<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for MatthewReichbach</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-40f9c4b7" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/MatthewReichbach/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:58:34 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: More Americans believe in UFOs than oppose a public option</title><link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/37862/more-americans-believe-in-ufos-than-oppose-a-public-option#comment-17808917</link><description>I didn't know 34 percent of Americans lived in Roswell.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MatthewReichbach</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:58:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Abq mayoral race: Journal poll has Berry in the lead</title><link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=37583#comment-17743138</link><description>Benito, the article that you wrote for NMI a year ago (&lt;a href="http://newmexicoindependent.com/529/a-polling-dilemma" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://newmexicoindependent.com/529/a-polling-d...&lt;/a&gt;) is still pretty much true... While some pollsters include cell phone-only households, others do not and instead attempt to weight the other demographics to match cell phone only households.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wrote a month ago about how the editor and founder of SurveyUSA said of phone polling, "“it’s over… this is the end." And no one has a solution quite yet.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MatthewReichbach</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:52:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: City of ABQ has no contract with two lobbyists indicted by the state for fraud</title><link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=34520#comment-15151808</link><description>Marjorie's comment most likely came before the update. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Since she wrote the post and update, and all.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MatthewReichbach</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:25:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Did TX Gov. Rick Perry kinda suggest Texas might secede?</title><link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/25115/did-tx-gov-rick-perry-kinda-suggest-texas-might-secede#comment-8299245</link><description>Actually, Thomas, there were three profanity-laced comments (one of which that was aimed at you) that we had to delete. Then the user stepped up his efforts so we had to ban him.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MatthewReichbach</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:54:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Did TX Gov. Rick Perry kinda suggest Texas might secede?</title><link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/25115/did-tx-gov-rick-perry-kinda-suggest-texas-might-secede#comment-8288460</link><description>Reminder, folks, keep it civil or your posts will be deleted. If you keep it up, you'll be banned.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MatthewReichbach</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 01:41:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Actor Val Kilmer hints at guv run &amp;#8212; again</title><link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/15922/kilmer-hints-at-guv-run-again#comment-6369400</link><description>Michael, those links you provided from Snopes don't back up what you said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The first one, about Liz Clairborne, says that Spike Lee told Esquire that he thought Clairborne said her inflammatory remarks on Oprah. Snopes said he was hoodwinked (my word, not theirs). That should have been caught by Esquire's fact checkers, but is not the same situation as you described.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hilfiger's Snopes entry didn't even mention Esquire.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And the Groucho Marks one mentioned that Marks actually DENIED ever saying the infamous joke in an Esquire interview with Roger Ebert. I'm not sure what Esquire would have to gain by lying about this instance. The editor-in-chief says he has an audio recording of the event -- this hadn't been a controversy until I posted this blog post, so there was no need to produce the audio until now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe they will in the future.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MatthewReichbach</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 02:38:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Santa Fe&amp;#8217;s webcasting rebel</title><link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/16794/santa-fes-webcasting-rebel#comment-5702987</link><description>I believe that you can already see Congress in action on C-SPAN.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MatthewReichbach</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:32:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama&amp;#8217;s Fantasy Football team</title><link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/6444/obamas-fantasy-football-team#comment-3269489</link><description>Though I really dislike the way that Rick Reilly writes and think he is one of the most overrated sportswriters in America, this was a pretty cool article. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And good thing that they went with Brees instead of Palmer -- since Palmer has been horrible this season when he's even on the field.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MatthewReichbach</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 02:42:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RNC backing off of N.M. voter fraud complaints?</title><link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/5868/rnc-backing-off-of-nm-voter-fraud-complaints#comment-3204642</link><description>In that case, it would still be voter registration fraud. We have not seen any real reported cases of actual voter fraud in New Mexico, only voter registration fraud.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MatthewReichbach</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:02:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Freedom&amp;#8217;s Watch: bringing civic betterment and social welfare one negative TV ad at a time</title><link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/5283/freedoms-watch-bringing-civic-betterment-and-social-welfare-one-negative-tv-ad-at-a-time#comment-3142081</link><description>As someone who has attempted to call Freedom's Watch a number of times, I can assure you that I have always reached a machine and despite leaving messages have never received a call back. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Multiple times.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MatthewReichbach</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 02:11:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tonight&amp;#8217;s TV choice: Prez debate or &amp;#8216;Project Runway&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/5234/debate-or-project-runway#comment-3081002</link><description>Or, in my case, picture-in-picture with the debate and the US vs Trinidad &amp; Tobago soccer game.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MatthewReichbach</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:40:01 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>