<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for RobinHanson</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-211f6eb7" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/RobinHanson/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 22:45:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Harming Intentionally, Helping Incidentally</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/11/12/harming-intentionally-helping-incidentally/#comment-3852058</link><description>So what, we all need to make a fun video to introduce our blogs now?  The bar is raised!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobinHanson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 22:45:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Voter Abstinence Education</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/10/08/voter-abstinence-education/#comment-3003320</link><description>So does Colbert even understand Will's argument that he dismisses with such vigor?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobinHanson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 22:33:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hanson&amp;#8217;s Catechism</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/09/24/hansons-catechism/#comment-2588753</link><description>Blogging is new enough that we don't have as clear standard stories about what it is for.  But "Blogging isn't about conversation" is pretty good.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobinHanson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 22:20:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deliberation Day</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2003/12/23/deliberation-day/#comment-2465974</link><description>What, no one ever commented on this excellent post?  How much things have changed in five years! :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobinHanson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 15:41:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dancin&amp;#8217; with Hanson</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/07/07/dancin-with-hanson/#comment-830722</link><description>I am, I am friendly!  Er, hope that didn't sound to desperate ...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobinHanson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:51:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Raising Kids in Cages</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/28/on-not-being-a-domestic-tyrant/#comment-782704</link><description>Will it more about humility that relativity.  Yes some cultures can be right and others wrong, but the fact that so many other cultures disagree with a practice of my culture should give me pause, especially about using government force to impose my culture on others.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobinHanson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:20:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Raising Kids in Cages</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/28/on-not-being-a-domestic-tyrant/#comment-780683</link><description>&lt;i&gt;It is simply not OK to intentionally raise an illiterate child, even though illiteracy is the natural human condition&lt;/i&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So do you support the government forcing parents to teach their kids to read and write?  If a set of parents were proud of their illiterate culture, and wanted to raise their kids to be part of that culture, I'm pretty reluctant to use government force in this case.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobinHanson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:50:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Raising Kids in Cages</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/28/on-not-being-a-domestic-tyrant/#comment-776229</link><description>Yes of course once you accept that we should ever use the government to intervene in how kids are treated, the question becomes what the threshold is for that.  So to be clear, are you saying that the way these 400 kids were treated in Utah does or does not rise to this threshold?  Surely the consensus against locking kids in dark cages all their lives is far higher than the consensus against treating these kids they way they were treated.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobinHanson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:42:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Strategic Opinions</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/17/strategic-opinions/#comment-694518</link><description>Consider the strut.  It is a signal of dominance, but if you to use it without the power to back it up, you may be severely punished.  Same with trying to offer distinctive opinions when you aren't respected enough for others to take them seriously.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobinHanson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:16:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unfair in the Abstract, Fair in the Concrete</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/11/unfair-in-the-abstract-fair-in-the-concrete/#comment-648966</link><description>I'll bet the concrete case is fair because it is about art - if it were about working at a loading dock, people would think it unfair.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobinHanson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:11:47 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>