<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for HMTKSteve</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/abf9a7e118d22ef8ca56b7a55f46d383/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:38:40 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Microsoft&amp;#8217;s Ads on Digg Reach A New Low</title><link>http://copybrighter.disqus.com/microsoft8217s_ads_on_digg_reach_a_new_low/#comment-21674427</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I saw these ads and was thinking, "Digg must have no traffic if I am the 10,000 visitor!"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 06:06:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Linking Mistakes Frequently Encountered On Blogs</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/linking_mistakes_frequently_encountered_on_blogs/#comment-10989653</link><description>I tried the Alexa redirect thing for a month and it does not work. I even did the "bad" thing of making an invisible iframe on my website that loaded a page via an Alexa redirect. No change.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Using the redirect only lowers the amount of link juice you can get. It also makes you look low rent.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 11:43:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Linking Mistakes Frequently Encountered On Blogs</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/linking_mistakes_frequently_encountered_on_blogs/#comment-12524216</link><description>I tried the Alexa redirect thing for a month and it does not work. I even did the "bad" thing of making an invisible iframe on my website that loaded a page via an Alexa redirect. No change.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Using the redirect only lowers the amount of link juice you can get. It also makes you look low rent.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 11:43:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Akismet False Positives &amp;#038; Spam Karma Configuration</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/akismet_false_positives_038_spam_karma_configuration/#comment-10989624</link><description>I get over 1,000 spam comments every day. I used to be able to wade through them to find any false positives but now, I don't have the time to sift through 50 pages of possible spam comments!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I trust Akismet to weed out the bad stuff.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 11:47:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Akismet False Positives &amp;#038; Spam Karma Configuration</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/akismet_false_positives_038_spam_karma_configuration/#comment-12524189</link><description>I get over 1,000 spam comments every day. I used to be able to wade through them to find any false positives but now, I don't have the time to sift through 50 pages of possible spam comments!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I trust Akismet to weed out the bad stuff.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 11:47:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 29% Of Technorati Top 100 Never On Digg Home Page</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/29_of_technorati_top_100_never_on_digg_home_page_78/#comment-10990535</link><description>I found a copy of this over at another blog: &lt;a href="http://www.workconnexions.com/news/2007/08/15/140820071720.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.workconnexions.com/news/2007/08/15/1...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do not know what sort of license you publish under so I thought it best to inform you.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:19:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 29% Of Technorati Top 100 Never On Digg Home Page</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/29_of_technorati_top_100_never_on_digg_home_page_78/#comment-12525066</link><description>I found a copy of this over at another blog: &lt;a href="http://www.workconnexions.com/news/2007/08/15/140820071720.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.workconnexions.com/news/2007/08/15/1...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do not know what sort of license you publish under so I thought it best to inform you.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:19:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Diggers will find a way to get paid</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/diggers_will_find_a_way_to_get_paid/#comment-1306063</link><description>Why not just give the person who submitted the link/story to Digg a portion of the advertising revenue generated by that submission?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know AdSense offers channels to track ad placements, how hard could it be for Digg to approach AdSense and tell them that they will be modifying the AdSense code only to add the submitters name in an extra field so they can track who brought in what?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They could further modify it so that only frontpaged stories share revenue.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 09:45:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to handle getting buried on Digg</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/how_to_handle_getting_buried_on_digg/#comment-1309083</link><description>I once had something similar happen where my personal contact information was posted on Digg. Some Diggers even crank called my house?!?? Joke was on them as I have caller ID and anonymous calls are blocked...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The offending Digger who posted my information was quickly banned (and a few others) after a quick email to Digg support.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:43:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where does community end and &amp;#8220;gaming&amp;#8221; start?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/where_does_community_end_and_8220gaming8221_start/#comment-1310220</link><description>I submit stories to Digg because of the meta-game that is Digg. i.e. each story on the home page gets you one EXP and once you get enough EXP you appear in the top diggers list.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The bonus EXP comes when you get your story on the Diggnation podcast. Why remove this system? The system rewards good submissions, removing it will only increase Spamming of Digg because the spammers pay!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 08:05:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s good for Steve is good for you</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/what8217s_good_for_steve_is_good_for_you/#comment-1310409</link><description>Didn't Steve Jobs once say that even if the labels did not want DRM he would still use it?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 08:38:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s good for Steve is good for you</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/what8217s_good_for_steve_is_good_for_you/#comment-1310411</link><description>It looks like my Steve jobs quote may have been attributed to this: &lt;a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/mac/blog/2007/01/the_end_of_drm_as_we_know_it_1.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.oreillynet.com/mac/blog/2007/01/the_...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And it may have been a statement made on Apple's part but attributed to Jobs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 11:12:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wired&amp;#8217;s Digg slam is offside</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/wired8217s_digg_slam_is_offside/#comment-1311322</link><description>I think part of the story here is that the gaming of Digg and Digg's problems have long been circulating among the Digg bloggers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wired is one of the tech magazines that diggers like to read. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Reddit? A competitor to Digg? They are as  much of a Digg competitor as this blog is to the New York times!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Digg came out and said, "you can't game us, we have mad skillz, go away you hackers!"&lt;br&gt;Someone called them on it, "Look, I got this crappy site on the Digg homepage!"&lt;br&gt;Then Digg turns around and says, "Hey, I wasn't ready, that didn't count.. Wait a minute... You are from a competitor... discredit! discredit! discredit!"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They did the same thing when a blogger reproduced the top 100 list after they dumped it!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 12:12:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wired&amp;#8217;s Digg slam is offside</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/wired8217s_digg_slam_is_offside/#comment-1311326</link><description>I think it is more a case of the New York Times not seeing you as a competitor.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Think of Great Cthullu. The humans on the planet are not even a thought to him. To the humans on the planet, he holds a very large place in the thoughts of the people!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 12:37:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Digg the future or just a feature&amp;#63;</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/is_digg_the_future_or_just_a_feature63/#comment-1311999</link><description>Until Digg reins in the bury brigades and other areas where the tyranny of the minority thwarts the will of the majority Digg has no real future.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 19:52:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Online advertising needs to grow up</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/online_advertising_needs_to_grow_up/#comment-1312100</link><description>This is an interesting argument as print media uses something very similar; readership/circulation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If anything online advertising is better because, after reading the article it is not thrown away. That advertising will stay on that article, potentially forever.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Stay forever you say? Well, that depends on where you advertise. If you use the dreaded PPP or other similar services it likely will stay forever. If you advertise with the big boys it will not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I see more and more people everyday who neglect to purchase print media because they can get it free online. Why shouldn't they? You get to keep your fingers clean and save money! Besides, most big media companies that offer online news either charge a subscription or have so many ads on the page that it looks like a Splog!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 05:10:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Conflict of interest, Web 2.0-style</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/conflict_of_interest_web_20_style/#comment-1313226</link><description>Would it be a conflict of interest if someone from Ford Motors started up an after market parts company?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is this only a conflict of interests because they are pushing a company that was started by a former employee?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We are talking about journalism and reporting. If it is news it should be reported.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 09:49:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digg, the echo chamber and Matthew</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/digg_the_echo_chamber_and_matthew/#comment-1313707</link><description>I feel like a broken record player but...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Te Wisdom of Crowds only works when the members of the crowd are ignorant of what the other crowd members are doing. Digg is not about the Wisdom of Crowds.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is only one social site on the web that does follow the Wisdom of the Crowds mantra and that is StumbleUpon. (For the most part at least.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Digg is all about the mob mentality.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 00:40:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hey ISP &amp;mdash; Joost give me more bits</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/hey_isp_mdash_joost_give_me_more_bits/#comment-1314417</link><description>If you do not like the speeds your ISP offers you than you are always free to purchase a T1 or other faster connection to the Internet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A lot of this talk complaining about bandwidth is a waste of time and energy. Faster options are available.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do you go out and buy a 100HP car and then complain because it will not do a constant 150MPH on the highway? If you want that sort of performance buy a better car! Same goes for Internet access.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 09:02:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hey ISP &amp;mdash; Joost give me more bits</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/hey_isp_mdash_joost_give_me_more_bits/#comment-1314419</link><description>There is no limitation on upload speeds.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you are willing to pay for a higher tiered service you will get it! The only limitation is that you are looking at a consumer-level product (DSL) and expecting it to work as a business-level product (T1).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You get what you pay for. I choose to pay for DSL (not a T1) because DSL is "good enough" for me and my needs. If DSL is not "good-enough" for your needs than you need to spend the money for something better suited to your needs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's not as if the Telcos are not willing to sell you a better data product.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 08:34:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AOL euthanizes Digg-style Netscape</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/aol_euthanizes_digg_style_netscape/#comment-1315768</link><description>The real sad thing going on here is that the navigators were supposed to be editors whose job it is to keep the front page looking good and remove the spam that makes its way there. I read the news as saying that Netscape thinks the navigators did a terrible job of editing the content.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Have you seen what Netscape is moving to in regards to site design for the new Netscape Portal? It looks like a Yahoo clone!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 21:20:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real-life experience with the new Google News</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/real_life_experience_with_the_new_google_news/#comment-1315854</link><description>Perhaps it is time for a journalistic code of conduct in regards to sourcing for online content?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Google should also put something in place on Google News so that the original source of a news story gets top billing rather than the most popular source.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In this particular case, was the story written by a local staff writer and then the AP "picked up" the original staff writer's story or did they write their AP version based on new research and all? If the AP just scraped the story from the news papper than I feel it is up to AP to properly credit the story and provide a link to the originating story. Of course I have no idea what the contracts say in regards to AP grabbing your content...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 08:29:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Netscape packs bags, moves to Propeller</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/netscape_packs_bags_moves_to_propeller/#comment-1315850</link><description>My only big complaint about the Netscape digg-clone is the amount of spam that ends up on the front page. From what some of the navigators and scouts have told me their hands were tied in regards to removing some of that content.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They better remove that restriction and allow the site editors to remove garbage from the front page!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 08:31:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Reasons Why BumpZee Will Be The Next Digg, But Even Bigger</title><link>http://jimkukral.disqus.com/5_reasons_why_bumpzee_will_be_the_next_digg_but_even_bigger/#comment-4780305</link><description>Digg was cool until they added the extra categories and all the non-tech folks showed up. What is in place to stop the same thing from happening with BumpZee?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 07:32:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Version of Serendipity (s9y) to WordPress Importer Available</title><link>http://technosailor.disqus.com/new_version_of_serendipity_s9y_to_wordpress_importer_available/#comment-1034286</link><description>Great job, I just used it to save me some time!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One thing, why does it not pull the extended text?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:27:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The DMCA on Social News Sites</title><link>http://plagiarismtoday.disqus.com/the_dmca_on_social_news_sites/#comment-1346778</link><description>I have dealt with a few social bookmarking sites in regards to this issue. Both Digg and Netscape were very fast to respond and remove the content.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;De.lici.us and Stumbleupon were not so good.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 08:24:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Amazon Releases Kindle, Its eBook Reader: Top 10 (Un)Answered Questions *Updated*</title><link>http://bobcaswell.disqus.com/amazon_releases_kindle_its_ebook_reader_top_10_unanswered_questions_updated/#comment-1187181</link><description>Amazon has already said they pick up the EVDO tab on purchases.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:58:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Technorati Contest</title><link>http://jamesbritton.disqus.com/technorati_contest/#comment-3704263</link><description>I better gt in early on this one!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 06:08:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2007/04/12/imlikewithyou/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_6254/#comment-5927013</link><description>I'm sorry but, I just don't get it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How does the bidding and "getting the hosts attention" thing work? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is this moderated by a live hosts who judges things somehow? Is the point of this site to allow people to meet new people for dating?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Could someone provide a bit more information on this?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 05:35:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: John Cow In Bovine Business Magazine</title><link>http://johncowdotcom.disqus.com/john_cow_in_bovine_business_magazine/#comment-9382139</link><description>You should have photoshopped hooves on his hands!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 09:01:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Eight Things You Didn&amp;#8217;t Know About John Cow</title><link>http://johncowdotcom.disqus.com/eight_things_you_didn8217t_know_about_john_cow/#comment-9382184</link><description>So, is Miltank your favorite Pokemon?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 11:44:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Buzz Marketing Myths</title><link>http://johncowdotcom.disqus.com/buzz_marketing_myths/#comment-9383133</link><description>I have had a few things go viral on some of my sites but there is also a dark side to it. It's one thing when everyone links to you but it is something else when some folks just steal your content and try to make it go viral for them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is no money to made from Digg if you are using a CPC model on your site. You can make money off of an affilliate offer by getting on digg but that is about it. Even CPM ads don't work so well off of digg due to the high number of adblockers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can make a living writing "for" digg but it is a very shaky living. Just as you don't want to live on Google traffic alone you also do not want to live only on digg traffic.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you write good quality content and fill a niche you will get readers. Some of those readers will click but most will not.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:46:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Get Your Contest Noticed and 6 Pownce Invites Available!</title><link>http://johncowdotcom.disqus.com/get_your_contest_noticed_and_6_pownce_invites_available/#comment-9383109</link><description>Can I push my current contest here?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.hmtk.com/archives/quartile.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.hmtk.com/archives/quartile.html&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:49:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Confirms Click Fraud Rate is 0.02%</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/google_confirms_click_fraud_rate_is_002/#comment-9412413</link><description>Very interesting information. Blocking ads to a certain IP is very interesting but it also smacks of overkill. I would rather block by the website than by the IP.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 06:24:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wired.com Proves Digg Can Still be Bought</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/wiredcom_proves_digg_can_still_be_bought/#comment-9412435</link><description>Let's see here... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) Digg claims they can not be gamed.&lt;br&gt;2) Someone games Digg.&lt;br&gt;3) Some bloggers try to discredit the gaming because of the reddit affiliation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The simple fact is that Digg was gamed! It wasn't even gamed with an interesting website and that is the point. If someone can get a crap website onto the Digg home page then Digg can be gamed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The gaming goes both ways in that good websites can be buried before they reach the home page. I've seen stories with hundreds of Diggs that never make the home page!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 08:28:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If You Game Digg You Will Get Banned, Unless&amp;#8230;..</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/if_you_game_digg_you_will_get_banned_unless8230/#comment-9413409</link><description>Hey! I coined the "auto-bury" on digg phrase long before the guy you linked to did and I've been following it!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just do a search for Digg on my site and you will see.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:53:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If You Game Digg You Will Get Banned, Unless&amp;#8230;..</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/if_you_game_digg_you_will_get_banned_unless8230/#comment-9413416</link><description>I'm begining to think some of these things are just scam sites being run by digg to weed out the users that are trying to make money off of their digging habbits.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 07:14:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If You Game Digg You Will Get Banned, Unless&amp;#8230;..</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/if_you_game_digg_you_will_get_banned_unless8230/#comment-9413420</link><description>Many people do write good quality content but their audience does not match digg's userbase.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Even though digg is empty traffic it is traffic. when you have a high amount of traffic you can charge advertisers more money!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Think about that for a minute. A good digg front page story can generate 25K+ unique hits easily. Even as few as one a week can push your numbers over 100K uniques a month!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Most blogs I read are lucky to get 100 uniques a day.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Diggers may not click (or even see) ads but they do help inflate your bottom line numbers.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 07:34:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why is O&amp;#8217;Reilly Hell-bent on a Code of Conduct for Bloggers?</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/why_is_o8217reilly_hell_bent_on_a_code_of_conduct_for_bloggers/#comment-9413712</link><description>Perhaps he just wants something he can sell at a conference?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 06:54:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Partial Feeds Don&amp;#8217;t Draw Visitors</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/partial_feeds_don8217t_draw_visitors/#comment-9414032</link><description>I just use livebookmarks in Firefox for my feed tracking. If I see an interesting headline I'm likely to click right through to the blog in question.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Otherwise, I don't use a "feed reeder" application.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 05:21:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kevin Rose Hands Over Digg Control</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/kevin_rose_hands_over_digg_control/#comment-9414270</link><description>It is very interesting that Kevin chose to use the code as the title of his blog entry. By doing so he posted the code directly to Digg's servers as a company man!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That one act may have launched the Digg ship out of it's safe harbor.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 10:32:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Improve Your Blog&amp;#8217;s Stickiness</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/improve_your_blog8217s_stickiness/#comment-9414566</link><description>I was thinking of using the tactic that was very common in 2000 on pr0n sites.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I figure I can code in some sort of script that whenever a user tries to leave my site two random articles from my site spawn themselves in new windows. I mean, it's not like the person really meant to leave my site, right?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;j/k</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 20:38:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Improve Your Blog&amp;#8217;s Stickiness</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/improve_your_blog8217s_stickiness/#comment-9414568</link><description>My blog tends to the random side. I get more new traffic via Google than I get regular traffic via feeds.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 21:32:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Censorship Issues Continue for Digg</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/censorship_issues_continue_for_digg/#comment-9414594</link><description>This happened to me a few months ago. Web charts are provided and the infamous crawl3.digg.internal did me in:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.hmtk.com/archives/the-effect-of-being-buried-on-digg.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.hmtk.com/archives/the-effect-of-bein...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 22:39:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marketing Pilgrim is Looking for Additional Contributors</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/marketing_pilgrim_is_looking_for_additional_contributors/#comment-9414722</link><description>Hmmm...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I did not realize my trackback would grab the text right after the link! It almost looks like I'm busting on you guys when I'm not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do think that if someone took an unpaid position here it could lead to a paid position somewhere else.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 12:45:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Combating Click Fraud</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/combating_click_fraud/#comment-9414743</link><description>When advertisers are bidding $35+ for a single click you have to expect a certain amount of click-fraud.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can't imagine there being a lot of click fraud for the cheap ($0.10 and under) keywords because you would have to do so many fraudulent clicks that you would get caught in no time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 12:48:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Combating Click Fraud</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/combating_click_fraud/#comment-9414747</link><description>With all that bot activity doesn't Google notice when a site starts generating large income from AdSense with a high CTR? I know from my own experience with AdSense that my CTR is always low, very low, often below 1%.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Google must flag accounts for review when they hit a certain income or CTR level.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 13:33:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Latest Product Improvements</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/google8217s_latest_product_improvements/#comment-9414756</link><description>I was playing with the new interface last week too. I have not decided how I feel about it but I do like the way it defaults to one months worth of data.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 14:39:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Adsense Disabling Arbitrage &amp;amp; MFA Accounts</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/adsense_disabling_arbitrage_amp_mfa_accounts/#comment-9414774</link><description>I consider this to be a good thing. How will this affect click fraud numbers and AdWords bidding?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I spent a long time building up the competitive ad filter on my AdSense account to block out the MFA sites that were bidding nickels for my traffic and then getting dollars from that same traffic on their site.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 22:39:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Expanding its Frontiers: Click Fraud</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/google_expanding_its_frontiers_click_fraud/#comment-9417586</link><description>I have to agree with TextAdSearch above. I run tracking software that tracks all outgoing clicks on my sites and I always see a variance of more than 10% on my AdSense info page in regards to AdSense clicks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have had days where Google discounts 50% of my AdSense clicks and they never tell me why.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is simply too much secrecy in the Google AdWords/AdSense program. Google needs to understand that they need both sides of the program to be happy in order for it to work. If the keep pissing of publishers how will they be able to move their adwords inventory?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 06:08:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blocking Ad Blocking</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/blocking_ad_blocking/#comment-9418470</link><description>The hardest form of advertising to block is also the best; direct ad sales between the web site and the advertiser.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I just started selling 125x125 button ads on my site. Because these images are served from the same server as my content and content images blocking them will also result in blocking my content. I would like to think my visitors come to my site for my content so I do not think they will block my image directory just to avoid a few small button ads.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Because I sell these via direct sales I do not have to worry about some third party putting an annoying flash ad into my banner roation or on my site at all. Due to recent things Google has been doing I am finding them to be a very unreliable service in regards to AdSense.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also use Pay-Per-Post but most of the offers listed on the site are either outside of the area of my readers interest or do not pay enough.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:49:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blocking Ad Blocking</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/blocking_ad_blocking/#comment-9418472</link><description>Mark,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Adblocking does help the advertiser in a CPM situation, why pay for an impression if the reader will never even look at your ad? As for CPC, are you looking at CPC as a CPM campaign that costs less because you get "free" impressions of your ad?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Either way it is not the advertisers who are crying about adblocking it is the websites that generate income from readers having ads served to them that are doing the crying.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:16:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reuters Taps Attributor to Monitor Content Scraping</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/reuters_taps_attributor_to_monitor_content_scraping/#comment-9418539</link><description>What about AP who has been known to scrape content from news sites iteself?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:13:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BlogRush Finally Adds Reports But Traffic is Very Poor</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/blogrush_finally_adds_reports_but_traffic_is_very_poor/#comment-9418653</link><description>I would chalk this up as a scam. when you add in the multi-tier earnings bit it becomes a case of the early adopters (with a downline) earning massive amounts of credits. End result is that those who have the traffic will have their links shown all the time while the small guy who needs the traffic will almost never see his links show up.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:31:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BlogRush Finally Adds Reports But Traffic is Very Poor</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/blogrush_finally_adds_reports_but_traffic_is_very_poor/#comment-9418654</link><description>Why not just use &lt;a href="http://www.adgridwork.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.adgridwork.com&lt;/a&gt; and avoid all the pyramid scheme business?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:41:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Win $500! Tell Us Why You Read Marketing Pilgrim</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/win_500_tell_us_why_you_read_marketing_pilgrim/#comment-9418673</link><description>So I have until mid-November to do this? Hmm...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:42:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If Twitter and Yahoo Answers Mated You&amp;#8217;d Get Attendi</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/if_twitter_and_yahoo_answers_mated_you8217d_get_attendi/#comment-9419037</link><description>OK, and what benefit do I get for joining the site and answering questions? Are they offering some sort of revenue share?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I just do not see why an "expert" would want to hang out on one of these sites without gaininig something in return.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 11:13:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Get $150 for Participating in a Blogging Study</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/get_150_for_participating_in_a_blogging_study/#comment-9419159</link><description>I have sent them an email. If you google my handle you will get 40K results. I wonder if that is enough for them?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:32:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Get $150 for Participating in a Blogging Study</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/get_150_for_participating_in_a_blogging_study/#comment-9419161</link><description>Word - I hope you are not referring to me!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:52:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Halloween Costume Search Stats</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/halloween_costume_search_stats/#comment-9420193</link><description>I just wrote a short article about this myself and included an image of one of my writer's costumes from last year.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:30:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Five Ways Negative Reviews Help Your Online Reputation</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/five_ways_negative_reviews_help_your_online_reputation/#comment-9421173</link><description>Not only do positive reviews make people suspect the product being reviewed by they also throw the reviewer into a negative light. If they only ever say positive things they come off as a shill.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You don't want a review to tear you a new one but you do need honesty. If some part of a product is bad you need to know!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:49:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: eBay Not Out of the Woods Yet With Tiffany’s and Trademark Concerns</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/ebay_not_out_of_the_woods_yet_with_tiffanys_and_trademark_concerns/#comment-9432027</link><description>You can't compare eBay auctions to iTunes music downloads. Apple controls the entire iTunes system while eBay is just a facilitator.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is no cost effective method for eBay to insure that what someone lists for sale is the same as the item they are selling. there is a certain level of trust involved. If a buyer does not trust a seller they are free to use an escrow service.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;HMTKSteve's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hmtk/YbnF/~3/362892523/abu-bakr-muhammad-ben-yahya-as-suli-the-great-chess-master-of-the-arab-world.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Abu-Bakr Muhammad ben Yahya as-Suli: The Great Chess Master of the Arab World&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:38:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not All Traffic Is Created Equal</title><link>http://publishing20.disqus.com/not_all_traffic_is_created_equal/#comment-13569779</link><description>If your advertising model is based on a per-impression model (CPM), Digg is good for you. If your advertising model is based on a per action or per click model (CPA/CPC) such as AdSense or afilliate links than Digg traffic is bad for you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Search traffic does tend to run high in regards to conversions (people buying or leaving via an advertising link). Digg can sometimes give you a few extra advertising clicks but it tends to be less than 0.001%.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:07:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not All Traffic Is Created Equal</title><link>http://publishing20.disqus.com/not_all_traffic_is_created_equal/#comment-13569784</link><description>Scott,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I said "good for you" but that does not necessarily mean it is also good for your advertisers!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:04:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digg Tries To Flatten The Head Of Its Long Tail Participation Curve</title><link>http://publishing20.disqus.com/digg_tries_to_flatten_the_head_of_its_long_tail_participation_curve/#comment-13569822</link><description>Now that they have removed the meta-game (home page stories=EXP, top diggers=level) from Digg I find myself less willing to submit quality content.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 07:58:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 11 Tips to Enhance Your Digg User Experience (and Hopefully Bring You Front Page Fame)</title><link>http://techipedia.disqus.com/11_tips_to_enhance_your_digg_user_experience_and_hopefully_bring_you_front_page_fame/#comment-14968235</link><description>Good post Tamar! I'm still sitting about 182 on the top digger list but, I don't digg that often anymore.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 09:38:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An Open Letter to Kevin Rose</title><link>http://techipedia.disqus.com/an_open_letter_to_kevin_rose/#comment-14968320</link><description>If you want a clear indicator od wether digg is targeting you (as a blogger) or not is to launch a new site with no ties to your "auto-bury" site and see if the same content makes digg's home page. I have done this and you know what? The same content on a different domain makes the front page!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, what does that tell you about the bury system?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:44:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why the Fuss about BlogRush?</title><link>http://techipedia.disqus.com/why_the_fuss_about_blogrush/#comment-14968376</link><description>All I can say is: &lt;a href="http://www.adgridwork.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.adgridwork.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:12:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Increasing Alexa Rank &amp;#8211; A Joint Experiment</title><link>http://connectedinternet.disqus.com/increasing_alexa_rank_8211_a_joint_experiment/#comment-15280452</link><description>The redirect thing is BS, it does nothing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I added it as an iframe on my page footer and saw no jump when traffic spiked.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The easiest way to increase your Alexa ranking is to use Firefox with the toolbar. All you need is a dynamic IP and lots of time on your hands.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you check the Alexa numbers for &lt;a href="http://hmtk.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;hmtk.com&lt;/a&gt; you can see how one person with the toolbar can skew the site rating by thousands of points.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:32:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digg User Rankings Now Completely Gone</title><link>http://10e20.disqus.com/digg_user_rankings_now_completely_gone/#comment-16679349</link><description>I don't expect them to remove the friends feature but... removing the ability to Digg a story from the friends area would stop people from rapidly digging all the stories their friends submit.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 12:52:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digg User Rankings Now Completely Gone</title><link>http://10e20.disqus.com/digg_user_rankings_now_completely_gone/#comment-16679351</link><description>As much as I hate frames... A solution may exist where a small sliver of a frame appears above the story when you follow the link. This small frame would give you the option to Digg, bury or comment on the story.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You could then remove the digg option from the story page on Digg and force users to at least view the story before digging it. This could be used with the bookmark idea in that if you have not read the story you only bookmark it and the story gains no digg weight.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know some people have done studies in the past where people dugg a story because of the title when the story itself was just a test page saying, "did you read before you dugg this?"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 13:33:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dealing With Scrapers: What Do You Do?</title><link>http://10e20.disqus.com/dealing_with_scrapers_what_do_you_do/#comment-16679363</link><description>This is a touchy issue.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I publish my blog entries under a Creative Commons license that is visible on every page of my blog. I use partial feeds, not because I am against full feeds but due to the way the templates work on my blog it is easier to break a post into pieces to fit in the advertising blocks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I was recently the victim of blog scraping and it took me a few days to find out and clean up the mess. In my case I would not have minded if the content used under the terms of my license, but it was not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you want to use someone's content just ask! You would be amazed at how many folks will say, "yes, just give me proper credit and link backs."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wrote a short article on the release of the Wii News channel but I could not get screen caps at the time. I went to flikr, found some good photos and contacted the owner of those photos. In exchange for proper credit he allowed me to use the images.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:10:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dealing With Scrapers: What Do You Do?</title><link>http://10e20.disqus.com/dealing_with_scrapers_what_do_you_do/#comment-16679367</link><description>Tamar,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is why technorati is your friend. If you embed an invisible link back to your blog inside your article it is very likely that you will see your scraped content providing links back to you when doing a technorati search.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm often reminded of a certain quote in American history,"John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it!"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 10:40:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dealing With Scrapers: What Do You Do?</title><link>http://10e20.disqus.com/dealing_with_scrapers_what_do_you_do/#comment-16679376</link><description>Looks like that particular "auto-scraping" blog no longer scrapes your content!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 15:19:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digg Comes Out With Friendly Buttons For Every Site</title><link>http://10e20.disqus.com/digg_comes_out_with_friendly_buttons_for_every_site/#comment-16679381</link><description>Yeah!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I could never get the old button code to work...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 10:40:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The New Wave of Personalization and Who is Joining in the Game</title><link>http://10e20.disqus.com/the_new_wave_of_personalization_and_who_is_joining_in_the_game/#comment-16679387</link><description>If personalization came to Digg would less stories be buried?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 05:37:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Use StumbleUpon for Your Business: The Definitive Guide</title><link>http://10e20.disqus.com/how_to_use_stumbleupon_for_your_business_the_definitive_guide/#comment-16679489</link><description>StumbleUpon is the best for getting the word out on your site. I have had several instances where someone "Stumbled" a page on my blog and I received 20K+ hits over a months time. The fact that StumbleUpon spreads it out over time makes it even better.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 02:46:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Big Boys of Social Bookmarking &amp;#8211; The Top 24 Sites</title><link>http://10e20.disqus.com/the_big_boys_of_social_bookmarking_8211_the_top_24_sites/#comment-16681130</link><description>After the recent "numbers" fiasco at digg and their continued resistance to publish any sort of bury information I have begun to write digg off as another friendster.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;digg claims to be democratic but, even in a democracy we see ALL of the votes after an election. Bury votes are still votes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If digg were a democracy than wouldn't each vote (digg or bury) carry the same weight? Right now it takes far less buries to bury a story than it takes diggs to promote a story. Also, once buried a story can never be unburied.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 08:46:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is a Free Email Address Good for the Government to Use?</title><link>http://10e20.disqus.com/is_a_free_email_address_good_for_the_government_to_use/#comment-16681265</link><description>Bad move. I would never trust a generic web mail service with anything of any importance.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 08:43:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: StumbleUpon Gets Sold to eBay &amp;#8211; Initial Community Reactions Aren&amp;#8217;t Good</title><link>http://10e20.disqus.com/stumbleupon_gets_sold_to_ebay_8211_initial_community_reactions_aren8217t_good/#comment-16681499</link><description>So, what does this mean for us StumbleUpon users?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 08:05:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: London 2012 Olympics logo revealed. What do you think?</title><link>http://10e20.disqus.com/london_2012_olympics_logo_revealed_what_do_you_think/#comment-16681581</link><description>It may not convey the olympic feel but it does show what Londod is.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When I look at that I see a fractured entity that has no idea what it is or what it wants to be. I see confusion and a total lack of a grasp on reality.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:40:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: London 2012 Olympics logo revealed. What do you think?</title><link>http://10e20.disqus.com/london_2012_olympics_logo_revealed_what_do_you_think/#comment-16681583</link><description>Why the color change? It represents Londons new views on multi-culturalism. Because only 5 colors can be represented it wouldn't be fair to have any colors in the design. The colors not present would whine and complain that they were not included.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 08:45:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stepping Outside of Your Bubble</title><link>http://10e20.disqus.com/stepping_outside_of_your_bubble/#comment-16681600</link><description>SEO, that's like a CEO right? How much money do they make?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, I do tech support and I'm always surprised at how little some people know about what goes on beyond their front porch.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 09:20:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chris Winfield in Investor&amp;#8217;s Business Daily re: &amp;#8216;Google Placement Performance Reports&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://10e20.disqus.com/chris_winfield_in_investor8217s_business_daily_re_8216google_placement_performance_reports8217/#comment-16681722</link><description>I would like to see the same thing for AdSense publishers. I want to know what ads are showing up on my site as well as their CTR. I'd also like to know which ones are giving me a penny per click so I can block them! Most of those ones lead to MFA sites and I would rather not send my traffic to them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It can be very confusing to see a day with X clicks and Y money followed by a day of X clicks but only 50% of Y money.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:27:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chris Winfield in the Associated Press: &amp;#8216;Digg Fires Google for Online Ads&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://10e20.disqus.com/chris_winfield_in_the_associated_press_8216digg_fires_google_for_online_ads8217/#comment-16682136</link><description>I'm sure Google does not really care about digg. If diggers don't click ads on websites they go to why would they click ads on digg?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:29:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chris Winfield in Investor&amp;#8217;s Business Daily: &amp;#8216;Microsoft, Yahoo Tailor Ads To Users&amp;#8217; Behavior&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://10e20.disqus.com/chris_winfield_in_investor8217s_business_daily_8216microsoft_yahoo_tailor_ads_to_users8217_behavior8/#comment-16682277</link><description>It sounds like this would require a web user to submit to being tracked by an advertising company. It also sounds like something that would only be used on a search engines owned portal site because advertising on a website should be geared towards the content. i.e. a golf site should have golf ads not car ads even if the person was recently looking at a car site.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:30:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yahoo Deactivating Accounts Because of &amp;#8220;Answers&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://10e20.disqus.com/yahoo_deactivating_accounts_because_of_8220answers8221/#comment-17223706</link><description>I never thought of gaming Yahoo Answers for traffic. I get about 100-200 hits a day from Yahoo Answers because others have pointed people my way due to my Pokemon/Nintendo Wii articles.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HMTKSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 15:10:01 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>