<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Dave</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/a4244027fbdb75a0d119e98a80d33395/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:45:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: What Does Your Toilet Paper Roll Say About You?</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/what_does_your_toilet_paper_roll_say_about_you/#comment-4350088</link><description>It's all about dust on the roll.  Pull the paper towards you from the top and the dust stays on the paper until you deposit it on your rear.  Roll the paper away from you and the dust will be on the underside of the paper and more likely to fall.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-Dave..  A male with no dust on his ass.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 20:10:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Table Tennis: Getting Rocked</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/table_tennis_getting_rocked/#comment-4350227</link><description>I try to keep feet away from my bag at all costs.  Let's go with Hacky Sack.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 08:20:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Student vs. Competitor</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/student_vs_competitor/#comment-4350261</link><description>I would argue that you are focusing on what is most important.  You're understanding of the task.  I commend your integrity.  By the way, fuck winners, they just make the losers feel like shit so they can feel good for a second, all the while doing something that matters to nobody.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:46:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Student vs. Competitor</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/student_vs_competitor/#comment-4350263</link><description>I think the two are different parts of the equation though.  There's mastering the skill and then mastering the game.  Many people win the game but never master the skill.  That's almost always due to them competing against other non-skilled people.  They end up being the most skilled of the un-skilled.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think focusing on the skill shows dedication, and once you master the skill, the game becomes trivial.  Just like computing and everything else.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:15:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dilution of Pentesting</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/the_dilution_of_pentesting/#comment-4350264</link><description>I think you've just found the line between Analysts and Engineers.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A growing trend in security is to lower the costs of it.  Companies are starting to hire one or two Engineers and leave the rest of the work to Analysts.  Like the System Admin and Operator scenario.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry to spam the hell out of your blog today  =)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:09:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My First Personalized License Plate</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/my_first_personalized_license_plate/#comment-4350258</link><description>Probably better to use a project name like Gentoo and be confused for a penguin fan that name it after a project like &lt;a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/bacula" rel="nofollow"&gt;Bacula&lt;/a&gt; and be confused for a zoophile.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Main Entry: bac·u·lum&lt;br&gt;Pronunciation: 'bak-y&amp;amp;-l&amp;amp;m&lt;br&gt;Function: noun&lt;br&gt;Inflected Form: plural bac·u·lums /-l&amp;amp;mz/ or bac·u·la /-l&amp;amp;/&lt;br&gt;: a slender bone reinforcing the penis in many mammals</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 15:32:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chick-Fil-A</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/chick_fil_a/#comment-4350997</link><description>I suspect it's the pickle juice they presure cook the chicken in</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:15:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Linux: Harnessing The Über-Powerful Find Command (+xargs)</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/linux_harnessing_the_uber_powerful_find_command_xargs/#comment-4351260</link><description>Excellent stuf!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:29:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ten Weeks In NYC</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/ten_weeks_in_nyc/#comment-4351264</link><description>Get a t-shirt from the original CBGB before it closes for good.  They've lost their lease and a bit of Rock-nRoll history is going away.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cbgb.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.cbgb.com/&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 22:29:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10 Questions To Ask During An Information Security Interview</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/10_questions_to_ask_during_an_information_security_interview/#comment-4353035</link><description>"Don’t forget that security is mostly an attitude, or actually a way of life, and only secondly knowledge."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My favorite interview bonus question is "how many fire alarm levers did we pass on the way here?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'd hire someone who got every technical question wrong but answered that one even in the ball park.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-Dave</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:10:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Security Is Not A Technology Problem: Why Companies Need To Be Looking At Organizational Issues Instead Of Products</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/security_is_not_a_technology_problem_why_companies_need_to_be_looking_at_organizational_issues_inste/#comment-4353508</link><description>The issue of the organization standing "in the way" is more often an issue of perception.  Security folks (consultants, employees, etc) often assume that they've been tasked with the most critical task. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Make things safe".  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's rarely the case.  Most often, especially for consultants, you've been brought in to meet the requirement of "best effort" or "due diligence".  The goal for the company is to meet the invisible bar that determines if they've tried to secure their data or not.  Their goal is to remain profitable, not to secure anything.  If it costs too much or affects business too much,  whatever you feel needs to happen simply isn't going to happen. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's frustrating as hell, but 90% of the time, you're there because they *had* to have you come,  not because they wanted you to.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 13:27:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Security Is Not A Technology Problem: Why Companies Need To Be Looking At Organizational Issues Instead Of Products</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/security_is_not_a_technology_problem_why_companies_need_to_be_looking_at_organizational_issues_inste/#comment-4353506</link><description>Management comes to the security team to ask what happened almost always only because they'll be asked what happened.  If they ask, and it becomes apparent that it was a persons direct fault, they have someone to fire/blame.  If they ask and there's no one to fire,  they at least can answer the questions they'll receive. If they're asked and cant answer,  they'll be the ones fired.  It's mostly CYA, rarely FYI.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only empowered security teams I've *ever* worked with were ones who worked for organizations that had suffered serious loss due to an incident.  All the rest were there to go through the motions. If securing the network/product/servers was going to be more expensive than deemed profitable,  they were generally nerfed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's bullshit,  but true.  =(&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have heard of some orgs in the financial sector who operate on the idea that they only want to hear of their competitors incidents and never their own,  but I've not met these people first hand.   They're usually spoken about in the same context as unicorns and dragons =(</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 14:36:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Get Static Networking Up In Linux From The Command Line</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/how_to_get_static_networking_up_in_linux_from_the_command_line/#comment-4353580</link><description>Don't forget step 0, identifying which interface you need to use as your argument to ifconfig.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;$ dmesg | grep eth[0-9]</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 02:17:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Grandfather</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/my_grandfather/#comment-4353604</link><description>Sorry to hear of your loss Daniel.  Thanks for sharing some memories of him with the rest of us. You've painted the picture of a great man, sounds like the people who knew him were lucky to have.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;-Dave</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:55:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Portknocking Real Security?</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/is_portknocking_real_security/#comment-4353665</link><description>Hi Daniel,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You're an absolute saint for rolling around in piles of logic with people all the time.  Sadly it never seems to stick to some people. They simply 'd|w'on't get it =(&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You're absolutely correct about the merit of portknocking. We argued weather it was authentication or authorization when the paper was first published, but not weather or not it was part of security.  Being two, hard headed, "security by philosophy" type people, that should've been your first clue you were right about it bing valuable.  For sure one of us would have been arguing that it's just a bad idea.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This guys argument to you is that camouflage is ineffective. That all someone has to do is watch for you to put on your gille suit then follow where you move to.  If someone is able to watch you do your knock sequence, you have more serious issues at hand.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;-Dave</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:10:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Resonance Of Understanding</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/the_resonance_of_understanding/#comment-4353691</link><description>Ummmm,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've been drinking beers all day so I'm not completely sure.  But did you just describe the secret that oprah is pimping?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 03:06:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Resonance Of Understanding</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/the_resonance_of_understanding/#comment-4353690</link><description>Haha,  but it's about oscillations and what not.  I'm hip to the idea you're getting across though. Groovy  =)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 03:18:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why It&amp;#8217;s Sometimes Immoral To Treat The Poor and Uneducated As Equals (A Libertarian Essay)</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/why_it8217s_sometimes_immoral_to_treat_the_poor_and_uneducated_as_equals_a_libertarian_essay/#comment-4353909</link><description>"You can’t purchase cigarettes or cooked meat with food stamps."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Having grown up here, where ~25% of the population receives food stamps  (including my family at the time), I can tell you that you're mistaken.  You can purchase almost anything with food stamps.  What I suspect you meant to say was that you're not &lt;i&gt;supposed&lt;/i&gt;  to be able to.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Worse, that's inside the store.  Outside, you can buy literally anything. Drugs, guns, blowjobs, whatever, at roughly 50 cents on the dollar.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's a funny thing rules, only the "haves" follow them.  The "have not's" could give a fuck.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:37:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why It&amp;#8217;s Sometimes Immoral To Treat The Poor and Uneducated As Equals (A Libertarian Essay)</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/why_it8217s_sometimes_immoral_to_treat_the_poor_and_uneducated_as_equals_a_libertarian_essay/#comment-4353910</link><description>The "here" listed above was supposed to be a link to here:  &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary%2C_Indiana" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary,_Indiana&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:38:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On A Short Holiday</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/on_a_short_holiday/#comment-4354270</link><description>Aloha</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 21:26:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Best Metal Bands Of All Time</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/best_metal_bands_of_all_time/#comment-4354405</link><description>Metal</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 14:10:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Best Metal Bands Of All Time</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/best_metal_bands_of_all_time/#comment-4354400</link><description>Your site likes to eat chunks of my posts =(&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyway...   hardcore is where it's at. All the cool kids are rocking it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And for your listening pleasure I present the Cro-Mags. Best hardcore band, ever.  Their first and best album, Age of Quarrel, Free..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cromags.com/music.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.cromags.com/music.html&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's what I grew up on, and it blows all the bands you listed out of the water.  Sorry,  but it's true.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 15:00:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How I Became An Atheist</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/how_i_became_an_atheist/#comment-4354534</link><description>I agree,  well written posts.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One thing that has always puzzled me about atheism though is the need to proclaim the lack of belief.  I am a non-believer, or a person without faith, heretic, whatever it's called.  I have been all of my life.  I have never once had the urge to share my non-belief with anyone though. To me religion has always been what seemed to be mostly a fairly tail with a bunch of social impacts tied to it.  It has always seemed to me that anyone, whether citing their beliefs or non-beliefs , is usually selling something. To me the measure of true disbelief has always seemed to be never discussing the topic outside of its affect on society. Personal declarations on the topic usually look to me like someone who cares about the idea way too much.  Just like the tooth fairy,  I couldn't care less who believes in it or not.  I care so little about it that discussing the tooth fairy at all seems like a huge waste of time to me.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So I commend your writing here, it was a good read as far as reading goes.  I urge you to return to writing about more important stuff like technology though.  Your great writing skills serve the world much better when you spend time applying them to things that matter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;-Dave&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;PS.  You know the drill when it comes to stuff I say.  I'm not trying to be a dick.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 20:39:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How I Became An Atheist</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/how_i_became_an_atheist/#comment-4354531</link><description>I don't think I'd agree with you that religion does more and more harm. I'd probably argue that it's currently doing less harm than it has in the past. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you think it impacts your life enough, has screwed up your plans for scouting, or just care that much, then rock on.  Perhaps a person or two will listen.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the meantime,  I'd still say your technical topics serve more of humanity in a beneficial way.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;-Dave</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 23:30:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Link Could Have Been Anything [Reddit Spam Issue]</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/this_link_could_have_been_anything_reddit_spam_issue/#comment-4354548</link><description>"Quit being so polite - it’s not a job interview."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Haha.. dunno if you've ever watched Daniel wrestle the bottom feeders at &lt;a href="http://dslreports.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://dslreports.com&lt;/a&gt; or not,  but Daniel is always very well behaved.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hell, he didn't even tell you to eat a dick for your bullshit comments above.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 19:44:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: So I&amp;#8217;m Trying To Learn How To Drink Beer</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/so_i8217m_trying_to_learn_how_to_drink_beer/#comment-4354586</link><description>Beer is an acquired taste.  Know that now.  Also, for the record, you started with the boldest variety of beer made. Probably a poor choice for popping your cherry on.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's two main techniques/types to making beer, Ales (brewed at room temp) and Lagers (Brewed in a chilled environment).  Most of the beers in the world are Ales. The one you chose, a porter, is the boldest.  In order of flavor would probably be something like this.. (keep in mind that there's a TON of over lap).  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;From light to dark, or mild to rich: Pilsner, Pale, Golden, Tan, Brown, Dark, Stout, Porter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another thing to keep in mind is that for each of these, there's also a galaxy of variety in the bitterness.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If I had to recommend a decent starter beer for someone it would probably be a nice golden ale like Red Hook ESB. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good luck and have fun, beer is a great thing, and something great minds have enjoyed since before humans had written language.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers!&lt;br&gt;-Dave</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:28:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: So I&amp;#8217;m Trying To Learn How To Drink Beer</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/so_i8217m_trying_to_learn_how_to_drink_beer/#comment-4354592</link><description>I was pretty sure Papazian listed them with Porter last, but it's been 10 years since I've checked his book.  So I checked the wikipedia.  Interstingly it says there's no difference at all but symantecly. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porter_%28beer" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porter_(beer&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can certainly live with that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 01:06:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Johnny Dep Gets Entertained On A Japanese TV Show</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/johnny_dep_gets_entertained_on_a_japanese_tv_show/#comment-4354624</link><description>Daniel my friend.  I suspect we're all better off just leaving that to be seen only on Japanese TV.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 02:20:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: IM: Gtalk &amp;#8211;&gt; AIM</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/im_gtalk_8211_aim/#comment-4354646</link><description>IS Gtalk a fancy name for Jabber?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:56:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: People That Scare Me</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/people_that_scare_me/#comment-4354695</link><description>I've been in the habit of saying "dub dub dub".</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 19:41:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You&amp;#8217;ll Be Hearing About This</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/you8217ll_be_hearing_about_this/#comment-4354724</link><description>This looks like variation of line dancing or stomping, something that's been popular in black culture for thousands of years.  Kids in Gary had been doing this forever and mutated it into a bunch of different stuff.  Double dutch for example.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When it comes to dance,  in most cases whitey will always be imitating.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 20:31:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone: Initial Thoughts</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/iphone_initial_thoughts/#comment-4354760</link><description>Thanks for sharing Daniel,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Glad to hear a review from someone I actually know for sure doesn't work for Apple.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;-Dave</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 16:54:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Was This Necessary?</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/was_this_necessary/#comment-4354817</link><description>Why would it not be?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Or did you mean the death of his father?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:40:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Difference Between Web 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/the_difference_between_web_10_20_and_30/#comment-4354824</link><description>Why can't crypto as an underlying design element be part of the idea?  We're ok with other design elements being a core piece of what makes it Web 2.0 or 3.0 or 4.0 whatever. How about, instead of just Web 3.0 is the semantic web where data is labeled and sexy, we make it Web 3.0 is the semantic web where data is labeled and sexy and secure?  We're just labeling a method of working with data.  There's no reason at all security can't be considered an underlying design element of the idea.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 00:26:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Was This Necessary?</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/was_this_necessary/#comment-4354820</link><description>"To use this picture as anti-war material is reminiscent of true propaganda."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Absolutely agreed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As a Marine, I can assure everyone that the father of that boy knew full well and accepted the potential for that moment. I considered it, as does everyone when they agree to take on the obligation of picking up a rifle. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is the photograph touching? Yes it is. &lt;br&gt;Is the tradition of presenting the flag to the "man" of the family necessary?  In a warrior culture, like that of the Marine Corps, it is deemed to be. And I don't disagree.&lt;br&gt;What I would question the necessity of, is people posting this image all over the place. Making that moment into something other than the commemoration of a warrior is a tragedy in my opinion.  Doing so doesn't help the child, doesn't change the outcome, and doesn't mean we don't need people like the Marine who's funeral we're seeing to volunteer to do the horrible things most are afraid to do. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am not a fan of the war, but I strongly believe that the people who are trying to use the funerals of our fallen warriors as anything but a respectful ceremony are seriously hurting our nation.  Regardless of opinion, the truth is that we *need* people to do the job of our military.  If we mock them, they won't come.  Daniel,  surely as a veteran you must know this reality.  I really hope you aren't trying to use this photo like that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:41:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s Time to Drop the &amp;#8220;www&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/it8217s_time_to_drop_the_8220www8221/#comment-4354875</link><description>Agreed typing "http://"  is also superfluous.  As is adding "as well" after "also" =)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Grammar lunacy aside..  If people type &lt;a href="http://" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://&lt;/a&gt; it's a probably good thing. That likely means they also type &lt;a href="https://" rel="nofollow"&gt;https://&lt;/a&gt;. Which is something we all should be doing when we want to make sure ssl comes into play. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Far too many people get hit by the assumption that even though the page they're visiting was delivered to them by http, that the login forms on the page will use https.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:20:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 34</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/34/#comment-4355013</link><description>Congrats on making it another year.  =)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 22:01:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pack Light</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/pack_light/#comment-4355577</link><description>I've seen mIRC bots with more capability than this.   =(&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It must suck thinking you're cool when all you can muster is blog spam.  Maybe we'll stop by and say hello while you're working your shift at the dollar store.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 21:37:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Saying No To &amp;#8220;www&amp;#8221;: A Fortune 50 Company Analysis</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/saying_no_to_8220www8221_a_fortune_50_company_analysis/#comment-4355601</link><description>grep ^y fortune&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;=)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:08:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Paying People To Be Good Parents</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/paying_people_to_be_good_parents/#comment-4355854</link><description>Welfare by another name. The difference here is that it allows for a market response rather than a government response.  It's more successful to let people choose their own doctor and pay for it themselves than it is to use the same money (and probably more) to build a clinic because the doctors have to compete and the clinic doesn't.  Competition again shows itself to be valuable.  Don't get too distracted by the notion that the parents should be "taking care of their kids" anyway, that's not the main point. The same argument can be said of any kind of assistance, public or private. The "for the sake of the kids" part is just to make less people complain that New York is trying to change its public assistance program to one that allows market competition.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 18:55:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Glen Danzig Does Reading Rainbow</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/glen_danzig_does_reading_rainbow/#comment-4356127</link><description>My favorite Danzig video:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htnBi5TH5g8" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htnBi5TH5g8&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 21:41:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Math and Philosophy Behind Tool&amp;#8217;s Lateralus</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/the_math_and_philosophy_behind_tool8217s_lateralus/#comment-4356164</link><description>This sequence is very popular in music and film. All of the Stanley Kubrick are supposed to be using it as well.  They call it the "Golden Ratio".  Many artists believe it is the secret to successful art. If you look, there are dances, paintings, music, and movies that all use it. Tool is doing what mathematically aware artists have been doing for a few hundred years, and mother nature since the beginning of time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 11:03:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Math and Philosophy Behind Tool&amp;#8217;s Lateralus</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/the_math_and_philosophy_behind_tool8217s_lateralus/#comment-4356165</link><description>Actually,  looks like the Greeks used it in their architecture.  So make that thousands of years.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:34:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Crom&amp;#8217;s Dog Tags</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/crom8217s_dog_tags/#comment-4356184</link><description>For some reason I ended up being more of a Thundar fan.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lords of Light!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 01:28:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Curiosity is the Receptor, Understanding is the Stimuli</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/curiosity_is_the_receptor_understanding_is_the_stimuli/#comment-4356189</link><description>"The more questions one has floating around in their mind at any given time, the more knowledge can be harvested from day to day experiences."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have to disagree with this.  The more questions floating around in ones head the more likely they are to not generate questions based on their immediate observations. Effectively, too many questions results in too much noise and not enough room for signal. As a result, very little ends up being harvested. Instead the most likely result is "knowledge" produced inside their mind rather than by exposure to day to day experiences. Self made knowledge is often inaccurate without the test of reality. If you have a million questions already in your head, and they fill your thoughts, you'll completely miss the opportunities to harvest knowledge from your day to day.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I argue that in order to most benefit from day to day exposure to data one must be able to generate questions quickly on the spot and at the time of exposure.  Going around with a head full of questions is likely to be a major distraction as it's inherently related to things not in front of you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's good to keep the "pump primed" so to speak, but I think the definition of curiosity is to generate questions quickly based on observation,  not to have them pre-fetched.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:57:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Curiosity is the Receptor, Understanding is the Stimuli</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/curiosity_is_the_receptor_understanding_is_the_stimuli/#comment-4356188</link><description>Hey Daniel,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry, now that I've had the chance to reread this post, I mis-spoke when saying we were in disagreement.  And the notion of having all of the questions already formed up in your head was clearly a figment of that prior misreading.  Not sure wth I was doing at the time, or if I was interrupted between reading and replying, but clearly I ended up on some alternate conversation.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 01:07:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My First Cool Idea</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/my_first_cool_idea/#comment-4356272</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If every "first" visit became a multiple query interrogation of the servers used to host the sites (versions, redirection testing, etc) before a host made a connection, you'd be wildly unpopular instantly I suspect.  If you think the dig effect is specular today, you'll have seen nothing yet.  This would essentially bring every new site under attack the first time it was popular.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you're a believer in a score based system, my guess is that only the escrow/trust system scales. Everyone doing it on their own simply doesn't scale.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 00:47:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Drummer</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/the_best_drummer/#comment-4356804</link><description>&lt;p&gt;With that hair..  he's got my vote.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 23:55:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dumping Intense Debate</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/dumping_intense_debate/#comment-4356904</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I preferred the peanut gallery =)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:47:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone Source Addresses</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/iphone_source_addresses/#comment-4357666</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Daniel,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;AT&amp;amp;T Wireless is AS 20057&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;You can see all of their announced prefixes here: &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;http://www.robtex.com/bgp/as20057.html&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;At least one of the prefixes you list above is Google.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;AS      | IP               | AS Name&lt;br&gt;15169   | 66.102.1.1       | GOOGLE - Google Inc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Depending on what you're using to build your access table, you may be able to just allow from the AT&amp;amp;T AS. Not sure if netfilter/iptables can work with Autonomous System Numbers or not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;-Dave&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:45:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Does Your Toilet Paper Roll Say About You?</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/what_does_your_toilet_paper_roll_say_about_you/#comment-11142781</link><description>It's all about dust on the roll.  Pull the paper towards you from the top and the dust stays on the paper until you deposit it on your rear.  Roll the paper away from you and the dust will be on the underside of the paper and more likely to fall.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-Dave..  A male with no dust on his ass.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 20:10:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Table Tennis: Getting Rocked</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/table_tennis_getting_rocked/#comment-11143617</link><description>I try to keep feet away from my bag at all costs.  Let's go with Hacky Sack.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 08:20:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Student vs. Competitor</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/student_vs_competitor/#comment-11143818</link><description>I would argue that you are focusing on what is most important.  You're understanding of the task.  I commend your integrity.  By the way, fuck winners, they just make the losers feel like shit so they can feel good for a second, all the while doing something that matters to nobody.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:46:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Student vs. Competitor</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/student_vs_competitor/#comment-11143822</link><description>I think the two are different parts of the equation though.  There's mastering the skill and then mastering the game.  Many people win the game but never master the skill.  That's almost always due to them competing against other non-skilled people.  They end up being the most skilled of the un-skilled.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think focusing on the skill shows dedication, and once you master the skill, the game becomes trivial.  Just like computing and everything else.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:15:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dilution of Pentesting</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/the_dilution_of_pentesting/#comment-11143837</link><description>I think you've just found the line between Analysts and Engineers.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A growing trend in security is to lower the costs of it.  Companies are starting to hire one or two Engineers and leave the rest of the work to Analysts.  Like the System Admin and Operator scenario.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry to spam the hell out of your blog today  =)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:09:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My First Personalized License Plate</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/my_first_personalized_license_plate/#comment-11143782</link><description>Probably better to use a project name like Gentoo and be confused for a penguin fan that name it after a project like &lt;a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/bacula" rel="nofollow"&gt;Bacula&lt;/a&gt; and be confused for a zoophile.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Main Entry: bac·u·lum&lt;br&gt;Pronunciation: 'bak-y&amp;amp;-l&amp;amp;m&lt;br&gt;Function: noun&lt;br&gt;Inflected Form: plural bac·u·lums /-l&amp;amp;mz/ or bac·u·la /-l&amp;amp;/&lt;br&gt;: a slender bone reinforcing the penis in many mammals</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 15:32:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chick-Fil-A</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/chick_fil_a/#comment-11148660</link><description>I suspect it's the pickle juice they presure cook the chicken in</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:15:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Linux: Harnessing The Über-Powerful Find Command (+xargs)</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/linux_harnessing_the_uber_powerful_find_command_xargs/#comment-11151055</link><description>Excellent stuf!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:29:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ten Weeks In NYC</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/ten_weeks_in_nyc/#comment-11151102</link><description>Get a t-shirt from the original CBGB before it closes for good.  They've lost their lease and a bit of Rock-nRoll history is going away.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cbgb.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.cbgb.com/&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 22:29:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10 Questions To Ask During An Information Security Interview</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/10_questions_to_ask_during_an_information_security_interview/#comment-11153302</link><description>"Don’t forget that security is mostly an attitude, or actually a way of life, and only secondly knowledge."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My favorite interview bonus question is "how many fire alarm levers did we pass on the way here?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'd hire someone who got every technical question wrong but answered that one even in the ball park.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-Dave</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:10:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Security Is Not A Technology Problem: Why Companies Need To Be Looking At Organizational Issues Instead Of Products</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/security_is_not_a_technology_problem_why_companies_need_to_be_looking_at_organizational_issues_inste/#comment-11156189</link><description>The issue of the organization standing "in the way" is more often an issue of perception.  Security folks (consultants, employees, etc) often assume that they've been tasked with the most critical task. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Make things safe".  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's rarely the case.  Most often, especially for consultants, you've been brought in to meet the requirement of "best effort" or "due diligence".  The goal for the company is to meet the invisible bar that determines if they've tried to secure their data or not.  Their goal is to remain profitable, not to secure anything.  If it costs too much or affects business too much,  whatever you feel needs to happen simply isn't going to happen. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's frustrating as hell, but 90% of the time, you're there because they *had* to have you come,  not because they wanted you to.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 13:27:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Security Is Not A Technology Problem: Why Companies Need To Be Looking At Organizational Issues Instead Of Products</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/security_is_not_a_technology_problem_why_companies_need_to_be_looking_at_organizational_issues_inste/#comment-11156192</link><description>Management comes to the security team to ask what happened almost always only because they'll be asked what happened.  If they ask, and it becomes apparent that it was a persons direct fault, they have someone to fire/blame.  If they ask and there's no one to fire,  they at least can answer the questions they'll receive. If they're asked and cant answer,  they'll be the ones fired.  It's mostly CYA, rarely FYI.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only empowered security teams I've *ever* worked with were ones who worked for organizations that had suffered serious loss due to an incident.  All the rest were there to go through the motions. If securing the network/product/servers was going to be more expensive than deemed profitable,  they were generally nerfed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's bullshit,  but true.  =(&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have heard of some orgs in the financial sector who operate on the idea that they only want to hear of their competitors incidents and never their own,  but I've not met these people first hand.   They're usually spoken about in the same context as unicorns and dragons =(</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 14:36:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Get Static Networking Up In Linux From The Command Line</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/how_to_get_static_networking_up_in_linux_from_the_command_line/#comment-11156525</link><description>Don't forget step 0, identifying which interface you need to use as your argument to ifconfig.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;$ dmesg | grep eth[0-9]</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 02:17:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Grandfather</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/my_grandfather/#comment-11156674</link><description>Sorry to hear of your loss Daniel.  Thanks for sharing some memories of him with the rest of us. You've painted the picture of a great man, sounds like the people who knew him were lucky to have.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;-Dave</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:55:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Portknocking Real Security?</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/is_portknocking_real_security/#comment-11156999</link><description>Hi Daniel,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You're an absolute saint for rolling around in piles of logic with people all the time.  Sadly it never seems to stick to some people. They simply 'd|w'on't get it =(&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You're absolutely correct about the merit of portknocking. We argued weather it was authentication or authorization when the paper was first published, but not weather or not it was part of security.  Being two, hard headed, "security by philosophy" type people, that should've been your first clue you were right about it bing valuable.  For sure one of us would have been arguing that it's just a bad idea.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This guys argument to you is that camouflage is ineffective. That all someone has to do is watch for you to put on your gille suit then follow where you move to.  If someone is able to watch you do your knock sequence, you have more serious issues at hand.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;-Dave</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:10:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Resonance Of Understanding</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/the_resonance_of_understanding/#comment-11157087</link><description>Ummmm,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've been drinking beers all day so I'm not completely sure.  But did you just describe the secret that oprah is pimping?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 03:06:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Resonance Of Understanding</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/the_resonance_of_understanding/#comment-11157090</link><description>Haha,  but it's about oscillations and what not.  I'm hip to the idea you're getting across though. Groovy  =)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 03:18:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why It&amp;#8217;s Sometimes Immoral To Treat The Poor and Uneducated As Equals (A Libertarian Essay)</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/why_it8217s_sometimes_immoral_to_treat_the_poor_and_uneducated_as_equals_a_libertarian_essay/#comment-11158184</link><description>"You can’t purchase cigarettes or cooked meat with food stamps."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Having grown up here, where ~25% of the population receives food stamps  (including my family at the time), I can tell you that you're mistaken.  You can purchase almost anything with food stamps.  What I suspect you meant to say was that you're not &lt;i&gt;supposed&lt;/i&gt;  to be able to.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Worse, that's inside the store.  Outside, you can buy literally anything. Drugs, guns, blowjobs, whatever, at roughly 50 cents on the dollar.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's a funny thing rules, only the "haves" follow them.  The "have not's" could give a fuck.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:37:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why It&amp;#8217;s Sometimes Immoral To Treat The Poor and Uneducated As Equals (A Libertarian Essay)</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/why_it8217s_sometimes_immoral_to_treat_the_poor_and_uneducated_as_equals_a_libertarian_essay/#comment-11158186</link><description>The "here" listed above was supposed to be a link to here:  &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary%2C_Indiana" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary,_Indiana&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:38:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On A Short Holiday</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/on_a_short_holiday/#comment-11159765</link><description>Aloha</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 21:26:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Best Metal Bands Of All Time</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/best_metal_bands_of_all_time/#comment-11160354</link><description>Metal</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 14:10:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Best Metal Bands Of All Time</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/best_metal_bands_of_all_time/#comment-11160366</link><description>Your site likes to eat chunks of my posts =(&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyway...   hardcore is where it's at. All the cool kids are rocking it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And for your listening pleasure I present the Cro-Mags. Best hardcore band, ever.  Their first and best album, Age of Quarrel, Free..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cromags.com/music.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.cromags.com/music.html&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's what I grew up on, and it blows all the bands you listed out of the water.  Sorry,  but it's true.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 15:00:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How I Became An Atheist</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/how_i_became_an_atheist/#comment-11160875</link><description>I agree,  well written posts.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One thing that has always puzzled me about atheism though is the need to proclaim the lack of belief.  I am a non-believer, or a person without faith, heretic, whatever it's called.  I have been all of my life.  I have never once had the urge to share my non-belief with anyone though. To me religion has always been what seemed to be mostly a fairly tail with a bunch of social impacts tied to it.  It has always seemed to me that anyone, whether citing their beliefs or non-beliefs , is usually selling something. To me the measure of true disbelief has always seemed to be never discussing the topic outside of its affect on society. Personal declarations on the topic usually look to me like someone who cares about the idea way too much.  Just like the tooth fairy,  I couldn't care less who believes in it or not.  I care so little about it that discussing the tooth fairy at all seems like a huge waste of time to me.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So I commend your writing here, it was a good read as far as reading goes.  I urge you to return to writing about more important stuff like technology though.  Your great writing skills serve the world much better when you spend time applying them to things that matter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;-Dave&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;PS.  You know the drill when it comes to stuff I say.  I'm not trying to be a dick.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 20:39:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How I Became An Atheist</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/how_i_became_an_atheist/#comment-11160880</link><description>I don't think I'd agree with you that religion does more and more harm. I'd probably argue that it's currently doing less harm than it has in the past. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you think it impacts your life enough, has screwed up your plans for scouting, or just care that much, then rock on.  Perhaps a person or two will listen.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the meantime,  I'd still say your technical topics serve more of humanity in a beneficial way.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;-Dave</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 23:30:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Link Could Have Been Anything [Reddit Spam Issue]</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/this_link_could_have_been_anything_reddit_spam_issue/#comment-11161106</link><description>"Quit being so polite - it’s not a job interview."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Haha.. dunno if you've ever watched Daniel wrestle the bottom feeders at &lt;a href="http://dslreports.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://dslreports.com&lt;/a&gt; or not,  but Daniel is always very well behaved.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hell, he didn't even tell you to eat a dick for your bullshit comments above.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 19:44:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: So I&amp;#8217;m Trying To Learn How To Drink Beer</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/so_i8217m_trying_to_learn_how_to_drink_beer/#comment-11161297</link><description>Beer is an acquired taste.  Know that now.  Also, for the record, you started with the boldest variety of beer made. Probably a poor choice for popping your cherry on.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's two main techniques/types to making beer, Ales (brewed at room temp) and Lagers (Brewed in a chilled environment).  Most of the beers in the world are Ales. The one you chose, a porter, is the boldest.  In order of flavor would probably be something like this.. (keep in mind that there's a TON of over lap).  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;From light to dark, or mild to rich: Pilsner, Pale, Golden, Tan, Brown, Dark, Stout, Porter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another thing to keep in mind is that for each of these, there's also a galaxy of variety in the bitterness.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If I had to recommend a decent starter beer for someone it would probably be a nice golden ale like Red Hook ESB. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good luck and have fun, beer is a great thing, and something great minds have enjoyed since before humans had written language.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers!&lt;br&gt;-Dave</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:28:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: So I&amp;#8217;m Trying To Learn How To Drink Beer</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/so_i8217m_trying_to_learn_how_to_drink_beer/#comment-11161308</link><description>I was pretty sure Papazian listed them with Porter last, but it's been 10 years since I've checked his book.  So I checked the wikipedia.  Interstingly it says there's no difference at all but symantecly. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porter_%28beer" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porter_(beer&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can certainly live with that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 01:06:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Johnny Dep Gets Entertained On A Japanese TV Show</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/johnny_dep_gets_entertained_on_a_japanese_tv_show/#comment-11161494</link><description>Daniel my friend.  I suspect we're all better off just leaving that to be seen only on Japanese TV.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 02:20:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: IM: Gtalk &amp;#8211;&gt; AIM</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/im_gtalk_8211_aim/#comment-11161571</link><description>IS Gtalk a fancy name for Jabber?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:56:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: People That Scare Me</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/people_that_scare_me/#comment-11161944</link><description>I've been in the habit of saying "dub dub dub".</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 19:41:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You&amp;#8217;ll Be Hearing About This</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/you8217ll_be_hearing_about_this/#comment-11162106</link><description>This looks like variation of line dancing or stomping, something that's been popular in black culture for thousands of years.  Kids in Gary had been doing this forever and mutated it into a bunch of different stuff.  Double dutch for example.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When it comes to dance,  in most cases whitey will always be imitating.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 20:31:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone: Initial Thoughts</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/iphone_initial_thoughts/#comment-11162340</link><description>Thanks for sharing Daniel,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Glad to hear a review from someone I actually know for sure doesn't work for Apple.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;-Dave</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 16:54:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Was This Necessary?</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/was_this_necessary/#comment-11162782</link><description>Why would it not be?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Or did you mean the death of his father?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:40:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Difference Between Web 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/the_difference_between_web_10_20_and_30/#comment-11162805</link><description>Why can't crypto as an underlying design element be part of the idea?  We're ok with other design elements being a core piece of what makes it Web 2.0 or 3.0 or 4.0 whatever. How about, instead of just Web 3.0 is the semantic web where data is labeled and sexy, we make it Web 3.0 is the semantic web where data is labeled and sexy and secure?  We're just labeling a method of working with data.  There's no reason at all security can't be considered an underlying design element of the idea.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 00:26:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Was This Necessary?</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/was_this_necessary/#comment-11162785</link><description>"To use this picture as anti-war material is reminiscent of true propaganda."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Absolutely agreed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As a Marine, I can assure everyone that the father of that boy knew full well and accepted the potential for that moment. I considered it, as does everyone when they agree to take on the obligation of picking up a rifle. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is the photograph touching? Yes it is. &lt;br&gt;Is the tradition of presenting the flag to the "man" of the family necessary?  In a warrior culture, like that of the Marine Corps, it is deemed to be. And I don't disagree.&lt;br&gt;What I would question the necessity of, is people posting this image all over the place. Making that moment into something other than the commemoration of a warrior is a tragedy in my opinion.  Doing so doesn't help the child, doesn't change the outcome, and doesn't mean we don't need people like the Marine who's funeral we're seeing to volunteer to do the horrible things most are afraid to do. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am not a fan of the war, but I strongly believe that the people who are trying to use the funerals of our fallen warriors as anything but a respectful ceremony are seriously hurting our nation.  Regardless of opinion, the truth is that we *need* people to do the job of our military.  If we mock them, they won't come.  Daniel,  surely as a veteran you must know this reality.  I really hope you aren't trying to use this photo like that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:41:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s Time to Drop the &amp;#8220;www&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/it8217s_time_to_drop_the_8220www8221/#comment-11163205</link><description>Agreed typing "http://"  is also superfluous.  As is adding "as well" after "also" =)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Grammar lunacy aside..  If people type &lt;a href="http://" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://&lt;/a&gt; it's a probably good thing. That likely means they also type &lt;a href="https://" rel="nofollow"&gt;https://&lt;/a&gt;. Which is something we all should be doing when we want to make sure ssl comes into play. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Far too many people get hit by the assumption that even though the page they're visiting was delivered to them by http, that the login forms on the page will use https.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:20:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 34</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/34/#comment-11163677</link><description>Congrats on making it another year.  =)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 22:01:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pack Light</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/pack_light/#comment-11165159</link><description>I've seen mIRC bots with more capability than this.   =(&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It must suck thinking you're cool when all you can muster is blog spam.  Maybe we'll stop by and say hello while you're working your shift at the dollar store.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 21:37:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Saying No To &amp;#8220;www&amp;#8221;: A Fortune 50 Company Analysis</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/saying_no_to_8220www8221_a_fortune_50_company_analysis/#comment-11165419</link><description>grep ^y fortune&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;=)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:08:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Paying People To Be Good Parents</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/paying_people_to_be_good_parents/#comment-11166755</link><description>Welfare by another name. The difference here is that it allows for a market response rather than a government response.  It's more successful to let people choose their own doctor and pay for it themselves than it is to use the same money (and probably more) to build a clinic because the doctors have to compete and the clinic doesn't.  Competition again shows itself to be valuable.  Don't get too distracted by the notion that the parents should be "taking care of their kids" anyway, that's not the main point. The same argument can be said of any kind of assistance, public or private. The "for the sake of the kids" part is just to make less people complain that New York is trying to change its public assistance program to one that allows market competition.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 18:55:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Glen Danzig Does Reading Rainbow</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/glen_danzig_does_reading_rainbow/#comment-11167858</link><description>My favorite Danzig video:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htnBi5TH5g8" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htnBi5TH5g8&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 21:41:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Math and Philosophy Behind Tool&amp;#8217;s Lateralus</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/the_math_and_philosophy_behind_tool8217s_lateralus/#comment-11168081</link><description>This sequence is very popular in music and film. All of the Stanley Kubrick are supposed to be using it as well.  They call it the "Golden Ratio".  Many artists believe it is the secret to successful art. If you look, there are dances, paintings, music, and movies that all use it. Tool is doing what mathematically aware artists have been doing for a few hundred years, and mother nature since the beginning of time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 11:03:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Math and Philosophy Behind Tool&amp;#8217;s Lateralus</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/the_math_and_philosophy_behind_tool8217s_lateralus/#comment-11168083</link><description>Actually,  looks like the Greeks used it in their architecture.  So make that thousands of years.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:34:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Crom&amp;#8217;s Dog Tags</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/crom8217s_dog_tags/#comment-11168130</link><description>For some reason I ended up being more of a Thundar fan.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lords of Light!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 01:28:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Curiosity is the Receptor, Understanding is the Stimuli</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/curiosity_is_the_receptor_understanding_is_the_stimuli/#comment-11168176</link><description>"The more questions one has floating around in their mind at any given time, the more knowledge can be harvested from day to day experiences."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have to disagree with this.  The more questions floating around in ones head the more likely they are to not generate questions based on their immediate observations. Effectively, too many questions results in too much noise and not enough room for signal. As a result, very little ends up being harvested. Instead the most likely result is "knowledge" produced inside their mind rather than by exposure to day to day experiences. Self made knowledge is often inaccurate without the test of reality. If you have a million questions already in your head, and they fill your thoughts, you'll completely miss the opportunities to harvest knowledge from your day to day.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I argue that in order to most benefit from day to day exposure to data one must be able to generate questions quickly on the spot and at the time of exposure.  Going around with a head full of questions is likely to be a major distraction as it's inherently related to things not in front of you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's good to keep the "pump primed" so to speak, but I think the definition of curiosity is to generate questions quickly based on observation,  not to have them pre-fetched.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:57:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Curiosity is the Receptor, Understanding is the Stimuli</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/curiosity_is_the_receptor_understanding_is_the_stimuli/#comment-11168177</link><description>Hey Daniel,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry, now that I've had the chance to reread this post, I mis-spoke when saying we were in disagreement.  And the notion of having all of the questions already formed up in your head was clearly a figment of that prior misreading.  Not sure wth I was doing at the time, or if I was interrupted between reading and replying, but clearly I ended up on some alternate conversation.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 01:07:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My First Cool Idea</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/my_first_cool_idea/#comment-11168839</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If every "first" visit became a multiple query interrogation of the servers used to host the sites (versions, redirection testing, etc) before a host made a connection, you'd be wildly unpopular instantly I suspect.  If you think the dig effect is specular today, you'll have seen nothing yet.  This would essentially bring every new site under attack the first time it was popular.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you're a believer in a score based system, my guess is that only the escrow/trust system scales. Everyone doing it on their own simply doesn't scale.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 00:47:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Drummer</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/the_best_drummer/#comment-11171962</link><description>&lt;p&gt;With that hair..  he's got my vote.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 23:55:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dumping Intense Debate</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/dumping_intense_debate/#comment-11172730</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I preferred the peanut gallery =)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:47:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone Source Addresses</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/iphone_source_addresses/#comment-11179084</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Daniel,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;AT&amp;amp;T Wireless is AS 20057&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;You can see all of their announced prefixes here: &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;http://www.robtex.com/bgp/as20057.html&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;At least one of the prefixes you list above is Google.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;AS      | IP               | AS Name&lt;br&gt;15169   | 66.102.1.1       | GOOGLE - Google Inc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Depending on what you're using to build your access table, you may be able to just allow from the AT&amp;amp;T AS. Not sure if netfilter/iptables can work with Autonomous System Numbers or not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;-Dave&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:45:27 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>