<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Shazzalive</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/Shazzalive/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/Shazzalive/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 12:27:49 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: SSD 101: What You Need To Know About Upgrading Your Computer With An SSD</title><link>https://www.backblaze.com/blog/?p=70831#comment-4275517252</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Acronis True Image allows you to clone any drive. It's also intelligent software that prevents many of the minor issues that you'll find with lesser software from arising.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shazzalive</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 12:27:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 13 mistakes to avoid when choosing antivirus software in 2018</title><link>http://newblog.emsi.loc/en/29702/choosing-antivirus-software-2018/#comment-3999017704</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I use Kaspersky Free. I also have Microsoft Defender scan my files periodically. In addition to the above I run a full scan by Adlice Software's Rogue Killer and a scan by ADWCleaner by Malwarebytes every week. ADWCleaner finds a lot of PUPs that Emsisoft can't see. Kaspersky has kept me malware-free for a year - barring 1 case which was detected by Rogue Killer - unlike Emsisoft which let in 2 infections in 3 months. I stopped using Emsisoft and used Kaspersky Free from then onwards. Microsolft Defender has been as good as useless compared to all other brands mentioned above.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shazzalive</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 20:20:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jeremy Clarkson jets off to Barbados for a romantic break - Caribbean Herald</title><link>http://www.caribbeanherald.com/index.php/sid/251844983#comment-3165370355</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm just trying to remember Clarkson's last dealings with an Irish person... 'Must have been at the BBC... I don't think it went that well. The Stig may have been wise to wear his helmet that day.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shazzalive</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 09:08:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Three misconceptions surrounding firewalls</title><link>https://blog.emsisoft.com/2016/05/02/three-misconceptions-surrounding-firewalls/#comment-2654778451</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Emsisoft does work alongside many other antivirus/antimalware solutions without issue; however Norton (unnecessarily) uses so many system resources that it makes me wonder if there'll be enough for anything else.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I suggest try the Symantec Removal Tool, which should get rid of most if not all the Norton bloatware so that Emsisoft can work unhindered.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shazzalive</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 20:49:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Popular Science names &amp;#8216;Power Over Wi-Fi&amp;#8217;  one of the year&amp;#8217;s game-changing technologies</title><link>http://www.washington.edu/news/2015/11/18/popular-science-names-power-over-wi-fi-one-of-the-years-game-changing-technologies/#comment-2369140673</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's like Nikola Tesla's dream-come-true: But I have an uneasy feeling that it's one of those technologies where, after spending billions developing &amp;amp; implementing it; some clueless ignorant health-freak will start a totally-unsubstantiated rumour that it's affecting people's health... You know; the usual BS from some non-tech-savvy nutjob, which will lead to adverse ramifications based upon arguments from ignorance further down the line.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shazzalive</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 18:59:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ari's Take - The Biz Behind Full-Time Independent Music by musician Ari Herstand</title><link>http://aristake.com/?post=158#comment-2345018357</link><description>&lt;p&gt;'Nothing to do with the content; but I have to say this: -&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I find it really annoying that whenever I've read half way through any of your articles and still reading the text fades out and a lightbox appears asking me to sign up. Please sort this, as my only option - if this keeps infuriating me like it does - is to stop reading your blog at all. I don't want to do that and you don't want me to do that; so please try other tactics to get new fans to sign up. - Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shazzalive</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 18:36:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Khloe Kardashian Proudly Displays Her ASSets Mid-Lunge! Fill In The Blank!</title><link>http://perezhilton.com/2015-10-07-khloe-kardashian-butt-workout-bodysuit-fill-in-the-blank#comment-2322235237</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It was probably something along the lines of, "All I need now is photoshop!"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shazzalive</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2015 00:57:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ari's Take - The Biz Behind Full-Time Independent Music by musician Ari Herstand</title><link>http://aristake.com/?post=151#comment-2120257780</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The question is this: Do Facebook 'likes' make any difference? OK it gives you some extra social proof, and as such I guess that can't be a bad thing... But Facebook is, in essence, 'here today, gone tomorrow', exactly the same as MySpace, except it's far more commercialised.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My big problem is that I don't own Facebook, and there is only so much I can do on Facebook. I DO own my self-hosted WordPress website, however. - Isn't it a lot more important to be concentrating on building up my mailing list and getting traffic to there, than giving myself an ego-trip by accumulating Facebook 'likes'; which at the end of the day are fairly worthless and don't pay any bills? I mean yes it's all good building up a large fanbase on social media, but surely there are much more important things to think about?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shazzalive</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 17:46:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why You Need to Approach Blogging Like a Business (Blogging Is NOT Art)</title><link>https://blog.thesocialms.com/need-approach-blogging-like-business-blogging-not-art/#comment-1921844860</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The thing is that this article appears to approach the matter with the same old approach: Write more, + link more + more SEO + guest-post more = more traffic = a business. The truth is that write more, + link more + more SEO + guest-post more = burnout. If you were a shop and you put all your effort into creating better displays, visiting other shops, and appearing in as many guidebooks as possible, it wouldn't mean you'd get more business. - You'd be spinning your wheels and going nowhere.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shazzalive</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2015 12:18:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Miley Cyrus goes topless in 'Adore You' artwork</title><link>http://music-mix.ew.com/2014/02/20/miley-cyrus-single-adore-you-topless/#comment-1254987654</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Where are the Christians? I expected to see at least one saying she's going to Hell for making the video. - Oh well; they're obviously too busy dangling on the end of Katy Perrys' publicity-hook and touting their Illuminati conspiracy-theories. :D&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shazzalive</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 11:33:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jeremy Clarkson in trouble for gay slur on Twitter</title><link>http://recombu.com/cars/articles/news/jeremy-clarkson-apologies-for-gay-picture-on-twitter#comment-1225142193</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is yet another example of political correctness taken beyond the pail again. - Yes Clarkson is probably a big homophobic twat, and I bet Hammond was holding the note. (I seriously am only guessing there.) - But did a few poor delicate sensitive angellic people get offended then? Aah poor little things. Poor little diddums go take a long rest, call in to work sick, get counselling and therapy for the harm inflicted... Actually just seek help: Get a life. - Jeez, I despair!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shazzalive</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 05:45:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Name Is Beyonce And I&amp;#8217;m Better Than You—Bow Down</title><link>http://popdust.com/2013/12/16/beyonce-ego-charity-album-diva/#comment-1166995299</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I thought this article was quite awesome, well written, and succinct. I disagree with the below comments: I enjoyed reading it and it made me smile. Obviously a lot of people didn't get the meaning it was actually portraying, which is a shame. :|&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shazzalive</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2013 22:05:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Down in the UK</title><link>http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/004137.html#comment-1039789372</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can't get You Tube either: It seems like all Google services are down. Pinging &lt;a href="http://google.co.uk" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="google.co.uk"&gt;google.co.uk&lt;/a&gt; doesn't get any packets returned either.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shazzalive</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 02:49:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boy George Warns Justin Bieber And Rihanna Over Their 'Disruptive Behavior'</title><link>http://www.starpulse.com/news/Joe_Bowers/2013/08/29/boy_george_warns_justin_bieber_and_rih1#comment-1022600746</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't know George personally but I know he's a pretty level-headed celeb and usually what he says makes a lot of sense. In this case he's also speaking some words of wisdom and I think Justin and Rihanna would do well to pay attention.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shazzalive</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 18:33:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Becky Hill Covers Rudimental In New Live Video</title><link>http://www.entertainment-focus.com/news/becky-hill-covers-rudimental-in-new-live-video#comment-716128697</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This cover is yet another musical triumph in an ever-growing-list for this extremely-talented up-and-coming starlet: The amazing vocal dexterity and quality is outstanding, and the overall rendition belies Becky's "born for celebrity" status. One thing is for sure; we'll be hearing more from Becky Hill - And what a pleasure that will be.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shazzalive</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:06:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Working Parts: LCD and LED Televisions</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/working-parts-lcd-and-led-televisions/#comment-685032536</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The information in this article is far too condensed in my opinion: so much so that it gives entirely the wrong impression and causes confusion in numerous cases throughout the article. Each component-part mentioned would be short-changed without its own article. ( I'm a [maybe overly-pedantic] qualified electronics technician.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shazzalive</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 05:00:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 5 PC Improvements Since Windows 95</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/top-5-pc-improvements-since-windows-95/#comment-679621567</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Linux - the only desktop-software? I very much doubt it to be honest: Microsoft are doing their best to grab a decent share of the tablet-market, but as usual are falling behind and allowing competitors such as Apple to take a clear lead. At best they manage to copy Apple; industrial espionage a distinct possibility maybe? - But I think that whatever happens, Microsoft software will always have at least backwards-compatibility for desktop-computers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Apple; there's more chance of Apple going totally-tablet in my humble opinion; but again I doubt it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shazzalive</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 04:01:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Working Parts: The Computer Keyboard</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/working-parts-the-computer-keyboard/#comment-649855415</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Central processor of your keyboard" may be somewhat excessive a term to use. As I understand it; it's a CMOS chip with a network of NAND gates and Schmitt-triggers (Did I spell that right?) that serves to de-bounce the keys and collectively accumulate the keystrokes (Does that sound right?) so that there's no need to have a wire for each key between the keyboard and the computer.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shazzalive</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 22:58:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows XP completes 11 years of success</title><link>http://www.thewindowsclub.com/?p=53371#comment-628774329</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Windows XP is probably the best operating system ever as far as handling 2D graphics is concerned. - Although Windows 7 &amp;amp; 8 with their advanced graphics-handling algorithms have the edge over XP as far as 3D graphics are concerned, (XP being limited to DX9, despite the capabilities of whatever graphics-card is installed.) XP still has the edge, even if only in terms of fractions of a second, in the amount of time taken to process 2D graphics for programs such as Microsoft Office and the like.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shazzalive</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 14:54:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Couldn&amp;#8217;t Get Much Lighter: Katy Perry to Go Dark on Next Album</title><link>http://popdust.com/2012/06/29/katy-perry-upcoming-album-dark/#comment-572132616</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Katy's the kind of superstar who looks good in anything sexy: Personally I can't wait to witness her "dark side". :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shazzalive</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:58:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft criticised for obscene dance act at conference </title><link>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/9323153/Microsoft-criticised-for-obscene-dance-act-at-conference.html#comment-553967274</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Whoever is making a big fuss about an innuendo-strewn act needs to get a life... And what is the big deal with not printing the words penis and vagina? If I wrote kneecap or left hip which are also body parts; do they get edited out too? I'm so tired of this bullshit morality and Mary Whitehouse mentality.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shazzalive</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2012 16:40:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We are all standing on digital quicksand</title><link>http://www.businessesgrow.com/2012/03/20/we-are-all-standing-on-digital-quicksand/#comment-470592657</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh come on; walking on eggshells for fear of a bit of negative publicity is just not my thing: Ok there are haters, detractors, scammers, whatever; but surely a little negative publicity is more a test of fire than the end of everything? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here's my take on it: Some people love me, some people hate me; and that goes for everyone. - Either way; fair play to them. The haters want to bring me down and vice-versa. - That's the way it is and there's nothing else I, or anybody else can do but live with it. - So give me the viral neggies; bring it on. - It's publicity for my brand either way. Fame may come at a price. :S&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shazzalive</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:09:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kepler-22b could be inhabited</title><link>http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/kepler22b-could-be-inhabited-6273036.html#comment-383151312</link><description>&lt;p&gt;...Unless, of course, you're in some sort of warp-field; which renders your vessel in a sense separate from the time/space continuum. - Maybe I've been watching too much Star-Trek, but this has never been ruled out as a possibility.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shazzalive</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:10:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Takeout Is Good And You Should Use It</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/google-takeout-is-good-and-you-should-use-it/#comment-369448418</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'll just back up VIVROCKS' comment above: Facebook allows you to download a folder of absolutely everything; deleted and still-posted, that you've ever posted on Facebook since the day you started your account. This includes everything; text, data, pics, the lot. You can get yours by going to Facebook,clicking Home&amp;gt;Account Settings, and click the link "Download a copy of your Facebook data".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shazzalive</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:52:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Which Is Better: Google Plus Pages Or Facebook Pages?</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/which-is-better-google-plus-pages-or-facebook-pages/#comment-367179152</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Addy everything Google - well OK, a lot of things Google - is seemingly perpetually in beta, so it's no surprise that G+ goes along with that trend.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shazzalive</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 23:04:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>