<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Tschmidt</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/Tschmidt/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:57:48 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Instant fertilizer: Farmer injects tractor&amp;#8217;s carbon into the ground</title><link>http://granitegeek.disqus.com/instant_fertilizer_farmer_injects_tractor8217s_carbon_into_the_ground/#comment-21667558</link><description>Great idea it it works. Really isn't Carbon sequestration since CO2 is not permanently removed from the environment but reduction in fertilizer use has great environmental benefit.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tschmidt</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:57:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Martha&amp;#8217;s Vineyard oak die-off - a sign of things to come?</title><link>http://granitegeek.disqus.com/martha8217s_vineyard_oak_die_off_a_sign_of_things_to_come/#comment-21667294</link><description>That is bad news. I knew Maples in the region were at risk due to climate change but didn't think Oaks were also in danger. We heat with wood so have a practical stake in this. Plus as mrwg posted Oaks are beautiful trees. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not looking forward to the day when our 13 acres goes back to what it looked like 150 years ago - open fields.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tschmidt</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:52:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Broadband network on &amp;#8220;white space&amp;#8221; amid TV signals</title><link>http://granitegeek.disqus.com/broadband_network_on_8220white_space8221_amid_tv_signals/#comment-21008830</link><description>The Cable industry is fighting this. They are worried about signal ingress from nearby transmitters. That is a little confusing since there is always the possibility of full power TV stations nearby.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As to it being a solution for rural broadband there are many wireless ISP servicing rural populations. Are they hamstrung due to lack of available channels?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tschmidt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 22:17:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Helicopters and thermal imaging - can they see people in winter woods?</title><link>http://granitegeek.disqus.com/helicopters_and_thermal_imaging_can_they_see_people_in_winter_woods/#comment-20896081</link><description>Interesting article - I though IR was more sensitive then that.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One of the comments I found interesting is why lost hikers don't notice helicopter and make themselves more visible. From my experiences they are pretty noisy and travel relatively slowly. If I were lost and heard a helicopter I'd be very motivated to make myself as viable as possible. But that only works if you are near a clearing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wonder is there any kind of lightweight thermal flare/bomb hiker could carry to make them more observable to SAR teams?  Smoke grenades are too heavy and dangerous.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tschmidt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:32:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Life without a cell phone? Priceless (mostly)</title><link>http://granitegeek.disqus.com/life_without_a_cell_phone_priceless_mostly/#comment-20872437</link><description>That's true but I love using the term Luddite since it bring up such vivid images.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tschmidt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:07:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Life without a cell phone? Priceless (mostly)</title><link>http://granitegeek.disqus.com/life_without_a_cell_phone_priceless_mostly/#comment-20861130</link><description>I'm a cell phone Luddite. Both our children have cell phones and our daughter got one for my wife a while ago. I have no desired to be that connected. Which is interesting since I strongly embraced email and the Internet. But that is a fundamentally different type of connectivity. I use it on my own terms when I chose. This post is a good example, I chose to read it and respond. It did not interrupt something else I was doing.  Numerous studies have shown that multitasking reduces productivity. The human brain does not make context shifts quickly. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I fear we are creating a generation that will never know the joy of peaceful isolation and contemplation.  They are always on, waiting for the next event to intrude into their lives. At the end of the workday it is interesting to watch two different groups rush out the door. The smokers, getting Nicotine fix, and the cell phone addicts catching up on what happened the previous few hours.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Popularity of cell phones means pay phones are a dying breed making it very difficult to make a call when traveling.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tschmidt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:14:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Utilities dump Chamber of Commerce over global warming</title><link>http://granitegeek.disqus.com/utilities_dump_chamber_of_commerce_over_global_warming/#comment-17770101</link><description>I've been following that story with interest. Hopefully more companies will replace stonewalling with action so we can focus on reducing Carbon Dioxide emissions. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm surprised CO2 reduction has been so controversial. US excels at invention and creating new technology. Where we have a problem is manufacturing - competing with low cost labor. A wholesale change in how we generate and use energy should play to our strengths. In addition to addressing Global Climate change should help our trade deficit.  Just goes to show how hard it is to break away from the status quo.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I assume your prediction of an uneventful computer transition came true.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tschmidt</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:50:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Take the science knowledge quiz</title><link>http://granitegeek.disqus.com/take_the_science_knowledge_quiz/#comment-17114258</link><description>12/12 here to. Seemed pretty basic but then science/geography/history knowledge is pretty poor in the US.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tschmidt</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:33:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Seldom seen Shuttle Photos</title><link>http://granitegeek.disqus.com/seldom_seen_shuttle_photos/#comment-16872995</link><description>Need a yahoo account to view them. Any other way to access them?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tschmidt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:21:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WiMax coming - and the unexpected perils of newspaper layout</title><link>http://granitegeek.disqus.com/wimax_coming_and_the_unexpected_perils_of_newspaper_layout/#comment-16713302</link><description>In my column I'm vague about 3G/WiMax/LTE etc. ... "better vague than wrong" is one of my mottos!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DaveBrooks</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:31:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WiMax coming - and the unexpected perils of newspaper layout</title><link>http://granitegeek.disqus.com/wimax_coming_and_the_unexpected_perils_of_newspaper_layout/#comment-16712055</link><description>I assume irony of "live free or die" and being put in jail for growing your own Marijuana is lost on most folks. It is my understanding anti Marijuana laws were driven not because of its psychoactive effects but because hemp competed with cotton.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interesting about Wimax. I though it was pretty much dead in developed countries with established cellular providers being beaten out by 3GPP LTE (long term evolution)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tschmidt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:06:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Open road tolling&amp;#8221; on I-95</title><link>http://granitegeek.disqus.com/8220open_road_tolling8221_on_i_95/#comment-16633877</link><description>True but a gas tax is a reasonable approximation since one only uses gas while driving. Toll collection has very high overhead costs and even with EZ-pass creates bottlenecks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tschmidt</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:23:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Open road tolling&amp;#8221; on I-95</title><link>http://granitegeek.disqus.com/8220open_road_tolling8221_on_i_95/#comment-16626928</link><description>On the other hand, tolls place more of the cost on those who actually use the service - which has a certain fairness aspect. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's like charging people to ride the bus or subway.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DaveBrooks</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:49:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Open road tolling&amp;#8221; on I-95</title><link>http://granitegeek.disqus.com/8220open_road_tolling8221_on_i_95/#comment-16626778</link><description>I wish they would just get rid of the tolls and raise gas tax a little to pay for construction and maintenance. Seems like a much better solution to trying to use technology to solve a political problem. EZ-pass is convenient but one more intrusion of Big-Brother and is costly to implement.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tschmidt</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:45:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Distilled Water (Not)</title><link>http://granitegeek.disqus.com/distilled_water_not/#comment-15759877</link><description>It is evaporation that leaves behind the nasties.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Condensation brings whatever dirt is in the air with it. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I had the same idea as a kid and took a sip from our dehumidifier - tasted awful.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tschmidt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 10:06:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Turning old dams into hydropower dams</title><link>http://granitegeek.disqus.com/turning_old_dams_into_hydropower_dams/#comment-15137274</link><description>Yeah, I deleted a bunch of them but they're still coming - sigh</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DaveBrooks</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:32:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Turning old dams into hydropower dams</title><link>http://granitegeek.disqus.com/turning_old_dams_into_hydropower_dams/#comment-15128550</link><description>Hopefully the dam will either be used to generate electricity or breached. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Breaching it was discussed a decade or so ago but was felt that would release pollution trapped in the sediment. Current study indicates that will not be a major problem.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree hydro seems to have fallen off the radar. Years ago it was billed as "free electricity" now we are finding out as with all energy sources there is a price to pay. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Looks like your blog has attracted a spammer.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tschmidt</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:01:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comcast redirecting bad URLs to their own ads</title><link>http://granitegeek.disqus.com/comcast_redirecting_bad_urls_to_their_own_ads/#comment-14469524</link><description>No, in all cases it is the MAC of your cable modem</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fran Taylor</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 06:36:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comcast redirecting bad URLs to their own ads</title><link>http://granitegeek.disqus.com/comcast_redirecting_bad_urls_to_their_own_ads/#comment-14343077</link><description>Good point – I had not read the Slashdot article.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Media Access Controller (MAC) address is the low level address used by the  communication interface. For example each Ethernet NIC is assigned a unique 48-bit address by the manufacture. Without a unique address there is no way for network devices to communicate with one another. This is different then the IP address, which is assigned later when the IP stack is configured.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the case of Cable the MAC address of interest is that of the router's WAN port or if PC is directly connected to Cable modem the PC’s Ethernet MAC address.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tschmidt</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 10:24:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comcast redirecting bad URLs to their own ads</title><link>http://granitegeek.disqus.com/comcast_redirecting_bad_urls_to_their_own_ads/#comment-14011951</link><description>Keep in mind opt-out is a browser cookie so opting out is pretty fragile. Wipe out the cookie or use a different browser and you have opted back in. If you have a hone network each PC and each browser has to opt-out. If Comcast really though this was a useful customer service, rather then just another revenue source, why not encourage customers to opt-in rather then forcing then to expend energy opting-out?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why not bypass ISP nonsense and run your own DNS Resolver? Can either set it up on an individual PC or if you have a home network, with an always-on server use it as a shared DNS server. DNS for a home network is easy and not very demanding.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've been using Treewalk for years. That way I don't care what the ISP does with DNS.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://ntcanuck.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://ntcanuck.com/&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tschmidt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 21:07:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m - egad - average in electricity use!</title><link>http://granitegeek.disqus.com/i8217m_egad_average_in_electricity_use/#comment-13994002</link><description>Given how hard we have worked to reduce energy consumption I'm surprised and dismayed we are so much higher then local average. 21 kwh per day seems pretty low. We don't have AC which is why I assume there is such disparity between northern and southern states. California's stats are amazing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tschmidt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 15:24:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Electrical Outlets</title><link>http://granitegeek.disqus.com/electrical_outlets_45/#comment-13752663</link><description>Here are the pro and cons of Ground up vs Ground down. Not as cut and dried as one might think.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mikeholt.com/technical.php?id=grounding/unformatted/9-23-99&amp;type=u&amp;title=Receptacles%2520-%2520Ground%2520Up%2520or%2520Ground%2520Down?%2520%25289-23-99%2529" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.mikeholt.com/technical.php?id=ground...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tschmidt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:11:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can three 20-watt CFL bulbs overwhelm a 600-watt generator?</title><link>http://granitegeek.disqus.com/can_three_20_watt_cfl_bulbs_overwhelm_a_600_watt_generator/#comment-13278664</link><description>Was able to access it today without problem.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;CFLs are like other electronics that use switching power supplies. They draw power for only a portion of the AC cycle so current is higher then expected, even though actual power consumption is low.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tschmidt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:59:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can three 20-watt CFL bulbs overwhelm a 600-watt generator?</title><link>http://granitegeek.disqus.com/can_three_20_watt_cfl_bulbs_overwhelm_a_600_watt_generator/#comment-13225541</link><description>Looks like site may have been "slashdotted" I was unable to access.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I find it hard to believe a CFL has higher inrush current then an incandescent.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tschmidt</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:55:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apollo program was Leif Ericson, not Columbus</title><link>http://granitegeek.disqus.com/apollo_program_was_leif_ericson_not_columbus/#comment-12855484</link><description>Agree with the analogy. I'm a big fan of space exploration but given cost/benefit trade off of automated probes compared to sending people I think we are much better off with probes for a while. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lets settle worldwide economy and see if we can pull together an international effort to share glory and cost.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW I wonder if LRO images will finally settle the "moon landings were faked" debate or will deniers just assume LRO images are also faked?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tschmidt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:30:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>