<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for StephenMartin</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/StephenMartin/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/StephenMartin/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 23:40:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: More Companies Pull Ads from Beck; 'Support Glenn' Counter Campaign Set Up - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/more-companies-pull-ads-from-beck-support-glenn-counter-campaign-set-up/28548#comment-14944137</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Glenn Beck has the right to say whatever he likes. Advertisers have the right to place their ads where ever they want. If you don't like what Glenn says, don't watch him. That's what I do regarding the bozos over at MSNBC. If I don't like a product or the manufacturers policies, I won't buy from them. Let the market decide. That is what freedom is all about. I surely don't need someone telling me what I can watch or cannot watch. I can handle that all by myself.  The basic creed of liberalism is don't force your morals on me. Seems many of the progressives have a hard time living up to that creed. Otherwise they'd give Beck his space. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StephenMartin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 23:40:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cable News Ratings for Monday, August 18</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/19/cable-news-ratings-for-monday-august-18/4733#comment-1674914</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I do not believe she will be able to maintain the viewers. When she sits in for KO, her viewer ship usually slides downhill as the week goes by doesn't it? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StephenMartin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 01:56:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Olympics Bump Up NBC Nightly News Versus July, But Not Athens in 2004</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/19/olympics-bump-up-nbc-nightly-news-versus-july-but-not-athens-in-2004/4730#comment-1655539</link><description>&lt;p&gt;LOL, yeah. "CNN. We Suck Less"  lol. Good one Robert!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StephenMartin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:12:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Olympics Bump Up NBC Nightly News Versus July, But Not Athens in 2004</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/19/olympics-bump-up-nbc-nightly-news-versus-july-but-not-athens-in-2004/4730#comment-1654300</link><description>&lt;p&gt;According to the new PEW results (&lt;a href="http://people-press.org/report/?pageid=1358)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://people-press.org/report/?pageid=1358)"&gt;http://people-press.org/rep...&lt;/a&gt; all of the news agencies suck. NBC is at a low 24% believability rating. CNN came in with the highest, 30%. Pretty dismal. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StephenMartin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:22:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Little Gordon Ramsay</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/14/little-gordon-ramsay/4688#comment-1441217</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it's inappropriate to show children talking to their parents that way,or vise versa. Even if it is meant to be funny. But then again, in my view, one is free to show whatever they like on their website. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StephenMartin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:26:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cable News Ratings for Monday August 11, 2008</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/12/cable-news-ratings-for-monday-august-11-2008/4670#comment-1206425</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Like I said, I watch all the networks regularly. FOX uses "Fair and Balanced" frequently. I do realize Olbermann is MSNBC's bread and butter. I'm not sure why you're making that an issue. I certainly am not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And from my observation, and some of the major polls, for the most part, FOX leans right, and the rest lean left. It is my point of view. A view I came to from many years of watching. I'm not going to argue about it,  or debate it. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StephenMartin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:25:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cable News Ratings for Monday August 11, 2008</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/12/cable-news-ratings-for-monday-august-11-2008/4670#comment-1191457</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I watch FOX, MSNBC, CNN HEADLINE NEWS, and CNN regularly. The only difference I see in their new presentations is that FOX leans to the right, the rest to the left. They all give pretty good news coverage when special stories present themselves. Other than that, they're opinion oriented. Arguing happens from time to time on all of the networks, (except for Olbermann. He never has an opposing view or any conflict whatsoever.) Most of the programming on these networks revolve around politics and celebrity gossip. And they do it for the ratings. Making money is why they're in business. No other reason. The journalists and commentators may have other motives, but the owners are doing it to make money, plain and simple. They are business peopleand that's all they are. That's my take.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StephenMartin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:24:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cable News Ratings for Monday August 11, 2008</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/12/cable-news-ratings-for-monday-august-11-2008/4670#comment-1183405</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;chris merrill="" :="" i="" honestly="" hope="" the="" other="" networks="" don't="" adopt="" fnc's="" tactics.="" they="" are="" chugging="" along,="" making="" profits="" for="" their="" parent="" companies="" and="" gaining="" in="" viewership.="" american="" news="" doesn't="" need="" more="" fluff="" and="" anger.="" it="" needs="" more="" news.=""&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just curious. Do you watch FOX on a regular basis? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StephenMartin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 22:27:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cable News Ratings for Monday August 11, 2008</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/12/cable-news-ratings-for-monday-august-11-2008/4670#comment-1180769</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wonder where all those Olbermann fans went for those few days. ummmmm. Interesting. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StephenMartin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:46:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cable News Ratings for Friday August 8, 2008</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/11/cable-news-ratings-for-friday-august-8-2008/4655#comment-1167405</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Anonymous, Olbermann was on. It's interesting to see how much he's dropped. Abrams has dropped too, but not nearly as much as Olbermann. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StephenMartin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:27:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cable News Ratings for Friday August 8, 2008</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/11/cable-news-ratings-for-friday-august-8-2008/4655#comment-1165476</link><description>&lt;p&gt;^^&lt;br&gt;You'd lose. The sun doesn't actually rise. ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StephenMartin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:43:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nielsen Ratings Sunday, August 10: Swimming/Gymnastics average 32.6 Million for NBC</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/11/nielsen-ratings-sunday-august-10-swimminggymnastics-average-326-million-for-nbc/4649#comment-1159808</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wasn't clear. Do you have Cable News Ratings for Friday, Saturday and Sunday, 2008?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StephenMartin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:54:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nielsen Ratings Sunday, August 10: Swimming/Gymnastics average 32.6 Million for NBC</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/11/nielsen-ratings-sunday-august-10-swimminggymnastics-average-326-million-for-nbc/4649#comment-1159411</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Do you have cable ratings for Friday, Sat and Sun? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StephenMartin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:13:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screw You Internet: Olympic Opening Ceremonies Set Nielsen Ratings Records for NBC</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/09/screw-you-internet-olympic-opening-ceremonies-set-nielsen-ratings-records-for-nbc/4635#comment-1146801</link><description>&lt;p&gt;^^&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the explanation. Appreciate it. I haven't kept up with all of the hype, so I had no clue. lol&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As i am sure you know, NBC is not the reason why people watch. It has to do with the Olympics.  NBC gets the rights to show it because it was the highest bidder. But then again, I'm preaching to the choir. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StephenMartin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 14:53:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screw You Internet: Olympic Opening Ceremonies Set Nielsen Ratings Records for NBC</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/09/screw-you-internet-olympic-opening-ceremonies-set-nielsen-ratings-records-for-nbc/4635#comment-1146443</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm just trying to figure out the meaning of your headline, "Screw You Internet."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm not surprised at the ratings. My drift is that many people like to watch the opening ceremonies, but not the events (insert my wife, and many of my friends, here).  I passed. It just doesn't interest me one bit. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StephenMartin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 13:54:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cable News Ratings for Thursday August 7, 2008</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/08/cable-news-ratings-for-thursday-august-7-2008/4633#comment-1143990</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think the Olympics, or the fact that it is lighter outside have anything to do with it. If those were the case, then why are the other shows either up from Tuesday (and previous days), or even? Seems that MSNBC is down across the board. Especially Olbermann. Yet shows like Larry King and BOR are up, as well as Special Report, Fox Report, Mad Money, Prime News, On the Money, Hannity and Colmes, Beck, Grace, On the Record, etc.  Not to mention that the Olympics were not on on Wednesday night ( it was light then also) and Olbermann was at around 600K too. In fact, a case could be made that since the Olympics are on the NBC network, and MSNBC gets crumbs from the mother network, their numbers would be up.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StephenMartin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 04:36:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cable News Ratings for Thursday August 7, 2008</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/08/cable-news-ratings-for-thursday-august-7-2008/4633#comment-1142014</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe Olbermann's ratings are dropping because people are bored with his narcissistic arrogant personality. O'Reilly is arrogant, but his narcissism is minimal compared to Olbermann's. IMO, that is. Plus, from what I'm seeing, many of the cable shows that have talk politics most of the time are losing viewers. FOX seems to mix it up more. For me, the whole presidential campaign thing is just old, and I find myself avoiding shows that focus on it. I'm just tired of it all. I might not be alone. Maybe it's as simple as that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StephenMartin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 22:20:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cable News Ratings for Thursday August 7, 2008</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/08/cable-news-ratings-for-thursday-august-7-2008/4633#comment-1140659</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Two nights in a row Olbermann hit just over 600k. This is significant. Very interesting. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StephenMartin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 19:44:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cable News Ratings for Wednesday August 6, 2008</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/07/cable-news-ratings-for-wednesday-august-6-2008/4619#comment-1132931</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I compared the 8 and 9 pm slots for Tuesday and Wednesday. The left hand column represents Wednesday night. The right Tuesday. As you can see Olbermann took a big hit as did Abrams, but the rest seems pretty normal. Some up...some down.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;8PM - P2+ (25-54) (35-64)&lt;br&gt;The O’Reilly Factor-  2,376,000....2,329,000&lt;br&gt;CNN Election Center– 575,000....659,000 &lt;br&gt;Countdown                – 662,000...1,289,000 &lt;br&gt;On the Money             -130,000...120,000&lt;br&gt;Nancy Grace             – 994,000...891,000&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;9 PM - P2+ (25-54) (35-64)&lt;br&gt;Hannity &amp;amp; Colmes –      1,840,000....1,904,000&lt;br&gt;Larry King Live –             878,000...1,131,000&lt;br&gt;Verdict w/ Dan Abrams– 253,000...594,000&lt;br&gt;Saving General Motors- 320,000...Detroit Auto Show- 186,000&lt;br&gt;Glenn Beck-                   423,000...471,000&lt;br&gt;                      &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StephenMartin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 08:54:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cable News Ratings for Monday August 4, 2008</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/05/cable-news-ratings-for-monday-august-4-2008/4605#comment-1114592</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Up until a couple of months ago, I watched consistently, and I don't remember ever seeing an opposing point of view. And when trying to make a point,  I've never seen any other opinion oriented commentator take so many things out of context as this man does. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StephenMartin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 14:28:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cable News Ratings for Monday August 4, 2008</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/05/cable-news-ratings-for-monday-august-4-2008/4605#comment-1111180</link><description>&lt;p&gt;^&lt;br&gt;He lies way more than the rest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With those kind of numbers it always surprises me, and makes me giggle, that some people believe Olbermann is giving BOR a run for his money. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StephenMartin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 09:16:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cable News Ratings for Thursday June 5, 2008</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/06/06/cable-news-ratings-for-thursday-june-5-2008/4055#comment-614383</link><description>&lt;p&gt;MSNBC's strategy to go far left is attracting new viewers. Matthews and Abrams are up too. But have they topped out and how long will it last? We'll see. Also, Obermann's ratings took a jump with the McClellan interview, but they have come down some since then. Another factor in the Olbermann case is he has been getting quite a bit of attention lately and many people may be dropping by to see what he's all about. Once they see that he is a loon they will more than likely move on. One last thing. Sometimes I watch him just because I want to watch his insanity.Watching him is like looking at a car wreck. I wonder how many people are watching him for that reason. Plenty, I would imagine. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StephenMartin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 13:35:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cable News Ratings for Friday, May 23</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/27/cable-news-ratings-for-friday-may-23/3914#comment-541246</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bill O' was in rerun on Friday.  Unfortunately, for the sanity of the world, KO's numbers are rising. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StephenMartin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 09:19:03 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>