<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for CT Moore</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/a519f603a193926631afa565f898eef7/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:30:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Sweet! Camtasia is now available for Mac&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://erinblaskie.disqus.com/sweet_camtasia_is_now_available_for_mac8230/#comment-22176836</link><description>It's about f**king time. I can haz screencast now!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:59:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kris Kristofferson Is the Greatest Theologian of Our Time</title><link>http://samharrelson.disqus.com/kris_kristofferson_is_the_greatest_theologian_of_our_time/#comment-2899684</link><description>The man is also a Rhodes Scholar...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 17:06:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Video Blogging Coming Your Way: Choosing A Camcorder Was Not Easy</title><link>http://sageblogger.disqus.com/video_blogging_coming_your_way_choosing_a_camcorder_was_not_easy/#comment-1793525</link><description>You know, Vlad, you don't really need something as high end as a camcorder to vlog. I look forward to your vlog posts nonetheless.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:26:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Did WidgetBucks Just Got Yanked From The SERPS?</title><link>http://sageblogger.disqus.com/did_widgetbucks_just_got_yanked_from_the_serps/#comment-1793928</link><description>This is gold...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:14:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Video Blogging Coming Your Way: Choosing A Camcorder Was Not Easy</title><link>http://volodymyrzablotskyy.disqus.com/video_blogging_coming_your_way_choosing_a_camcorder_was_not_easy/#comment-1622270</link><description>You know, Vlad, you don't really need something as high end as a camcorder to vlog. I look forward to your vlog posts nonetheless.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:26:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Did WidgetBucks Just Got Yanked From The SERPS?</title><link>http://volodymyrzablotskyy.disqus.com/did_widgetbucks_just_got_yanked_from_the_serps/#comment-1622576</link><description>This is gold...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:14:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No, Email Isn&amp;#8217;t Dead&amp;#8230; Yet</title><link>http://jimkukral.disqus.com/no_email_isn8217t_dead8230_yet_05/#comment-1169637</link><description>I think that there are two things going on with how email marketing is evolving.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(1) A generational effect: younger demographics see it all as spam (in my opinion).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(2) The idea of permission based email marketing is changing. It's now more about community -- e.g. marketing a product to me that I'm already a consumer/user of. That is, I think that users aren't interested in being pitched through their inbox. Rather, they want content that's relevant to them, and if that content is what's in the email, then your open and click through rates will probably be a lot higher.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:07:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ethical Issues in Affiliate Marketing</title><link>http://affiliatesummit.disqus.com/ethical_issues_in_affiliate_marketing/#comment-4329111</link><description>You know that an industry is reaching maturity when ethics becomes a point of interest. I think that sorting our the ethics of affiliate marketing will be invaluable in terms of getting major brands to understand that affiliate marketing is an integral part of their overall marketing strategy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It remind me of the ethics debate that waged across the blogosphere in previous years, and even even prompted me to blog about the "ethics of affiliate blogging": &lt;a href="http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/09/25/ethics-of-affiliate-blogging/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/09/25/ethics-o...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:33:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Retailers Monitoring Bloggers and Microblogs</title><link>http://bloggersblog.disqus.com/retailers_monitoring_bloggers_and_microblogs/#comment-1392055</link><description>This is precisely the kind of approach to blog seeding that we advise our merchant-partners to do. I think, however, a lot of retailers just don't get it. With marketing staff who are from a FMCG world, anything that doesn't directly lead to a measurable sale (e.g. coupon, CPA ad, etc.) they are just not willing to entertain because they can't measure ROI.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What did this really cost Garmin, however?&lt;br&gt;Google Alert: $0&lt;br&gt;Communications Personnel: Annual Salary (doing other things anyway)&lt;br&gt;A single Garmin unit: cost&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Google juice from Brogan's blog post alone would be worth that, but I would be very surprised if 10 of Brogan's readers/followers didn't end up buying a Garmin.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:34:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Salon Debuts Open Salon Beta</title><link>http://bloggersblog.disqus.com/salon_debuts_open_salon_beta/#comment-1392193</link><description>Did you ever hear of the social network Capazoo? I did 'cause I worked for them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They had a tipping system for users, and they got nothing but flack for it -- well, that and a kind of referral program that tipped users for referring their friends.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The point is that users tend to be very suspicious about anything that compensates them for their participation. It carries the connotation that the product is (1) not good enough on its own, and (2) if you're actually paying users, there must be some ulterior motive for luring them in.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hopefully for Salon, the fact that the entire tipping system is peer-to-peer will remove some of that anathema of a virtual micro-currency. It did, after all, work for SecondLife. However, there might still be a danger that users will be too suspicious to participate just because the incentivization system is there.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:48:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Akoha VIP Starter Deck Christmas Giveaway @ Gypsy Bandito</title><link>http://thebroadbrush.disqus.com/akoha_vip_starter_deck_christmas_giveaway_gypsy_bandito/#comment-4611993</link><description>Link love earns you brownie points, Todd.... ;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:12:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Selling On Blip.FM</title><link>http://thebroadbrush.disqus.com/selling_on_blipfm/#comment-7371671</link><description>Todd,&lt;br&gt;I use to work for these guys. Trust me, that's nothing. Consider the ads they run in France: &lt;a href="http://wetamericandream.com/american-apparel-en-francais/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://wetamericandream.com/american-apparel-en...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:24:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: User Generated eCommerce / eCommerce 2.0 / We-Commerce</title><link>http://vinnylingham.disqus.com/user_generated_ecommerce_ecommerce_20_we_commerce/#comment-1611414</link><description>Your point about many SMEs not having the budget or know-how to get ecommerce enabled reminds me of MySpace. That network started out as a website solution for bands; it just turned out that there were more fans than bands, and some unsustainable growth ensued. The only questions now is whether MySpace will survive that unsustained growth long enough to revert back to being a network of band pages.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Something about the "Centralized Me," however, is at odds with social media -- namely that it's egocentric. I think that a huge advantage that social network pages have over a run of the mill website is they are &lt;b&gt;integrated&lt;/b&gt; with other pages and (therefore) individuals. That gives them a lot more reach, I think, in providing some kind of trust-meter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then again, that just underscores your point about data-portability and how we need a way to carry trust from one network to the next. I agree that there's a huge impetus for something like Friend Connect or Facebook Connect.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This all goes to beg the question, then, with that kind of data-portability, will anyone really need their own site anymore?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I mean, wouldn't an eBay or CafePress site suffice?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;After all, with portable personal data, the communities to which we belong would be accessible from anywhere on the net we go.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 12:36:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ogilvy On Social Media: "Totally Baffled" Says Biographer | Social Media Explorer</title><link>http://socialmediaexplorer.disqus.com/ogilvy_on_social_media_totally_baffled_says_biographer_social_media_explorer/#comment-6575967</link><description>With the way that media evolves so quickly now, I wonder if Ogilvy would've ever even succeeded in advertising today....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:03:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Indecision&amp;#8217;s Bugging Me</title><link>http://rustedrobot.disqus.com/this_indecision8217s_bugging_me/#comment-1183544</link><description>Go for the sleep, Jeff. Whatever is going on out "in the world" is fleeting and will probably re-occur via some reasonable facsimile. Your children, though, only grow up once, and it's so sweet to be well rested enough that you can fully enjoy their company and exploits.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:58:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stealing Avatars: Identity Theft 2.0</title><link>http://instigatorblog.disqus.com/stealing_avatars_identity_theft_20/#comment-1648505</link><description>This might be worse than blog scraping.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:46:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Don&amp;#8217;t Just Linkbait Top Bloggers, Write For Them</title><link>http://instigatorblog.disqus.com/don8217t_just_linkbait_top_bloggers_write_for_them/#comment-1648809</link><description>I've had some trouble getting the attention of high traffic blogger. They receive so many back links and trackbacks, that I've gotten lost in the storm.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In any case, congrats on the post. Brian's blog is kind of a big deal. I've been doing some guest blogging myself lately, and I know how great it is to reach a new audience.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:21:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hacking The Shirt Haxxor</title><link>http://slashbe.disqus.com/hacking_the_shirt_haxxor/#comment-2142665</link><description>Who sells these shirts?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 09:23:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: hope[ful/less]. - We have bigger houses, 
but smaller families;...</title><link>http://hopefulless.disqus.com/hopefulless_we_have_bigger_houses_but_smaller_families/#comment-6136452</link><description>Amen...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:03:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/12/30/google-chrome-ads-in-gmail/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_71906/#comment-6034470</link><description>They are so sly...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But this doesn't surprise me at all. I only wonder why they bother with Firefox (I guess brand recognition). Either way, it looks like they're simply out to get MSFT....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 14:44:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Long Tail of Community</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/the_long_tail_of_community/#comment-8511809</link><description>I think the problem that non-online-centric businesses have is a lack of understanding, and people tend to fear what they don't understand. Communication professionals have spent decades honing their media and public relations skills, and now there's a whole new facet of "new media" that they likely feel intimidated by because they don't know it inside-out like they do other forms of media.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What it comes down to, though, is that there's an ADDITIONAL facet to the realm of communication, and any serious professional needs to understand this new media facet as well as the more conventional forms if they are going to be effective communicators. I've tried quelling Strumpette-style backlash against this facet, but to no avail as of yet: &lt;a href="http://gypsybandito.com/front-page-20/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://gypsybandito.com/front-page-20/&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 10:32:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Big Media- Learn About Participation</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/big_media_learn_about_participation/#comment-8511880</link><description>This clip is awesome. But dude, it's so two months ago. Where have you been?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:39:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why LOLSaur Really is Cool</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/why_lolsaur_really_is_cool/#comment-8513550</link><description>I can haz stegosaurus eggs...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:44:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Value of Networks</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/the_value_of_networks/#comment-8515807</link><description>Brilliant post, Chris.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's now &lt;i&gt;what&lt;/i&gt; you know, it's &lt;i&gt;who&lt;/i&gt; you know because every extra set of hands helps lighten that load.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The way that social media is allowing to both expand and integrate the networks through which we share info (in a Venn diagram kind of way), however, reminds me a lot of &lt;i&gt;the collective&lt;/i&gt; of the borg. Perhaps that's the resistance people have to their potential: as much as they stand to gain by participating, they feel that their individuality will be compromised because there's so much being shared that their own contribution will become just another numbered piece of the puzzle.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:36:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Let Them MAKE Cake</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/let_them_make_cake_07/#comment-8515819</link><description>Your point about media, I think, is bang on. The cake analogy, however, might be a bit of a stretch. I suspect that it has to do with consumers/bakers feeling that a mix that requires actual ingredients would produce a higher quality result.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But media: yes, there's a better ROI when it's participatory.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:47:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: LinkedIN Gets Pretty</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/linkedin_gets_pretty/#comment-8516139</link><description>I can't believe they still haven't made it possible to login from the index page...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:55:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spectrums of Social Media for Marketing</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/spectrums_of_social_media_for_marketing/#comment-8521711</link><description>I like the sliding scale a lot, Chris. The only thing I'd disagree with is moving from left to right rather than right to left -- but only for poetic reasons: it seems to me that since communism is traditionally left, that's where the community managers should be, and since capitalism is on the right, that's where the impersonal banner ads should go.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's a moot point, though, 'cause your progression in engagement seems bang on.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:46:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PitchEngine Launches- I Might Have a Plan</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/pitchengine_launches_i_might_have_a_plan/#comment-8522245</link><description>Just about anything would be an improvement on PR Web's email subscriptions. I've been on both sides of the PR flow, Chris, and I really feel that the web has only confounded the press release process -- but you know that already.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now I'm just waiting for an invite :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:12:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Important Speaking Tips</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/two_important_speaking_tips/#comment-8525109</link><description>Your last point about Cirque du Soleil, Chris, reminded me of a concept that Zach Braiker mentioned (albeit not as his own): Return on Experience.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It seems a bit of a fluffy concept at first, but in the digital context alone we emphasize user experience. So in the real world, the WIIFM and Takeaways might just be part and parcel of the "audience's experience."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:06:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Lynch on Product Placement</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/david_lynch_on_product_placement/#comment-8509632</link><description>Ah, brevity is a breath of fresh air, especially on the internet. Don't you think, Chris?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:57:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Counterpoint to the Branding Craze</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/a_counterpoint_to_the_branding_craze/#comment-8525603</link><description>Behavioral targeting is something that's obviously becoming more of a big deal. Maybe that's the idea behind lifestyle marketing -- i.e. branding your products as items that fit in with certain behavioral patterns.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The title, though, reminds me of this anti-branding video: &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RN7mTobPOI" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RN7mTobPOI&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 08:22:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: America &amp;#8216;08</title><link>http://jasonkeath.disqus.com/america_821608/#comment-9228500</link><description>I am so f**king sick of hearing about how everyone loves this guy. He's just a shoe-in because he's neither Bush nor some 70+ war veteran. Woopty doo. As much as the country needs change, I can't wait until he turns out to be the same anti-climactic dud that every other presidential hopeful looks like at the end of their term.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;abbr&amp;gt;&lt;em&gt;CT Moore’s latest blog post..&lt;a href="http://gypsybandito.com/seo-vs-content-6-secrets-to-ranking/" rel="nofollow"&gt;SEO vs Content: 6 Secrets to Ranking&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;/abbr&amp;gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:43:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Bribing the Next President of the United States?</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/google_bribing_the_next_president_of_the_united_states/#comment-9416746</link><description>This is the thing with Privacy Policies. Governments have to follow rules to collect personal data, and that can either be time consuming or outright impossible.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But users are waiving that right whenever they use online services, so the private sector is amassing data that governments are simply going to be able to ASK for. It's ludicrous: &lt;a href="http://gypsybandito.com/privatization-of-privacy/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://gypsybandito.com/privatization-of-privacy/&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:51:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Online Ad Spending to Pass US Newspapers by 2011</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/online_ad_spending_to_pass_us_newspapers_by_2011/#comment-9417100</link><description>Of course it's a smart move. When all those people that've been advertising through Google in print finally catch on and decide to advertise online, who do you think they're going to turn to?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 11:36:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Add Music and Video to your Bebo Profile</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/add_music_and_video_to_your_bebo_profile/#comment-9420917</link><description>Yeah, I caught this press release in my inbox too. It's almost like Bebo is trying to make sure that Capazoo doesn't out-pace them. I think, though, content producing users are going to gravitate to wherever they can actually monetize their work.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:49:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Search Engine Optimization Tips</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/search_engine_optimization_tips/#comment-9428427</link><description>You should add "attract linkbait by blogging about SEO" ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;CT Moore's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://blog.shareresults.com/?p=669" rel="nofollow"&gt;Affiliate Marketing - The American Dream?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 13:35:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Linky Goodness, May 23</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/linky_goodness_may_23/#comment-9428451</link><description>I wonder what implications that that first link has for Wikipedia...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;CT Moore's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://blog.shareresults.com/?p=671" rel="nofollow"&gt;Racing in the TOCA with SkillGround&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 17:28:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The &amp;#8220;Free&amp;#8221; Model is Killing Start-Ups; Why I Built Trackur to be Different</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/the_8220free8221_model_is_killing_start_ups_why_i_built_trackur_to_be_different/#comment-9428521</link><description>I think that the one who really has the best chance at monetizing the "free model" is Google.&lt;br&gt;1) They already have a very well established ad network.&lt;br&gt;2) Free web apps are &lt;b&gt;added value&lt;/b&gt; to their ad network because&lt;br&gt;3) it helps with user retention, tracking, and targeting.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;CT Moore's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://blog.shareresults.com/?p=675" rel="nofollow"&gt;3 Steps to Increase User Retention&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 13:46:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The &amp;#8220;Free&amp;#8221; Model is Killing Start-Ups; Why I Built Trackur to be Different</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/the_8220free8221_model_is_killing_start_ups_why_i_built_trackur_to_be_different/#comment-9428523</link><description>@Andy Beal - No doubt that they're having trouble with YouTube. I was thinking more along the lines of office-oriented applications, however, such as Google docs and, your main competitor, Google alerts. :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;CT Moore's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://blog.shareresults.com/?p=675" rel="nofollow"&gt;3 Steps to Increase User Retention&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 14:05:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Being a Blogger Does Not Give You Diplomatic Immunity</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/being_a_blogger_does_not_give_you_diplomatic_immunity/#comment-9429209</link><description>I think that something bloggers (and most people) need to learn to appreciate is that life is a series of trade-offs, and when it comes to your opinions, you can either say what you want, or get what you want (by keeping your mouth shut and focusing no influencing others) because if there's anything I learned in college it's that if you want to convince someone that THEY'RE right, all you have to do is argue with them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;CT Moore's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://blog.incomeaccess.com/?p=539" rel="nofollow"&gt;Avoid .info Domains, Choose .com Domains&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 12:15:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google to DOJ: Why You Should Approve Yahoo Deal</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/google_to_doj_why_you_should_approve_yahoo_deal/#comment-9429626</link><description>I think one of the DOJ's biggest concern is that, although the deal wouldn't prevent Yahoo! from making similar deals with other companies, they wouldn't have much of an incentive to do so.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;CT Moore's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/gypsybandito/~3/311193659/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Plurk Sounds Like Poop&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:45:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama Will Win The US Presidency - Guaranteed!</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/barack_obama_will_win_the_us_presidency_guaranteed/#comment-9429947</link><description>All you just told me is that Obama has the youth vote. We knew that already.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The youth vote wasn't enough to stop Nixon in '68, and it might not be enough to stop McCain now. It helps to have it behind you, but it is no guarantee.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is politics, not Google analytics. There are so many variable that we just can't measure.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama has the digital natives in the bag: so what. What about dejected Clinton supporters. They could either vote GOP or abstain altogether.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As crazy as the Democratic National Convention was in '68, none of those youths who supported McGovern or Kennedy were going to vote Nixon just because their candidate was nominated. They voted for Humphrey at election time, and Nixon still one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;CT Moore's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/gypsybandito/~3/311193659/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Plurk Sounds Like Poop&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:06:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brin, Page, &amp;#038; Yang: What Do You Think They Were Saying?</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/brin_page_038_yang_what_do_you_think_they_were_saying/#comment-9430944</link><description>Jerry: I should have bought you guys out when I had the chance...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;CT Moore's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://blog.shareresults.com/?p=707" rel="nofollow"&gt;Extra, extra!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:17:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The New York Times Threatened by Google?</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/the_new_york_times_threatened_by_google/#comment-9431966</link><description>I think that right now, Google (and Yahoo) might just be facing the potential risk of being bought out by MSM company. If Congress decides to mess with their behavioral ad targeting model, they can end up in dire enough financial straights that someone like Rupert Murdoch could easily swoop in and snatch them up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Consider: &lt;a href="http://gypsybandito.com/the-real-google-killer/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://gypsybandito.com/the-real-google-killer/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;CT Moore's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://gypsybandito.com/the-real-google-killer/" rel="nofollow"&gt;The Real Google Killer?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:30:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Moderator Launches, Raising the Question: &amp;#8220;Are Google Engineers Bored With Search?&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/google_moderator_launches_raising_the_question_8220are_google_engineers_bored_with_search8221/#comment-9433371</link><description>I don't think that they're bored. I think Google gives them the 20% time because it prevents exhaustion. I might be great at search development, but as a person, I have other interests too, so I probably have some good ideas there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just consider how the likes of gmail and chrome probably came out of someone's 20% time, and have actually enhanced search.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Besides, Google moderator could very well create an addition crowd source for Google by brining more corporate info into the online (i.e. Google) world.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;CT Moore's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://gypsybandito.com/my-workshop-at-nokia-open-lab-in-helsinki/" rel="nofollow"&gt;My Workshop at Nokia Open Lab in Helsinki&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 10:11:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mobile Monday returns to Toronto on Oct 6th at the Spoke Club</title><link>http://burningthebaconwithbarrett.disqus.com/mobile_monday_returns_to_toronto_on_oct_6th_at_the_spoke_club/#comment-13135202</link><description>Gawd, I've gotta get something like this going in Montreal...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:41:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Palm Centro is a surprisingly good alternative to blackberry Pearl</title><link>http://burningthebaconwithbarrett.disqus.com/palm_centro_is_a_surprisingly_good_alternative_to_blackberry_pearl/#comment-13135200</link><description>I got a chance to trial the Nokia E71 recently, and I personally felt that it was a complete Blackberry killer. There are a slew of apps, email set up was super easy, and it never froze. It doesn't, mind you, have a touch screen :(</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:44:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BIGLIST SEO Blog Reviews 040909</title><link>http://toprankblog.disqus.com/biglist_seo_blog_reviews_040909/#comment-17135521</link><description>Wow, for a second there I thought you were adding Vanessa Fox for the first time... then I actually read the post. Thanks for the update, Lee...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also want to thank you for inspiring &lt;a href="http://BAMroll.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;BAMroll.com&lt;/a&gt; -- the Big Affiliate Marketing Blogroll. It's kinda like the BigList of SEM blogs, but all affiliate marketing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:08:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;ve got something to show you&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://whatleydude.disqus.com/i8217ve_got_something_to_show_you8230/#comment-18550891</link><description>@whatleydude, I would've noticed but I take the weekends away from the internet... seriously, it's the best tech decision I've ever made...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:14:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sunday Morning Snooze</title><link>http://whatleydude.disqus.com/sunday_morning_snooze/#comment-18551019</link><description>I knew there had to be something about you that I wouldn't like.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 16:05:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Seven, Eight and Nine</title><link>http://whatleydude.disqus.com/seven_eight_and_nine/#comment-18551156</link><description>Gawd, the comments are almost as long at the post... Subsequently, I have noting new to add to this... How's that for conversation? ;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:42:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mobile Industry Review: The End of an Era</title><link>http://whatleydude.disqus.com/mobile_industry_review_the_end_of_an_era/#comment-18551168</link><description>Alas, content is king, but money talks...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:18:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The value of ideas</title><link>http://whatleydude.disqus.com/the_value_of_ideas/#comment-18551243</link><description>I like Carl's advice. The last line (a proverb I believe?) reminds me of the 4th Law of Power.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 10:50:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Plans for the Summer</title><link>http://whatleydude.disqus.com/plans_for_the_summer/#comment-18551275</link><description>I hate you, I hate you, I hate you...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lucozade should've added pub crawling with GypsyBandito to the challenge, though. That's where we separate the men from boys.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:31:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Making notes for the future</title><link>http://whatleydude.disqus.com/making_notes_for_the_future/#comment-18551279</link><description>I've never had anything so fancy, but I'm all about having the "official notebook." I find it has presence, commands your focus, and stops your mind wandering all over the place like an over-zealous Tweeter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I used to carry a notebook on my morning commute, and did an immense amount of writing. The only problem is that it never made it off the paper and into digital format.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:30:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Notes from Namibia, Jul 9th</title><link>http://whatleydude.disqus.com/notes_from_namibia_jul_9th/#comment-18551287</link><description>How does this post have only 2 comments? That might be a record low for your site, never mind your travel posts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You're on the journey of a life time, sir, but I'm sure you don't need me to tell you that. I just hope that that moleskin is filling up much more so than this blog.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:30:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Exit stage right</title><link>http://whatleydude.disqus.com/exit_stage_right/#comment-18551312</link><description>I remember when you first hinted at this. I'm interested to see what you do next. I just turned a page in my career, as well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And BTW, I still hate you for having such an awesome summer. I also hate the British postal service for never getting that package to you; there was a note in there I think you needed to read.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In any case, enough about me. Back to you: good luck, old man...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:07:20 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>