<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for RobLoach</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/RobLoach/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:10:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Give me your podcast suggestions!</title><link>http://coldacid.net/blog/2009/01/02/give-me-your-podcast-suggestions#comment-4921706</link><description>Linux Link Tech SHow&lt;br&gt;Linux Basement&lt;br&gt;Acquia Podcast&lt;br&gt;Lullabot Podcast&lt;br&gt;Jupiter Broadcasting&lt;br&gt;Progressive Aggressive</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobLoach</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:10:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook could kill Twitter? Yeah, and I&amp;#039;m a flying pig</title><link>http://coldacid.net/blog/2009/01/03/facebook-could-kill-twitter-yeah-and-im-flying-pig#comment-4921650</link><description>Twitter is trying to be one thing and one thing only. A way of posting public status updates. Facebook is trying to be everything at once. They're completely different services, and neither of them are going away in favor of the other.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;OpenMicroBlogging FTW!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobLoach</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:06:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Drupal and the Desktop Online | Rob Loach .Net</title><link>http://robloach.net/node/82#comment-4425289</link><description>Really sorry, but I don't have the code anymore....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobLoach</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:50:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The perfect Drupal development environment</title><link>http://millwoodonline.co.uk/perfect-drupal-development-environment#comment-4217305</link><description>Yay! &lt;a href="http://drupal.org/project/demo" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://drupal.org/project/demo&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://drupal.org/project/demo_profile" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://drupal.org/project/demo_profile&lt;/a&gt; .</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobLoach</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 01:57:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: kkkkkkk</title><link>http://localhost/drupal/6/node/2#comment-4059601</link><description>Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book. It has survived not only five centuries, but also the leap into electronic typesetting, remaining essentially unchanged. It was popularised in the 1960s with the release of Letraset sheets containing Lorem Ipsum passages, and more recently with desktop publishing software like Aldus PageMaker including versions of Lorem Ipsum.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobLoach</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:14:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: kkkkkkk</title><link>http://localhost/drupal/6/node/2#comment-4059601</link><description>Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book. It has survived not only five centuries, but also the leap into electronic typesetting, remaining essentially unchanged. It was popularised in the 1960s with the release of Letraset sheets containing Lorem Ipsum passages, and more recently with desktop publishing software like Aldus PageMaker including versions of Lorem Ipsum.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://localhost/drupal/6/node/2</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:14:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: kkkkkkk</title><link>http://localhost/drupal/6/node/2#comment-4059597</link><description>This is child of test, damn it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobLoach</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:12:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: kkkkkkk</title><link>http://localhost/drupal/6/node/2#comment-4059597</link><description>This is child of test, damn it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://localhost/drupal/6/node/2</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:12:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: kkkkkkk</title><link>http://localhost/drupal/6/node/2#comment-4059567</link><description>This is the second test!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobLoach</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:03:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: kkkkkkk</title><link>http://localhost/drupal/6/node/2#comment-4059500</link><description>This is a test, damn it!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobLoach</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 08:49:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hello!</title><link>robloach//2#comment-4059229</link><description>This is a test comment Hello!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobLoach</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 08:01:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Test</title><link>http://localhost/drupal/6/node/1#comment-4056852</link><description>Yo, what's up?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobLoach</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 02:26:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Drupal 7 Code Freeze = Two Months?</title><link>http://robloach.net/node/126#comment-4023112</link><description>I'm personally hoping for a June-July time frame for D7. Working for a Drupal based dev company, I can say with some authority that we aren't using D6 hardly at all yet, and that just blows my mind... it's been out for 6 months! I know other Drupal companies are in the same (or similar) boat. When you have to meet &amp;lt;a href="http://www.cafemuhabbet.com/" title="adtech ile reklam 2.0 dönemi başlıyor ve Trkycmhrytllbtpydrklcktr &lt;a href="http://r10.net" rel="nofollow"&gt;r10.net&lt;/a&gt; seo yarışması"&amp;gt;adtech ile reklam 2.0 dönemi başlıyor ve Trkycmhrytllbtpydrklcktr &lt;a href="http://r10.net" rel="nofollow"&gt;r10.net&lt;/a&gt; seo yarışması&lt;/a&gt; the needs of customers you have to have as feature complete a product as possible, and D6 is still missing a few features before we can say that. Those features (thankfully) are under development, but still...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cris</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:43:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SoundMAX + Vista = Pain and fail</title><link>http://coldacid.net/blog/2008/11/05/soundmax-vista-pain-and-fail#comment-3581369</link><description>Sorry dude, you just ain't selling me on it. Especially not Eclipse, you've already heard and read my rants about that POS.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://coldacid.net/blog/2008/11/05/soundmax-vista-pain-and-fail</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 03:35:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SoundMAX + Vista = Pain and fail</title><link>http://coldacid.net/blog/2008/11/05/soundmax-vista-pain-and-fail#comment-3576011</link><description>MonoDevelop 2.0 is pretty slick now. I use Eclipse primarily though. If you're looking to build .NET software applications, the closest you can get on Linux is a Windows XP/Vista VirtualBox, or Mono.... VirtualBox is pretty awesome though, particularly with seamless mode turned on.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobLoach</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 21:22:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SoundMAX + Vista = Pain and fail</title><link>http://coldacid.net/blog/2008/11/05/soundmax-vista-pain-and-fail#comment-3573488</link><description>No.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I write programs for WIndows XP and Vista, therefore I need Vista, even if the hardware is old and crappy. There are hardware alternatives supported by Vista, which aren't expensive at all, that will give me back my beloved sounds.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On top of that, there are no good IDEs on Linux. When Microsoft starts releasing Visual Studio for Linux, perhaps I'll reconsider making Linux my primary OS. Until then, nay.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://coldacid.net/blog/2008/11/05/soundmax-vista-pain-and-fail</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 19:11:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SoundMAX + Vista = Pain and fail</title><link>http://coldacid.net/blog/2008/11/05/soundmax-vista-pain-and-fail#comment-3568959</link><description>The answer is Linux!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've been really enjoying &lt;a href="http://www.linuxmint.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Linux Mint&lt;/a&gt;, although they haven't yet updated to Ubuntu 8.10. I keep on hearing Fedora is good too. Linux Mint is pretty much Ubuntu, prettified, with some usability enhancements and the restricted extras.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobLoach</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:58:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unspoken Rules of Drupal</title><link>http://robloach.net/node/128#comment-3210179</link><description>Hey Tom!  Loved your post :-) .&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;1 &amp; 2: What if you want Drupal behind a reverse proxy? What if you want to use memcached? node and path caching with advcache? Serving files from a dedicated file server? All require changing core. Drupal core is not perfect and does not provide all the flexibility needed, especially when running large sites on more than one machine.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have absolutely no problem with changing core, as long as it's documented where the patch is in the &lt;a href="http://drupal.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;drupal.org&lt;/a&gt; issue queue. I wouldn't consider that hacking core because it's documented, and it's publicly available on &lt;a href="http://drupal.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;drupal.org&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you're behind a reverse proxies, you should be participating in one of the oldest &lt;a href="http://Drupal.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;Drupal.org&lt;/a&gt; node issues available: &lt;a href="http://drupal.org/node/7881" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://drupal.org/node/7881&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For dedicated or external file servers, it really depends on what you're trying to accomplish, but the &lt;a href="http://drupal.org/project/media_mover" rel="nofollow"&gt;Media Mover API&lt;/a&gt; is pretty robust. Of course, it depends on what you're doing. Amazon S3 anyone?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Memcache is &lt;a href="http://drupal.org/project/memcache" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. Advcache is &lt;a href="http://drupal.org/project/advcache" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. Both are documented and there is a push for more of this in Drupal core itself.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Again, I have no problems with changing core, as long as there's some documentation outlining what's going on, as well as an ongoing issue in the Drupal issue queue so that progress is made into making it possible to accomplish the same thing without having to change core.  It's &lt;em&gt;hacking core&lt;/em&gt; that I'm against.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Also, upgrading a hacked core is actually very easy - download the release tarball of the version you're running, download the latest release tarball, diff 'em and apply that patch to your hacked core, I've gone from 5.2 to 5.11 without having to hand patch a single thing.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;Upgrading a hacked core is possible, but isn't that fun. Can't go wrong with a simple "cvs update -r DRUPAL-5-11".&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;4. Ugh, there are so many half-finished, poorly written or overly general modules out there. Yes, I could use messaging and notifications module to send email alerts when someone replies to each user's comment. It would add nearly 9k lines of complex code to my Drupal install and require hours to learn to configure or I could write my own in 100 lines in a couple hours.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hit this all the time and I really wish that I could have the resources to fix all the problems that I find in contributed modules that I use/maintain. Sometimes, you do have to just put together your own small solution into fixing something that already exists. In a Drupal Utopian society, however, every contributed module would be awesome and do what it advertises perfectly.  The big ones (CCK and Views) fall in this category and that's part of what has been attributed to Drupal's success. Other small unpopular contributed modules though? Not so much. Sad, but true....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Someone inspired by fc_helper hell?&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;lol&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;7. This would be great except for the 200 lines of errors that all my contrib modules generate. Another point against #4&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;Again, spend a bit of time hacking at the module and contribute a patch. It might resurrect the module so that everyone could benefit from it again. You're right though, sometimes we just don't have the resources available to fix things and just have to hack our own solution.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;9. Mostly agree, but deadpr0grammer seems to have a good time complaining about everything, might be worth a shot.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;Haha, you know him too well.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobLoach</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 20:47:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: HTML formatting in a comment?</title><link>http://disqus.disqus.com/html_formatting_in_a_comment/#comment-3208364</link><description>adfsDFSAsdfsdfasdsdf&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Heaefer!&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;asdfdasf</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobLoach</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 20:17:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unspoken Rules of Drupal</title><link>http://robloach.net/node/128#comment-3204441</link><description>Patch++</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobLoach</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:52:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unspoken Rules of Drupal</title><link>http://robloach.net/node/128#comment-3200353</link><description>Dave wins!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobLoach</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:08:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unspoken Rules of Drupal</title><link>http://robloach.net/node/128#comment-3197868</link><description>Haha, caught on my own rules! :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobLoach</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 05:27:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gone for a week, back October 27</title><link>http://coldacid.net/blog/2008/10/17/gone-week-back-october-27#comment-3136300</link><description>Have an awesome cruise!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobLoach</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 21:29:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reader &amp;amp; Google Apps for Your Domain - Why Can&amp;#039;t Google Share Accounts?</title><link>http://davidkanter.com/post/37537473#comment-3131412</link><description>I'd love to have Google Reader in part of my Google Apps on my domain. Wish Google would push more services there....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobLoach</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:54:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disqus and Drupal: Rethinking Comments | Rob Loach .Net</title><link>http://www.robloach.net/node/109#comment-3097737</link><description>just testing module</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">e</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:58:41 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>