<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Geoff Livingston</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/a2d75a74412d3ed5183fe70a8b674fe2/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 07:07:06 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: You Are Not Listening To Whispers</title><link>http://andrewhyde.disqus.com/you_are_not_listening_to_whispers/#comment-3603597</link><description>Listening only works if you act. How many times have you had some tell you they are sorry, then go and do the same thing again?  The synergy between and individual and a company apologizing are similar. And amends is not an apology. It involves action.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:58:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comment, Community, and/or Conversational Marketing, Will the Real CM Please Stand Up?</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/comment_community_andor_conversational_marketing_will_the_real_cm_please_stand_up/#comment-12370138</link><description>I'm not sure if its PR&amp;lt; or PR firms that don't understand human behavior.  Either way, I agree.  I think big firms take mass media approaches to individual bloggers, and pay the price. Or their clients pay the price.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:32:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Tools &amp;#8211; Twittervision, Twittersearch, Twitterholic</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/twitter_tools_8211_twittervision_twittersearch_twitterholic/#comment-12370229</link><description>Thanks for the heads up on this.  Will check it out.  How do you think this will impact current business blogs?&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;GL&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 22:04:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Geoff Livingston Interviews Me for Diary of an Ad Man</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/geoff_livingston_interviews_me_for_diary_of_an_ad_man/#comment-12370241</link><description>Thanks for the hat tip, Brian.  You are very kind.  '&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Keep up the great work.  You should definitely author a book.  I saw pollster Frank Luntz speak today on words and how they impact us, and as brilliant as he is, you could stand with him.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;GL&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 17:27:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Me This, Is Jaiku a Threat? Let&amp;#8217;s Ask Those Defining the Landscape</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/twitter_me_this_is_jaiku_a_threat_let8217s_ask_those_defining_the_landscape/#comment-12370253</link><description>Competition is good, so I think Jaiku enriches the marketplace with new options. Worse case scenario is that Twitter gets better.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Neither of these media forms really excites me though. Of course, that may mean I am reaching dotage or am becoming a Luddite.&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:23:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Robert Scoble Meets Hooman from Radio Alice 97.3 at Web 2.0 Expo</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/robert_scoble_meets_hooman_from_radio_alice_973_at_web_20_expo/#comment-12370270</link><description>Nothing like a little old fashioned lobby networking.  Old marketing methods + new media = superior results. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:48:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PRWeek Claims Industry Enters Age of PR 3.0 – They Couldn’t be More Wrong</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/prweek_claims_industry_enters_age_of_pr_30_they_couldnt_be_more_wrong/#comment-12370274</link><description>This seems to be a bandwagon move, or even one upmanship. I actually am not a big fan of PRSA as I feel it offers me little to no value as a practitioner. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Convincing people that our business has just been turned upside once (a.k.a. 2.0) has turned into a dogfight with my competing agency brethren as well as business owners locally in DC. People have a hard time grasping how much new media has changed PR, demanding a new level of transparency and openness.  They just don't get it.  &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can't imagine trying to push PR 3.0 given the reticence to join the current revolution...  Further 3.0 does not seem relevant to me. Unless Second Life pulls off a new miracle that is ;)&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:53:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PRWeek Claims Industry Enters Age of PR 3.0 – They Couldn’t be More Wrong</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/prweek_claims_industry_enters_age_of_pr_30_they_couldnt_be_more_wrong/#comment-12370279</link><description>You inspired me to write up the 3.0 gaff... &lt;a href="http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/blog/?p=249%3Cbr%3ESorry" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/blog/?p=249&lt;br&gt;Sorry&lt;/a&gt; about the PRSA snafu in my original comment.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;GL&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:17:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media Releases &amp;#8211; Everything You Ever Wanted to (or Should) Know</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/social_media_releases_8211_everything_you_ever_wanted_to_or_should_know_60/#comment-12370292</link><description>This is great stuff indeed.  Means quite a lot for the world... The question is will the average non-marketing joe be the disseminator?  If PR is out, who is in? And will they be functional?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 17:41:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media Killed the Video News Release Star</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/social_media_killed_the_video_news_release_star/#comment-12370299</link><description>It's time to get camera training. This should be a requirement for any communications school these days.   Good advice on balancing traditional programs with the new. Always poignant, Brian.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 23:46:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Evolution of Social Media Press Release Distribution and Technorati Tags</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/the_evolution_of_social_media_press_release_distribution_and_technorati_tags/#comment-12370010</link><description>Very well put together.  Seems like PRWeb is the best distribution outlet.  It would be great if more case studies were available.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 19:18:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why PR Doesn&amp;#8217;t Work and How to Fix It</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/why_pr_doesn8217t_work_and_how_to_fix_it/#comment-12370313</link><description>Ahh, the problem with PR people is that they're PR people!  They buy their own BS!  It seems to me the primary issue is relations, or lack there of.  Relating requires other-centric behavior in all things, and that's the antithesis of most PR firms activities. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;OK, oversimplifying the problem by a grand mile, but man what a bloody mess this industry is in.&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 12:50:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why PR Doesn&amp;#8217;t Work and How to Fix It</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/why_pr_doesn8217t_work_and_how_to_fix_it/#comment-12370321</link><description>I'm with Chris on this one.  Personally, the firm is slammed so we're hiring again, and I've gotten to the point where I really don't want agency people.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Re-training PR agency staffers is much more difficult than teaching the ropes to a  former journalist, blogger or recent college grad.  It's better to show them the new way from scratch rather than suffer through arguments about the merits of SPIN (Stupid PR Inserted in News).  SPIN stops information from being translated and hurts long-term relationships.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If Chris is right, then we've separated from the PR pack. In theory, we can't be called a PR agency. What will our agencies be dubbed?&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another $.02 delivered.&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 22:56:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Social Media Manifesto – Integrating Social Media into Marketing Communications</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/the_social_media_manifesto_integrating_social_media_into_marketing_communications/#comment-12370334</link><description>Favorite comment in all of this:&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"What does the future of integrated marketing and communications look like? It’s a mashup of new media and traditional media – all with the common goal of engaging people and influencers on their terms."&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And that' the real rub of social media.  As time passes users will no longer sit back and accept being dictated to, they'll demand the same type of dialogue (or extensions of it) in traditional media, too.  Traditional media will come to reflect new media. THe lines will blur...&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Brilliant as always.&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:34:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Social Media Manifesto – Integrating Social Media into Marketing Communications</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/the_social_media_manifesto_integrating_social_media_into_marketing_communications/#comment-12370345</link><description>Dear anonymous, me thinks thou protest too much. At least on this blog. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here's the deal. Brian's a PR guy. We as a breed seek earned opportunities, and the open forum you reference represents one of them. &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If a forum allows this content, then they must welcome it.  If they feel this content intrudes on them or editorial standards or the community, then they can always ask users to submit stories for consideration and review them.  They can also simply take Brian's post down. &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But beefing here -- especially "anonymously" -- makes no sense, and to be frank, means nothing to the referenced forum, its readers or to Brian's readers. Folks like me.&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 16:31:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PR and Social Media are Still Oil and Water</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/pr_and_social_media_are_still_oil_and_water/#comment-12370436</link><description>Good to see you back on social media and PR.  I am starting to see a break-out of social media agencies, which are separating themselves from PR firms.  My belief is that at least half of PR practitioners will never understand the medium, and this will require a different group of practitioners/service firms.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 15:23:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Building a Bridge Between Your Story, Bloggers, and People &amp;#8211; Part I</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/building_a_bridge_between_your_story_bloggers_and_people_8211_part_i/#comment-12370448</link><description>You da man.  Well done, my friend.  Love the advice on the A-Listers.  How true.  And to be frank, I think they read the more dedicated bloggers for source material.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Now is Gone Set to Publish in Late October</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/now_is_gone_set_to_publish_in_late_october/#comment-12370457</link><description>Don't listen to Brian. His contribution was significant, and dramatically impacted the direction of the book.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you, Brian, for this and all of  your help.&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 15:31:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media is About Sociology Not Technology</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/social_media_is_about_sociology_not_technology/#comment-12370471</link><description>You are the man.  This sociology concept came from the future of marketing post, and I love the continued expansion of it. Mazl tov.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anonymous = weak (maybe I should delete that fake caveman tweet I got going, oops). Seriously, I have little respect for someone who claims to be a pro but can't own the criticism with their own name.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 22:46:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Now is Gone Book Cover Ready to Print</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/now_is_gone_book_cover_ready_to_print/#comment-12370488</link><description>Brian is the man. Flat out. I was lucky enough to get him to participate.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22:46:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Conversational Marketing Versus Market Conversations</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/conversational_marketing_versus_market_conversations/#comment-12370544</link><description>F'ing fantastic post, Brian.  Right on.  I love it (going to tweet it). &lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's a self centered ethos to cos that they can just jump in and do what they want. But only by getting out of themselves and into the community can they become part of the  conversation.  Perhaps all social media marketers should read Dale Carnegie before even starting to read out here.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;GL&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 21:59:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Get a F#ck!ng Blog Already</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/get_a_fckng_blog_already/#comment-12370552</link><description>That's a ringer, ladies and gentleman.  Great post!!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:30:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The New Rules for Breaking News, Robert Scoble Should be in PR</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/the_new_rules_for_breaking_news_robert_scoble_should_be_in_pr/#comment-12370612</link><description>We do much more than PR in the classic sense of media relations, yet few folks really understand what PR is... &lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Brian, this post is outstanding and should be mandatory reading for anyone who is in our business. Lot's of cookies and though leadership. Great job, and thank you for sharing this info.&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:38:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MicroMedia Paves the Way for Macro Influence</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/micromedia_paves_the_way_for_macro_influence/#comment-12370632</link><description>Sometimes less is less.  Very, very true. And dinner is what you really crave when you have a snack.  Well done. Funny video, too.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:29:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PR Roundtable Discussion: Outing Bad PR</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/pr_roundtable_discussion_outing_bad_pr/#comment-12370656</link><description>Scary stuff.  I also think it has benefited us, but is irresponsible on the blogger's part.  Very gray matter ethically.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 22:45:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The New Rules of Breaking News, Beware of Embargoes</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/the_new_rules_of_breaking_news_beware_of_embargoes/#comment-12370670</link><description>Brian:&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Most PR firms don't have the guts to admit when something goes wrong.  But real leaders do because they know they, too, are human, and even better learn from these experiences.  Kudos, my friend.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am fascinated by the continuing blogger relations developments.  Personally, we need them, but at the same time know that we cannot have any of the same expectations of "journalistic" integrity from them.  It's a one by one case, as you say.  Everyone's got a six shooter, and can write what they want.&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:35:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Don&amp;#8217;t Throw Out that Social Media Rulebook Quite Yet</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/don8217t_throw_out_that_social_media_rulebook_quite_yet/#comment-12370728</link><description>Press release are not the best way to engage the media, in my experience.  Relationships with reporters, great customized pitches, and exclusives supersede spam and wire services.  I do see press releases as significant SEO vehicles with direct stakeholder impact.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great post, Brian.&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:41:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BrandWeek Runs My First Article: You Are the Online Brand in 2008</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/brandweek_runs_my_first_article_you_are_the_online_brand_in_2008/#comment-12370762</link><description>Congratulations, Brian.  This is big.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:48:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Evolution of Social Media Releases</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/the_evolution_of_social_media_releases/#comment-12370776</link><description>How's that cane treating you?  :P Good to see a vibrant discussion on SMRs again.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:06:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Get Rich Quick with Social Media Marketing</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/get_rich_quick_with_social_media_marketing/#comment-12370818</link><description>Yes,m it's pretty disappointing. Our hopes and dreams for a better marketing world  are not so bright because of this bad trend. But I think the media form(s) will carry the day.  Because this behavior and approach is anti-social, and I just believe it won't succeed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good post, Brian.&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:59:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Now is Gone is &amp;quot;Now&amp;quot; an Award Winning Book</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/now_is_gone_is_quotnowquot_an_award_winning_book/#comment-12370851</link><description>It feels pretty good, my man. We made it happen, we had a dream of supporting the incoming market with a service oriented, no BS book. And now we've been recognized for it.  Congratulations, Brian!  I think we did well.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 00:58:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Should I Read This? Is This the Future of Social Media Marketing?</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/how_should_i_read_this_is_this_the_future_of_social_media_marketing/#comment-12370932</link><description>That's why we like you, Mr. Brain.  Yer smart. ;) LOL. Yeah. PR is still PR unfortunately.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:53:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cultural Voyeurism and Social Media</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/cultural_voyeurism_and_social_media/#comment-12370935</link><description>Gutsy, post, my man. A great self-check barometer on this is how many comments are you dropping versus blog posts. Seriously, a great community member engages on other people's turf.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But more importantly, I think there's a a larger theme, which is outbound push is not enough in social networks.  Especially with blogs.  As you say, it's just not enough to set up camp outside the corporate walls.&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:01:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Making Mistakes in Social Media Marketing</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/making_mistakes_in_social_media_marketing/#comment-12370970</link><description>I'd agree with that, but at the same time, I think some mistakes are inevitable. It's still very new, and we are all learning. There will come a time when we all have our visible scars.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 22:43:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Making Mistakes and Amends in Blogger and Media Relations</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/making_mistakes_and_amends_in_blogger_and_media_relations/#comment-12371061</link><description>I agree amends should be made. As I was not privy to the scenario, I am sure you did the right thing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Devil's Advocate: I also think reporters and bloggers who accept pitches can be absolute tyrannical idiots with this stuff.  There's a two way street, but because we are PR, we will always get t the short end of the stick.  Sometimes I weigh the source, too.&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 12:38:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Now is Gone Celebrates First Anniversary</title><link>http://pr20.disqus.com/now_is_gone_celebrates_first_anniversary/#comment-12371516</link><description>It was an honor working with you on Now Is Gone.  Thank you for everything you did to make this a success.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 18:38:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comment, Community, and/or Conversational Marketing, Will the Real CM Please Stand Up?</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/comment_community_andor_conversational_marketing_will_the_real_cm_please_stand_up/#comment-12605137</link><description>I'm not sure if its PR&amp;lt; or PR firms that don't understand human behavior.  Either way, I agree.  I think big firms take mass media approaches to individual bloggers, and pay the price. Or their clients pay the price.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:32:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Tools &amp;#8211; Twittervision, Twittersearch, Twitterholic</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/twitter_tools_8211_twittervision_twittersearch_twitterholic/#comment-12605226</link><description>Thanks for the heads up on this.  Will check it out.  How do you think this will impact current business blogs?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;GL</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 22:04:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Geoff Livingston Interviews Me for Diary of an Ad Man</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/geoff_livingston_interviews_me_for_diary_of_an_ad_man/#comment-12605238</link><description>Thanks for the hat tip, Brian.  You are very kind.  '&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Keep up the great work.  You should definitely author a book.  I saw pollster Frank Luntz speak today on words and how they impact us, and as brilliant as he is, you could stand with him.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;GL</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 17:27:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Me This, Is Jaiku a Threat? Let&amp;#8217;s Ask Those Defining the Landscape</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/twitter_me_this_is_jaiku_a_threat_let8217s_ask_those_defining_the_landscape/#comment-12605251</link><description>Competition is good, so I think Jaiku enriches the marketplace with new options. Worse case scenario is that Twitter gets better.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Neither of these media forms really excites me though. Of course, that may mean I am reaching dotage or am becoming a Luddite.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:23:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Robert Scoble Meets Hooman from Radio Alice 97.3 at Web 2.0 Expo</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/robert_scoble_meets_hooman_from_radio_alice_973_at_web_20_expo/#comment-12605268</link><description>Nothing like a little old fashioned lobby networking.  Old marketing methods + new media = superior results. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:48:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PRWeek Claims Industry Enters Age of PR 3.0 – They Couldn’t be More Wrong</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/prweek_claims_industry_enters_age_of_pr_30_they_couldnt_be_more_wrong/#comment-12605273</link><description>This seems to be a bandwagon move, or even one upmanship. I actually am not a big fan of PRSA as I feel it offers me little to no value as a practitioner. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Convincing people that our business has just been turned upside once (a.k.a. 2.0) has turned into a dogfight with my competing agency brethren as well as business owners locally in DC. People have a hard time grasping how much new media has changed PR, demanding a new level of transparency and openness.  They just don't get it.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I can't imagine trying to push PR 3.0 given the reticence to join the current revolution...  Further 3.0 does not seem relevant to me. Unless Second Life pulls off a new miracle that is ;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:53:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PRWeek Claims Industry Enters Age of PR 3.0 – They Couldn’t be More Wrong</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/prweek_claims_industry_enters_age_of_pr_30_they_couldnt_be_more_wrong/#comment-12605279</link><description>You inspired me to write up the 3.0 gaff... &lt;a href="http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/blog/?p=249%3Cbr" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/blog/?p=249&amp;lt;br&lt;/a&gt; /&amp;gt;Sorry about the PRSA snafu in my original comment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;GL</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:17:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media Releases &amp;#8211; Everything You Ever Wanted to (or Should) Know</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/social_media_releases_8211_everything_you_ever_wanted_to_or_should_know_81/#comment-12605294</link><description>This is great stuff indeed.  Means quite a lot for the world... The question is will the average non-marketing joe be the disseminator?  If PR is out, who is in? And will they be functional?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 17:41:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media Killed the Video News Release Star</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/social_media_killed_the_video_news_release_star/#comment-12605302</link><description>It's time to get camera training. This should be a requirement for any communications school these days.   Good advice on balancing traditional programs with the new. Always poignant, Brian.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 23:46:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Evolution of Social Media Press Release Distribution and Technorati Tags</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/the_evolution_of_social_media_press_release_distribution_and_technorati_tags/#comment-12604961</link><description>Very well put together.  Seems like PRWeb is the best distribution outlet.  It would be great if more case studies were available.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 19:18:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why PR Doesn&amp;#8217;t Work and How to Fix It</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/why_pr_doesn8217t_work_and_how_to_fix_it/#comment-12605316</link><description>Ahh, the problem with PR people is that they're PR people!  They buy their own BS!  It seems to me the primary issue is relations, or lack there of.  Relating requires other-centric behavior in all things, and that's the antithesis of most PR firms activities. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;OK, oversimplifying the problem by a grand mile, but man what a bloody mess this industry is in.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 12:50:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why PR Doesn&amp;#8217;t Work and How to Fix It</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/why_pr_doesn8217t_work_and_how_to_fix_it/#comment-12605324</link><description>I'm with Chris on this one.  Personally, the firm is slammed so we're hiring again, and I've gotten to the point where I really don't want agency people.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Re-training PR agency staffers is much more difficult than teaching the ropes to a  former journalist, blogger or recent college grad.  It's better to show them the new way from scratch rather than suffer through arguments about the merits of SPIN (Stupid PR Inserted in News).  SPIN stops information from being translated and hurts long-term relationships.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If Chris is right, then we've separated from the PR pack. In theory, we can't be called a PR agency. What will our agencies be dubbed?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Another $.02 delivered.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 22:56:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Social Media Manifesto – Integrating Social Media into Marketing Communications</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/the_social_media_manifesto_integrating_social_media_into_marketing_communications/#comment-12605341</link><description>Favorite comment in all of this:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"What does the future of integrated marketing and communications look like? It’s a mashup of new media and traditional media – all with the common goal of engaging people and influencers on their terms."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And that' the real rub of social media.  As time passes users will no longer sit back and accept being dictated to, they'll demand the same type of dialogue (or extensions of it) in traditional media, too.  Traditional media will come to reflect new media. THe lines will blur...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Brilliant as always.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:34:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Social Media Manifesto – Integrating Social Media into Marketing Communications</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/the_social_media_manifesto_integrating_social_media_into_marketing_communications/#comment-12605352</link><description>Dear anonymous, me thinks thou protest too much. At least on this blog. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here's the deal. Brian's a PR guy. We as a breed seek earned opportunities, and the open forum you reference represents one of them. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If a forum allows this content, then they must welcome it.  If they feel this content intrudes on them or editorial standards or the community, then they can always ask users to submit stories for consideration and review them.  They can also simply take Brian's post down. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But beefing here -- especially "anonymously" -- makes no sense, and to be frank, means nothing to the referenced forum, its readers or to Brian's readers. Folks like me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 16:31:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PR and Social Media are Still Oil and Water</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/pr_and_social_media_are_still_oil_and_water/#comment-12605453</link><description>Good to see you back on social media and PR.  I am starting to see a break-out of social media agencies, which are separating themselves from PR firms.  My belief is that at least half of PR practitioners will never understand the medium, and this will require a different group of practitioners/service firms.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 15:23:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Building a Bridge Between Your Story, Bloggers, and People &amp;#8211; Part I</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/building_a_bridge_between_your_story_bloggers_and_people_8211_part_i/#comment-12605465</link><description>You da man.  Well done, my friend.  Love the advice on the A-Listers.  How true.  And to be frank, I think they read the more dedicated bloggers for source material.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Now is Gone Set to Publish in Late October</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/now_is_gone_set_to_publish_in_late_october/#comment-12605476</link><description>Don't listen to Brian. His contribution was significant, and dramatically impacted the direction of the book.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thank you, Brian, for this and all of  your help.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 15:31:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media is About Sociology Not Technology</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/social_media_is_about_sociology_not_technology/#comment-12605490</link><description>You are the man.  This sociology concept came from the future of marketing post, and I love the continued expansion of it. Mazl tov.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Anonymous = weak (maybe I should delete that fake caveman tweet I got going, oops). Seriously, I have little respect for someone who claims to be a pro but can't own the criticism with their own name.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;LOL</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 22:46:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Now is Gone Book Cover Ready to Print</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/now_is_gone_book_cover_ready_to_print/#comment-12605511</link><description>Brian is the man. Flat out. I was lucky enough to get him to participate.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22:46:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Conversational Marketing Versus Market Conversations</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/conversational_marketing_versus_market_conversations/#comment-12605574</link><description>F'ing fantastic post, Brian.  Right on.  I love it (going to tweet it). &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There's a self centered ethos to cos that they can just jump in and do what they want. But only by getting out of themselves and into the community can they become part of the  conversation.  Perhaps all social media marketers should read Dale Carnegie before even starting to read out here.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cheers,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;GL</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 21:59:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Get a F#ck!ng Blog Already</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/get_a_fckng_blog_already/#comment-12605582</link><description>That's a ringer, ladies and gentleman.  Great post!!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:30:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The New Rules for Breaking News, Robert Scoble Should be in PR</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/the_new_rules_for_breaking_news_robert_scoble_should_be_in_pr/#comment-12605653</link><description>We do much more than PR in the classic sense of media relations, yet few folks really understand what PR is... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Brian, this post is outstanding and should be mandatory reading for anyone who is in our business. Lot's of cookies and though leadership. Great job, and thank you for sharing this info.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:38:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MicroMedia Paves the Way for Macro Influence</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/micromedia_paves_the_way_for_macro_influence/#comment-12605676</link><description>Sometimes less is less.  Very, very true. And dinner is what you really crave when you have a snack.  Well done. Funny video, too.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:29:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PR Roundtable Discussion: Outing Bad PR</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/pr_roundtable_discussion_outing_bad_pr/#comment-12605701</link><description>Scary stuff.  I also think it has benefited us, but is irresponsible on the blogger's part.  Very gray matter ethically.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 22:45:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The New Rules of Breaking News, Beware of Embargoes</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/the_new_rules_of_breaking_news_beware_of_embargoes/#comment-12605715</link><description>Brian:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Most PR firms don't have the guts to admit when something goes wrong.  But real leaders do because they know they, too, are human, and even better learn from these experiences.  Kudos, my friend.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I am fascinated by the continuing blogger relations developments.  Personally, we need them, but at the same time know that we cannot have any of the same expectations of "journalistic" integrity from them.  It's a one by one case, as you say.  Everyone's got a six shooter, and can write what they want.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:35:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Don&amp;#8217;t Throw Out that Social Media Rulebook Quite Yet</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/don8217t_throw_out_that_social_media_rulebook_quite_yet/#comment-12605780</link><description>Press release are not the best way to engage the media, in my experience.  Relationships with reporters, great customized pitches, and exclusives supersede spam and wire services.  I do see press releases as significant SEO vehicles with direct stakeholder impact.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Great post, Brian.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:41:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BrandWeek Runs My First Article: You Are the Online Brand in 2008</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/brandweek_runs_my_first_article_you_are_the_online_brand_in_2008/#comment-12605817</link><description>Congratulations, Brian.  This is big.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:48:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Evolution of Social Media Releases</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/the_evolution_of_social_media_releases/#comment-12605831</link><description>How's that cane treating you?  :P Good to see a vibrant discussion on SMRs again.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:06:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Get Rich Quick with Social Media Marketing</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/get_rich_quick_with_social_media_marketing/#comment-12605878</link><description>Yes,m it's pretty disappointing. Our hopes and dreams for a better marketing world  are not so bright because of this bad trend. But I think the media form(s) will carry the day.  Because this behavior and approach is anti-social, and I just believe it won't succeed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Good post, Brian.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:59:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Now is Gone is &amp;quot;Now&amp;quot; an Award Winning Book</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/now_is_gone_is_quotnowquot_an_award_winning_book/#comment-12605916</link><description>It feels pretty good, my man. We made it happen, we had a dream of supporting the incoming market with a service oriented, no BS book. And now we've been recognized for it.  Congratulations, Brian!  I think we did well.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 00:58:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Should I Read This? Is This the Future of Social Media Marketing?</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/how_should_i_read_this_is_this_the_future_of_social_media_marketing/#comment-12606002</link><description>That's why we like you, Mr. Brain.  Yer smart. ;) LOL. Yeah. PR is still PR unfortunately.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:53:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cultural Voyeurism and Social Media</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/cultural_voyeurism_and_social_media/#comment-12606006</link><description>Gutsy, post, my man. A great self-check barometer on this is how many comments are you dropping versus blog posts. Seriously, a great community member engages on other people's turf.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But more importantly, I think there's a a larger theme, which is outbound push is not enough in social networks.  Especially with blogs.  As you say, it's just not enough to set up camp outside the corporate walls.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:01:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Making Mistakes in Social Media Marketing</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/making_mistakes_in_social_media_marketing/#comment-12606045</link><description>I'd agree with that, but at the same time, I think some mistakes are inevitable. It's still very new, and we are all learning. There will come a time when we all have our visible scars.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 22:43:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Making Mistakes and Amends in Blogger and Media Relations</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/making_mistakes_and_amends_in_blogger_and_media_relations/#comment-12606145</link><description>I agree amends should be made. As I was not privy to the scenario, I am sure you did the right thing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Devil's Advocate: I also think reporters and bloggers who accept pitches can be absolute tyrannical idiots with this stuff.  There's a two way street, but because we are PR, we will always get t the short end of the stick.  Sometimes I weigh the source, too.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 12:38:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Now is Gone Celebrates First Anniversary</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/now_is_gone_celebrates_first_anniversary/#comment-12606626</link><description>It was an honor working with you on Now Is Gone.  Thank you for everything you did to make this a success.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 18:38:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Launch Memphis, Sarah Lacy, Geoff Livingston, Social Networking, Wait for Daddy,</title><link>http://buckdaddysblog.disqus.com/launch_memphis_sarah_lacy_geoff_livingston_social_networking_wait_for_daddy/#comment-17778084</link><description>Buck:&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It was a pleasure meeting you.  Keep the faith, keep blogging, and see you again soon, online or off.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Geoff&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:37:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Freshly Squeezed Edition of Five in the Morning</title><link>http://freshpeel.disqus.com/freshly_squeezed_edition_of_five_in_the_morning/#comment-20075837</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Darn, I was hoping to become a generic brand, or really anything but a brand.  Thanks for the hard work, Steve.  Congratulations on your success, which has caused this departure.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;This comment was originally posted on &lt;a href="http://brandimpact.wordpress.com/2009/03/06/five-in-the-morning-finale/#comment-9666" rel="nofollow" title="“Five in the Morning - Finale”"&gt;StickyFigure&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff Livingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 07:07:06 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>