<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for SamThornton</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/SamThornton/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/SamThornton/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:07:26 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Michelle Malkin Appearing on &amp;#8216;This Week&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/53474/michelle-malkin-appearing-on-this-week#comment-13762908</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"How the liberal media shuts down conservative voices?" Michelle Malkin? What febrile nonsense. Looks like ABC has gone over to the dark side. They've always been close. Oh, well, one less network whack job infotainment venue to watch. I think they've done me a favor.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SamThornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:07:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Blimp, a Republican and the Epitome of Hypocrisy</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/53239/a-blimp-a-republican-and-the-epitome-of-hypocrisy#comment-13664978</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The people in Congress have a crippling credibility problem stemming, in large part, by the way they have passed legislation that effectively makes them immune from formal charges of bribe taking, reclassifying the bribes they receive as "campaign contributions," among other dodges.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The public is not ignorant, well understands that Congress is corrupt, and knows Congresspeople expend a considerable effort both in their quests for bribes as well as figuring out ways steal from  public treasury for the benefit of those who are bribing them. These are among the reasons poll after poll shows an extremely low confidence in Congress. It's also among the reasons so many people don't bother voting. Beyond the political demagoguery, what's to choose between one thief or the other?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SamThornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:21:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Group Wants Lou Dobbs Off the Air for “Adopting an Unsubstantiated Conspiracy Theory that Originated on the Radical Racist Right” - TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/group-wants-lou-dobbs-off-the-air-for-adopting-an-unsubstantiated-conspiracy-theory-that-originated-on-the-radical-racist-right/28745#comment-13354748</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's might white of good ol' Lew to give the poor, downtrodden birfers a forum. Course, he always was a good ol' boy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SamThornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 12:36:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: President Obama Makes Surprise Appearance At White House Daily Briefing - TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/president-obama-makes-surprise-appearance-at-white-house-daily-briefing/28755#comment-13291008</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A simple "I screwed up" would suffice. The more obfuscation, the worse it looks. He's almost starting to sound like the late Strom Thurmond trying to excuse one of his clueless gaffes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SamThornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:48:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Campbell Brown: “CNN Is the Only One Who’s Still Doing Journalism” - TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/campbell-brown-cnn-is-the-only-one-whos-still-doing-journalism/28804#comment-13000773</link><description>&lt;p&gt;CNN does "journalism?" Sure, if journalism is the process by which every right-wing loony in the universe is provided a friendly forum. If journalism is a procedure where the lies, distortions, and scurrilous attacks by Republican hit-artists and treated as if they were somehow sane.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;CNN needs to get over itself and realize that they can't fool all of the people all of the time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SamThornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:46:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marcus Epstein is Free at Last</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/50317/marcus-epstein-is-free-at-last#comment-12449445</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Check out the link, "much more about the case here," above. All your questions will be answered. Mr. Epstein appears to be an extremely aggressive racist.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SamThornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:06:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: There&amp;#8217;s No Constituency for Post-Acquittal Detention</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/50343/theres-no-constituency-for-post-acquittal-detention#comment-12447039</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Despite what they say in public, especially while campaigning, Presidents are adamant in refusing to step back from any perceived powers, justified or not. Obama appears to be no different in this case and in others. It's almost as if a spring uncoils in their brains when sworn into office, short-circuiting the areas involving reasonable limits.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SamThornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:16:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Andy McCarthy Learns to Read</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/49696/andy-mccarthy-learns-to-read#comment-12196939</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Bad prose?" I read the article, and while it did have a viewpoint, it was decidedly not "bad prose." It was informative, well sourced and cogent in offering a snapshot of the current state of play on a college campus in 1983. This says a lot more to recommend the author (22-year old Barack Obama) than the inchoate hit pieces by Jack Cashill.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SamThornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 10:45:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Has Gupta Taken Himself Out of Running for SG Position? - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/has-gupta-taken-himself-out-of-running-for-sg-position/24104#comment-6924478</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Although undoubtedly a fine surgeon, Dr. Gupta has not distinguished himself when it comes to fiddling with the facts in some his on-air reports. I'm recalling of course, his grievously flawed diatribe against global warming which trotted out every discredited industry canard crafted by energy industry propagandists. Probably better if his sort is firmly excluded from responsible public service.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SamThornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:07:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DeMint on GOP Stimulus Opposition: &amp;#8216;That&amp;#8217;s the Leadership We Need&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/27566/demint-on-gop-stimulus-opposition#comment-5599048</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looks like the Republicans can't learn new tricks. Same old, scorched earth, take no prisoners, political hardball targeted at gaining advantage for themselves, the public be damned.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SamThornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:48:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mandela, King, Gandhi... Blagojevich? -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.com/archives/2009/01/25/mandela_king_gandhi_blagojevich.html#comment-5535719</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mr. Blagojevich appears more and more to be a trifle unbalanced, his behavior edging ever closer to the pathological. Perhaps the Illinois Senate should have a psychiatric evaluation the Governor available in the their deliberations. Couldn't hurt.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SamThornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:46:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is It Just Me Or Are the Obama People Not Using the &amp;#8216;War on Terror&amp;#8217; Phrase Anymore?</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/25861/is-it-just-me-or-are-the-obama-people-not-using-the-war-on-terror-phrase-anymore#comment-5154650</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hopefully, you're right, Spencer. Here's wishing the Obama Administration understands that the "war on terror" label has been coopted to apply to every opposition group faced by every tin-horn dictator in the world and come up with a more accurate paradigm.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SamThornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:13:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smith Takes on Coulter Over Victimhood - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/smith-takes-on-coulter-over-victimhood/23354#comment-4942771</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't mind conservatives, just the ignorant ones Coulter draws in her wake, for example, the ones posting here.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SamThornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:38:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Report: Obama to Tap CNN Doc Gupta for Surgeon General</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/24057/report-obama-to-tap-cnn-doc-gupta-for-surgeon-general#comment-4941185</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Had to check twice to make sure I wasn't reading The Onion. But after reading your article, have to agree Gupta might be one the more inspired appointments.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SamThornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:17:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Ann Coulter Story</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/23945/my-ann-coulter-story#comment-4940920</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I understand Coulter and her monomaniacal self promotion. What I don't get is how and why anyone in the media puts up with her. If ratings are the issue, you could get just as big or bigger ratings by putting on a pedophile endlessly bragging about his conquests. Maybe that's next. I predict MSNBC will be first.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SamThornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:09:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If You Want To Talk About Effective And Realistic Foreign Policy, You Better Stop By AEI</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/23965/if-you-want-to-talk-about-effective-and-realistic-foreign-policy-you-better-stop-by-aei#comment-4940668</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The only way I can make any sense out of U.S. foreign policy is to adopt the Noam Chomsky thesis that says, in effect, our foreign policy is essentially gun boat diplomacy at the direction and for the benefit of big business. Regardless of the pretty frames and clever nuances put on it by outfits like AEI, that seems to be exactly the way things have played out in the world for the last hundred years or so. Frankly, early signs seem to suggest that Obama is in that mainstream. Meet the new administration. Just like the old administration, only different.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SamThornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:54:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Feingold Is Pro-Panetta</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/23995/feingold-is-pro-panetta#comment-4940341</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe it's just me, but Leon Panetta (whom I don't know and have never met) seems to bear a striking resemblance to Silent Screen comedian Buster Keaton. I don't know if this has anything to do with the "I don't get no respect" phase he seems to be going through on his nomination, but hey, stranger things have happened. Feinstein, California, Hollywood. Pratfalls. Connect the dots.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Truth is none of these government jobs require more than half a brain. The guys at the top have flunkies to handle the details and get to say Yes or No once in a while. Panetta will probably be bored out of his skull after the first six months if he gets the job. Good health plan, though, and the retirement benefits are sweet.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SamThornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:33:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Glenn Beck Story Pulled Because of his Mormon Faith? - TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/glenn-beck-story-pulled-because-of-his-mormon-faith/23269#comment-4672120</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, my God, they're eating their own. There really, really is a God. Belly up to the table, brethren. There's more goodies on the way.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SamThornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 21:14:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Beck: &amp;quot;It's Just The Way I Roll&amp;quot; - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/beck-its-just-the-way-i-roll/23238#comment-4578496</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Beck knows stupid.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SamThornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:44:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ali Velshi Wants You To Get Your Money Back - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/ali-velshi-wants-you-to-get-your-money-back/23219#comment-4544052</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Does the phrase "tax dodge" ring a bell?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SamThornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 15:23:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blago: I Won't Be Going on &amp;quot;Meet the Press or on the TV News&amp;quot; - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/blago-i-wont-be-going-on-meet-the-press-or-on-the-tv-news/23213#comment-4531095</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This guy deserves life in prison on his haircut alone.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SamThornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:30:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Latest Bailout -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.com/archives/2008/12/19/the_latest_bailout.html#comment-4524929</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The mousetrap in the package is the requirement that UAW workers absorb pay cuts that would put them on par with non-union autoworkers in the south, the deal breaker that stopped the package in the Senate. Interestingly, there seem to be no demands that executives take pay cuts, too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SamThornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:04:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Curry-Warren Interview Already Drawing Reactions - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/curry-warren-interview-already-drawing-reactions/23207#comment-4524654</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Reminiscent of Jimmy Carter's "...I've lusted in my heart" moment. Odd that so many evangelical preachers seem to have some sort of obsession with sex.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SamThornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:51:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Linda Stouffer and Rusty Dornin Out at CNN - TVNewser</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/linda-stouffer-and-rusty-dornin-out-at-cnn/23147#comment-4416610</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree, it's a bloodbath at CNN. Don't know if anyone else has noticed, but I detect an increasingly rightward slant in their coverage and commentary. But maybe I'm just being paranoid. I'll continue to watch with interest as this unfolds. If they do go the Fox News route, I'll block them just like I blocked Fox news about a year ago. That leaves me LINK, CMT, BBC, and MSNBC (except for the always egregious Morning Joe.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SamThornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:06:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rahm's List -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.com/archives/2008/12/13/rahms_list.html#comment-4393346</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Exactly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SamThornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 21:31:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>