<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Brent Buckner</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/a9df06ff2a986958211a3aea7dd9118a/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:27:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Moral Philosophy and Economic Growth</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/moral_philosophy_and_economic_growth/#comment-3709997</link><description>I don't understand why _The Moral Consequences of Economic Growth_ by Benjamin M. Friedman does not meet your requirements. It does make the case that economic growth promotes democracy, openness, and tolerance.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brent Buckner</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 08:22:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Moral Philosophy and Economic Growth</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/moral_philosophy_and_economic_growth/#comment-3709999</link><description>If that's what you want, to my mind you were misleading in asking for something that argues "that maintaining a relatively high rate of economic growth is morally mandatory for a good government (or is a necessary condition for justice, or legitimacy, or anything like that)", and for complaining about the lack of materials on "growth as a cardinal social and political value".&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In your clarified request are you claiming that you're having difficulty finding writings that link economic growth with individual people having "more money, more freedom, more life-options, better health, longer lives, etc."?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brent Buckner</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:32:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Moral Philosophy and Economic Growth</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/moral_philosophy_and_economic_growth/#comment-3710002</link><description>Thank you for the clarification. If Tyler Cowen's forthcoming book addresses that, I'll buy a copy!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brent Buckner</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 10:33:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Class, Education, and Meaning Manufacture</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/class_education_and_meaning_manufacture/#comment-3710361</link><description>Wayne, there's a distinction between what even the best teachers in the country can do and what the best schools in the country actually do. I suspect that Will would be willing to stipulate that there may well be someone else in the country, possibly presently employed as a teacher, who would outperform him in educating his children in a one-on-one (or close to) home setting. Schools aren't organized that way.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With income tax driving a wedge between cost to an employer and income to an employee, even if one could find such a full-time tutor in whom one had such trust, the cost would be prohibitive for the vast majority.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brent Buckner</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 09:25:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Happiness and Economic Growth</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/happiness_and_economic_growth/#comment-3710736</link><description>On-going (general) economic growth seems such a wonderful thing in the context of the "hedonic treadmill". Strange that mentions of the latter are so rarely matched with mentions of the former.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brent Buckner</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 09:31:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: IQ, Clusters, and Francisco Gil-White</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/iq_clusters_and_francisco_gil_white/#comment-3710931</link><description>You may want to consider &lt;a href="http://www.lrainc.com/swtaboo/taboos/apa_01.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;APA Task Force on Intelligence: Knowns and Unknowns&lt;/a&gt; before moving your priors very far.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brent Buckner</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 10:24:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Kost of Kidz</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/the_kost_of_kidz/#comment-3712960</link><description>Why pick only one?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brent Buckner</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:10:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Procrastination Is Not Laziness</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/procrastination_is_not_laziness/#comment-3713185</link><description>"It's not procrastination, it's The Incredible Just-In-Time Workload Management System(tm)!"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brent Buckner</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 11:40:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clipping the Hedge</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/clipping_the_hedge/#comment-13619042</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps you should not be looking at &amp;quot;investors&amp;quot; as monolithic.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;If hedge funds could generate risk-adjusted excess returns but had limited capacity to do so, regulation that excluded classes of people/entities from hedge fund investment would benefit the classes of people/entities still permitted to invest in hedge funds. Less competition for limited capacity. Perhaps even enough ring-fencing to keep the average risk-adjusted excess returns above zero for the classes still permitted to invest in hedge funds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;If that were the case, such regulation could benefit rich individuals and large institutions.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brent Buckner</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 05:56:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stop Screening</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/stop_screening/#comment-13623822</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Shouldn&amp;#39;t that be twice not thrice as conscientious or effective (success in detection rate of 80% versus success in detection rate of 40%)?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brent Buckner</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:11:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kindle Problem?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/kindle_problem/#comment-13636104</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the newsflash.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brent Buckner</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:40:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Incomes in America</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/incomes_in_america/#comment-17373685</link><description>If there's no need for scare quotation marks for "probability distribution", I see no need for scare quotation marks for "income-distribution", your point about market economies notwithstanding.&lt;br&gt;Brent Buckner, posting as guest</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brent Buckner</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:27:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>