<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for RobertM</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/RobertM/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:56:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-42052</link><description>thanks robertm for your translations. I know dominick dunnes work quite well. But does Coyotewaits seriously expect people to guess who GVS etc are? To me, good writers, good blogs, good forums are all about communicating clearly not confusing people.&lt;br&gt;I prefer a margharita myself!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:56:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-40674</link><description>RobertM:  You can't just move the links by copy and pasting the post to HaloScan because often the are truncated and the copy function can't pick up the truncated portion.  So  copy and paste the whole thread to Halscan but do not hit publish, then come back launch each link, copy from the browsers link URL window, go back to HaloScan post and copy paste the true length over the truncated one pasted before.  (Don't wipe out any of the body of the post).  After all links re copied to HaloScan, hit Publish in HaloScan</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:06:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-39867</link><description>&lt;b&gt;Have a Happy &amp; Healing Hiatus, Steve!&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This IS worde than herding cats: OK start moving links from today's stories. For those who don't know how to use tinyurl, here is its web-site:   &lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://tinyurl.com/&lt;/a&gt;     Become familiar with it, as some of the stories will have nested upon nested listings.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For your entertainment, reposted here from the New Haloscan Thread:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;ANOTHER Veddy British Crime Story&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;from likely early in 2006. The TIMES ran a series of very droll yet strictly factual pieces on this case. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Summary:&lt;/i&gt; The retired physician wife confronted the husband's so-called mistress in her Oxbridge rooms with a smallish tea knife over her alienation of said husband's affections. It would have been a true farce if it wasn't a real felony assault in that the mistress's one eye socket got cut up very badly. The physician wife got close to 3 years and probation, the mistress was ambivalently saddened &amp; was done with the husband, and the husband showed himself to be a total dithering fool, not understanding at all how his uncommunicative behavior had brought two women to near total ruin. I'd have decked him on the spot if I was his kid or the wife's relative.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It seems he'd abandoned the marital bed a full decade before (wife aged 52 &amp; a busy practice) and taken up with the professional who became his mistress on hopes of being able to sustain an erection. But as it soon became evident that he couldn't do that with her either, and he refused to see a regular MD over it all, he and mistress took to doing crossword puzzles over tea. Very cozy, new companion, no demands. The physician wife kept thinking he was having sex with the mistress &amp; so her rejection level mounted and mounted, until she invited herself over to the Other Women's offices for tea and brought her own knife with her.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And so, &lt;b&gt;a Good Woman,&lt;/b&gt; &lt;i&gt;someone who's done more good in the world than I,&lt;/i&gt; is currently sitting in an HM prison doing who knows what over a crime that should never have happened but did, because she loved the fool her husband so much that she didn't want a divorce. Sheesh. I can only hope that the grown children are NOT talking to him. Total low-grade narcissist. The Times reporter let the husband hang himself with his own key words. A fine piece of reporting.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;LADIES--&amp;gt;&lt;/b&gt;  Divorce them, have your own affairs, just do not use knives, guns or rat poison, despite how much they deserve it. Ain't worth the blot on your good name, nor sucking down taxpayer's money by being in prison that could go elsewhere.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;OK cats, keep moving.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobertM</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:53:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-39799</link><description>And AGAIN&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;HEY, EVERYONE!!!!!!&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lets get back on the same pathway so we can continue an actual discussion, especially in regards today's events.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why not start by going over to the NEW Halsoscan Open Thread page Steve has started at &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/2kftvc?" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://tinyurl.com/2kftvc?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;etc, for which see below or abo ve, however you've got this set up.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobertM</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:14:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-39794</link><description>&lt;b&gt;bpcl&lt;/b&gt;  Please move comment over to &lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/2kftvc" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://tinyurl.com/2kftvc&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks so very much</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobertM</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:11:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-39773</link><description>I agree, RobertM! It would be great to get everyone on the same page (literally!) again. I couldn't find anyone when I tried to move before,  and I hadn't struggled with this format...But its too quiet here. As far as moving posts--?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:59:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-39745</link><description>&lt;b&gt;HEY, EVERYONE!!!!!!&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lets get back on the same pathway so we can continue an actual discussion, especially in regards today's events.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why not start by going over to the NEW Halsoscan Open Thread page Steve has started at &lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/2ykcxa" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://tinyurl.com/2ykcxa&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's a lot more gray pixels to kill over there. And do consider moving your posts and links done here, so we don't have to go back and forth among 3 threads!!!! Two is exhausting and 3 is unmanageable. One is Best.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would suggest starting by moving everything posted here from 1st 12/16 post, but really the ones with links are most imporatn. This is directed at AndyT and Kermit especially.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;PLEASE&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am now going to post a similar request over the Haloscan thread #2.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;PRETTY PLEASE WITH SUGAR ON TOP&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/b&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobertM</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:45:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-39691</link><description>&lt;b&gt;chrischris&lt;/b&gt; Just link per Squiggles recommendations several days ago to prior post, please don't quote the whole thing. This format "kills" white psace pixels enough as it is. Thanks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobertM</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:11:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-39365</link><description>Actually, the origin of &lt;b&gt;xin/s&lt;/b&gt; main post is a Mystery to Me too, other than that through life-contacts she knows this Duncan woman &amp; associates. [Pay attention. Xin knows a lot of people who know a lot of people--I'm beginning to suspect there's a fine non-fiction narrative on California life &amp; people that one could weave using xin's life. Or one hell of a roman a clef novel(s) if she decided to go the Jacqueline Susann route, as In "Beyond the Further Adventures of the Girls from the Valley of the Dolls".]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Still, DD = Dominick Dunne, famed reporter/gossip colunmist who, due to his daughter's murder, came to realize that sometimes only true justice is what gets onto printed pages that  will outlast us all. His viewpoint style  is "what fool's these mortals be", caring all the while. Google him or so see wiki article. His focus is true crime among celebrities.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;GVS= Greta van Susteren from cable news court shows. She's the one with the slightly funny mouth. A more credible version as a lawyer than Nancy Grace.  Where oh where is Dan Abrams.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But as to just whom JB &amp; TD really are, we both will have to read the blog or &lt;br&gt;checkout  the wiki article. I'm thinking JB is Jeff Beck but strongly suspect that's only showing my age..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As to what CW is on, well, its likely scotch, and if it was weed, it'd be nowhere's near the quality xin gets for her scrip.  Me, a now prefer dry reds; there are a lot of nice little labels out ther from California, but in general I haven't imbibed since birthday. Situation, not preference.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobertM</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:29:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-39334</link><description>&lt;b&gt;NOTE - General &amp; Personal&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;This unannounced change by Steve to the parameters and even nature of his sandbox(es) is indeed typical of what's been happening over the past 2 plus years. The medium develops, some stuff works, some doesn't, preferences change &amp; Steve re-arranges the furniture, sometimes drastically. It is his sandbox. We are guests.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But this guest, for all his blue-statedness, has deep "conserve" tendencies, as in if it ain't really broke, don't fix it. Haloscan was not broke. There was no need to change.  Disqus is not broke, either. It just works differently. There was still no need to change. But with the change being made, and given that only I and seattleite have posted at the new Haloscan thread--I presume there are some posting at the old one but I'm having trouble reaching that through this maze of links--the discussion ought to continue here for the time being. Google will be caching these pages soon, as with the Haloscan pages and so new visitors will find all this work sooner rather than later. And especially when the story ramps up into greater prominence.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm not feeling well about this, however. I spent WAY too much time over the past two days coming to grips with the formats, learning what works (thanks, Squiggle &amp; for those still confused read Steve's headers but then also read Squiggle's post here on Days 1 &amp; 2)  &amp; how to make what works work for me. Which is why I stated in reply to the Kid Genius who started this, it was &lt;b&gt;too much bloody work&lt;/b&gt;. Yes, too much like work, and work is one of my personal issues right now. I intend to be in read-mode-only for a while with an occasional post or reply (famous last words) as over-committing to a "hobby" is not what I need to do; it should be an outlet and not my focus of hours. Then too, I can't produce quality work like Kermit's PP Slides!! (Go find link below &amp; download it! Understanding the total environment, the landscape, is something we lose sight of using flat maps and kermit's is multiple window onto that understanding.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Be posting with you. May true justice be done in this case. (&amp; for Kat &amp; Molly, too, though there is no mystery there, just the same deep family loss the Kerchers suffer now.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobertM</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:04:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-39179</link><description>This reply is to parent post &lt;a href="http://truecrimeweblog.disqus.com/open_thread_the_murder_of_meredith_kercher/#comment-38817" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://truecrimeweblog.disqus.com/open_thread_t...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;and RobertM's reply to the Rhonda post following it at&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://truecrimeweblog.disqus.com/open_thread_the_murder_of_meredith_kercher/#comment-38956" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://truecrimeweblog.disqus.com/open_thread_t...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;in thread view only.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Robert concluded his post asking "So, given that there's hard evidence and broader circumstantial evidence, why Rudy is holding back from naming Rafe and/or Amanda is a real "yellow" here?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have asked this same question over and over.  My only logical answer needs help from our friends in Italy,  (fran, belle, middie, damien pls cmebck).  But this is my thought.  In this stage of the Italian CCP process it is still only the equivalent of the interrogation/interview process of POI (persons of interest) in USA CCP.  Until an arrest and formal charges and indictment is imminent there is no plea deals offered to just POI in the USA (in Italy they already call them suspects and can detain them).  So if we are in a sort of complementary stage of the investigation in Perugia, it is that ILE are trying to gather more evidence, especially against AK and RS but without tipping their hand as to what they have.  By getting each suspect to talk in interrogations they just hope to learn more a piece at a time and to break down more and more each suspects story.  (e.g., just why is it reported they are going back to the HOH and look at a foot print (the heel or the trainer sole?) or something else.  Because they have gleamed something in these interviews that a re-forensic examination might uncover new hard evidence.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thus they are not tipping their hand with offers of leniency to the one suspect they have dead to rights for a M1 charge.  When they finally have got all they think necessary to pull the plug and issue arrest warrants with charges,  then they will top off their case with "here's the deal Mr Rudy, tell us all you really do know and we can offer you............!".  By that time they will think fairly confidently that they can take down the other[s] with their forensic evidence even if Rudy fucks up his testimony of truth (the deal) in the trial from the defense attacks.  So then the judges and jurors will be swayed by the whole story the LE has put together, not just some story by a known petty drug criminal of Afro ethnicity.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is why I feel it is going to be a long time before this case goes to arrests with a scheduled trial date.   PS:  I also do not think RG has told his lawyer any more truth than he has the investigators.  I don't know about RS and AK in that latter regard and have no opinion or guess.  Coyotewaits has to wait again and again.  Dang it!!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 08:56:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-38985</link><description>Can't decide if I'm on the inside looking out at me looking back in or the other way round. Here or there? Or both? And all this good stuff just from today. What think you?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobertM</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 04:40:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-38969</link><description>You went exploring, huh? Of the several hundreds of people who've I've encountered here, only a handful have ever figured out my ongoing persona, or rather have had the curioisty. You know, based on how thick the formal Howland family books are &amp; will be, one can safely say that the stray young man who the Pilgrims picked up off the London docks (well, we could use another likely lad) turned out to be the most fecund of all the Mayflower males. (I'm a Hopkins-Doty-Cooke-somebody else i've forgotten descendant. No Howlands. Certain families never married with others in the first 5 generations or so. The Billingtons? Who'd want to join the family which had the First Murderer and so the first execution in Ye Olde Plymouth Colony.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobertM</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 04:20:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-38968</link><description>Same thing the paper of the Hearst papers had a yellow tint.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 04:20:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-38956</link><description>That conclusion is MORE TRUE for AK &amp; Rafe then it is for Rudy. In fact, I fail to see how its in Rudy's best interests NOT to directly implicate them. After all, as Piecone can now glory in, the real, HARD, evidence, both physical and DNA is ALL Rudy's --SO FAR, of course. As his lawyer, i'd looking at him and saying, you got to come up with more than that, I've got bupkis to work with here. And the trial will be a bench or judges' trial, utlizing a much more wide ranging standard of evidence than could possibly be seen in the US &amp; UK. As seattleite points out, part of the rationale for keeping Amanda in prison is her statements to Meredith's friends &amp; police on Sat., &amp; Sun. [Plus of course ILE went out and got WIRE-TAPPING warrants right away.] In the US, whether any of that or NONE OF IT would be admitted to trial is dealt with in preliminary hearings. Much of what has leaked would fall under the NOT ADMIT category.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, given that there's hard evidence and broader circumstantial evidence, why Rudy is holding back from naming Rafe and/or Amanda is a real "yellow" here.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobertM</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 04:05:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-38943</link><description>chill, babee. a little merlot, a short stroll to your hot tub, and transient karmic enlightenment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[Neither format is at all satisfactory but I'm finding Oldest to Newest as Thread the best SO FAR--except with this older laptop which loads the thread better if I do it as Newest as Thread. And now for a bed-time Chivas neat--ha! if only.]</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobertM</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 03:55:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-38942</link><description>Most of this stuff falls under the heading of litigation support. There are many areas tech, paralegal, and information technology--for instance Kermit took several concepts of the case--locations of suspects, location of evidence, geography and reduced many pages of documents to just a couple of slides: comprehension through info tech.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't talk about my cases or clients but if what you pay for a gallon of gas goes up maybe I just got a chunk of work.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 03:53:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-38935</link><description>OK, what we would have called,in a slightly different context, "yellow journalism" circa 1880-1910, say Hearst's push for the Spanish-American war. Just wiki that for more detail on that. I don't remember how yellow originated in this case as US slang.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;...&lt;br&gt;This weird, really out of left field thought crossed my mind: As Patty Hearst did serve several years in Cali prison, and did and is still married to an ex-guard/security agent, just imagine some of their reminisences at quiet, private moments, eh? And perhaps some variant, bedroom games.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, &lt;b&gt;xin&lt;/b&gt; with your rolodek relationships, you must have SOMETHING on PH?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobertM</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 03:47:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-38912</link><description>god i hate this shit (DQ)&lt;br&gt;hope CW and others who need this find it. I am sick of working for this start-up software company.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;this term giallo was asked and answered ages ago, as with "giallo Perugia" which means&lt;br&gt;Perugia mystery...and may be related to our own "yellow" (exploitive) journalism. but to be simple, think of it as "mystery."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;yes, giallo means yellow.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 03:35:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-38911</link><description>Well, if you are working the civil side, ultimately it comes from the consumers who buy the product made by the company being sued or sueing. Its all part of over-head. If its the govt sueing a company, say Patrick Fitzgerald after Conrad Black, Fitz has to go back to DOJ to get authorized increases in his budget--if he actually had to. This is of course where ANY legal system, and even jurisprudence, fails one type of person--the defendant in a criminal trial. That person must have the ability to defend him or herself for any system to have the support of the people who use it. Miranda wasn't just the only or even the most important thing legally out of the 60s. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Federal funds were committed to creating Public Service Defense Lawyers to adequately represent US, yes, you &amp; me.  If accused of  a crime, I can figure out whom to call, but can I afford a downtonw Beantown lawyer? Only if they are working pro bono. That didn't cut it, and raising dollars as nonprofits didn't cut it. So fed dollars were voted in. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Even then, as from the Innocency Project which takes on the tough DNA projects of those already convicted (but not all), your public dfender might get paid but he or she doesn't have much of a budget either. There's a Texas death penalty case in which Jim Baker's white-shoed pro bono firm is shooting at the previous, one-wild-man public defender who lost what looks like a winnable case. (Being Texas its really complicated but was never a sexy case because there was no sex involved; just a naturalized Caribbean woman of smarts who was run as a deep DEA agent for yours and was never really off the books, but  a couple of years ago the boyfriend borrowed her rented car as the getaway vehicle in a robbery turned hit. All three men then named her as the brains behind it and the Texas DAs bit and even got a death penalty decision out of the jury. [The DP must be coded into the sugar on their cornflakes.] Not until she told her prison case manager that she was also a british citizen did real resources for the defense shake loose. The Brit consul knew nothing, but this Brit consul runs in Baker's circle, so...)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And by the way, just what would your job title description be like and how would characterize your firm's role in the legal industry. I'm trying to imagine this.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobertM</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 03:35:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-38896</link><description>We really need the absolute time stamp (like in haloscan which was set to Steve's local time) and not a relative time stamp as here in disqus set to the users preferred time.  Daniel did said they just added this time stamp feature recently and were still shaking it out but it would be an option of the blog owner whether to make different time options available to posters.&lt;br&gt;Here's the rub:&lt;br&gt;From RobertM post at Today (12/17/07) 05.51 PM; Robert says: "This is a reply to coyotewaits at Today 5:06 pm for those of you using Oldest or Newest with Flat formatting."   (Putting you I believe at USA EST).&lt;br&gt;From CW post at Today (12/17/07) 04.06 PM; was my post RobertM replied to (Putting me at USA CST one hour earlier which is where I have my absolute time option set to).  So the time is not absolute per se to all posters it is just absolute to the user.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hope disqus understands this (or see our posts here), and provides that fixed for all posters, whatever their locations, time stamp option and Steve (owner) can set it that way.  Or so all posters who would like it so, could set an option to do so. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is a reply to RobertM's reply (to my original parent post) posted at Today (12/17/07) at 9:28 PM.   &lt;br&gt;My first chance coming back to read all the posts in thread mode.  It is really great to see the posts organized like this and makes so much more sense.  The posts are really great by all, logical, and clear this way.  But when you're online with many posters at the same time, it is more like conversation back and forth continuously.   So to keep up the only way I can see is to be in the flat mode.  I wish there was some way to integrate the two.  Maybe side by side split screens.  Next time I am going to try to have two browser windows open (not two tabs) simultaneously and see if I can manage the flow that way.  Though only because I have a very large "25" monitor.  I would never try that on my laptop.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There have been suggestions here, xin, Robert, Squiggle, chris? that we need not only the fixed time stamp but a post #stamp that is the number in the parent or perma link.&lt;br&gt;I would like to add to those requests that it would be great to have next to reply  edit buttons a "Go To" button with a data entry box where you could fill in the post number and jump to that post.  Then following the "Go To" Button would be a Back button, which whenever you had jumped to find an old post you could click on the Back button and the software would jump you back to whatever was your last screen position before you used the Go To.   I think that would be quite user friendly.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 03:27:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-38873</link><description>RobertM: I never thought of my profession as legalized theft. He could work at my shop anytime.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 03:03:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-38867</link><description>&lt;b&gt;KERMIT!!&lt;/b&gt;, lissen up buddy-boy. Dese powered &amp; pointed presentashuns of yours is good stuff for doz slick legal types what do defend de accussed person in what may be called civil and too in criminal trials. Beaucop bucks to had, shiny sheckles indeed, to had stateside with your especially on the civil side, which ain't too civil when the trial starts! But you won't care with your "consulting" fees. Legalized theft.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobertM</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 03:00:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-38861</link><description>Giallo=yellow and refers to the yellow covers of sensational crime fiction (paperbacks).  It's hot or fantastic crime or maybe sleazy crime.  Example of a "yellow" crime fiction cover. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Giallo001.jpg" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Giallo001.jpg&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 02:55:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-38858</link><description>GIALLO is the word for Yellow.  CRIMINE is crime. [from Altavista's Babelfish]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What is the context in which the English word appears?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobertM</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 02:44:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>