<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for jchurch</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/a1ef3ae375cca956e96a64e8e2f07e16/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 02:54:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; The Experimental Open Mic Friday</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/ohgizmo_raquo_archive_raquo_the_experimental_open_mic_friday/#comment-1758604</link><description>The $60 million figuer came from assuming that Rose owned 30% of Digg. And then, assuming that Digg could be worth $200 million. The article suggests that the $200 figure is just plain crazy. But you know something, something is worth as much as someone is willing to pay for it. Murdoch paid $500 or so millions for MySpace. So, despite no real business model, that?s how much MySpace is worth.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If someone is willing to pay $200 million for Digg, then that?s what it?s worth. Sure, at this point, it may not generate much more than $3 million a year, but people are wiolling to pay for potential. And, to be able to reach more than a million ppl daily, to be able to shift public opinion? thjat?s priceless for some.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jchurch</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 02:54:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>