<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Scientific</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/Scientific/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 15:29:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Pawlenty: I&amp;#8217;m Calling Obama Out</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/pawlenty_i8217m_calling_obama_out/#comment-16930057</link><description>I don't know; a bunch of riled-up wingnuts aided the rise of the Devil Incarnate in a certain country in central Europe in 1933.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pbrower2a</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 15:29:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pawlenty: I&amp;#8217;m Calling Obama Out</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/pawlenty_i8217m_calling_obama_out/#comment-16922606</link><description>i like pawlenty less after this article. obama is an unbearable liar and a hack but i'd vote for him in 2012 over a right wing nuttter reciting bible verses any day.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">liberalrapturedotcom</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 10:58:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pawlenty: I&amp;#8217;m Calling Obama Out</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/pawlenty_i8217m_calling_obama_out/#comment-16904187</link><description>Credit where credit's due, but getting a crowd of wingnuts riled up is not something to be concerned about, frankly. And again, pimping Christianity for votes - sickening.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scientific</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:38:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RNC chair Michael Steele upset that Obama read Kennedy's letter, per Kennedy's wishes</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/rnc_chair_michael_steele_upset_that_obama_read_kennedys_letter_per_kennedys_wishes/#comment-16389745</link><description>But when Huckabee pimped lies about health care reform before Ted was even in the ground? Silence. I really wonder who Steele thinks he's fooling. (Aside from the MSM.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scientific</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 17:56:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Correcting Follower Counts: 1000s of Spammers Perish</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/twitter_correcting_follower_counts_1000s_of_spammers_perish/#comment-13265940</link><description>Lost 60 followers. Thing is, I thought I'd been conscientious about blocking spammers - guess not.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scientific</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 08:03:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Video: Ann Coulter on O&amp;#8217;Reilly- Tiller wasn&amp;#8217;t Murdered, He was Aborted</title><link>http://therightscoop.disqus.com/video_ann_coulter_on_o8217reilly_tiller_wasn8217t_murdered_he_was_aborted/#comment-11708436</link><description>because a president committing treason isn't that important to you. [facepalm] #fail</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wolfsbayne</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:02:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Video: Ann Coulter on O&amp;#8217;Reilly- Tiller wasn&amp;#8217;t Murdered, He was Aborted</title><link>http://therightscoop.disqus.com/video_ann_coulter_on_o8217reilly_tiller_wasn8217t_murdered_he_was_aborted/#comment-11708267</link><description>Whatever.  Fox was the Monica Lewinsky Network for months, people.  Let's be honest.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scientific</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:54:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brian Williams On White House Access: &amp;quot;We Were Pretty Stunned At How Much We Were Able To Record&amp;quot; - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://tvnewser.disqus.com/brian_williams_on_white_house_access_quotwe_were_pretty_stunned_at_how_much_we_were_able_to_recordqu/#comment-10437338</link><description>.............but Bush had an entire cable network (Fox News).  And along that same thought line BO has two (CNN and MSNBC)  Looks like BO continues to try and one-up Bush.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chiefjgmac</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 13:35:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brian Williams On White House Access: &amp;quot;We Were Pretty Stunned At How Much We Were Able To Record&amp;quot; - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://tvnewser.disqus.com/brian_williams_on_white_house_access_quotwe_were_pretty_stunned_at_how_much_we_were_able_to_recordqu/#comment-10437096</link><description>No, that is true..........All the other things he is doing will do that.  Is there any truth to the fact that the president is now asking for a bailout?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chiefjgmac</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 13:28:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brian Williams On White House Access: &amp;quot;We Were Pretty Stunned At How Much We Were Able To Record&amp;quot; - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://tvnewser.disqus.com/brian_williams_on_white_house_access_quotwe_were_pretty_stunned_at_how_much_we_were_able_to_recordqu/#comment-10403574</link><description>Bullseye.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scientific</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:33:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brian Williams On White House Access: &amp;quot;We Were Pretty Stunned At How Much We Were Able To Record&amp;quot; - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://tvnewser.disqus.com/brian_williams_on_white_house_access_quotwe_were_pretty_stunned_at_how_much_we_were_able_to_recordqu/#comment-10403558</link><description>"What's the big deal about popping M&amp;M's? Glenn Beck does it all the time.....does Brian think that's "unbelievable" too? HA!"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No, but I suspect that you do.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's "Barack", by the way.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scientific</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:33:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brian Williams On White House Access: &amp;quot;We Were Pretty Stunned At How Much We Were Able To Record&amp;quot; - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://tvnewser.disqus.com/brian_williams_on_white_house_access_quotwe_were_pretty_stunned_at_how_much_we_were_able_to_recordqu/#comment-10403525</link><description>Guys like you probably think anything he does is "arrogant", and we all know what that's code for.  Besides, Bush spent nearly 900 days on vacation, guy.  Set the record for US Presidents by only a hair over Reagan.  Was on vacation a month before 9/11 and during Hurricane Katrina (which didn't put a crimp in his plans).  So, have some perspective.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A date night in NYC for President Obama and the First Lady isn't going to bankrupt the nation.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scientific</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:31:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brian Williams On White House Access: &amp;quot;We Were Pretty Stunned At How Much We Were Able To Record&amp;quot; - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://tvnewser.disqus.com/brian_williams_on_white_house_access_quotwe_were_pretty_stunned_at_how_much_we_were_able_to_recordqu/#comment-10403414</link><description>Well, Obama may get a prime-time special, but Bush had an entire cable network (Fox News).  And besides, being given access doesn't mean the government's running the media.  Idiot.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scientific</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:27:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dear Senators Obama and Biden&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/dear_senators_obama_and_biden8230/#comment-2136254</link><description>Calm down.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scientific</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:26:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama&amp;#8217;s Trying To Start A Race War, Says Black McCain Supporter</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/obama8217s_trying_to_start_a_race_war_says_black_mccain_supporter/#comment-1089650</link><description>I DON'T have to vote for any one of these two guys and nuance is John Kerry's French word for triangulation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/oilRpt/idUKN0340213420080803" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://uk.reuters.com/article/oilRpt/idUKN03402...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LL</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 01:32:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama&amp;#8217;s Trying To Start A Race War, Says Black McCain Supporter</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/obama8217s_trying_to_start_a_race_war_says_black_mccain_supporter/#comment-1089610</link><description>Wonder which side Joe Watkins would be fighting on in this "war" of his.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scientific</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 01:24:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama&amp;#8217;s Trying To Start A Race War, Says Black McCain Supporter</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/obama8217s_trying_to_start_a_race_war_says_black_mccain_supporter/#comment-1089605</link><description>Not wholly accurate.  Obama supports the possibility of drilling on lands already designated for drilling, and McCain wants to ignore what we already have to drill in even more locations.  Nuance, perhaps, but an important distinction.  As for nuclear power, Obama's supported it in Illinois, but hasn't committed 100% to doing so as President.  As for liquid coal - I don't know as much about that issue, so if that's true, that's not good.  But it's the dent in the Rolls Royce, people.  At the end of the day, it's about November 4, and picking one of these two cats to be President.  Who would you rather see in there, warts and all?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scientific</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 01:23:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ludacris &amp;#8220;Helps&amp;#8221; Obama Pretend Like He&amp;#8217;s Never Met Ludacris</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/ludacris_8220helps8221_obama_pretend_like_he8217s_never_met_ludacris/#comment-1056203</link><description>Luda, dude: NOT helping.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scientific</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:28:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;You Got More Face Time With Him&amp;#8230;&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/8220you_got_more_face_time_with_him82308221_49/#comment-1040374</link><description>I spent two summers in Oxford.  Gotta got to Harvey's in Gloucester Green.  Amazing shrimp-salad baguettes.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scientific</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:36:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This should Settle the Question of Hillary as VP</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/this_should_settle_the_question_of_hillary_as_vp_02/#comment-1001067</link><description>Yes, but the news here isn't who McAuliffe's advocating &lt;i&gt;for&lt;/i&gt; - it's that he didn't say that Obama should pick Hillary.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scientific</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:24:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Citizens of the World . . . &amp;#8220;Hope&amp;#8221; Knows No Boarders</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/citizens_of_the_world_8220hope8221_knows_no_boarders_55/#comment-994962</link><description>Scientific:  Who's stuff?  And what's your twinge?  Trying to share your "watch".  Thanks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GreenLadyHere</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:48:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Citizens of the World . . . &amp;#8220;Hope&amp;#8221; Knows No Boarders</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/citizens_of_the_world_8220hope8221_knows_no_boarders_55/#comment-994729</link><description>I smelled another crab in the barrel when reading some of his recent stuff.  Something is going on, and we better get wise quickly.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scientific</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:18:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wednesday Open Thread - Hi Everyone!</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/wednesday_open_thread_hi_everyone/#comment-849792</link><description></description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pjamma</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 19:45:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FISA-Jacking - Obama Takes the Lead</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/fisa_jacking_obama_takes_the_lead/#comment-849736</link><description>Tell the truth and shame the devil.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Speaker of the House capitulated and she gets a free pass.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I call ish.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And Conyers can kiss my ass.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CraigHickman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 19:37:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FISA-Jacking - Obama Takes the Lead</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/fisa_jacking_obama_takes_the_lead/#comment-848422</link><description>I hate admit it even to myself, but it was going to be law anyway.  Once Pelosi caved, that was it.  But I don't think this is nearly as apocalyptic as everyone else.  If you really think Bush &amp; Co. think that they need a FISA law to enable them to spy on us, you need to wake up.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scientific</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:11:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>