<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Nathan_Lanier</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/Nathan_Lanier/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/Nathan_Lanier/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 08:04:44 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich review</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/29/dnp-android-4-0-ice-cream-sandwich-review/#comment-377474647</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been able to tell Voice Command to add commas and smiley faces via voice for years...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Lanier</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 08:04:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://natelanier.tumblr.com/post/1539962665</title><link>http://natelanier.tumblr.com/post/1539962665#comment-96658896</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Anne,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thank you! I'm glad you guys like them. I had a wonderful time and the girls were outstanding. I really appreciate you putting your trust in my abilities and it's encouraging to know that I'm doing alright! Again, thanks!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-Nate&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PS - If you're so inclined, head over here and leave a testimonial!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.natelanierphotography.com/Other/Guestbook/9796861_iRN3o" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.natelanierphotography.com/Other/Guestbook/9796861_iRN3o"&gt;http://www.natelanierphotog...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Lanier</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:09:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://natelanier.tumblr.com/post/426468777</title><link>http://natelanier.tumblr.com/post/426468777#comment-43643353</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for the kind words, Ed.  I hope you continue reading!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Lanier</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 08:56:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Back from Blogging Hiatus - Update 3</title><link>http://blog.tonybain.com/tony_bain/2009/11/back-from-blogging-hiatus-update-3.html#comment-22794117</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey I saw an inbound link to my photo here.   The above is Russian to me but thanks for using my photo!!  Take care.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Lanier</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:39:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Online advertising is now dead (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/11/13/onlineAdvertisingIsNowDead.html#comment-3764189</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just wish my dead business pulled $20 billion in revenue this year.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Lanier</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 20:41:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple's web (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/31/applesWeb.html#comment-3412362</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The problem is that the license sucks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Lanier</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:54:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple's web (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/31/applesWeb.html#comment-3410763</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dave, I would recommend looking into the Nokia E-71.   It is a highly underrated, highly capable device.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Lanier</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:13:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 8 Easy Ways to Save Money and Beat Gas Prices</title><link>http://natelanier.com/8-easy-ways-to-save-money-and-beat-gas-prices/#comment-612480</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you.  I appreciate your patronage! :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Lanier</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 00:17:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Make Exercise Not Feel Like Exercise</title><link>http://natelanier.com/how-to-make-exercise-not-feel-like-exercise/#comment-612474</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your comment.  There are absolutely cardiovascular benefits to snorkeling.  They aren't that great, but it sure beats the gym and ESPECIALLY beats the couch!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Lanier</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 00:17:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: James Siminoff</title><link>http://jamessiminoff.com/post/36536244#comment-561764</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Haha that is great&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Lanier</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 00:22:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FaceBook and Twitter&amp;#8230;Don&amp;#8217;t Trust the Nerds&amp;#8230;Focus on the Big Picture</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=3628#comment-559259</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Brilliant.   Some folks would vehemently disagree with you but they would be wrong.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Very glad I came across this blog.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Lanier</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 15:16:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: JAY PARKINSON + MD + MPH</title><link>http://blog.jayparkinsonmd.com/post/36442599#comment-554803</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lovely indeed.  Thanks for the link!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Lanier</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 23:51:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jenaé</title><link>http://jenaelee.com/post/34706241#comment-554682</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The fourth one is se....... sensual :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Lanier</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 23:19:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Speaking of Airlines&amp;#8230;What Do You Suck At?</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=3626#comment-550321</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I really, really, really, really suck at going with my gut instinct.  Always second guessing myself.  I think it's a horrible trait.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Lanier</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 12:37:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On Ted Kennedy</title><link>http://natelanier.com/on-ted-kennedy/#comment-550282</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sir or Madame:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I sincerely appreciate your comment and I apologize for my naive perspective.  As a patient, it is very refreshing to get both sides of the story and it's also very encouraging to know that Mr. Kennedy did not receive preferential treatment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And your point about White Coat Rants is correct:  The comparison of Cape Cod Hospital to MGH is an embarassment.  Not to say Cape Cod Hosptial isn't a fine institution; it's just his lack of knowledge on MGH was troubling.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At any rate, I have had a very difficult time with things and I have done a lot of homework on a lot of hospitals and I am keenly aware that MGH is one of the finest in the world.  As I am sure you understand, it's easy as a patient to become bitter and make excuses when you are notting getting an answer to your "why" questions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thank you for the advice on calling the clinic.  I will do that today.  The person discharging me didn't make a mistake unless they also made a mistake in my discharge notes where the instructions were the same.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Again, I appreciate you taking the time to stop by and voice your opinion - It is much appreciated.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Take care,&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Lanier</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 12:32:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On Ted Kennedy</title><link>http://natelanier.com/on-ted-kennedy/#comment-550275</link><description>&lt;p&gt;edit: mistake&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Lanier</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 12:31:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: JAY PARKINSON + MD + MPH</title><link>http://blog.jayparkinsonmd.com/post/36241770#comment-542562</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Touche. . . I wouldn't mind being that jackass though because at least I'd get to travel the globe!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Lanier</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 12:28:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Web Video&amp;#8230;More All-Time Highs Ahead and Welcome TubeMogul to The Blog</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=3621#comment-542535</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Love Toronto   :thumbs up.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'll stay tuned.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Lanier</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 12:24:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Get An RSS Feed Of Your Recent iTunes Purchases</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/05/27/how-to-get-an-rss-feed-of-your-recent-itunes-purchases/#comment-538392</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very Nice&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Lanier</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 18:55:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: JAY PARKINSON + MD + MPH</title><link>http://blog.jayparkinsonmd.com/post/36241770#comment-538382</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And so starts the race for someone to do it for real....!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Lanier</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 18:54:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are You Getting Enough Vitamin D?</title><link>http://natelanier.com/are-you-getting-enough-vitamin-d/#comment-538146</link><description>&lt;p&gt;True. . . I could write a book about the Vitamin but I tried to keep it concise.   Google is your friend, this is just a starter :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for reading.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Lanier</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 18:09:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft Releasing Social Bookmark Program</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/microsoft-releasing-social-bookmark-program#comment-538042</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Talk about late to the show.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Lanier</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 17:48:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should Twitter charge high-spew users? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/05/26/shouldTwitterChargeHighspe.html#comment-537575</link><description>&lt;p&gt;All I'm saying is that Twitter has specifically benefited from the early adoption by big names and power users.  They're the ones that editorialize about, use it, and ultimately give it traction.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't disagree with you that it's outgrown that phase....  At any rate, it has a long, long, long way to go before it can say it's an essential/important service for people.  Anecdotally, take a look at this:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://google.com/trends?q=facebook%2C+twitter&amp;amp;ctab=0&amp;amp;geo=all&amp;amp;date=ytd&amp;amp;sort=0" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://google.com/trends?q=facebook%2C+twitter&amp;amp;ctab=0&amp;amp;geo=all&amp;amp;date=ytd&amp;amp;sort=0"&gt;http://google.com/trends?q=...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Lanier</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 16:26:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: James Siminoff - Let&amp;#039;s just set gas at $20 per gallon</title><link>http://jamessiminoff.com/post/36238512#comment-537442</link><description>&lt;p&gt;At $20 a gallon Tar Sands would be more economically feasible than ever and we would lose the whole of Canada to massive excavation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hmm.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Let's do it!!  (Kidding, I love Canada)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyway, thought provoking stuff.  Unfortunately you can't give a baby a lolli-pop and expect it's not going to cry when you take it away.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thus is a Texan and his F-450.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Lanier</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 16:06:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: James Siminoff</title><link>http://jamessiminoff.com/post/36152316#comment-537203</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wasn't even alive during the oil crisis of the early eighties, but I'm assuming it had similar effects at the time on the American psyche?  And you're right, that didn't stop us all from soon forgetting how precarious the energy situation is by producing Hummers and Ford F-450's etc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What boggles my mind is that Volkswagen was making a Jetta that got better than 50 MPG in 1988!!! And here we are TWENTY years later and no one has improved upon that?  It's amazing to me that with all of the car manufacturers out there that one didn't have the foresight to really push for mass production of 100 MPG + vehicles.  The technology is there, it's just the resource/manufacturing pipeline is way behind where it needs to be.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I share the same fear as you but I think this time there will AT LEAST be more economical cars AVAILABLE for the savvy consumers among us.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Lanier</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 15:23:29 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>