator Famously Disciplined</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/troopergate_investigator_famously_disciplined/#comment-2990229</link><description>Sarah may have given Mr. Monegan a cause of action for damages for wrongful termination.  It is enough to make out a case for Monegan if the refusal to terminate the trooper was a "substantial" or "motivating factor" in her descision to terminate him. Methlin v. Bartholomew (Alaska 1998) 971 P.2d 151 at page 154. And there are lots of similar cases.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RichardfromHB</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:34:58 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>