<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for aaronwhite</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/aaronwhite/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:18:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Caterpillar Cowboy</title><link>http://bedaba.disqus.com/caterpillar_cowboy_3139/#comment-22838816</link><description>pretty sure they are extremely young. Least, I recall reading that somewhere, and having it verified consistently when I ran adwords trials.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aaronwhite</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:18:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: kevinmook:

3D Eye Tracking from TAT, the guys... - Aaron White</title><link>http://aaronwhite.disqus.com/kevinmook_3d_eye_tracking_from_tat_the_guys_aaron_white/#comment-22829506</link><description>Drew, many thanks!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aaronwhite</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:15:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Too bad the show Dexter is in a bit of a decline,... - Aaron White</title><link>http://aaronwhite.disqus.com/too_bad_the_show_dexter_is_in_a_bit_of_a_decline_aaron_white/#comment-22465125</link><description>thanks, Mo</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aaronwhite</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:21:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Too bad the show Dexter is in a bit of a decline,... - Aaron White</title><link>http://aaronwhite.disqus.com/too_bad_the_show_dexter_is_in_a_bit_of_a_decline_aaron_white/#comment-22465117</link><description>heh, mission accomplished on both accounts; thanks</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aaronwhite</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:21:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Aaron White - What animal has a grandfather, but no father?</title><link>http://aaronwhite.disqus.com/aaron_white_what_animal_has_a_grandfather_but_no_father/#comment-22253316</link><description>Well, hopefully this isn't cheating ;-) but I posted the answer here: &lt;a href="http://aaronwhite.tumblr.com/post/30118991/what-animal-has-a-grandfather-but-no-father-an-answer" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://aaronwhite.tumblr.com/post/30118991/what...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aaronwhite</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:12:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dear Steve Blank, this is incredibly irresponsible - Aaron White</title><link>http://aaronwhite.disqus.com/dear_steve_blank_this_is_incredibly_irresponsible_aaron_white/#comment-22058546</link><description>Ok, agreed on that. Steve's whole point/purpose/message/mantra is "demonstrate you have a business by cultivating paying customers, or you have nothing to scale" which is very much in-line w/ your comment, so I suspect you'd agree w/ his CD approach.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aaronwhite</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:03:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Staying The Course vs. Numbers Don&amp;#039;t Lie</title><link>http://leftovertakeout.disqus.com/staying_the_course_vs_numbers_don039t_lie/#comment-21874433</link><description>I understand what you are saying and also have a interest in YC's magic.  You may also want to examine Ron Conway's approach at SV Angels - he's the alpha and omega in the angel investing game.  From his talk yesterday at Betaworks, his magic is simple:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;* 1/3 of his investments fail, 1/3 return even money, 1/3 return multiples&lt;br&gt;* investments from $50-$200K, almost always part of a syndicate&lt;br&gt;* no board seats&lt;br&gt;* very rarely do they do follow on, but they have done follow-on funding through liquidity (Sean Fanning's last company)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ergo, my back of the envelope is that Ron Conway's follow-on funding percentage is very low.  This is not a negative signal to the market as I would gather his portfolio of 500 investments have a high percentage raising funds outside SV Angels.  Frankly, if I were Ron, I would advertise these numbers to entrepreneurs.  YC should also.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gbattle</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:45:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Staying The Course vs. Numbers Don&amp;#039;t Lie</title><link>http://leftovertakeout.disqus.com/staying_the_course_vs_numbers_don039t_lie/#comment-21873589</link><description>my un-stated assumption was that it'd be difficult (read: impossible) to provide meaningful numbers if there were 0 participants in the program. Transparency around follow-on % needs to follow at least some information about level of seed activity. I have an intellectual love-affair w/ YC's general approach and uber-transparency regarding their portfolio.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aaronwhite</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:31:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Staying The Course vs. Numbers Don&amp;#039;t Lie</title><link>http://leftovertakeout.disqus.com/staying_the_course_vs_numbers_don039t_lie/#comment-21873025</link><description>I don't work for Spark so I can't answer that question Aaron.  Again, I'm not being specific to Spark here - Mo, Bijan and the Spark team are fantastic and nothing but accessible online or offline - I am just pointing out that Mo's piece did not answer Chris' question.  I provided the exact statistics to address it.  Do I believe I'll see it in the market generally? Only from early-stage VC's whose percentages are superior in the market.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gbattle</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:23:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Staying The Course vs. Numbers Don&amp;#039;t Lie</title><link>http://leftovertakeout.disqus.com/staying_the_course_vs_numbers_don039t_lie/#comment-21872633</link><description>Greg, is there a public list of companies that have received Start@Spark funding? I haven't heard news of one yet</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aaronwhite</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:16:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Prediction: 2010 will be the year of game mechanics</title><link>http://bedaba.disqus.com/prediction_2010_will_be_the_year_of_game_mechanics/#comment-21059558</link><description>Game mechanics aren't anything new, and generally they can be great,  &lt;br&gt;but there is definitely a need to "only use when appropriate". There  &lt;br&gt;are lots of cases where game mechanics encouraged destructive behavior  &lt;br&gt;(Digg leaderboards come to mind).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The whole concept of badges and mayorships that reset periodically is  &lt;br&gt;an interesting one, and I'm excited to see how it plays out.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dlifson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:34:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Prediction: 2010 will be the year of game mechanics</title><link>http://bedaba.disqus.com/prediction_2010_will_be_the_year_of_game_mechanics/#comment-21056806</link><description>Wrote this almost exactly a year ago, would love to hear your thoughts!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Prepare yourself to see game-like elements appear like wild-fire across the web in the coming year (if you haven’t already). Examples include goal based systems: guided profile completion, guided and staged interactive tutorials. Achievements: social rewards, system rewards, points &amp; merits. Competitive rankings: global leader-boards, social leader-boards, etc."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://aaronwhite.tumblr.com/post/57278732/web-3-0-prescriptive-lifestyles" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://aaronwhite.tumblr.com/post/57278732/web-...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aaronwhite</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:44:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Good lord, what has science done?!
... - Aaron White</title><link>http://aaronwhite.disqus.com/good_lord_what_has_science_done_aaron_white/#comment-21050436</link><description>haha; glad someone remembered that video :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aaronwhite</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:17:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Just ordered the new Magic Mouse. Amazing. - bijansabet.com</title><link>http://bijanblog.disqus.com/just_ordered_the_new_magic_mouse_amazing_bijansabetcom/#comment-20649328</link><description>you bet they are. my 3 year old son tries to "swipe" and "tap" every screen&lt;br&gt;he sees....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bijan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:32:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Just ordered the new Magic Mouse. Amazing. - bijansabet.com</title><link>http://bijanblog.disqus.com/just_ordered_the_new_magic_mouse_amazing_bijansabetcom/#comment-20649196</link><description>do I dare swing by Boylston tonight and see if they have them in the flesh... err plastic?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is a really neat step forward. Once all macs have, or have access to, simple touch inputs, I hope to see similar innovation in interface as on the iPhone.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One wonders if Apple is "training" the next gen os OS X users on "touch interfaces 101"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aaronwhite</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:30:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Finally Deactivated my Vark.com Account</title><link>http://aaronwhite.disqus.com/finally_deactivated_my_varkcom_account/#comment-20141234</link><description>Thanks for following up - you do a great job of providing constructive criticism. We're constantly working on improving the service, so hopefully we can win you back soon :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alison</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:30:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Finally Deactivated my Vark.com Account</title><link>http://aaronwhite.disqus.com/finally_deactivated_my_varkcom_account/#comment-20126984</link><description>Hi Alison... I did see the new social connections coming through (A friend of John has a question) and that is fantastic. My only comment here is that at the present time the volume of "3rd party" vs. "2nd party" questions seems to weigh heavily towards the former. Even still, that may motivate me to answer a few more questions, but eventually the burden returns. Evan had some interesting ideas of using it for self-promotion (perhaps not unlike LinkedIn's question/answer system)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I enjoyed reading the reasoning behind not adding a scoring system, and can get behind that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Looking forward to hearing/seeing what Aardvark does next, as I said, I have tons of startup-respect for you guys!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aaronwhite</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:45:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Finally Deactivated my Vark.com Account</title><link>http://aaronwhite.disqus.com/finally_deactivated_my_varkcom_account/#comment-20071085</link><description>Good point - the system would be *more* useful if this were built-in to take advantage of any potential network effects. For example, if it added my link for me, and automatically tracked who clicked on it for me - that'd be cool</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">evanleonard</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:57:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Finally Deactivated my Vark.com Account</title><link>http://aaronwhite.disqus.com/finally_deactivated_my_varkcom_account/#comment-20070281</link><description>Fair use... though why doesn't vark do that for me? It doesn't have to be 'hard' for them to fix the service, they just need to be aware it's broken :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aaronwhite</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:49:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in... - Aaron White</title><link>http://aaronwhite.disqus.com/debugging_is_twice_as_hard_as_writing_the_code_in_aaron_white/#comment-17376965</link><description>Haha, I dig it. There's just a sticky edge-case; what if you're already the smartest guy out there? Tough life to live, I bet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Happy to meet another Aaron White! If there's one thing Google &amp; Facebook are succeeding at, it's making me feel less unique every day :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aaronwhite</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:43:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in... - Aaron White</title><link>http://aaronwhite.disqus.com/debugging_is_twice_as_hard_as_writing_the_code_in_aaron_white/#comment-17157653</link><description>Don't worry, I've seen all of our code, we're not at risk.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aaronwhite</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:21:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Complete GAE + Lift + Maven project zipped up, with datastore</title><link>http://aaronwhite.disqus.com/complete_gae_lift_maven_project_zipped_up_with_datastore/#comment-16989247</link><description>Definitely going to do a bigger post on why this is so cool... fits the whole 'lean development' arc I'm digging into now.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aaronwhite</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 13:20:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Aaron White - Free Idea #1: iCal desktop background</title><link>http://aaronwhite.disqus.com/aaron_white_free_idea_1_ical_desktop_background/#comment-14529029</link><description>Oh awesome, that's totally what I wanted, thank you!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aaronwhite</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 20:16:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heresy and Usurpation</title><link>http://morningstar.disqus.com/heresy_and_usurpation_709/#comment-13811764</link><description>I have an old memory of a bowflex commercial, "The human body is an amazing machine, the more you work it, the better it becomes" (something like that). Nice example.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aaronwhite</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 12:32:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Events: You&amp;#039;re Doing It Wrong</title><link>http://bedaba.disqus.com/facebook_events_you039re_doing_it_wrong/#comment-13233443</link><description>Ok yes, I change my mind. I was thinking more about myself (I rarely  &lt;br&gt;care what others are doing), but I can see how people could be swayed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do think an A/B test is in order. And Brian Van (I can't spell his  &lt;br&gt;last name from memory) correctly points out that the design of the  &lt;br&gt;Accept / Decline UI does make it seem like your comment should only be  &lt;br&gt;used for "Why are you declining?", creating the social proof you  &lt;br&gt;mention.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Honestly, though, I don't see Facebook addressing this any time soon.  &lt;br&gt;They don't have any motivation to fix it; what gain to they get out of  &lt;br&gt;improving the Accept :: Decline ratio?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dlifson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:03:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>