<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for SteveK</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/SteveK/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 01:58:49 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Yokels Are At It Again</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/the_yokels_are_at_it_again/#comment-23116192</link><description>Papa Bush (H. W.) went to Japan and puked... and Obama did what?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SteveK</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 01:58:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Situational Justice</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/situational_justice/#comment-22964889</link><description>Thank you, Steve. It seems that great minds think alike.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kathykattenburg</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:01:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Situational Justice</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/situational_justice/#comment-22963491</link><description>Kathy, Not sure why you're being stalked by a certain Democrat (sic) that has bought into (and is, tried to sell) every Fox News talking point and all the childish "Tea Bagger" hyperbole (ahem)... (sigh)... (&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Btfsplk" rel="nofollow"&gt;btfsplk&lt;/a&gt;) [oops, pardon me] but I would like you to know that some of us Democrats do appreciate the timely articles that you post... Others don't appear to have taken the time to read the &lt;a href="http://themoderatevoice.com/comment-policy-important/" rel="nofollow"&gt;TMV Comment Policy&lt;/a&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SteveK</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:23:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sean Hannity Apologizes to Jon Stewart Who&amp;#8230;.(Etc.)</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/sean_hannity_apologizes_to_jon_stewart_who8230etc/#comment-22952533</link><description>&lt;i&gt;There were many, many "Tea Bags" brought to the "Tea Party's"... ergo "Tea Bag Party" if they'd had any sense they would have bought it  in bulk, it's cheaper and it's better.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Indeed.  Not to mention that throwing around loose tea likely would not have required as much clean up.  In fact, it might have been quite beneficial for the White House lawn.  Though I do wonder how much sales tax was paid in this protest on taxation, and folks fail to see the irony in that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If they'd stop and actually consider why the Boston Tea Party happened the way it did, they'd know that it wasn't merely a symbolic thing.  Dumping all that tea meant that it would not be sold and therefore could not be used to collect taxes.  It was also illegal, but then some of the more effective protests usually are.  You could even compare it to the sit-ins of the 1960s and bus boycotts.  They weren't just symbolic.  They had an actual effect.  Symbolism and lack of sacrifice just isn't that effective.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Almoderate</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:20:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sean Hannity Apologizes to Jon Stewart Who&amp;#8230;.(Etc.)</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/sean_hannity_apologizes_to_jon_stewart_who8230etc/#comment-22921506</link><description>The bad link in my post above should have been to: &lt;a href="http://www.reteaparty.com/2009/02/27/rick-santelli-is-as-mad-as-hell-chicago-tea-party/" rel="nofollow"&gt;April 1, 2009 | Tea Bag the Fools in D.C.&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SteveK</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:09:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sean Hannity Apologizes to Jon Stewart Who&amp;#8230;.(Etc.)</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/sean_hannity_apologizes_to_jon_stewart_who8230etc/#comment-22921144</link><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;tidbits wrote: "The odd part about the term "tea bag" associated with these protests, is that it was initally used by the protesters themselves, until its double meaning became apparent."&lt;/blockquote&gt;Exactly right tidbits, as pointed out in the Wikipedia post: &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tea_Party_protests" rel="nofollow"&gt;Tea Party Protests&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;In February [2/27/09], David Weigel of The Washington Independent &lt;a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/31868/scenes-from-the-new-american-tea-party" rel="nofollow"&gt;photographed a protester&lt;/a&gt; holding a sign that read "Tea Bag the Liberal Dems Before They Tea Bag You." The verb "tea bag" is used by others including Fox News Reporter Griff Jenkins and &amp;lt;a &lt;a href="http://href=%22http://www.reteaparty.com/2009/02/27/rick-santelli-is-as-mad-as-hell-chicago-tea-party/%22%3Ereteaparty.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;href="http://www.reteaparty.com/2009/02/27/rick...&lt;/a&gt; where it is used self-referentially&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href="http://Salon.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Salon.com&lt;/a&gt;, however, pointed out that "teabagging" has long had another meaning.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tea_Party_protests#April_15_Tax-day_events" rel="nofollow"&gt;April 15th Tax-day Events&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;An April 15, 2009 Tea Party protest outside the White House was moved after a box of tea bags was hurled over the White House fence. Police sealed off the area and evacuated some people. The United States Secret Service brought out a bomb-detecting robot, which determined the package was not a threat. Approximately a thousand people had demonstrated, several waved placards saying "Stop Big Government" and "Taxation is Piracy".&lt;/blockquote&gt;There were many, many "Tea Bags" brought to the "Tea Party's"... ergo "Tea Bag Party" if they'd had any sense they would have bought it &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Taylors-Harrogate-Earl-Grey-Loose/dp/B000F3ZU98/ref=sr_1_15?ie=UTF8&amp;s=grocery&amp;qid=1258138735&amp;sr=1-15" rel="nofollow"&gt;in bulk&lt;/a&gt;, it's cheaper and it's better.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SteveK</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:03:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sean Hannity Apologizes to Jon Stewart Who&amp;#8230;.(Etc.)</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/sean_hannity_apologizes_to_jon_stewart_who8230etc/#comment-22917385</link><description>Glad to see Jim Lehrer is up there too... which isn't so surprising.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JSpencer</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:03:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sean Hannity Apologizes to Jon Stewart Who&amp;#8230;.(Etc.)</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/sean_hannity_apologizes_to_jon_stewart_who8230etc/#comment-22916066</link><description>According to &lt;a href="http://people-press.org/report/319/public-knowledge-of-current-affairs-little-changed-by-news-and-information-revolutions" rel="nofollow"&gt;a survey&lt;/a&gt; done by the Pew Research Center viewers of The Daily Show have the highest intelligence level... Fox News and the Morning Network Shows the lowest. Here's a link to &lt;a href="http://people-press.org/reports/images/319-2.gif" rel="nofollow"&gt;a graphic of the ratings&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you take the "What's you News IQ" test be forewarned... You'll get three questions wrong if you actually know the &lt;i&gt;current&lt;/i&gt; news!.. The test was written last April.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SteveK</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:43:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lou Dobbs Leaves CNN</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/lou_dobbs_leaves_cnn/#comment-22791706</link><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Lou Dobbs surprised everyone when he announced that he is leaving CNN effective immediately.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Dobbs getting canned from CNN has been talked about for six months... anyhow.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SteveK</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:18:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Strangest Paragraph in the History of Journalism</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/the_strangest_paragraph_in_the_history_of_journalism/#comment-22576545</link><description>ArMY, reached while PETting a GOAT at his Texas ranch. Hum... Now where have we heard &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVjWQrU8kbE" rel="nofollow"&gt;that one&lt;/a&gt; before? Seems strange the Republican and their attraction to Goats.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SteveK</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:00:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Price for Health Care Reform: Poor Women&amp;#8217;s Health</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/the_price_for_health_care_reform_poor_women8217s_health/#comment-22519502</link><description>"You're a real class act JD."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually, you're right...Steve.&lt;br&gt;A few of those jabs were uncalled for.  I think I was tired and moody when I typed that.&lt;br&gt;My sincerest apologies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jefferson</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JeffersonDavis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:18:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Price for Health Care Reform: Poor Women&amp;#8217;s Health</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/the_price_for_health_care_reform_poor_women8217s_health/#comment-22248097</link><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;He typically rambles partisan rants in a noncohesive manner. I suppose you get used to it. If the Democratic party were to pass a bill that allowed the use of invalids as kicking posts, he'd be right there to defend it. He is a partisan, not a logic-weilding pundit.&lt;/blockquote&gt;You're a real class act JD.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SteveK</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 11:34:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Not to Play the Minority Party</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/how_not_to_play_the_minority_party/#comment-22247435</link><description>Elections have consequences - &lt;a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2009/05/mccain-election.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;John McCain&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Elections have consequences - &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x4iHan7BjqY" rel="nofollow"&gt;Barbara Boxer&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SteveK</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 11:12:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: House Passes Health Care Bill But Future Unclear</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/house_passes_health_care_bill_but_future_unclear/#comment-22246203</link><description>Nicely said, partisan.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JeffersonDavis</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:32:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Price for Health Care Reform: Poor Women&amp;#8217;s Health</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/the_price_for_health_care_reform_poor_women8217s_health/#comment-22179194</link><description>"Don't you have a clue?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know that this is, or should be, a very small part of the budget.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The rest of your reply was unrelated ranting.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ProfElwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:34:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: House Passes Health Care Bill But Future Unclear</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/house_passes_health_care_bill_but_future_unclear/#comment-22179162</link><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Just because someone disagrees with you doesn't make them bad.&lt;/blockquote&gt;I never said that it did.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SteveK</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:34:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Republicans Disrupt Debate on House Floor</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/republicans_disrupt_debate_on_house_floor/#comment-22178599</link><description>2271. Having fun yet? :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AustinRoth</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:18:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Republicans Disrupt Debate on House Floor</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/republicans_disrupt_debate_on_house_floor/#comment-22178577</link><description>2270</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AustinRoth</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:18:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Republicans Disrupt Debate on House Floor</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/republicans_disrupt_debate_on_house_floor/#comment-22178576</link><description>2269</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AustinRoth</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:18:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Republicans Disrupt Debate on House Floor</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/republicans_disrupt_debate_on_house_floor/#comment-22178556</link><description>2268</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AustinRoth</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:18:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Republicans Disrupt Debate on House Floor</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/republicans_disrupt_debate_on_house_floor/#comment-22178551</link><description>2267</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AustinRoth</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:18:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Republicans Disrupt Debate on House Floor</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/republicans_disrupt_debate_on_house_floor/#comment-22178541</link><description>2266</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AustinRoth</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:17:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Republicans Disrupt Debate on House Floor</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/republicans_disrupt_debate_on_house_floor/#comment-22178533</link><description>2265</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AustinRoth</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:17:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Republicans Disrupt Debate on House Floor</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/republicans_disrupt_debate_on_house_floor/#comment-22178493</link><description>2261/6 years at TMV = ~360 per year, on average.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course, you seem to be getting more and more obsessed with me and how I spend my time. You aren't gay and looking at my butt with lascivious intent, too, are you?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And this is 2263.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AustinRoth</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:17:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Republicans Disrupt Debate on House Floor</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/republicans_disrupt_debate_on_house_floor/#comment-22177493</link><description>comment 2261 read</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SteveK</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 00:43:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>