<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for MattJMcD</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-9ff390c2" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/MattJMcD/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:32:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: We Are Our Own Worst Enemy</title><link>http://www.mattjmcd.com/2009/09/we-are-our-own-worst-enemy/#comment-16882537</link><description>Right. I'm not completely innocent of anything I mentioned, I don't think any of us really are. I think the best thing is to make a conscious effort to do things the way you honestly believe is the best/most effective.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MattJMcD</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:32:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Determining The Best Social Medium For Your Message</title><link>http://www.mattjmcd.com/2009/09/determining-the-best-social-medium-for-your-message/#comment-16769549</link><description>Thank you sir, glad you liked it. Sometimes the simplest explanations are the best.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MattJMcD</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:08:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Links from 5/14/2009 to 8/9/2009</title><link>http://whitneyhess.com/blog/2009/08/09/links-from-5142009-to-892009/#comment-14966914</link><description>Hey thanks for the link! Awesome to be in some esteemed company there.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MattJMcD</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:11:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cutting Corners</title><link>http://tangerinetoad.blogspot.com/2009/07/cutting-corners.html#comment-13186637</link><description>Amazing how things have changed. Now I'm packing for a flight tomorrow and wondering if I can stuff all my clothes into a carry-on so I can avoid another $15-$20 just for checking a bag. There's something about being nickel-and-dimed that just makes you feel good about the whole experience.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MattJMcD</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 22:45:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Photo of the day: Insert hands to dry</title><link>http://whitneyhess.com/blog/2009/07/photo-of-the-day-insert-hands-to-dry/#comment-12217536</link><description>It's a good idea, and I'm glad that they're trying to push the thinking on otherwise mundane things, but it looks a little creepy. Also, while I know it's not dangerous at all, I'm not sure people want to go sticking their hands into something with the word "blade" in the name. Just saying.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MattJMcD</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:09:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do Supermarkets Do This?</title><link>http://www.mattjmcd.com/2009/05/do-supermarkets-do-this/#comment-9327616</link><description>I had heard a little bit about the Kroger story, but I didn't know if they used it proactively to market their products or provide useful recipes, recommendations, etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hadn't thought much about the privacy issue, but it makes sense. It seems to me like the store would have to have a something in their fine print that indicates they will never release the data to third parties, or have people identified by numbers in their systems instead of names.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MattJMcD</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 12:06:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Twitter Rules of Engagement</title><link>http://www.mattjmcd.com/2009/04/my-twitter-rules-of-engagement/#comment-9253862</link><description>Thanks everyone for your support! I feel like these are things that can resonate with a lot of people. Hopefully if more of us adopt this attitude publicly, the spammers will calm down.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MattJMcD</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 14:57:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter changes its email notifications</title><link>http://whitneyhess.com/blog/2009/05/twitter-changes-its-email-notifications/#comment-9095173</link><description>I'm actually a fan of these new emails. I see your point about the clutter, and images can be a pain, but I still think there are some benefits.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's made it much easier to find a spammer without clicking through and wasting time. Hot girl picture? Following a ton of people? 2 updates? Easy. I used to have to waste time on the profile pages, but not anymore.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That being said, it would be nice if they'd put the bio in the email as well. Doing that would give you the best idea of who they are without actually having to see their updates.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rock on.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MattJMcD</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 11:51:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Prom King Brands Redux</title><link>http://tangerinetoad.blogspot.com/2009/05/prom-king-brands-redux.html#comment-8901443</link><description>I think you're right on here. I've been saying for a while that there needs to be value in these social interactions, and like you said, with many small brands, there isn't anything intrinsically there. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now I'm not saying that smaller brands have to bribe people with coupons or sales, that's not the point. There are other ways to add value, such as organizing a common meetup, or discussing product comments seriously. But I agree that you can't expect people to commit their time and energy without getting something, tangible or intangible, in return.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MattJMcD</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 14:00:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Has &amp;#8220;Never Been The Same&amp;#8221; 46 Times Already</title><link>http://www.mattjmcd.com/2009/04/twitter-has-never-been-the-same-46-times-already/#comment-8573848</link><description>@Michael &lt;br&gt;It is a little funny sometimes. But I guess to her it really did just show up the other day. It's a sliding scale.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Beth&lt;br&gt;But Twitter isn't just buzz! It's TeH Awesom!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Seriously though, the Plurk mention got you a little teary. It's okay, we're all friends here.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MattJMcD</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:22:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Community Looks Like</title><link>http://www.mattjmcd.com/2009/02/what-community-looks-like/#comment-6245661</link><description>Glad you guys liked it. I'd been trying to figure out a way to show the idead for a while. Seems like this worked!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MattJMcD</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:38:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Maybe They Aren&amp;#8217;t Talking About You</title><link>http://www.mattjmcd.com/2009/02/maybe-they-arent-talking-about-you/#comment-5871322</link><description>I agree that people are still talking about the M&amp;P places, and that it's important for them to listen, but not to the point of having dedicated resources. It's always a good idea to respond to any mentions, but there may not be that many.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Taking things offline is a whole other ballgame. As a small business owner/employee you have to understand that you're one of the few ambassadors of that brand, and a lot of the "word of mouth" vibe is up to you.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MattJMcD</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:29:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Brand Purpose Model</title><link>http://www.mattjmcd.com/2009/01/a-brand-purpose-model/#comment-5652157</link><description>@Beth&lt;br&gt;Glad you liked it. I agree that there's a lot of shifting going on between roles, but the thing is, one brand can be a thousand different things to a thousand different people. I think the important thing is just to mean something to at least one person.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Adam&lt;br&gt;Thanks. It's hard to make a graphic sometimes without doing shades of Armano. He's got the "visual thinking" thing pretty covered.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@pfountain&lt;br&gt;Like I mentioned with Beth, I think you can be all those things, to different people. You have to see how the core of your audience views you and then align that with how you'd like to be seen. If you keep filling that gap, as you have been for 30 years, then people will stick around. I'd say the first thing to do is ask.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MattJMcD</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:05:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Too Many Chiefs&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.mattjmcd.com/2009/01/too-many-chiefs/#comment-5652221</link><description>@Brian&lt;br&gt;Haha, I'm right there with you. I feel like maybe if I use more jargon, someone will call me an expert one day.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@warrenss&lt;br&gt;I have heard about that auto-expert feature on Twitter, funny. I do agree with you that maybe when you're looking for someone to do work in that area, don't like for the "experts"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MattJMcD</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:05:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On The State Of Magazines</title><link>http://www.mattjmcd.com/2009/01/thoughts-on-the-state-of-magazines/#comment-5652000</link><description>@Leah&lt;br&gt;You're probably right that the big mags aren't agile enough to make some of the changes needed to survive. I can image at huge publishers like Hearst or HC that it takes a lot to get anything done. I only have a little bit of insight into the magazine world because my girlfriend (@ashlebo) is the copy editor for Charleston Home + Design. We pick up your magazine every time we go to the vet, keep up the good work!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Jennifer&lt;br&gt;I know that more readers = more ad revenue, so I guess my question is, are people reading magazines less? Or are ads getting pulled and the pinch is on that end?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Mitch&lt;br&gt;I do read a lot online, especially stuff that's printed as well, but sometimes it's just good to have the physical copy. I can't take my computer with me everywhere, and sometimes the presentation of a magazine helps. Then again, maybe that's just me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MattJMcD</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:58:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Too Many Chiefs&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.mattjmcd.com/2009/01/too-many-chiefs/#comment-5476635</link><description>@Beth&lt;br&gt;I think that it's a good insight to note that by calling themselves experts they hope to position themselves better with bigger companies/clients. I guess the problems happen when those companies can't see through that. Bonus points for the Edelman case! You are truly a comment Ninja/Wizard.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Tim&lt;br&gt;I think you're right that some are just trying to "ride the wave". Social media expert? Everyone's doing it!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Laura&lt;br&gt;Haha cynical but telling. I think there are a lot of people that get "tunnel vision" with the social media stuff and other stuff only really gets on their radar when mentioned by the "bigs" in the industry.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MattJMcD</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:57:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Twitter Could Monetize</title><link>http://www.mattjmcd.com/2009/01/how-twitter-could-monetize/#comment-4968848</link><description>I would also like see what my entire tag cloud look like. Would be fun to see what I talk about the most.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree that there would be some resistance to ads on Twitter. I think one option may be to offer an ad supported and subscription version that removes the ads. That way, those of use who really enjoy Twitter as it is and see the value in it, would be able to pay a little to keep it that way.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MattJMcD</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:26:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Twitter Could Monetize</title><link>http://www.mattjmcd.com/2009/01/how-twitter-could-monetize/#comment-4940361</link><description>What a great idea. I hadn't even thought of that. something like &lt;a href="http://Superbowl.twitter.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Superbowl.twitter.com&lt;/a&gt; would make a great space to brand but to also provide a lot of good functionality.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MattJMcD</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:34:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Simple Social Media Truths</title><link>http://www.mattjmcd.com/2008/12/simple-social-media-truths/#comment-4511538</link><description>Thank you sir! Glad you liked them. 13 is one of my favorites too.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MattJMcD</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:21:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Simple Social Media Truths</title><link>http://www.mattjmcd.com/2008/12/simple-social-media-truths/#comment-4485521</link><description>@Stuart&lt;br&gt;Thanks! Glad you liked them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Tim&lt;br&gt;I appreciate it. There's a lot of fluff in this space sometimes and it's tough to ignore.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Steve&lt;br&gt;Thanks. I agree with your first point, which is why I included number 12 on the list, and I guess you're right that it comes down to the definition of initiatives&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Brain&lt;br&gt;With the first one I guess I was writing from more of a "pundit" standpoint. It seems like anyone who starts a blog things that they're a social media guru all of a sudden, which is far from the truth. You know the type....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MattJMcD</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:38:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Principles: Secrets, Secrets Are No Fun</title><link>http://www.mattjmcd.com/2008/11/twitter-principles-secrets-secrets-are-no-fun/#comment-4084743</link><description>I have a lot of the same experiences with people. I don't understand the "I barely have a presence here, but I'm going to pimp it anyway" mentality. Hopefully, as Twitter grows in popularity, some of the more positive habits will start to rub off on people. I don't know if there's a "right" way to use Twitter, but there's certainly a way to get more out of it than you otherwise would.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MattJMcD</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 12:18:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Principles: Secrets, Secrets Are No Fun</title><link>http://www.mattjmcd.com/2008/11/twitter-principles-secrets-secrets-are-no-fun/#comment-4084674</link><description>Lyn,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know the type of people you're talking about. I usually tend to unfollow or tune them out if they're on a particular bender.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Claudia,&lt;br&gt;I agree that location is a good thing. Just having moved to Charleston, it's cool to see who else is in the area, and it gives me another way to connect. Glad you liked the post.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MattJMcD</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 12:14:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Some Quick Thoughts on Motrin</title><link>http://www.mattjmcd.com/2008/11/some-quick-thoughts-on-motrin/#comment-4084631</link><description>Hey Neal,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Glad you agree. I think it's very easy to broadcast a knee-jerk reaction to the world now. A little friction might have helped.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MattJMcD</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 12:11:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Common Mistakes In Starting A Blog</title><link>http://www.mattjmcd.com/2008/11/common-mistakes-in-starting-a-blog/#comment-4084602</link><description>Thank you sir. I do agree that a method, more than a style necessarily, has to be developed earlier. Like you said, style will develop, but if you don't make time to sit down and actually write something, then it's a pretty tough task.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MattJMcD</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 12:09:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Common Mistakes In Starting A Blog</title><link>http://www.mattjmcd.com/2008/11/common-mistakes-in-starting-a-blog/#comment-3993470</link><description>I think that leaving comments and adding to discussions is a great way to get things rolling. It helped me a lot too when I was first starting out. If someone can't get to your site to see your great ideas, then you can bring them to theirs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But, like you said, hijacking the conversation with a link all the time comes off as a little selfish and doesn't really add anything.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also I think it's good to mention that linking to A-list bloggers, while easy, isn't a great strategy because, as you mentioned, they rarely link back. Also most people have already read the A-listers stuff. That's why they're A-listers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MattJMcD</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:47:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>