<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Paulr</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/a2e3f9e0871418c22bdc2d4755800ef0/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:44:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Middle-aged Aussies and Social Media &amp;ndash; report</title><link>http://bcr.disqus.com/middle_aged_aussies_and_social_media_ndash_report/#comment-22700843</link><description>Nice work Lee. Earlier this morning I read a posting on Steve Rubel's lifestream &lt;a href="http://www.steverubel.com/the-next-great-media-company-wont-have-a-web#comment" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.steverubel.com/the-next-great-media-...&lt;/a&gt; that takes a view on media that is similar to your view on advertising: connect with people over social networks. Ev&lt;br&gt;.-= Paul Roberts&amp;#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href="http://conem.wordpress.com/2009/09/08/trapped-girls-call-for-help-on-facebook/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Trapped girls call for help on Facebook&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paulr</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:44:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chronc Pain or Acute Pain - Newspapers or Online - Stocktwits or CNBC&amp;#8230;Marc Andreesen on Charlie Rose</title><link>http://howardlindzon.disqus.com/chronc_pain_or_acute_pain_newspapers_or_online_stocktwits_or_cnbc8230marc_andreesen_on_charlie_rose/#comment-6493453</link><description>Great interview. Marc's comments about defensive compared to offensive strategies are spot on. History repeats itself once more.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paulr</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 02:41:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Knew The Web Was Big</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/google_knew_the_web_was_big/#comment-1007940</link><description>1 zillion on the horizon</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paulr</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 08:01:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Gambles with Social Advertising &amp;#8212; Will It Pay Off?</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/facebook_gambles_with_social_advertising_8212_will_it_pay_off/#comment-1726375</link><description>News and information has gone 'social', why not advertising? As long as people get some value out of viral or social advertising, it should pay off.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paulr</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 19:40:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Starbucks To Close Over 70% Of Australian Stores</title><link>http://technationau.disqus.com/starbucks_to_close_over_70_of_australian_stores_12/#comment-1034471</link><description>Great. Standard of coffee in Oz on the rise again</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paulr</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:43:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Average Person Can&amp;#8217;t Figure Out Twitter</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/the_average_person_can8217t_figure_out_twitter/#comment-3438850</link><description>I use Twitter for two purposes: as another source of information, tapping into the rich and deep knowledge base of the 'masters of the web'; and toe experience living life online. it has its frustrations, but the weak relationships work for me just as much if not more than Twitter relationships with people I have met face-to-face.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paulr</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 23:43:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/06/29/less-is-more-unlock-the-web/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_6926/#comment-6009049</link><description>Great post Stan. I agree with that - in a networked society/economy - it is important to be influential in as many networks as possible. The easier it is for people to participate, network effects ramp-up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm new to Twitter (@conem) but so far I'm really impressed with the scope and reach of who I can connect with. Twitter crosses organisational, geographic and cultural barriers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To me, Twitter is about creating and sharing knowledge and news about events -it's more than a one-to-many short message broadcast. I decide on the level of my engagement. It's very easy to use.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can tolerate some technical problems, given the benefits.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paulr</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 17:08:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Can Do Your Job Without Twitter</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/you_can_do_your_job_without_twitter/#comment-8524796</link><description>Hey, great posting Chris. Love the comments too. Great stuff. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've looked at this from an attention and participation point of view. Media shapes and influences. Social media shapes and influences, but it includes us. Mainstream media directional. Social media is interactive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;See more in my blog posting &lt;a href="http://conem.wordpress.com/2008/09/18/could-i-do-my-job-without-twitter/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://conem.wordpress.com/2008/09/18/could-i-d...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paulr</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:06:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Template for Building a Small Powerful Network</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/template_for_building_a_small_powerful_network/#comment-8530847</link><description>Great ideas Chris, you are a legend. Time to get some action as well getting connected. Looks like many people are looking for more leverage from their online networks. We are on the cusp!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paulr</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 02:54:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>