Hello!
The comments on this profile are unclaimed and thus are unverified.
Do they belong to you? Claim these comments.
wiredryo
Is this you? Claim Profile »
1 year ago
in Lets Talk Copyright on The Inquisitr
So, what do you want then?
Shutting down Google reader and GMail?
Or just wanna squeeze more money out of articles?
See, i give out my content under the terms of the Creative Commons License by-sa. So, feel free to make money with my articles as long as you give me attribution. With that, I get a lot of visitors, which might give me money, on my ads.
The whole Internet is based on that kind of business model. Big companies are giving out stuff for "free". like Google does with their services, where thousands of people get paid. If you deny them to make money with ads, there is only one conclusion. They must make pay-services. So do you really want to pay for everything on the Internet.
You might have the money, but others don't. You would hut down a whole industry.
So, if you don't like how the Internet works, you should not publish content there, or make a closed access site, without RSS and with a monthly fee (like some newspaper did). Otherwise, it's like you get out, say something on the street, and then trying to get money from one who repeat it.
Shutting down Google reader and GMail?
Or just wanna squeeze more money out of articles?
See, i give out my content under the terms of the Creative Commons License by-sa. So, feel free to make money with my articles as long as you give me attribution. With that, I get a lot of visitors, which might give me money, on my ads.
The whole Internet is based on that kind of business model. Big companies are giving out stuff for "free". like Google does with their services, where thousands of people get paid. If you deny them to make money with ads, there is only one conclusion. They must make pay-services. So do you really want to pay for everything on the Internet.
You might have the money, but others don't. You would hut down a whole industry.
So, if you don't like how the Internet works, you should not publish content there, or make a closed access site, without RSS and with a monthly fee (like some newspaper did). Otherwise, it's like you get out, say something on the street, and then trying to get money from one who repeat it.
- 0 points
- Jump to »
typical splogger line: if you don't want it ripped, don't put it out there. And you obviously didn't watch the video either. Google reader is personal use and uses feeds in that context. by publishing a feed we are offering personal use of that feed, we are NOT offering commercial use unless specified. If you've got a CC license that allows that, great, but I'd note that YOU GAVE PERMISSION, where as these scum bags take the content without even asking. Permission for commercial use must be obtained, it's not a given that it exists already