<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for THE_Anonymous</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-e30f55b0" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/THE_Anonymous/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:57:55 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Scoreboard: Monday, Nov. 9 - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/ratings/the_scoreboard_monday_nov_9_142783.asp#comment-22644186</link><description>He did?&lt;br&gt;WOW&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No wonder the guy is in the GUTTER ratings wise.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">THE_Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:57:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Scoreboard: Monday, Nov. 9 - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/ratings/the_scoreboard_monday_nov_9_142783.asp#comment-22644148</link><description>Your post makes no sense. &lt;br&gt;Bill's ratings are **lower** than CBS news.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So by your reasoning, a lot of people don't want to watch more than an hour of news analysis.  They pick one - CBS/ABC/NBC news - that's why their ratings are so much higher.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">THE_Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:57:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barbara Walters Sits Down with Sarah Palin for 5-Part Interview - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/abc/barbara_walters_sits_down_with_sarah_palin_for_5part_interview_142213.asp#comment-21879744</link><description>I like Sarah, but writing a book is NOT a big accomplishment.  Practically EVERYONE with a known name has a book out (multiple books, in some cases).  It's just a way for her to make a few bucks, that's it.  She won't be winning any awards or accolades for this, trust me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">THE_Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:45:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barbara Walters Sits Down with Sarah Palin for 5-Part Interview - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/abc/barbara_walters_sits_down_with_sarah_palin_for_5part_interview_142213.asp#comment-21879354</link><description>Campbell has a book??</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">THE_Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:38:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama 'Not Losing Sleep Over' Fox News - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/politics/obama_not_losing_sleep_over_fox_news_141006.asp#comment-20798104</link><description>LOL don't you mean Brian WILLIAMS?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">THE_Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:29:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Glenn Beck's Armed Guard - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/fnc/glenn_becks_armed_guard_140829.asp#comment-20709248</link><description>Errr...this IS true.  Glenn even mentioned it on his show a while ago (around September during the Van Jones incident)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">THE_Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:35:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Imus Debut Week Ratings - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/fox_biz/imus_debut_week_ratings_140125.asp#comment-20081359</link><description>You remind me of this guy who used to post at another forum, the same crap everyday - and no one ever listened.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First off, you're nuts to assume that Imus alone is going to bring in 10, 20 or 30 MILLION more subscribers.  That alone is laughable.   It's obvious that the rest of the Fox Business programming is unable to attract a sustained viewership, and it's been 3 years, and they're in 50 million homes, and they have the backing of Fox News, and they clearly have the visibility (as evidenced through Imus' debut week)....on and on and on. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And considering the ratings the rest of the day brings in (from campbellbear's post below), it is obvious that the network is NOT attracting new eyeballs despite the increased exposure from Imus.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you're really that person who I think you are (from &lt;a href="http://Reportercaps.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Reportercaps.com&lt;/a&gt;), I suggest you keep your misleading stuff to yourself.  Even if you aren't, everything you wrote is pretty nutty (and is not backed by any credible outside sources, nor does it have any citations).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">THE_Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:17:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rachel Maddow, Voice of America? - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/msnbc/rachel_maddow_voice_of_america_140065.asp#comment-20044233</link><description>Wow, it's interesting that MSNBC is even on the radar screens of people across the pond....I didn't even know that channel was widely available over there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's somewhat similar in Canada, except the cable news "standard" around here is CNN - particularly the likes of Wolf, Larry, Anderson and even Campbell.  Any newspaper website, or political/political related blog around here tends to bash anything Fox News related.  My neighbo&lt;b&gt;u&lt;/b&gt;r works for one of the national news stations in Canada, and Fox News is apparently regarded as a joke in their offices.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">THE_Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:31:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Scoreboard: Monday, October 5 - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/ratings/the_scoreboard_monday_october_5_139412.asp#comment-19257475</link><description>Very true, bear.&lt;br&gt;People need to make up their mind about Fox Business and why it's underperforming.  You've really got some good points there.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">THE_Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:43:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Imus at FBN: 'I'm More Likely to Believe Shep Smith than Katie Couric or Brian Williams' - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/fox_biz/imus_at_fbn_im_more_likely_to_believe_shep_smith_than_katie_couric_or_brian_williams_138738.asp#comment-18602026</link><description>Yikes, sorry blueblue - but she's right.&lt;br&gt;If you wanna get Fox News around here in Canada, you have to subscribe to the top digital tier in most big cities (or get it on a grey dish...like me :P)&lt;br&gt;But to be honest, CNN is pretty much the "standard" when it comes to American news.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(and trust me, MSNBC is in even worse dire straits LOL)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry&lt;br&gt;*hides face in shame*</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">THE_Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:16:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Zucker on NBCU: &amp;quot;There Are a Number of Possible Things That Could Happen&amp;quot; - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/nbc/zucker_on_nbcu_there_are_a_number_of_possible_things_that_could_happen_138480.asp#comment-17943892</link><description>I'm seeing $21 billion-ish too - do you have a link to the $30 billion?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">THE_Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:05:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BCLocalNews.com - Dragons see their underwear</title><link>http://www.bclocalnews.com/business/62451992.html#comment-17900242</link><description>LOL were these guys high or something?&lt;br&gt;They value this company at over $500k +?  Half a million for a mediocre undergarment company with a gagillion (better) competitors?  &lt;br&gt;I want what they're on!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">THE_Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:18:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Q3 Cable Ratings: CNN Back to #2 - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/ratings/q3_cable_ratings_cnn_back_to_2_137119.asp#comment-17797967</link><description>Actually, I clicked "like" on all of her posts.  You can take your detective hat off, kid.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">THE_Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:01:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NBC vs. ALG. Anti-Semitic Email or &amp;quot;Smear Campaign&amp;quot;  - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/nbc/nbc_vs_alg_antisemitic_email_or_smear_campaign__136925.asp#comment-17451339</link><description>Proof?&lt;br&gt;Links?&lt;br&gt;Example of an e-mail?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh wait, you're just talking out of your butt...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">THE_Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 16:55:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Glenn Beck's Homecoming, Part Warm Welcome &amp;amp; Part Cold Shoulder - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/the_morning_show_wars/glenn_becks_homecoming_part_warm_welcome_part_cold_shoulder_136782.asp#comment-17381456</link><description>So let me get this straight.&lt;br&gt;You think it's perfectly OK for Fox News to be essentially DICTATING media outlets in how to cover this story? (by preventing coverage)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If this is such a "small" event, as you put it, then media outlets will allocate their resources accordingly to get appropriate coverage of this story &amp; Beck.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But for Fox to SPECIFICALLY come out and say NO COVERAGE allowed - well, that's definitely fishy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">THE_Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:06:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNBC Reports Goes Away; Three Hours of Docs to Air in Primetime - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/cnbc/cnbc_reports_goes_away_three_hours_of_docs_to_air_in_primetime_136221.asp#comment-16899237</link><description>Poor guy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He tried hard - I could tell.  However, at the end of the day the ratings were really quite awful.  From 6am to 10pm, it was usually the lowest rated show on the network (cringe-worthy ratings most nights).  &lt;br&gt;I suppose he was also a victim of the relatively "boring" business news cycle as of late, since the 8pm slot did well when volatility was high.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh well...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">THE_Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:06:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Look Who's on the Cover of &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;Time&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt; - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/fnc/look_whos_on_the_cover_of_time_135992.asp#comment-16817752</link><description>WHAT??????&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's NOT???!?!?!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Colour me surprised! :O&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;....idiot.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">THE_Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:00:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Look Who's on the Cover of &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;Time&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt; - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/fnc/look_whos_on_the_cover_of_time_135992.asp#comment-16817069</link><description>Unlike YOUR show, which averages about 42-44 SECONDS of content.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Time to waddle over to Burger King Eddie...and hide your face in a plate of fries.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">THE_Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:47:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Look Who's on the Cover of &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;Time&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt; - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/fnc/look_whos_on_the_cover_of_time_135992.asp#comment-16816488</link><description>Wow, you're back to being a bear eh?  &lt;br&gt;That means you're officially BACK to being related to....*gag*....the pinkster...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">THE_Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:38:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN Holding Auditions for New Show - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/cnn/cnn_holding_auditions_for_new_show_130443.asp#comment-16208262</link><description>+1&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Plus he's already WAYYYYYYYYYY overexposed on AC360.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">THE_Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:27:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN Holding Auditions for New Show - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/cnn/cnn_holding_auditions_for_new_show_130443.asp#comment-16208091</link><description>I think we might be a bit premature in celebrating the (long overdue) demise of "Campbell Brown".&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;IMO, I think CNN might be thinking about eliminating one of the 3 hours for "The Situation Room".  In the ratings post for August '09, it was noted that TSR plunged 35%+ in the demo (August '08 v. August '09), while CB was actually UP in total viewers (and flat demo).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let's be honest, CNN has invested a lot of time, effort (and probably money) into Campbell's show, so I doubt they'll easily give it the axe.  Don't forget that "Paula Zahn Now" stayed wayyyyyyyyyyyyy past it's due date, which proves that CNN is unusually patient with their underperformers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wouldn't be surprised to see something like:&lt;br&gt;TSR: 4-6pm&lt;br&gt;New show: 6-7pm&lt;br&gt;Lou: 7-8pm</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">THE_Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:23:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Scoreboard: Wednesday, September 2 - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/ratings/the_scoreboard_wednesday_september_2_130262.asp#comment-15920755</link><description>Yup you're definitely right - Dylan's show and Dr. Nancy's show in particular are doing really bad...not only are they WAY down in the demo, but they're losing to CNBC in the same timeslot (must hurt Dylan especially)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/09/03/with-dylan-ratigan-and-dr-nancy-a-change-didnt-do-msnbc-good/26133" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/09/03/with-dylan...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">THE_Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 20:03:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Breaking&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;: Charlie Gibson To Step Down from ABC 'World News', Diane Sawyer to Anchor Broadcast - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/abc/breaking_charlie_gibson_to_step_down_from_abc_world_news_diane_sawyer_to_anchor_broadcast_130078.asp#comment-15762453</link><description>Whoa, this was sudden and unexpected....wonder what the reason(s) are behind this?  Is Charlie's health to blame, an internal struggle or something else.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Putting Diane in the anchor seat is a pretty gutsy move considering Katie has been less-than-successful in the anchor seat.  Plus, GMA has been faltering lately so losing Diane will hurt that show as well.  Should be interesting to see how this all unfolds...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">THE_Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:01:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'View,' 'GMA' Take Home Daytime Emmys - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/awards_accolades/view_gma_take_home_daytime_emmys_129819.asp#comment-15657588</link><description>Actually there WAS a male View...called "The Other Half" (it was full of d-bags like Mario Lopez &amp; Donny Bonaduce)....AND it got Emmy nominations too ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Other_Half_(TV_series)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">THE_Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:10:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'View,' 'GMA' Take Home Daytime Emmys - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/awards_accolades/view_gma_take_home_daytime_emmys_129819.asp#comment-15657415</link><description>pinkpinkbear in HD??&lt;br&gt;NO THANKS!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">THE_Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:06:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>