<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for WVMikeP</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/WVMikeP/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:15:56 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Verizon Holiday Ads Mock AT&amp;#038;T and the iPhone [VIDEOS]</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/verizon_holiday_ads_mock_at038t_and_the_iphone_videos/#comment-22461049</link><description>I'm talking the Eastern Panhandle, where I have full coverage from AT&amp;T.  However, the NRQZ doesn't cover all of WV.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The reason I was on Cingular originally was because Verizon wasn't offering WV numbers at all for their cellular service.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">WVMikeP</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:15:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon Holiday Ads Mock AT&amp;#038;T and the iPhone [VIDEOS]</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/verizon_holiday_ads_mock_at038t_and_the_iphone_videos/#comment-22440191</link><description>NOBODY has coverage in that part of West Virgina, it's the National Radio Quiet Zone - NO radios are allowed in the area. &lt;a href="http://www.gb.nrao.edu/nrqz/nrqz.shtml" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.gb.nrao.edu/nrqz/nrqz.shtml&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"The National Radio Quiet Zone (NRQZ) was established by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in Docket No. 11745 (November 19, 1958) and by the Interdepartment Radio Advisory Committee (IRAC) in Document 3867/2 (March 26, 1958) to minimize possible harmful interference to the National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO) in Green Bank, WV and the radio receiving facilities for the United States Navy in Sugar Grove, WV. The NRQZ is bounded by NAD-83 meridians of longitude at 78d 29m 59.0s W and 80d 29m 59.2s W and latitudes of 37d 30m 0.4s N and 39d 15m 0.4s N, and encloses a land area of approximately 13,000 square miles near the state border between Virginia and West Virginia. "</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martin F</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 09:24:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon Holiday Ads Mock AT&amp;#038;T and the iPhone [VIDEOS]</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/verizon_holiday_ads_mock_at038t_and_the_iphone_videos/#comment-22436726</link><description>Funny thing is, looking at Verizon's map, they screw WV with their 3G coverage.  However, I DO have reliable 3G coverage from AT&amp;T.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">WVMikeP</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:41:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: LEAKED: Microsoft Courier Tablet User Interface Details</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/leaked_microsoft_courier_tablet_user_interface_details/#comment-21948953</link><description>My question regarding this and the (mythical?) Apple tablet is "What's the central use case?"  If it's the same as the tablet: a note taker for nerds in meetings, then the hype is way over-blown.  I tried using tablets that way and each time, they failed for me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here's a use case that works for me: e-book reader with color.  If I'm reading an Edward Tufte book or something similar, I don't want images and diagrams that were in color for a reason converted to grayscale.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">WVMikeP</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:53:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: LEAKED: Microsoft Courier Tablet User Interface Details</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/leaked_microsoft_courier_tablet_user_interface_details/#comment-21947321</link><description>Like how the iPhone and iPod Touch is usable by iTunes on Windows and the Zune software can be used by, um, something(?) on OS X...oh, yeah, there goes that argument.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">WVMikeP</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:48:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T to Verizon: &amp;#8220;There&amp;#8217;s a Lawsuit for That&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/at038t_to_verizon_8220there8217s_a_lawsuit_for_that8221/#comment-21856840</link><description>"A push start"....after it's been in use for 22 years.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cracks me up every time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">WVMikeP</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:46:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T to Verizon: &amp;#8220;There&amp;#8217;s a Lawsuit for That&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/at038t_to_verizon_8220there8217s_a_lawsuit_for_that8221/#comment-21856627</link><description>They have been.  Six months ago, in my corner of WV, I noticed I had 3G all of a sudden.  Give credit where it's due.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">WVMikeP</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:42:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Droid Does: Verizon Launches Anti-iPhone Ad for Motorola Droid [Video]</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/droid_does_verizon_launches_anti_iphone_ad_for_motorola_droid_video/#comment-20800685</link><description>Personally, I think anyone that uses "{product name} killer" is a small-minded half-wit. Competition is good for us all.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">WVMikeP</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:15:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Think Outside the Slides</title><link>http://mikepulsifer.disqus.com/think_outside_the_slides/#comment-20407438</link><description>Thanks :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">WVMikeP</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 06:00:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Targus Bluetooth Presentation Remote</title><link>http://mikepulsifer.disqus.com/review_targus_bluetooth_presentation_remote/#comment-20193286</link><description>There was a Logitech remote that was handed to me at another presentation that felt too bulky and lacked the features of the Targus.  It also had that dongle, which is something I personally would like to avoid.  In addition to the limited space at our off-site meetings, if I have to put my 15" laptop on a lectern, there's no guarantee there would be enough room for a dongle.  So, I'm still looking.  Bluetooth (no dongle) &amp; works well with Keynote.  That's what I'm (still) looking for.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">WVMikeP</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:14:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple to Woolworths: Your New Logo Is Too Apple-y</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/apple_to_woolworths_your_new_logo_is_too_apple_y/#comment-19025620</link><description>If we were talking about the Woolworth's that I grew up with, that is the five and dimes, I'd say Apple should sue because with that logo that clearly looks like the Apple logo when you factor in the leaf.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the other hand, what we're talking about here is a grocery chain.  "Woolworths...the fresh food people"  Their new logo certainly makes you think of produce in that context, not electronics.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now, if they do get into electronics sales with that logo, then I think they're in trouble.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">WVMikeP</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 08:23:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digsby Revamps Its Twitter Features, Reverses the Twitter Timeline</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/digsby_revamps_its_twitter_features_reverses_the_twitter_timeline/#comment-17229056</link><description>With all the changes to your browser (search engine, toolbars) that Digsby tries to foist on your machine, it's best left alone.  Good thing I only installed it on a Win7 VM.  I don't trust it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">WVMikeP</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:07:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: POLL: Do You Still Use a Dictionary?</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/poll_do_you_still_use_a_dictionary/#comment-16183210</link><description>We have an overwhelming majority of kids coming up through the school system nowadays that don't even know that the dictionary (book-form) is even alphabetized.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">WVMikeP</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 08:57:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digsby Updates: Post to Twitter and Facebook via IM</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/digsby_updates_post_to_twitter_and_facebook_via_im/#comment-14781376</link><description>Hey Mike, we're sorry for the bad first impression. Please know that we're working on making the install process more user friendly. Feel free to let us know if you have any problems or if there's anything else we can improve on.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Erick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:25:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digsby Updates: Post to Twitter and Facebook via IM</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/digsby_updates_post_to_twitter_and_facebook_via_im/#comment-14772599</link><description>I found Digsby to be intrusive.  After the install process (on a VM, thank God), I was left with the impression that this product and its creators can't be trusted.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">WVMikeP</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 08:02:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Chart Make-Over Challenge of 2009</title><link>http://mikepulsifer.disqus.com/the_chart_make_over_challenge_of_2009/#comment-13873049</link><description>I don't have the raw data, but I'll surely try to come up with  &lt;br&gt;something this evening.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">WVMikeP</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 05:48:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Slide Make-over: EPA Greenversations</title><link>http://mikepulsifer.disqus.com/slide_make_over_epa_greenversations/#comment-13106791</link><description>Thanks for the feedback!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">WVMikeP</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 09:37:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No better place than Flickr to get "real" images</title><link>http://slidesthatstick.disqus.com/no_better_place_than_flickr_to_get_real_images/#comment-12764541</link><description>Good point. I updated the post. All images in this presentations have a Creative Commons license.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JanSchultink</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:14:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No better place than Flickr to get "real" images</title><link>http://slidesthatstick.disqus.com/no_better_place_than_flickr_to_get_real_images/#comment-12763885</link><description>Great point.  That's where I tend to look first.  One thing to add is to seek the Creative Commons license that works for you.  If you pull from the general pool, you're pulling from a collection of copyrighted images with "all rights reserved."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">WVMikeP</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:58:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What about this: the presentation subtitle?</title><link>http://slidesthatstick.disqus.com/what_about_this_the_presentation_subtitle/#comment-12384579</link><description>Smiling. Yes you want to take them out 2 minutes before the live presentation and save it in a different file.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JanSchultink</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:51:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What about this: the presentation subtitle?</title><link>http://slidesthatstick.disqus.com/what_about_this_the_presentation_subtitle/#comment-12383239</link><description>As handouts, they can save time.  As presentation slides, you're handing all the attention to the slides and you might as well stand facing a corner talking to the dusty spider webs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">WVMikeP</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:17:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Slide Make-over: EPA Greenversations</title><link>http://mikepulsifer.disqus.com/slide_make_over_epa_greenversations/#comment-11837642</link><description>Thanks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can't claim credit for the "Rules" poster.  You can find it at &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/clintjcl/375585107/sizes/o/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/clintjcl/375585107...&lt;/a&gt;.  The URL is also included in the .key file in the slide notes for those who choose to download it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I look forward to your post!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">WVMikeP</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:19:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft flips the EU (and Opera) the bird, and I love it.</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/microsoft_flips_the_eu_and_opera_the_bird_and_i_love_it/#comment-10813056</link><description>I'm not arguing that IE's not losing market share.  However, with the usage numbers they have, at about 2/3 of the market, they're still dominant.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The free market may fix the problem, but it was anticompetitive practices that gave IE a dominant position in the first place.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">WVMikeP</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:04:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft flips the EU (and Opera) the bird, and I love it.</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/microsoft_flips_the_eu_and_opera_the_bird_and_i_love_it/#comment-10811095</link><description>give me a break that argument is probably older than half the people using browsers these days. The fact is that IE's market share is being eroded by all three major contenders - Firefox, Safari and Chrome. The argument that they all need protection against big bad Microsoft is pure and unadulterated bullshit. Firefox has literally gone from nowhere to being a major competitor against IE and without any government interference. The free market works and continues to work as Firefox numbers show it is still growing - as is Safari's and Chrome's.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let me know when you come up with a better argument.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StevenHodson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:09:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft flips the EU (and Opera) the bird, and I love it.</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/microsoft_flips_the_eu_and_opera_the_bird_and_i_love_it/#comment-10810700</link><description>If 65% market share isn't dominant, then what is?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2009/06/safari-mac-and-iphone-os-use-climbed-in-may-09.ars" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2009/06/safar...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">WVMikeP</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:59:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>