<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for PWT</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/PWT/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:12:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: From &amp;#8220;No&amp;#8221; to &amp;#8220;Boo!&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/from_8220no8221_to_8220boo8221/#comment-22594378</link><description>Perhaps, the bill would have a better chance of passing if the democrats were able to allay some of the fears of the electorate that the republicans have been showcasing.  In my view, that they don't, means that they can't.  They've already lost the argument and will likely start referring to opponents of reform as fascists.  The only unanswered question is whether it will die in committee or on the senate floor.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PWT</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:12:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Same-Sex Marriage Setback in Maine, Hope for the Future</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/same_sex_marriage_setback_in_maine_hope_for_the_future/#comment-21962256</link><description>Why doesn't 'limited government' apply to social issues as well?  It seems hypocritical to me to scream 'tax cuts, tax cuts, tax cuts' one minute and then to try to keep the gays from marrying the next.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PWT</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:49:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deja Vu: The Spanish Inquisition</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/deja_vu_the_spanish_inquisition/#comment-21699965</link><description>Ummm, except that the election is tomorrow, PWT. I don't think the ad will have any effect one way or the other at this point, but it will definitely have a negative effect on Chris Christie's legal fund.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kathykattenburg</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:22:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deja Vu: The Spanish Inquisition</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/deja_vu_the_spanish_inquisition/#comment-21698805</link><description>The impact of the ad and the following legal challenges will probably have a more positive effect for the Christie campaign as more people view the ad to find out what it's all about.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PWT</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:02:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ethics Probe Of 33 Lawmakers A Yawner</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/ethics_probe_of_33_lawmakers_a_yawner/#comment-21387382</link><description>A lot were arrested or thrown out of office.  There are a lot fewer R's to get in trouble, but don't worry.  Elect more R's and they will happily catch up with the D's in the corruption games.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zzzzz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:11:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ethics Probe Of 33 Lawmakers A Yawner</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/ethics_probe_of_33_lawmakers_a_yawner/#comment-21373173</link><description>I'm sad to see that (R)s are falling behind their (D) counterparts in regards to corruption.  Have they cleaned up their act or just gotten smarter about it?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PWT</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:08:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Get off your lazy duffs!!</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/get_off_your_lazy_duffs/#comment-21291679</link><description>"Paradyme" - that reminds me of a guy used to stand down in the  Wall street area (Maiden Lane) most weekdays, his phrase was, "spare a dime?". - somehow sounds appropriate for this new paradigm.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PWT</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:04:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dithering Before Sending Americans to Die</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/dithering_before_sending_americans_to_die/#comment-21196674</link><description>In defense of "dithering", we can clearly see what Republican "Knee Jerking" has gotten us into.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Father_Time</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:03:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dithering Before Sending Americans to Die</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/dithering_before_sending_americans_to_die/#comment-21195661</link><description>You know that a whole truckload of BS is about to be dumped when an author refers to military deferments in order to make a point about a critique of current events.  You can be sure, too, that past military deferments is the entire scope of the authors argument.  By the author's logic, I am unfit to comment on the situation in Afghanistan, as is he, from what I can read in his biography.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But the real point is that, to appear not to be 'dithering', Mr. Obama should address the charge.  He should rebut the notion that he is dithering not by describing the meetings that he is holding or the consultations that he is getting, but rather by explaining the current strategy, explaining what effects, if any, delaying the implementation of the recommendations will have and what his overall goal is for Afghanistan.  He has the rhetorical skills, especially compared to Cheney, he should use them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PWT</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:00:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Under 200 Votes For Public Option ?</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/under_200_votes_for_public_option/#comment-21173598</link><description>Exactly.  What is important to know is: how many votes are there for the "punk-assed-bitch" P.O.?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PWT</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:46:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lieberman Threatens to Join GOP Filibuster</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/lieberman_threatens_to_join_gop_filibuster/#comment-21139367</link><description>I agree it is all about the insurance companies being based in CT.  It will be interesting to see what happens if Lieberman follows through.  CT is a pretty blue state.  People who don't work for those companies are likely to support healthcare reform, and some of the lower level employees of those companies are likely to support it also.  If he is right, then his vote will have more local support than opposition.  If he is wrong, he will have trouble the next election.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zzzzz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:15:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lieberman Threatens to Join GOP Filibuster</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/lieberman_threatens_to_join_gop_filibuster/#comment-21117327</link><description>Given that he is from CT, the insurance capital of the world, it is unlikely that he would consider voting for any form of public option.  He knows where his bread is buttered and where his constituents work.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PWT</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:02:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is the Smart Grid Coming at Last?</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/is_the_smart_grid_coming_at_last/#comment-21105099</link><description>At least it is a start on what is billed as a $2,000,000,000,000 project.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PWT</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:26:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Answer</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/the_answer/#comment-21040039</link><description>A: "Present"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PWT</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:29:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Turkey from Cranberry Township; or, When a Conservative Attacks Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/the_turkey_from_cranberry_township_or_when_a_conservative_attacks_iraq_and_afghanistan_veterans/#comment-20879375</link><description>He has his viewpoint, you have yours.  For the record, I strongly agree with Mr. Metcalfe.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PWT</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:44:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Harry Reids Big &amp;#8220;Doc Fix&amp;#8221; Senate Defeat</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/harry_reids_big_8220doc_fix8221_senate_defeat/#comment-20791983</link><description>I think when you write, 'not up to the job', that could also apply to about 98 other members of the Senate.  The only standout, sadly, is Robert Byrd.  I don't agree with him, but I respect him.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PWT</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:26:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Flashback From the Afpak Migraine</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/flashback_from_the_afpak_migraine/#comment-20731097</link><description>"so it seems ridiculous to wish that the situation were different than it is. "&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Where is he wishing?  He was stating a fact.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shannonlee</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:37:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Flashback From the Afpak Migraine</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/flashback_from_the_afpak_migraine/#comment-20717450</link><description>And if Mr.Bush hadn't bombed the WTC in 2001, we wouldn't be discussing either situation.  But here we are.  Mr. Obama knew what he was getting himself into when he began campaigning to be POTUS, so it seems ridiculous to wish that the situation were different than it is.  It is what he signed on for, that he is unable to handle the situation is another matter.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PWT</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:52:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bono on Obama: The World Needs America Again</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/bono_on_obama_the_world_needs_america_again/#comment-20507638</link><description>"Bono on Obama" - who's on top?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PWT</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:28:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Health Insurers&amp;#8217; Self-Inflicted Wounds</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/health_insurers8217_self_inflicted_wounds/#comment-20228364</link><description>If they've angered the White House and Nancy Pelosi, they must be doing something right.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PWT</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:04:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Helen Thomas: Obama &amp;#8220;Lacks Courage&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/helen_thomas_obama_8220lacks_courage8221/#comment-20070158</link><description>I can't imagine any 'context' that would make this a positive assessment of Mr. Obama.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PWT</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:47:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Senate Health Care Reform Panel Vote: Snowe Job?</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/senate_health_care_reform_panel_vote_snowe_job/#comment-19978916</link><description>She should take a cue form Mr. Obama and vote 'present'.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PWT</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:44:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tide Turning On Health Care Reform, Democrats and Republicans?</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/tide_turning_on_health_care_reform_democrats_and_republicans/#comment-19598827</link><description>By the way, THERE IS NO BILL!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2009/10/there-is-no-baucus-bill.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2009/10/t...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PWT</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:24:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Obama Is Intellectual But Incompetent&amp;#8221;, Gore Vidal</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/8220obama_is_intellectual_but_incompetent8221_gore_vidal/#comment-19558255</link><description>Correction; Republicans don't watch them, but Republicans stopped mattering a year ago anyway so nobody that maters….cares.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Father_Time</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 12:30:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Obama Is Intellectual But Incompetent&amp;#8221;, Gore Vidal</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/8220obama_is_intellectual_but_incompetent8221_gore_vidal/#comment-19552794</link><description>&lt;i&gt;President Obama is NOT incompetent.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe he can state that in a press conference, nobody watches them anymore anyway, since that formulation worked so well for Nixon.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PWT</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:33:27 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>