<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for RichardfromHB</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/RichardfromHB/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/RichardfromHB/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:27:04 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Occupy Wall Street to Publish Newspaper to Control Their Message</title><link>http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/146711/occupy-wall-street-to-publish-newspaper-to-control-their-message/#comment-323274602</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Call the union guys and see if there is a friendly printer with a good union bug that can work with you on the price point.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RichardfromHB</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:27:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The slum 'super-sheds' housing Britain's most vulnerable residents</title><link>http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/the-slum-supersheds-housing-britains-most-vulnerable-residents-2351022.html#comment-305968677</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thermal imaging would violate constitutional search limits here in the US without a search warrant, Big Bro'.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RichardfromHB</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:51:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Obama &amp;#8220;strong&amp;#8221; or &amp;#8220;weak&amp;#8221;?</title><link>http://americablog.com/2011/08/is-obama-strong-or-weak.html#comment-293169970</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Go Green, they're nationwide and maybe by 2016 we could build it into a winning position.  Otherwise, as Chomsky said, "In the US, there is basically one party, the business party.  It has two factions, called Democrats and republicans, which are somewhat different but carry out variations on the same policies.  By and large, I am opposed to those policies as is most of the population."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RichardfromHB</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 14:32:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Manning-Lamo Chat Logs Revealed</title><link>http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/07/manning-lamo-logs/#comment-256859432</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Firstly, and most importantly, it's now clear that Julian Assange did NOT know if Bradley Manning was the source who leaked the US cables to WikiLeaks. Manning tells Lamo that Assange “knows little about me” and “he takes source-protections uber-seriously.” Furthermore, he says, Assange "won’t work with you if you reveal too much about yourself.” Assange even instructs Manning to lie about his identity!&lt;br&gt;This blows apart the US government's protracted efforts to suggest that Assange actively enticed Manning to hand over the cables, and thereby charge the Australian with criminal activity. In fact, it was only through his own protracted sleuth work that Manning even knew who HE was talking to: "it took me four months to confirm that the person i was communicating [with] was in fact assange". &lt;br&gt;Why would Wired with-hold this critically important information, unless they were actively co-operating with US agents trying to fabricate charges against Assange? Given that Lamo had notified authorities of Manning's alleged actions while still continuing to chat with him, it's logical to assume the Feds would have wanted to censor any published details. Wired appears to have willingly complied.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RichardfromHB</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 00:24:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Looming Betrayal</title><link>http://www.truth-out.org/node/3949#comment-246900449</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The social contract in America is broken.  Now it's every person for themselves, a giant kleptocrisy.  The Citizens United decision guarantees that we'll have the best pols that corporate money can buy, regardless of "party."  Public protestations and denials will just lead to a cozy corporate friendly back room deal that is buried in the text of the bill.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RichardfromHB</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 18:35:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.calgarysun.com/2011/06/20/sleepwalker-not-responsible-for-brutal-attack</title><link>http://www.calgarysun.com/2011/06/20/sleepwalker-not-responsible-for-brutal-attack#comment-231246983</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What do you call a lawyer with a 70 IQ?&lt;br&gt;Your Honor.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RichardfromHB</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:09:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Shouldn\'t Mexicans Speak Proper Spanish?</title><link>http://www.ocweekly.com/2011-05-26/columns/ask-a-mexican-proper-spanish/#comment-219462521</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was interning in Corpus Crispy, TX and sat in on a murder trial where the court interpreter translated the defense counsel's question "And then what happened in the driveway?" as "Y entonces que paso en el driveway?"  I had to leave the courtroom briefly to not disturb the trial with laughter.  Over time, I have come to believe that the deep structure of language that is the communication of meaning is much more important than the superficial structure of the form of the words we use to get our meaning understood.  The witness clearly understood the question and answered it quickly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RichardfromHB</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:00:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WikiLeaks And Bradley Manning</title><link>http://onpoint.wbur.org/2011/03/17/wikileaks-and-bradley-manning#comment-169660128</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cutting off the commercial processing of defense funding by PayPal, etc. may be a problem for corporations that are doing business in California (PayPal is headquartered in Cali).  Check out California Civil Code Section 51 (prohibiting "arbitrary discrimination").  It also provides for attorneys fees if you win the case.  Go get 'em!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RichardfromHB</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:41:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jump in Foreclosures Reaches Historic High in March</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/39115/jump-in-foreclosures-reaches-historic-high-in-march#comment-8420991</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Larry Summers was specifically asked on Meet the Press about foreclosure assistance.  He just went to his "get the overall economy jump startrd" talking point.  He never mentioned foreclosure assistance in during the lengthy interview.  This is not a man of the people.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RichardfromHB</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:23:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Norm Coleman's never-ending death row appeal</title><link>http://americablog.com/2009/04/norm-colemans-never-ending-death-row.html#comment-7978622</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Minnesota Supreme Court, when it refused to order that Franken be seated before the election contest was completed, did a lot of thinking, and writing (see &lt;a href="http://www.courts.state.mn.us/opinions/sc/current/OPA090064-0306.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.courts.state.mn.us/opinions/sc/current/OPA090064-0306.pdf"&gt;http://www.courts.state.mn....&lt;/a&gt; ) about when an election must be certified.  In short, &lt;strong&gt;there's not a lot of doubt that Pawlenty must sign the certificate when the state court contest is over&lt;/strong&gt;.  Minnesota Law (Minn. Stat. § 204C.40, subd. 2) does not allow him to wait "years" for Norms federal suits to be finished.  Here's what the Minnesota Supreme Court said with Slip Opinion Page citations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Page 16: &lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;The plain language of Minn. Stat. § 204C.40, subd. 2, provides that no election certificate can be issued in this Senate race until the &lt;strong&gt;state courts &lt;/strong&gt;have finally decided the election contest pending under chapter 209. &lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Page 11: &lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;The term “contest” in Minn. Stat. § 204C.40, subd. 2, refers to contests initiated pursuant to the general election laws &lt;strong&gt;of this state&lt;/strong&gt;—that is, chapter 209—and not to the potential continuation of that contest into the United States Senate.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Seems pretty clear, and good for Al, that Governor Pawlenty must certify the election after the upcoming state supreme court appeal.  Without that certification, Pawlenty is not acting in the manner which the law specifically requires, and denying his constituents their second US senator.  Would Minnesotans like that?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So, the only way for Norm to use up his newly found $30,000 ceiling on individual election contest contributions is to get an order from the federal courts that prevents Pawlenty from issuing any certificate.  If the order, called a "stay" is denied, the fight is over and Al gets seated as a matter of law.  Let's all hope that Al's lawyers are researching the federal stay cases for every argument.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Interestingly, Pawlenty today is quoted agreeing with my analysis that the certification only waits for the conclusion of state court appeals, but expects it to take a "few more months".  &lt;a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/37489/pawlenty-a-few-more-months-to-resolve-franken-coleman-standoff" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://washingtonindependent.com/37489/pawlenty-a-few-more-months-to-resolve-franken-coleman-standoff"&gt;http://washingtonindependen...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RichardfromHB</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 12:34:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bankruptcy Reform Meets Unlikely Foe</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/27377/bankruptcy-reform-meets-unlikely-foe#comment-5623440</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have personally witnessed many of my acquaintences in the OC who had been employed in the sub-prime mortgage field, now switch to staffing the weekend auctions of foreclosed properties..  I wonder if they see anyone that recognises them as double bottom feeders.  Good riddance to Ameriquest and all their ilk.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RichardfromHB</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:25:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Citibank adding new $50 million jet to corporate fleet</title><link>http://americablog.com/2009/01/citibank-adding-new-50-million-jet-to.html#comment-5600388</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Huffington Post is reporting that Obama nixed this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/01/27/obama-officials-tells-cit_n_161202.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/01/27/obama-officials-tells-cit_n_161202.html"&gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.c...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RichardfromHB</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:51:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: "Semi-nationalization" is out and "nationalization" appears to be in</title><link>http://americablog.com/2009/01/semi-nationalization-is-out-and.html#comment-5220322</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We're debating terminology, Gemany wants an "I'm sorry," from their bankers.  German President Horst Köhler, former head of the International Monetary Fund. asked bank managers to apologize for their role in the financial crisis. &lt;a href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/0,1518,600382,00.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/0,1518,600382,00.html"&gt;http://www.spiegel.de/inter...&lt;/a&gt; Accountability seems outside the lines being discussed to date.  Even Bernie Made Off with Your Money is under house arrest in his luxury home.  What to do; surprise, corporate interests control America.  And by the way, the US Supreme Court defines corporations' first amendment rights to include campaign contributions.  So we're doomed to the best politicians that money can buy.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RichardfromHB</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:17:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Yorkers Favor Cuomo to Replace Clinton -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.com/archives/2009/01/15/new_yorkers_favor_cuomo_to_replace_clinton.html#comment-5156473</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Over at Daily kos:&lt;br&gt;Research 2000 for Daily Kos. 1/12-14. Likely voters. MoE 4% overall, 5% for Democratic oversample (No trend lines)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Approval/Disapproval/No opinion&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cuomo (D) 53/26/21 &lt;br&gt;Kennedy (D) 58/32/9 &lt;br&gt;Israel (D) 17/6/77&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;King (R) 39/41/20 &lt;br&gt;Giuliani (R) 38/56/6&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Democratic head-to-heads&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kennedy 31 &lt;br&gt;Cuomo 26 &lt;br&gt;Israel 2 &lt;br&gt;Undecided 41&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unlike polling from Quinnipiac and PPP (PDF), this R2K edition shows both Cuomo's (+27) and Kennedy's (+26) net favorability to be nearly identical. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RichardfromHB</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 20:21:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &lt;strike&gt;Bush&lt;/strike&gt; Obama now talking $300 bn in tax cuts</title><link>http://americablog.com/2009/01/bush-obama-now-talking-300-bn-in-tax.html#comment-4917710</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If we deficit spend enough to make China nervous about the real value of all our debt, we will spend our way into national bankruptcy.  I see an Argentina style debt nationalization in our future, because we won't be willing to make the tough belt-tightening needed in the future to pay off the debt.  Any politician that proposes it would be thrown out of office.  We could stave this off somewhat with a carbon tax on gas etc., a return to actually taxing high income persons, or other income measures.  Enron paid NO tax in the last five years of its existence, but had almost 800 off-shore penergy trading "partnerships" which were totally legal, and donated 1/4 million to Bushes inaugeration committee.  It's cheaper to buy influence than pay taxes.  As Ross Perot said so long ago: The problem is that no one wants to pay for the party.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RichardfromHB</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:46:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cabinet Watch: Janet Napolitano</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.com/18575/cabinet-watch-janet-napolitano#comment-3937321</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Recent news has McCain strongly in favor of her appointment.  This is smart stuff by Obama who is courting the maverick McCain on many levels, even forgiving/protecting his best friend in the Senate, Lieberman.  There is no such thing as the "magic 60" for Obama, and I bet the two moderate republican Senators from Maine get a lot of love too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RichardfromHB</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:56:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain Eager For Napo To Head To DHS</title><link>http://www.jedreport.com/2008/11/mccain-eager-for-napo-to-head.html#comment-3937133</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is smart stuff by Obama.  While the MSM are tittering about the 60 seat control in the Senate, Obama is courting maverick McCain on several fronts.  I bet the Dems give the two moderate republicans from Maine a lot of love too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RichardfromHB</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:48:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Time to boycott Utah, and Marriott?</title><link>http://americablog.com/2008/11/time-to-boycott-utah-and-marriott.html#comment-3559853</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Mormons also sponsor about 75% of the Boy Scout Troops in the US.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RichardfromHB</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 17:17:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What's Next</title><link>http://www.jedreport.com/2008/11/whats-next.html#comment-3492568</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Getting Obama in is just the start; there is much work to do.  We have to clean up the Bush end game which is threatening to just plunder the country. Paulson is negotiating the purchase of stock and warrants at about twice the going market rate.  This gives about ½ of the taxpayer’s money to Goldman Sachs, his old employer, and the other banks involved right away.  Check it out at: &lt;a href="http://www.thenation.com/doc/20081110/greider2" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.thenation.com/doc/20081110/greider2"&gt;http://www.thenation.com/do...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;	We have to spur them for more help on home foreclosures. Obama took a public position favoring a home loan modification program administered by Bankruptcy judges be included in the bailout/rescue. Reps said thanks, but no thanks to the proposal and it was transformed into a toothless program without the judges. Obama lobbied Dems for support basically saying that the proposal could be brought up again after the election when they would likely be in a stronger position. Fast forward. 7.5 million home owners are under water, where they owe more than their home is worth and the number is going up. Check it out at:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/10/30/real_estate/underwater_borrowers/index.htm?eref=rss_topstories" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://money.cnn.com/2008/10/30/real_estate/underwater_borrowers/index.htm?eref=rss_topstories"&gt;http://money.cnn.com/2008/1...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;We're now looking at 80,000 home foreclosures a month with more ARM resets to occur over the next three to four years. Check it out at:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/10/23/real_estate/foreclosures/index.htm?postversion=2008102311" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://money.cnn.com/2008/10/23/real_estate/foreclosures/index.htm?postversion=2008102311"&gt;http://money.cnn.com/2008/1...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;The nationwide Help for Homeowners program modified a total of 42 mortgages in the first half of October 2008.  Check it out at: &lt;a href="http://www.housingwire.com/2008/10/31/questions-emerge-h4h/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.housingwire.com/2008/10/31/questions-emerge-h4h/"&gt;http://www.housingwire.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;An early recipient of bailout funding, PNC Financial took Billions of funds and promptly bought up a competitor.  Check it out at:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mlive.com/businessreview/annarbor/index.ssf/2008/10/pnc_financial_services_buying.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.mlive.com/businessreview/annarbor/index.ssf/2008/10/pnc_financial_services_buying.html"&gt;http://www.mlive.com/busine...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then PNC opposed any modifications of mortgages it holds, claiming a constitutional right against "impairment of contract". What's really going on? Existing Federal law for years has given bankruptcy judges the power to modify mortgages for second, vacation, or investment homes (and luxury boat loans) so that the debtors can keep them after declaring bankruptcy; but not primary residences. Reps claim its "socialist" to have the same protection for folk that actually live in the home.  Redistribution to the elites justified with a "trickle-down" is good, but life as we know it will end when the theory is modified to a bottom-up approach? The vast number of non-performing mortgages could be restored to some level of performance, and their derivatives could hence regain value using an effective mortgage modification program. It is unlikely under the current administration where Sec. Paulson gives away $7.7 Billion bonus to PNC Financial to do mortgage modifications and doesn't require that ANY mortgages actually be modified for our kid's Billions.  Check it out at:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/101965-hedge-funds-threaten-to-block-mortgage-modifications" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://seekingalpha.com/article/101965-hedge-funds-threaten-to-block-mortgage-modifications"&gt;http://seekingalpha.com/art...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Similarly, Chase is taking it’s bailout and holding it for acquisitions instead of lending it out to consumers, builders, factory owners, etc.  Check it out at:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/25/business/25nocera.html?_r=1&amp;amp;adxnnl=1&amp;amp;oref=slogin&amp;amp;adxnnlx=1225497492-FpBtbdaiQMCjpzqdyXUFNw" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/25/business/25nocera.html?_r=1&amp;amp;adxnnl=1&amp;amp;oref=slogin&amp;amp;adxnnlx=1225497492-FpBtbdaiQMCjpzqdyXUFNw"&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2008...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Moreover, the firms that are bailed out are using taxpayer funds to raise year-end bonuses and executive salaries.  Check it out at:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1853846,00.html?xid=rss-nation" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1853846,00.html?xid=rss-nation"&gt;http://www.time.com/time/bu...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;amp;sid=aVann0.cv9Tw&amp;amp;refer=home" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;amp;sid=aVann0.cv9Tw&amp;amp;refer=home"&gt;http://www.bloomberg.com/ap...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;($20 Billion in bonuses to be paid this year in two firms)&lt;br&gt;Also Goldman Sacks:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1081624/Goldman-Sachs-ready-hand-7BILLION-salary-bonus-package--6bn-bail-out.html#fuck_mccain_obama" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1081624/Goldman-Sachs-ready-hand-7BILLION-salary-bonus-package--6bn-bail-out.html#fuck_mccain_obama"&gt;http://www.dailymail.co.uk/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;AIG spent Billions in dividends through first ½ of 2008: &lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2203416/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.slate.com/id/2203416/"&gt;http://www.slate.com/id/220...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's still a lot of work to do.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RichardfromHB</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:10:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BREAKING: AP: Sarah Palin Abused Her Power</title><link>http://americablog.com/2008/10/breaking-ap-sarah-palin-abused-her.html#comment-2990591</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Monegan may get himself a "golden parachute"  Sarah may have given him a cause of action for damages for wrongful termination.  It is enough to make out a case for Monegan if the refusal to terminate the trooper was a "substantial" or "motivating factor" in her descision to terminate him. Methlin v. Bartholomew (Alaska 1998) 971 P.2d 151 at page 154. And there are lots of similar cases.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RichardfromHB</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:01:06 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>