<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for RonThompson</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/RonThompson/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:04:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: GOP leader Rush wants Specter to take McCain (and Meghan)</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/gop_leader_rush_wants_specter_to_take_mccain_and_meghan/#comment-8814085</link><description>Limbaugh is not the titular leader of the Republicans--that would be Michael Steele, or perhaps John McCain. Limbaugh is the de facto, or actual, leader of the Republicans.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RonThompson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:04:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A contrary view on Lieberman</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/a_contrary_view_on_lieberman/#comment-3774421</link><description>I don't know where Evan Bayh and MG got the idea that Liebermamn can be replaced in the middle of the 111th Congress if the Democrats choose to do so, but I don't think that's correct.&lt;br&gt;     It's my understanding that the Senate adopts an organizing resolution at the beginning of each Congress, assigning committee posts and chairs. To change that during the 111th Congress would require passage of a motion, which would be subject to a filibuster, and there would not, at present, be 60 votes to invoke cloture if Lieberman and all the Republicans oppose it. Lieberman can be expelled from the caucus by a majority vote among Democrats, but there's no way he will be removed as Committee Chair once the Senate has approved a resolution appointing him to that position.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RonThompson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 13:09:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Gregory:  Meet Pollster.com and FiveThirtyEight.com</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/david_gregory_meet_pollstercom_and_fivethirtyeightcom/#comment-3072349</link><description>Nor is it just David Gregory and NBC. CNN at noon Eastern time October 15th reported their own Virginia poll in which Obama leads 53-43. But their Electoral Vote Projection has Obama at 264, with Virginia a "toss up".</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RonThompson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:20:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Gregory:  Meet Pollster.com and FiveThirtyEight.com</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/david_gregory_meet_pollstercom_and_fivethirtyeightcom/#comment-3056749</link><description>This needs to be explained as simply as possible:&lt;br&gt;     In order to maximize their profits from sales of newspapers and of advertising, the corporate media is lying to their readers and viewers, trying to convince them that the election is much closer than it is.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RonThompson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:45:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Colorado only remaining toss-up state, Hotline says</title><link>http://coloradoindependent.disqus.com/colorado_only_remaining_toss_up_state_hotline_says/#comment-3005902</link><description>Yes, WVa is Obama-lean based on the most recent poll, ARG, which is a Republican polling outfit and which has Obama up 50-42, which is outside the 4 percent margin of error. I imagine it's a lean because that's the first WVa poll to show Obama ahead, previous polls have had McCain up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And mathyoo, you're right, most recent polls have shown Obama with healthy leads in Colorado, but this is a projection, not just the result of the latest poll. Hotline also doesn't consider every poll that comes down the pike -- the most recent Colorado poll in its stable is the Denver Post's Mason Dixon poll from a week ago, which showed Obama and McCain in a dead heat. I would imagine Colorado moves at least to Obama-lean in next week's Hotline projection.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eluning</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 02:36:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Colorado only remaining toss-up state, Hotline says</title><link>http://coloradoindependent.disqus.com/colorado_only_remaining_toss_up_state_hotline_says/#comment-3002898</link><description>This seems to be off by 5. Are they counting West Virginia for Obama? With Kerry's 252, they're adding Florida 27, Ohio 20, Iowa 7, New Mexico 5, North Carolina 15, Nevada 5, and Virginia 13. That's 344, not 349.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RonThompson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 21:21:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poor Gwen Ifill, Sarah Palin 'blew me off'</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/poor_gwen_ifill_sarah_palin_blew_me_off/#comment-2886376</link><description>If it's like any of the others, the moderators will take the question, then reword and ask follow ups 'til they barely resemble the original question.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bush_Bites</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 23:13:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poor Gwen Ifill, Sarah Palin 'blew me off'</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/poor_gwen_ifill_sarah_palin_blew_me_off/#comment-2886267</link><description>Gwen "Potted Plant" Awful and Brokaw are jokes, of course. But I thought the Tuesday debate is a town-hall style format where the questions come from the audience, not Brokaw.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RonThompson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 23:02:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Scoreboard: Thursday, Sept. 18 - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://tvnewser.disqus.com/the_scoreboard_thursday_sept_18_mediabistrocom_tvnewser/#comment-2451465</link><description>I thought we were supposed to look at trends, and numbers over a period of time.  Another article posted here today says that he's up significantly from last year... so isn't that something?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tokar?  Where are you, buddy.  Isn't this your specialty?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ImNotBlue</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 02:23:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Scoreboard: Thursday, Sept. 18 - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://tvnewser.disqus.com/the_scoreboard_thursday_sept_18_mediabistrocom_tvnewser/#comment-2451238</link><description>Headline News is a niche network like CNBC. Look at Jim Cramer's numbers. On an average night he has about 200,000 viewsers but this show is a huge hit for CNBC. Headline News is not after large numbers. Nancy Grace does well when there is a huge court case ala OJ.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bart1205</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 01:23:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Scoreboard: Thursday, Sept. 18 - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://tvnewser.disqus.com/the_scoreboard_thursday_sept_18_mediabistrocom_tvnewser/#comment-2450219</link><description>Exactly. On first run, she outdraws him 501 to a pathetic 205 in the prime demographic, and 1204 to 691 among all viewers. When she goes away he drops CNN Headline from 1204 to 729, and from 501 to 261. When he goes away, her repeats top his repeats 351 to 261 and 744 to 729.&lt;br&gt;     Glenn Beck's ratings give rich new meaning to the term "anchor" when it comes to network news.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RonThompson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 22:29:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Scoreboard: Thursday, Sept. 18 - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://tvnewser.disqus.com/the_scoreboard_thursday_sept_18_mediabistrocom_tvnewser/#comment-2448996</link><description>This has been covered before, for Headline News he's doing well.  Compared to a few years ago when they just showed 1/2 hour newscasts 24 hours a day, he's got good ratings.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joes_Shovel</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 19:57:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Scoreboard: Thursday, Sept. 18 - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://tvnewser.disqus.com/the_scoreboard_thursday_sept_18_mediabistrocom_tvnewser/#comment-2448770</link><description>His numbers are good for Headline News.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bart1205</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 19:31:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Scoreboard: Thursday, Sept. 18 - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://tvnewser.disqus.com/the_scoreboard_thursday_sept_18_mediabistrocom_tvnewser/#comment-2447596</link><description>Why is Glenn Beck still on my television? He draws barely 10% of the viewers on all four networks for his two hours, and less than 12% of viewers 25-54.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RonThompson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:40:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Scoreboard: Wednesday, Sept. 17 - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://tvnewser.disqus.com/the_scoreboard_wednesday_sept_17_mediabistrocom_tvnewser/#comment-2434357</link><description>So in Prime Time MSNBC outdrew CNN among both the 25-54 demographic and all viewers last night. How often has that happened?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RonThompson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:56:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweeties Gone Wild</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/tweeties_gone_wild/#comment-2410200</link><description>Same thing. Toma(e)to/Toma(h)to.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scottsdalian</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:29:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweeties Gone Wild</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/tweeties_gone_wild/#comment-2409802</link><description>John, you wrote "trying to claim that McCain and company aren't really Republicans". Is that right, or did you mean "Bush and company"?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RonThompson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:51:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rumors that the Fed will cut interest rates</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/rumors_that_the_fed_will_cut_interest_rates/#comment-2367038</link><description>Lord knows I'm no economist, but how is lowering interest rates inflationary? Don't lower interest rates reduce the cost of borrowing?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RonThompson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 20:31:20 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>