<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for MikeChapman</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/MikeChapman/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/MikeChapman/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 09:31:01 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: PredictIt | Who will win the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination?</title><link>https://www.predictit.org/Market/3633/Who-will-win-the-2020-Democratic-presidential-nomination#comment-4385085334</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andrew Yang? Apparently some folks on here aren't that familiar with the delegate selection process. Harris is a great buy right now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeChapman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 09:31:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who will win the Republican presidential nomination?</title><link>http://www.predictit.com/Home/SingleMarket?marketId=1233#comment-2390884256</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What does that even mean?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeChapman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2015 11:13:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who will win the Republican presidential nomination?</title><link>http://www.predictit.com/Home/SingleMarket?marketId=1233#comment-2390857387</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lots of people on this site seem to be wasting their money on Rubio. interesting. &lt;a href="http://polling.reuters.com/#poll/TR130/filters/PARTY_ID_:2/dates/20151126-20151201/type/day" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://polling.reuters.com/#poll/TR130/filters/PARTY_ID_:2/dates/20151126-20151201/type/day"&gt;http://polling.reuters.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeChapman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2015 10:58:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who will win the Republican presidential nomination?</title><link>http://www.predictit.com/Home/SingleMarket?marketId=1233#comment-2387513400</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The 'ole non-answer. Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeChapman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 13:55:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who will win the Republican presidential nomination?</title><link>http://www.predictit.com/Home/SingleMarket?marketId=1233#comment-2387512609</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeChapman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 13:55:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who will win the Republican presidential nomination?</title><link>http://www.predictit.com/Home/SingleMarket?marketId=1233#comment-2387190854</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Please let's get Bush down to 10 cents. :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeChapman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 10:51:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who will win the Republican presidential nomination?</title><link>http://www.predictit.com/Home/SingleMarket?marketId=1233#comment-2387178248</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Are you asking me or the journalist who wrote the op-ed?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeChapman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 10:44:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who will win the Republican presidential nomination?</title><link>http://www.predictit.com/Home/SingleMarket?marketId=1233#comment-2387119668</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Will Jeb Bush be last Republican standing?&lt;a href="http://www.sun-sentinel.com/opinion/todays-buzz/sfl-will-jeb-bush-be-the-last-republican-standing-20151201-story.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.sun-sentinel.com/opinion/todays-buzz/sfl-will-jeb-bush-be-the-last-republican-standing-20151201-story.html"&gt;http://www.sun-sentinel.com...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeChapman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 10:07:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who will win the Republican presidential nomination?</title><link>http://www.predictit.com/Home/SingleMarket?marketId=1233#comment-2384549326</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Please keep driving down the price of Yes for Bush. Thank you!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeChapman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2015 18:37:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who will win the Republican presidential nomination? Jeb Bush</title><link>https://www.predictit.com/Home/SingleOption?contractId=439#comment-2381170811</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Organizational strength, experience, history, party bonafides, quality of campaign, ability to count delegates, money. Need I continue?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeChapman</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:24:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who will win the Republican presidential nomination?</title><link>http://www.predictit.com/Home/SingleMarket?marketId=1233#comment-2380600045</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Barry Goldwater, I'd say. Ike was anointed. Reagan had run twice previously and had become more acceptable. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeChapman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 20:08:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who will win the Republican presidential nomination?</title><link>http://www.predictit.com/Home/SingleMarket?marketId=1233#comment-2380572916</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Who's the last nominee who was anti-establishment and not anticipated as the nominee? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeChapman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 19:31:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who will win the Republican presidential nomination?</title><link>http://www.predictit.com/Home/SingleMarket?marketId=1233#comment-2380539865</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Worth reading if you haven't. &lt;a href="http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/dear-media-stop-freaking-out-about-donald-trumps-polls/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/dear-media-stop-freaking-out-about-donald-trumps-polls/"&gt;http://fivethirtyeight.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeChapman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 19:11:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who will win the Republican presidential nomination? Jeb Bush</title><link>https://www.predictit.com/Home/SingleOption?contractId=439#comment-2380534904</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It appears that the latest polls rather than more reliable predictors are driving this site. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeChapman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 19:08:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who will win the Republican presidential nomination? Jeb Bush</title><link>https://www.predictit.com/Home/SingleOption?contractId=439#comment-2380532740</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You cracked the code!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeChapman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 19:05:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who will win the Republican presidential nomination? Jeb Bush</title><link>https://www.predictit.com/Home/SingleOption?contractId=439#comment-2378268774</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There doesn't seem to be a great deal of understanding on here about how the nomination process actually works.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeChapman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:02:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who Will Actually Fix The ACA-- Thom Tillis (R-NC) Or Rick Weiland (D-SD)?</title><link>http://crooksandliars.com/2014/02/who-will-actually-fix-affordable-care-act#comment-1256520399</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post showing the striking difference between the candidates who actually want to make health care work for everyone in our country - namely Rick Weiland of South Dakota - and the Republicans. I found your piece on &lt;a href="http://flyoverwire.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://flyoverwire.com"&gt;http://flyoverwire.com&lt;/a&gt; which is covering the South Dakota Senate race.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeChapman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2014 15:39:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ideals Make Us American, Not Origins.</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/08/where-are-you-really-from-mitt/261551/#comment-628141693</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very nicely done. Thank you for writing this. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeChapman</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 20:41:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ratings Agencies Play Chicken&amp;#8230;Against the US Economy    The Reformed Broker</title><link>http://www.thereformedbroker.com/2010/07/28/ratings-agencies-play-chicken-against-the-us-economy/#comment-65082873</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can we agree that turning the trial lawyers loose on the ratings agencies is NOT the solution?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeChapman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:12:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is it time to reconsider Google Buzz vs Facebook or Twitter?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2010/06/13/is-it-time-to-reconsider-google-buzz-vs-facebook-or-twitter/#comment-56509912</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice post. For me, Buzz is my solid number three with Twitter first, Facebook second. I'm a huge Gmail and Google profile fan, so keeping the Buzz account going isn't a problem. I maintain a LinkedIn account too. I'm keen on the SEO potential and, while certainly not a power user like you, want to be positioned for the benefits later. Mainly, I like the more geekish, international, and eclectic crowd on Buzz. It kind of reminds me of social networking a few years back before the celebrities came along.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeChapman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 09:27:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Twitter Death Sentence</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2010/06/10/the-twitter-death-sentence/#comment-55748710</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There may one day be government intervention, but one case won't create the momentum needed to push a measure through a legislature or Congress. Imagine the education process that would be required.. If there were economic damages in this case, then @RayS has a court system at his disposal and can always write his Congressman in the meantime.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If something like this happens to an important elected official in the middle of a hotly contested campaign, then watch out!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeChapman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:18:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Manly Man Monday- Mike C.</title><link>http://austinstf.tumblr.com/post/653575914#comment-53384897</link><description>&lt;p&gt;OK, I'll work on an alternative to the Tevas. :) Great article, and very flattering. Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeChapman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 12:04:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook's Culture Problem May Be Fatal</title><link>http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2010/05/facebooks_culture_problem_may.html#comment-52398627</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's tempting to start predicting the demise of the world's largest online social network just after it also becomes the worlds most visited website, but just a tad premature. Facebook has become part of the mainstream. It's drawing the same kinds of people who watch television shows that are written to help you forget your day. If Facebook prohibited Farmville and the other games that are being played to help provide an alternative to the tough realities of daily living, then Facebook would be in trouble.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't want to imply that there might be an ivory tower analysis taking place here, but I guess I just did. So relax, enjoy, and wait for the next innovation in online social networking to emerge. It's out there somewhere and that is the only real threat to Facebook's future. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeChapman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 09:25:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Now That's One Savvy Entrepreneur</title><link>http://www.scottmonty.com/2008/07/now-thats-one-savvy-entrepreneur.html#comment-854312</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with your assessment completely about the importance of this group, and any similar group, of humans with real concerns, who exist in large numbers and who have specific needs and concerns. The beauty of social media is that it can actually be relevant to even small groups. This is a big one and an important one. Great work.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeChapman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:13:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Truth About Barack Obama</title><link>http://politics.drumsnwhistles.com/2008/05/the-truth-about-barack-obama/#comment-551857</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great video. Thanks for calling my attention to it on Twitter. I'll spread it around.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeChapman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 15:37:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>