Disqus - Latest Comments for Winace

Re: Channel Lines: plagarism

Winace — Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:19:25 -0000

Good deal, probably shouldn't mention that here though, not with the SEC lurking! Hope things go well for you. Won't say good luck, cause we know luck is for suckers!

----- Reply message -----

Re: Channel Lines: plagarism

Winace — Sun, 28 Nov 2010 22:45:42 -0000

I hear ya man. Sup Z?

----- Reply message -----

Re: Channel Lines: plagarism

Winace — Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:56:43 -0000

I'll see what I can do!

Sent from my HTC on the Now Network from Sprint!

----- Reply message -----

Re: Channel Lines: plagarism

Winace — Wed, 06 Oct 2010 00:07:04 -0000

It's true, although, everything said regarding the market is true, at one point or another. You will find anything, at any given time, that backs what you feel subconsciously. All feelings aside, I also believe being heavily weighted delta negative is the place to be. On the other hand, I've been delta negative for some time and will be adding if we break a 1yr high. I'm playing by the book, and apparently they are giving a glimpses of that book. They did leave one red arrow out though. They were fooled on one of the most recent arrows, there was one prior to that which they left out, but that wouldn't make for a good read, would it?

Sent from my HTC on the Now Network from Sprint!

----- Reply message -----

Re: Channel Lines: plagarism

Winace — Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:53:42 -0000

All is good, thanks for stopping in!

----- Reply message -----

Re: Fascinating Fibs

Winace — Wed, 07 Jul 2010 22:09:53 -0000

BTW, long BP @ 27.00, coincidental entry, only got 1 lot long. Was hoping for it to deteriorate more before recovery. Once 33.85 is taken out, any movement in BP will be sporadic and pure speculation on anyones part. The smart money should be dumping it on your average Joe at this 33.84/33.85 area. We may chop there while it is unloaded.

Re: Fascinating Fibs

Winace — Wed, 07 Jul 2010 22:03:14 -0000

Sup Hiker? Watch BP's reaction to 33.84/33.85, should be a nice level of resistance. I will be selling to close at that level. Just a hunch ;-)

Re: Fascinating Fibs

Winace — Wed, 07 Jul 2010 21:56:22 -0000

Sup Crowder! ;-)

Re: Five Days. Fifty Percent Loss.

Winace — Wed, 07 Jul 2010 21:52:59 -0000

If we trade up, watch for BP to hit 33.84/33.85 before we "potentially" turn down. If we trade down, watch for QQQQ to hit 41.10 before we "potentially" move up. Slice and dice ;-)

Re: The World Has Been Pulled Over Our Eyes (by Springheel Jack)

Winace — Mon, 05 Jul 2010 17:41:40 -0000

Good Jacksoo! And you?

Re: The World Has Been Pulled Over Our Eyes (by Springheel Jack)

Winace — Mon, 05 Jul 2010 11:53:21 -0000

Short covering areas are approaching, watch short entries for a quick and scary bounce. It may be short lived, but violent enough to shake the confidence of any being short. Just offering up some words of caution. Enjoy the rest of the holiday weekend if you are lucky enough to have today off! As always... good luck!

Re: BP Entry

Winace — Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:38:17 -0000

My contingent exit orders were not hit, so no, they did not. Without looking
at the numbers, my memory says the reset is right around 41.08 on the Q's.
I'll post a follow-up with my exit prices as soon as time allows. Have a
good night.

Re: Heads, Shoulders, and Poisons

Winace — Wed, 30 Jun 2010 22:33:43 -0000

I could explain how, but really, it is no use ;-)

Re: Heads, Shoulders, and Poisons

Winace — Wed, 30 Jun 2010 22:14:42 -0000

I've always been around. Feels like yesterday when it was just Tim and I chatting on a typepad comment system ;-)

Re: Heads, Shoulders, and Poisons

Winace — Wed, 30 Jun 2010 22:09:50 -0000

Where's 2sweets when you need him? ;-). Seeing mention of Atilla... he really would not be considered crazy for going long a bounce. The odds of more continuous down days straight are low indeed. The market still holds an ace in the hole which may blind-side bounce attempts here. The March 9th, 2009 days market launch has yet to be compensated on the NASDAQ. If I were wanting to catch a bounce, I'd wait for a touch of the Q's 41.08 area (watch volume explode at that level (should be interesting)). AAPL did compensate with the "flash crash" to the penny (close anyway!) of the March 09 launch, this was required for AAPL to climb higher (which I am still short due to the general NASDAQ extension). In any case, good luck all!

Re: Heads, Shoulders, and Poisons

Winace — Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:54:03 -0000

Eight straight days of closes lower than openings on the Q's. When is the last time we seen this?

Re: Updates...

Winace — Sun, 27 Jun 2010 11:05:31 -0000

I always respond to comments and questions ;-)

Re: It All Lines Up

Winace — Sat, 26 Jun 2010 14:00:15 -0000

You do not see the possibility of a head and shoulders pattern coming to completion now? The right shoulder can be concieved as already formed in the major indices. I believe the markets have held too high for too long to support the bounce which you are looking for. Not saying you scenerio will not come to pass, just seeing a less likelyhood of it. In either event, should we push higher, watch for the NASDAQ to be relatively weaker, and if we should start a plunge the NASDAQ should dominate the decline.

If long, look to hedge by shorting the NASDAQ. If your choice is to be net delta short, reduce risk by being long the financials (S&P). Just some recommendations, opinions of one simple mind. As always Tim, wish you and your readers the best!

Re: added at the open

Winace — Fri, 14 May 2010 20:03:46 -0000

38.00 based on a 31.70ish bottom of the "crash" (eyes rolling) last week.

Re: added at the open

Winace — Mon, 10 May 2010 20:19:45 -0000

AAPL's reset level (actually reset already with thursdays spike), or the
reset of qqqq. Aapls reset was highlighted in a chart a few days ago. I
should of had a contingent buy order to cover, it would have filled
Thursday.

Re: A few thoughts....

Winace — Fri, 07 May 2010 10:32:03 -0000

44.54 was QQQQ Secondary extension reset. Might see a little hesitation here.

Re: ProphetCharts: GS

Winace — Wed, 05 May 2010 13:00:43 -0000

No guarantee, but going long GS to hedge some shorts would of come in to
play. No way I would be net long though, not with the NASDAQ being in the
state it is. A paired trade would be long GS / short AAPL.

Re: Volatility Index Based Indicators (by George Rahal)

Winace — Mon, 03 May 2010 00:00:45 -0000

Doubt that. The justice department, or any other governmental department for that matter, can not show out right support of GS, not now anyway. GS takes the roll of the bad guy for now, let's see where GS stands in 18 months when called upon to stop the depression which ensues after this preperative collection of cash assets.

Re: Lunchtime review

Winace — Sun, 28 Mar 2010 19:54:32 -0000

3/6-3/10 (09) range had the primary launch in GS. I recorded the exact launch, but lost the information on an SD Card which was misplaced. The low on 1/29 may have very well reset the run, unfortunately I can not confirm that since the information between 3/6 and 3/10 has been buried. If it did not reset, we are not "obligated" to drop much below that percentage move from posted high to the 1/29 low. thq 1/29 low was within .5% or less if it did not, in fact, reset.

Re: Lunchtime review

Winace — Sun, 28 Mar 2010 19:45:01 -0000

When I lost my spreadsheets and launch points, I combined the plays and now averaging to keep the primary deleverage above even.