<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for TDavid</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/TDavid/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 02:50:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: What are they hiding? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/09/05/whatAreTheyHiding.html#comment-2174804</link><description>NItpicking here but Palin didn't really "lie" about putting the jet on eBay. She did list it there three times. She conveniently (intentionally?) left off the fact that it didn't sell there and needed to be sold to a private party in Alaska.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TDavid</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 02:50:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Asking My Readers &amp;ndash; A Poll</title><link>http://www.winextra.com/2008/08/18/asking-my-readers-a-poll/#comment-1600367</link><description>I don't care what the results of the poll turn out to be (and no I wasn't one of the people who emailed), these link posts do not provide significant value on any blog, not just yours. I skip past them and/or filter them in some cases with third party tools. There are plenty of sites for sharing bookmarks for those interested, save your blog for saying something worthwhile and fresh that will live beyond a few nanoseconds.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And might want to fix this gremlin, FYI: "I don’t use GReader and have absolutely no intention of *every* using it."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TDavid</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:32:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Techmeme fails the tech community again</title><link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2008/08/02/techmeme-fails-the-tech-community-again/#comment-1080695</link><description>Left on your FriendFeed post as well. The story is on TechMeme now: &lt;a href="http://www.techmeme.com/080802/p19#a080802p19"&gt;http://www.techmeme.com/080802/p19#a080802p19&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TDavid</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 17:01:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comcast shut me down again (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/07/24/comcastShutMeDownAgain.html#comment-992267</link><description>Dave - your second use of fcuk made me laugh. You need to get a domain with fcuk in it for some future project :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TDavid</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:31:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 14 Podcasts To Help You Through Your Commute</title><link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/news/14-podcasts-to-help-you-through-your-commute/#comment-989555</link><description>Thanks for sharing this list. I like it when folks make lists like these! I checked the Zune Marketplace where I've been helping with podcast submissions and only two of these are not listed in the marketplace: The Web 2.0 Show and Things That You Can't Say About The Internet. I'll contact these podcasters.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TDavid</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:10:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Off the Cuff: Who needs destinations</title><link>http://www.winextra.com/2008/06/30/off-the-cuff-who-needs-destinations/#comment-789697</link><description>I'll be working on that TDavid as I work my way through several podcasting ideas I've been having. Rather do it all at once rather than having to keep repeating the process - but yes there will be one.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.winextra.com/2008/06/30/off-the-cuff-who-needs-destinations/</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:23:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Off the Cuff: Who needs destinations</title><link>http://www.winextra.com/2008/06/30/off-the-cuff-who-needs-destinations/#comment-788757</link><description>Any separate podcast feed (with decent sized image) for Off The Cuff, Steven?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TDavid</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 13:34:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Search isn&amp;rsquo;t about buying stuff</title><link>http://www.winextra.com/2008/06/26/search-isnt-about-buying-stuff/#comment-764228</link><description>Sorry TDavid but I can honestly say that I haven't searched for where to find a product I want to buy. *If* I am buying something from the web it is because it is something I have already on my radar which means I know where to find the product. I will say I have used search for navigation purposes but not for buying stuff.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.winextra.com/2008/06/26/search-isnt-about-buying-stuff/</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:58:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Search isn&amp;rsquo;t about buying stuff</title><link>http://www.winextra.com/2008/06/26/search-isnt-about-buying-stuff/#comment-761347</link><description>Not saying the following statement is untrue, but it seems a bit far-fetched:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"I know myself I have never used any search engine in order to find something I wanted to purchase. "&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Never? *Never*? How much shopping do you do online? You *never* have heard about a product or service from somewhere other than the internet and used a search engine to find out where to buy it? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We do a considerable amount of shopping online and while that 10% figure seems high even to our household, it's a long way from "never."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TDavid</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:42:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: From the Pipeline &amp;ndash; 6.24.08</title><link>http://www.winextra.com/2008/06/24/from-the-pipeline-62408/#comment-745251</link><description>Congratulations on your new Mashable gig, Steven.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TDavid</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:26:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bringing Yahoo back from the grave</title><link>http://www.winextra.com/2008/06/18/bringing-yahoo-back-from-the-grave/#comment-710873</link><description>Heh, just swap del.icio.us and Friendfeed, heh.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.winextra.com/2008/06/18/bringing-yahoo-back-from-the-grave/</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 23:17:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bringing Yahoo back from the grave</title><link>http://www.winextra.com/2008/06/18/bringing-yahoo-back-from-the-grave/#comment-704058</link><description>Actually my "affection" for FriendFeed has nothing to do with being an early adopter (which btw isn't a term I would really associate with me :) ). For me FriendFeed; as I have written in the past, is an integral part of my work as a blogger. And I realize that FriendFeed isn't mainstream - I think it will have a hard time getting there as well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree that Yahoo needs to sell off some things as it needs to really re-discover who and what it is as a company.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.winextra.com/2008/06/18/bringing-yahoo-back-from-the-grave/</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 01:51:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bringing Yahoo back from the grave</title><link>http://www.winextra.com/2008/06/18/bringing-yahoo-back-from-the-grave/#comment-703973</link><description>I understand your early adopter affection for FF, but it's still a long way from mainstream -- it's barely tech mainstream. Y! doesn't need more early adopter, whiz bang stuff, they need some serious leadership and focus. Yang is a terrible CEO. Buying FriendFeed or Twitter or anything like this at the present time would take them in yet another direction rather than enhance and strengthen their existing services.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Y! should consider *SELLING* some of their prized, but less financially viable assets and fortify their strategy for the future. I doubt as long as Yang is at the helm this will be possible, so let's hope that dream suggestion of yours for him to get the boot comes true.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TDavid</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 01:36:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bringing Yahoo back from the grave</title><link>http://www.winextra.com/2008/06/18/bringing-yahoo-back-from-the-grave/#comment-703900</link><description>Yes I realize that Carl is a major stockholder but as far as I am concerned his actions are causing more problems for Yahoo that they are solving.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for the suggestion the FriendFeed guys be bought up and put in control of Yahoo - yes that was totally facetious and meant strictly to point out that for Yahoo to make it back from the brink of obscurity it is facing there has to be something really radical and totally unexpected done. I figured that using FriendFeed as a foil in that argument would spark a serious conversation on what can be done. As it stands right now any discussion about the matter is just more of the same old thing and tired ideas.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I want Yahoo to stick around as well but I fear it won't unless something radical an unexpected is done and that doesn't include fire selling it to Microsoft.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.winextra.com/2008/06/18/bringing-yahoo-back-from-the-grave/</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 01:21:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bringing Yahoo back from the grave</title><link>http://www.winextra.com/2008/06/18/bringing-yahoo-back-from-the-grave/#comment-703832</link><description>"3. Tell Carl Icahn to go sit in the corner and STFU"&lt;br&gt;Umm, you do realize Carl Icahn is a part OWNER of Yahoo, right? Sure you do. As a major shareholder -- like it or not -- Icahn does have a say in Y! operations, He paid for that right. When Yahoo! decided to go public the company lost the ability for the execs, both current and future, to go tell shareholders to go pound sand -- without severe consequences. Icahn is simply sticking up for the rights of himself and all other shareholders for Y! to be fiscally responsible. I'm a Y! shareholder and am disgusted with what's happening there lately.  I don't want Icahn to STFU, I want him to make more noise.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The way Yang handled the Microsoft deal doesn't seem to be in the best interest of shareholders, at least from the heavily filtered information we see on the outside.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And putting the Friendfeed people in charge of Y! is one of the oddest suggestions I've seen yet. You can't be serious on that one, are you? If you are, let me laugh out loud. The owners of FF came from Google, remember, I don't think they want to become any part of the walking abortion Y! currently is operating as.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TDavid</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 01:09:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What every blogger should be using</title><link>http://blog.davemadethat.com/2008/05/26/what-every-blogger-should-be-using/#comment-536221</link><description>I meant to type TDavid. :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://blog.davemadethat.com/2008/05/26/what-every-blogger-should-be-using/</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 17:02:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What every blogger should be using</title><link>http://blog.davemadethat.com/2008/05/26/what-every-blogger-should-be-using/#comment-535983</link><description>Hey Ave, who is David?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TDavid</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 16:25:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What every blogger should be using</title><link>http://blog.davemadethat.com/2008/05/26/what-every-blogger-should-be-using/#comment-535942</link><description>HI David. There's an export function in Disqus. Like LinkedIn, I'm making a habit of d/l my content every so often. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I understand your concern though, it's a valid one. I thought about that too. It's worth listening to the interview on Net@Nite for a better understanding: &lt;a href="http://twit.tv/natn53"&gt;http://twit.tv/natn53&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;Dave</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://blog.davemadethat.com/2008/05/26/what-every-blogger-should-be-using/</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 16:21:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What every blogger should be using</title><link>http://blog.davemadethat.com/2008/05/26/what-every-blogger-should-be-using/#comment-535627</link><description>Disagree with the "every blogger" label as it sounds lemmingesq to me.  I like some of what Disqus is doing, but what if Disqus goes under or gets bought and shelved by a bigger fish? What happens to your comments then? I hope they continue to develop their API so one could use their system and yet backup all comments to future proof their service.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TDavid</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 15:29:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft needs an intervention</title><link>http://www.winextra.com/2008/04/28/microsoft-needs-an-intervention/#comment-392701</link><description>I'm glad to see Xbox is making a profit even though its millions are far&lt;br&gt;from the billions that the OS or Office divisions make. Like Brett Norquist&lt;br&gt;noted in a post not long ago Xbox and Zune are the only two divisions in&lt;br&gt;Microsoft that have managed to understand the *cool factor* that is the&lt;br&gt;driving force of the younger generations that are driving their profits. The&lt;br&gt;rest of the company still are in the utilitarion stage no matter how much&lt;br&gt;eye candy they dress their products up in.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for the corporate angle I would agree that currently little competition&lt;br&gt;for Microsoft but this is the prime area where they are indeed resting on&lt;br&gt;their laruels because they don't think they have any direct threats. That&lt;br&gt;however could be a dangerous attittude to have as Apple is beginning to make&lt;br&gt;inroads there as well - granted it isn't a rush of companies going that&lt;br&gt;route but it is happening all the same.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.winextra.com/2008/04/28/microsoft-needs-an-intervention/</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:55:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft needs an intervention</title><link>http://www.winextra.com/2008/04/28/microsoft-needs-an-intervention/#comment-391705</link><description>Here's something you might want to read, if you haven't already (and Zune is mentioned in a positive light, imagine that):&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dailytech.com/Xbox+360+Drives+Microsoft+Entertainment+and+Devices+Profit/article11599.htm"&gt;http://www.dailytech.com/Xbox+360+Drives+Micros...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You also skipped refuting the corporate angle. Little competition there.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TDavid</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:57:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft needs an intervention</title><link>http://www.winextra.com/2008/04/28/microsoft-needs-an-intervention/#comment-390041</link><description>Xbox Live might well be an anomoly within Microsoft but for all the press it&lt;br&gt;recieves it still hasn't or is just now beginning to make money - after how&lt;br&gt;many years of being as directionless as the rest of the company. As for&lt;br&gt;redefining music distribution we have Zune - yet another directionless&lt;br&gt;division.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As much as I dislike the naming convention the Live Services division could&lt;br&gt;*eventually* be the main course Microsoft goes but right now as Mary Jo&lt;br&gt;quotes her sources as saying it is as badly mismanaged and directionless as&lt;br&gt;any other division.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.winextra.com/2008/04/28/microsoft-needs-an-intervention/</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:58:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft needs an intervention</title><link>http://www.winextra.com/2008/04/28/microsoft-needs-an-intervention/#comment-389934</link><description>Steven - what about the Xbox Live angle? I'm guessing you didn't mention it because you haven't followed what's happening there(?) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Games like Rock Band and Guitar Hero are redefining music distribution online.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Live marketplace is growing, dominating and *the* place to be for the younger gaming generation. Don't be surprised if this division becomes the future for Microsoft. Can't underestimate the power of gaming. Look at the history behind solitaire.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, there is the corporate side of Microsoft and they still have massive penetration in that market.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TDavid</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:26:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to handily tell tech bloggers to STFU</title><link>http://www.ericrice.com/blog/2008/04/14/how-to-handily-tell-tech-bloggers-to-stfu/#comment-338276</link><description>Well said. I'd add to this post -- and Karoli's -- that people should first donate to their local communities. If not by opening their wallets than by volunteering their time. If everybody helped in their own communities their would be less need for global assistance. Think about it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TDavid</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:31:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft - the 10,000 pound chicken with its head cut off</title><link>http://www.winextra.com/2008/02/04/microsoft-the-10000-pound-chicken-with-its-head-cut-off/#comment-125087</link><description>I would agree with that. However, these are two dynamically different companies, built differently, with different cultures, both of which are in different kinds of trouble. It takes some pretty darkly-tinted rose glasses to see anything good come of this in my opinion, at least in the short term. Long term, who knows? There are some impressive minds and significant intellectual property at Yahoo that MS can make good use of, assuming they do it right. First order of business, at least if I were holding the tiller, would be to cut loose about 6 or 7 different 'divisions' of yahoo that they've not so wisely acquired over the last couple years.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.winextra.com/2008/02/04/microsoft-the-10000-pound-chicken-with-its-head-cut-off/</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 01:34:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>