<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for McLarty</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/McLarty/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/McLarty/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 22:14:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: http://www.robertsinn.com/2011/05/17/what-is-hpq-really-worth/</title><link>http://www.robertsinn.com/2011/05/17/what-is-hpq-really-worth/#comment-205692254</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good stuff.  I did basically, the exact same calcs around 10AM today. Makes me wonder if CFAI is building an effecient market army, or a bunch of predictable traders creating an eventual arbitrage opportunity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm writing the L2, in a couple of weeks.  Good luck, to you sir.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">McLarty</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 22:14:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Things that Make me say WOW!</title><link>http://www.howardlindzon.com/things-that-make-me-say-wow/#comment-201378522</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yah, I heard iShares was launching it, right after the homelayered nanotech&lt;br&gt;one.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But seriously...600,000 users on &lt;a href="http://the3dstudio.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="the3dstudio.com"&gt;the3dstudio.com&lt;/a&gt; ...charging $5 for&lt;br&gt;kilobytes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">McLarty</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 08:31:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Things that Make me say WOW!</title><link>http://www.howardlindzon.com/things-that-make-me-say-wow/#comment-201359714</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The price of 3D printers dropping like a stone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/571390/201105061725/Consumer-3D-Printers-In-Focus.aspx" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/571390/201105061725/Consumer-3D-Printers-In-Focus.aspx"&gt;http://www.investors.com/Ne...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You thought Redbull and laptops made it easy for web-startups.  You haven't seen nothing yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">McLarty</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 07:37:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I nuked my Twitter account this morning</title><link>http://20sinvestor.blogspot.com/2011/04/why-i-nuked-my-twitter-account-this.html#comment-199876895</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Welcome back to the productive part of society.  I left twitter for the exact same reasons.  I think I joined, for similar reasons. I didn't qwitter, or even say 'adios', one day, I just stopped cold-turkey.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Twitter, Stocktwits = noise...but so is my blog.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If stocks are moving higher - people are buying stocks.  If stocks are moving south - people are selling stocks.  That about sums up the stocktwits feed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">McLarty</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 17:39:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Behold! Deflationary Wave Is Upon Us</title><link>http://20sinvestor.blogspot.com/2011/04/behold-deflationary-wave-is-upon-us.html#comment-199871858</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Seriously man, how did we get here? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">McLarty</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 17:21:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real Gains in a Fiat Based World</title><link>http://www.jeffreymclarty.com/jm/2011/04/12/real-gains-in-a-fiat-based-world/#comment-185234138</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, and yes, it is true that the ETF has fees, but they are marginal&lt;br&gt;compared to the fees charged by mutual funds.  Mutual funds are a scam, and&lt;br&gt;poison for long-run retirement planning.  ETFs, in my opinion, charge a fair&lt;br&gt;fee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Eg.  For me to put $100K to work, in the 60 stocks in the TSX S&amp;amp;P 60&lt;br&gt;composite, I'd have to place 60 buy orders, and then a new buy order every&lt;br&gt;time a dividend is received from some of the stocks.  Even if you assume&lt;br&gt;that dividends are once annually, that's still 120 trades per year.  No way,&lt;br&gt;could I execute 120 trades for less than $150, the fee which would be&lt;br&gt;charged annually by the ETF company on $100K.  With smaller amounts, it's&lt;br&gt;even worse.  Okay, if you have half a million, or a million dollar&lt;br&gt;portfolio, you're probably better off buying the 60 stocks yourself.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">McLarty</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:18:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real Gains in a Fiat Based World</title><link>http://www.jeffreymclarty.com/jm/2011/04/12/real-gains-in-a-fiat-based-world/#comment-185231339</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Aasim, how you doing buddy?  How have you been?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm using proprietary models to support entry and exit points of options on&lt;br&gt;the index.  This generates cash, while my client holds the ETF, and collects&lt;br&gt;the dividends.  The chart included in this post, is the result of me using&lt;br&gt;profits from the derivatives trading, to continually accumulate more XIU.&lt;br&gt;Another way of putting it, is I've outperformed the TSX by the amount&lt;br&gt;required to buy about 9% more of the TSX.  Alternatively, it's an&lt;br&gt;approximation for how much I've outperformed the index, by using&lt;br&gt;derivatives.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">McLarty</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:13:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Long-run? Devaluation or Growth «  Step Away From the Fiat</title><link>http://www.jeffreymclarty.com/jm/2011/04/10/long-run-devaluation-or-growth/#comment-183198637</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Driving out industry, is a short-run consequence to higher energy&lt;br&gt;costs. This is going to happen, sooner, or later (either for man/government&lt;br&gt;made reasons, or due to less supply).  The 486 metaphor, is a wild&lt;br&gt;card.  Could prove true 5 years from now, could prove true 15 years from&lt;br&gt;now.  But, need to point out, that the dollars that are buying higher priced&lt;br&gt;electricity, aren't being detroyed. They are just circulating. Someobody is&lt;br&gt;always on the other side of the trade.  Since we are exporting that economic&lt;br&gt;benefit, it's likely something we have to do, to be able to have the&lt;br&gt;capacity in our grid, when we need it down the line.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now...the input/fuel costs for solar, wind and hydro don't rise with&lt;br&gt;inflation like the other commodities.  And, they aren't subject to supply&lt;br&gt;issues.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Compare the "effective tax of the subsidized", that I explained above, to&lt;br&gt;continually buying higher, and higher priced fuel solutions...both&lt;br&gt;would impact industry negatively.  However, the countries that wait&lt;br&gt;until market forces, force their hand, will be worse off, to make the switch&lt;br&gt;at the last minute.  I think ontario will have, less volatility of&lt;br&gt;unemployment, because of it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ok, of course, if you say we have spare Hydro capacity, and it can be&lt;br&gt;generated and transmitted cheaper than solar, wind, nuclear - sure, I'm all&lt;br&gt;ears, we should use that.  But when has a government ever gotten "straight&lt;br&gt;As"?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">McLarty</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:18:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The US Dollar is Drek&amp;#8230;and getting Drekker!</title><link>http://www.howardlindzon.com/the-us-dollar-is-drek-and-getting-drekker/#comment-158076866</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You should try it with a few of these...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mint.ca/store/product/product_exchange.jsp?itemId=prod1040001" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.mint.ca/store/product/product_exchange.jsp?itemId=prod1040001"&gt;http://www.mint.ca/store/pr...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A $20 Canadian silver coin, with $8 worth of silver in it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Slow double blinks is what you'll get from NYC.  Promise.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">McLarty</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 23:01:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 30 to 1</title><link>http://www.jeffreymclarty.com/jm/2010/11/27/30-to-1/#comment-107858719</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your quote inspired me, almost litterally the EXACT day, to finally execute on one of the hundreds of ideas I come up with.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, thank-you, for that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">McLarty</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 08:39:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Max Keiser, Eric Cantona, JP Morgan &amp; Eurodollar Time Deposits «  Leveraged Theta</title><link>http://www.jeffreymclarty.com/jm/2010/11/19/max-keiser-eric-cantona-jp-morgan-eurodollar-time-deposits/#comment-99931867</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You'll need a futures trading account.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The contract I'm proposing using, is the one right here:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cmegroup.com/trading/interest-rates/stir/eurodollar_contract_specifications.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.cmegroup.com/trading/interest-rates/stir/eurodollar_contract_specifications.html"&gt;http://www.cmegroup.com/tra...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Notional value = $1M, symbol GE, but I'm beginning to think, this might not&lt;br&gt;have the impact I originally hypothesized in my post.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">McLarty</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 22:10:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deflationists, I think you lost the debate «  Leveraged Theta</title><link>http://www.jeffreymclarty.com/jm/2010/11/09/deflationists-i-think-you-lost-the-debate/#comment-96525578</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yah, I know there has been previous nominal highs, higher for some of these&lt;br&gt;commodities.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But, it's them moving all in tandem that is bothering me.  I realize the&lt;br&gt;stuff going on in agriculture, but I'm betting the moves wouldn't be nearly&lt;br&gt;as bad, if the dollar wasn't also collapsing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This stuff going on, will be putting pressure on housing prices in the short&lt;br&gt;term, I think.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">McLarty</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 09:20:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Good News is Good News, Bad News is Good News «  Leveraged Theta</title><link>http://www.jeffreymclarty.com/jm/2010/11/05/good-news-is-good-news-bad-news-is-good-news/#comment-95072008</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder what other half comment replies have been lost in our discussions...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;...sigh...crap...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">McLarty</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 10:08:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Good News is Good News, Bad News is Good News «  Leveraged Theta</title><link>http://www.jeffreymclarty.com/jm/2010/11/05/good-news-is-good-news-bad-news-is-good-news/#comment-95071786</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here's my original reply: salvaged from g-mail.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bang on.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On that, I am looking at adding some single issue equity exposure,&lt;br&gt;against my short index positions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Check out WDC. Only reason I looked at the stock, is because I'm&lt;br&gt;looking at getting some sort of Media Server...and I think they have&lt;br&gt;my winning vote, at a pretty good price.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A PE under 7, which looks like it's on its way to at least 10.  They&lt;br&gt;got a ton of cash on hand, but using a market-cap-ex-cash PE is still&lt;br&gt;under 20.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Only downside, is likely short term, if they over-pay for some silly&lt;br&gt;acquisition.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">McLarty</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 10:07:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Good News is Good News, Bad News is Good News «  Leveraged Theta</title><link>http://www.jeffreymclarty.com/jm/2010/11/05/good-news-is-good-news-bad-news-is-good-news/#comment-95071262</link><description>&lt;p&gt;WTF??? I replied using the e-mail feature, with a big long paragraph after "Bang on." about looking to put some risk on to hedge against my index shorts...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;...I brought up WDC...and...blah...I guess it got erased or lost in the e-mail transmission to "discuss."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">McLarty</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 10:06:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Good News is Good News, Bad News is Good News «  Leveraged Theta</title><link>http://www.jeffreymclarty.com/jm/2010/11/05/good-news-is-good-news-bad-news-is-good-news/#comment-94619011</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bang on.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">McLarty</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 18:17:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Come Join me Up Here «  Leveraged Theta</title><link>http://www.jeffreymclarty.com/jm/2010/10/28/come-join-me-up-here/#comment-94124687</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sigh...okay....you're right...like always.  :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I was really hoping, I actually found the marginal RE buyers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So why is RE hitting new highs, in Toronto?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;YTD Average price of a single family home, is 9% higher than the 12&lt;br&gt;month average for 2009.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(2007 = $376K, 2008=$379K, 2009 = $395K, YTD = $431K).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't get it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'd really like to buy more Real-Estate, cause every other leveraged&lt;br&gt;investment model won't hold up through volatility.  But I can't&lt;br&gt;rationally make a good bullish pitch for RE.  Yet, it keeps going up.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">McLarty</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 08:18:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Halloween Came 4 Days Late to Wall-Street: America, how do you sleep at night? «  Leveraged Theta</title><link>http://www.jeffreymclarty.com/jm/2010/11/04/halloween-came-4-days-late-to-wall-street-america-how-do-you-sleep-at-night/#comment-94047761</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey...so, did you buy that farm yet?  Sounding more and more like a good idea...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">McLarty</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 23:08:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Come Join me Up Here «  Leveraged Theta</title><link>http://www.jeffreymclarty.com/jm/2010/10/28/come-join-me-up-here/#comment-93788652</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So you don't think there would be any correlation, between number of&lt;br&gt;applicants, and the number of affluent applicants allowed in? I have&lt;br&gt;no idea...I'm just guessing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That speculation aside, I think you're wrong about the existance of&lt;br&gt;quotas, or at least wrong on the numbers.  Because in a report, for&lt;br&gt;2010, the "target" for 2011 is a range from 240K to 265K.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/resources/publications/annual-report2010/section1.asp#part1_1" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/resources/publications/annual-report2010/section1.asp#part1_1"&gt;http://www.cic.gc.ca/englis...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Quota/Target...tomato/tamato...but a target, implies that they could&lt;br&gt;let in more.  Don't know if they will or not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In 2007 to 2009, all the years I checked, we had the same target range, but...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In 2009, we let 252K immigrants in.  42%, came to Ontario.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/resources/publications/annual-report2010/section3.asp" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/resources/publications/annual-report2010/section3.asp"&gt;http://www.cic.gc.ca/englis...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In 2008, we let 247K in.  45% came to Ontario.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/pdf/pub/immigration2009_e.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/pdf/pub/immigration2009_e.pdf"&gt;http://www.cic.gc.ca/englis...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In 2007, again we had the same range, but only let in 236K, 47% came to Ontario.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/resources/publications/annual-report2008/section3.asp#part3_2" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/resources/publications/annual-report2008/section3.asp#part3_2"&gt;http://www.cic.gc.ca/englis...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">McLarty</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 08:07:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Scenarios.  No Recovery. «  Leveraged Theta</title><link>http://www.jeffreymclarty.com/jm/2010/09/14/two-scenarios-no-recovery/#comment-79396079</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So I'm asking, where does the money go? All the wealth, that sells bonds,&lt;br&gt;has to go into another vehicle.  Are you really going to take what you used&lt;br&gt;to be saving in JGBs, and buy risk? Probably not. Could it possibly prop up&lt;br&gt;USTs, then?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">McLarty</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 23:26:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Scenarios.  No Recovery. «  Leveraged Theta</title><link>http://www.jeffreymclarty.com/jm/2010/09/14/two-scenarios-no-recovery/#comment-79345834</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good stuff.  Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">McLarty</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 20:25:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The American Dream    Joe Fahmy</title><link>http://joefahmy.com/2010/08/13/the-american-dream-2/#comment-79342967</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">McLarty</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 19:55:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10-Year JGB Yield Spikes 25bps (27%) in 12 Days (Japanese Bonds)</title><link>http://www.distressedvolatility.com/2010/09/10-year-jgb-yield-spikes-25bps-27-in-12.html#comment-79252382</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey DV, How you been?  I know it's been a while...the day job is killing me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Do you have a view, on which way the Nikkei will swing on JGBs selling off?  In a rational market, if the catalyst is a less credit-worthy government, I would think the N225 would sell off.  But money flow, could prop it up.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;IB currently only offers March 2011 FOPs and Sep 2011 FUT on JGBs...but the nikkei options go out to 2014.  Wondering if we can play JGB yields by proxy....and just, expect volatility.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">McLarty</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 09:57:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Scenarios.  No Recovery. «  Leveraged Theta</title><link>http://www.jeffreymclarty.com/jm/2010/09/14/two-scenarios-no-recovery/#comment-79251716</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can't figure out, if a crash in JGBs, would cause the Nikkei to&lt;br&gt;sky-rocket, stay flat, or crash too. I suppose it depends on the catalyst,&lt;br&gt;and how long it takes to play out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There are 2014 options available on the Nikkei 225, through IB.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">McLarty</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 09:53:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Scenarios.  No Recovery. «  Leveraged Theta</title><link>http://www.jeffreymclarty.com/jm/2010/09/14/two-scenarios-no-recovery/#comment-79243497</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If it helps at all, some company named "GL Trade", licenses and provides the&lt;br&gt;data, to IB from the TSE.  It's strange, I get an advertisement pop up in&lt;br&gt;IB, everytime I load the data.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They are owned by Sunguard, &lt;a href="http://www.sungard.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.sungard.com/"&gt;http://www.sungard.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's the only advertisement, I ever see, in my IB trading platform.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Currently, there are March 2011 options available, and a September 2011&lt;br&gt;futures contract.  That's as far as they go out, today.  I haven't found any&lt;br&gt;info anywhere, on when new contracts get created.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Jeffrey McLarty &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">McLarty</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 09:30:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>