<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Loz</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/Loz/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/Loz/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 05:21:37 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-40696</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am on Haloscan3 now but will check back here. People are talking about AKs 'fractured' personalities. And maybe she does have them. but here is something interesting about her 'male side' coming out that night (posted on haloscan3: ,&lt;i&gt;Also Robert M, having a 'masculine' aspect wouldn't necessarily mean that it is murdurous?&lt;/i&gt; - I guess that's why RM still says AK is responsible? &lt;i&gt;And what I find really interesting is &lt;b&gt;on that day that the male in amanda 'came out', she was actually wearing a skirt...&lt;/b&gt; I am not sure that she is 'fractured', my guess is she's just a lying socio/psycho. also, some women just have 'higher' testosterone levels than other women. While the hormone can affect psychlogy, I don't know that it'd automaically make you a rapist or murdress&lt;/i&gt; &lt;br&gt;8" filleting knife: &lt;a href="http://www.cookware.co.uk/shop?code=2098" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.cookware.co.uk/shop?code=2098"&gt;http://www.cookware.co.uk/s...&lt;/a&gt; 10" salmon knife &lt;a href="http://www.premiercutlery.co.uk/show_item/kitchen_knives/3000_knives/3016" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.premiercutlery.co.uk/show_item/kitchen_knives/3000_knives/3016"&gt;http://www.premiercutlery.c...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Loz</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 05:21:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-40183</link><description>&lt;p&gt;annarbor on blood:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;thank you :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Loz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:40:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-39652</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The RHG go potty doesn't make sense.&lt;br&gt;But seems to me RS reported the toilet bowl as clean because he may have been referring to the bloodied bathroom nearest MKs room, while AK may have been talking about the big bathroom. But RHG wouldn't he know which one he pottied in? It means his story doesn't add up. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Loz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:46:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-39646</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looking at the plan you posted kermit &amp;amp; video, I think you got te location of MKs wardrobe right.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Loz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:43:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-39633</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thankyou :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Loz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:37:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-39629</link><description>&lt;p&gt;the difference between a good fish knife like my gran would have used (ignore the handle quirks of these) &lt;a href="http://www.aurumandsun.com/images/StainlessSteelWare/BigPicture/bigCutleryfish.jpg" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.aurumandsun.com/images/StainlessSteelWare/BigPicture/bigCutleryfish.jpg"&gt;http://www.aurumandsun.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;and butter knives: &lt;a href="http://cookies.cookiesfromitaly.com/silverfromitaly.com/hazel-doc/cutlery_service/butter_knife.jpg" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://cookies.cookiesfromitaly.com/silverfromitaly.com/hazel-doc/cutlery_service/butter_knife.jpg"&gt;http://cookies.cookiesfromi...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;AK did mention a meal of fish at rafes house, his hand had blood on it?&lt;br&gt;she knows more than she should then, if it is a fish knife, she was there &amp;amp; was involved!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;to me though it looks like neither. it's massive. and if it was like a big master fish knife why is i not all 'silver' the handle is black. To me it looks like a bread knife or something. Unless it's a cheapo specialist fish-cookers knife. like what people who like to cook all different kinds of fish may have?&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Loz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:36:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-39612</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah right, no it's me reading hurridley.&lt;br&gt;Thanks kermit for your tireless work in ppt! &lt;br&gt;don't forget though, we don't know which bathroom it is.&lt;br&gt;and I can't remember if it was lost in translation or if that bathroom IS THE bathroom and that the blood was found on/in the bidet, cos I also read it was found on a sink tap?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Loz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:25:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-39606</link><description>&lt;p&gt;personally I'd like to stay here, cos it's quicker to refresh.&lt;br&gt;I can do flitting between the two. but now i find out that there is yet ANOTHER haloscan comments page tat only chrischris&amp;amp;seattleite know of?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;confusing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Loz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:21:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-39604</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I guess. LOL I just thought the hearing was too good to be true lol&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Loz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:19:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-39597</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;You have to wonder if this could aid the defense. They can say that much of the evidence collecting was bungled and cannot be considered reliable... &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;unfortunately maybe. BUT if the forensics they took / they did take at the time were sound?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, I had been following the mccann case and that brought up some interesting questions regarding the mccanns possibly disregarding forensics that are acceptible in the fresh Leslie Molseed &amp;amp; S.Lawrence case. well that's to do with dna i guess.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But all I am saying, is that yeah it's good to get to a crime scene fast. but what about forensics years after? I don't know :/&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Loz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:16:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-39590</link><description>&lt;p&gt;besides, at this time of year, the leaves have rotted down more, revealing more.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;but still, should have checked.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;but like I said, csi do 2nd sweeps.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Loz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:12:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-39587</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I disagree. on CSI they frequently do 2nd sweeps. fresh eyes. and also, in light of new information.&lt;br&gt;so, I disagree.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yeah sure, the bushes should have been checked. bet it turns out RSs dad chuckd them there the other day &amp;amp; they turn out to be nowt. - ONLY JOKING :D&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Loz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:10:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-39567</link><description>&lt;p&gt;but kermit, in your ppt floor plan of the crime scene (2 ppts ago) you showed where the wardrobe was. and actually, I think it was beside the door but it wasn't clear. In fact MKs body was by the bed/wardrobe in its final position. but not in the position AK described?&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;look at the vid agan, the wardrobe has white/painted white doors, near the radiator. to me, don't know though it looks to be in the diagonally opposite corner to the bed. I will check your ppt to see how it compares.oh crud I deleted it. please have you got it again? sorry kermit :(&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;it doesn't look much like a butter knife to me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;thanks for the video it's great.&lt;br&gt;Unlike the CCTV, it's defo not a reconstruction of what the forensic officers found?&lt;br&gt;I don't wanna get into another ski-mask/car bumper fiasco!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Loz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:56:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-39558</link><description>&lt;p&gt;this times article seems too good to be true.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Are AKs lawyers just witewashing? cooperated fully?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't get the contradiction.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Loz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:47:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-39255</link><description>&lt;p&gt;see that's the thing, I personally don't think an argument suddenly errupted, and weapons apparated magically in their hands. I think this cos of the mushrooms...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Loz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 07:28:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-39238</link><description>&lt;p&gt;and one way, obviously the way it was misreported MK was found in her bed.&lt;br&gt;well, the police would have said MK was found under a duvet (which she was) and those 'lazy' jornos jumped to the conclusion that she was found under her duvet &lt;b&gt;on her bed&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;so, her lawyers can't really use that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Loz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 06:54:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-39236</link><description>&lt;p&gt;soozieuk, don't worry about crying wolf. she's vry guilty. she even led the prison chaplain &amp;amp; nun on into thinking she'd tell the truth. The chaplain even said he thought she would. she even wrote in her diary that what the nun said about god helping her remember did help, until she fell asleep/passed out when MK was murdered! - see annabors posts.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Loz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 06:45:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-39235</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes soozie UK cut&amp;amp;dried, yesterday before I even knew what details she had relayed to witnesses that she shouldn't even know, I posted this, which is pretty succint.(see last para of this post emboldend). Oh &amp;amp; also remember, originally under questioning she broke down when police had revealed they found AKs fingerprint on MKs face &amp;amp; had held her down.&lt;br&gt;also why in her statements did she say she 1) watched amelie 2) made love 3) Ate 4) the pipes broke. and in this hearing she now says: 1) watched film 2) Ate 3) Made love ??????? oh yeah, cos she's losing track of her lies. &lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;are you saying that because those other (possibly english or extremely good english speaking) witnesses that told the police what AK had said to them, could not have physically (since they all have solid alibis) have known about these crime scene details on nov2nd themselves, and therefore AK definitely had to have relayed these details to them, as the police state, and that these witnesses are going to stand up in a court of law and say AK told them x,y,z, and that it's indisputably the truth ah, so she WAS there?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;wonder if she dragged the body, or rhg/rs, without telling her they did. or if she's just really THAT dumb.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Loz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 06:41:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-39227</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thanks &lt;br&gt;WOAH SO!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;* &lt;b&gt;8:40pm&lt;/b&gt; Knox, was seen outside RS house, 129 steps away from RHGs house. Knox (and RHG after going to his place? and RS?) makes her way home or to the basketball court&lt;br&gt;* or &lt;b&gt;8:40pm&lt;/b&gt; Knox arrives home, as per RHG, he also arrives there&lt;br&gt;* &lt;b&gt;9pm&lt;/b&gt; as per Knox is at the basketball court - RHG plays basketball.&lt;br&gt;* 9pm - 11pm AK &amp;amp; RS switch off mobiles&lt;br&gt;* &lt;b&gt;9pm-ish&lt;/b&gt; Mez leaves her friends house, her route would have taken her past the basketball court, and anyone on it would have seen MK.&lt;br&gt;* &lt;b&gt;9:15-ish&lt;/b&gt; MK arrives home. all is well at this point. because between...&lt;br&gt;...* &lt;b&gt;9:15 to earliest possible Time of death&lt;/b&gt; MK at least cooks garlic mushrooms (why wasn't a used punnet found in the house fridge or in the litter) and possibly cheese. She eats this JUST before T.O.D&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Loz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 06:24:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-39178</link><description>&lt;p&gt;and if AK &amp;amp; RS are innocent, they really are acting strangely.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Loz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 03:49:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-39175</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Here's how RHG could have been responsible for the whole thing on his own or with 'homies' &amp;amp; how the mushroom might go against this theory&lt;/b&gt; (discarding the 2 bloodied footprints, evidence of a clean up, cctv placing AK there, witness statements about other people, the 2am arguing, AK not using her key to open MKs door, the knife with AK&amp;amp;MKs dna etc).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;* MK lets herself into her house (she is not ambushed outside by RHG cos she has mushrooms)&lt;br&gt;further, I find it strange that if she lt rhg in for a rondevous she'd eat cheese &amp;amp; mushrooms with him, unless she did so before he came - unlikely cos of digestion time of mushrooms &amp;amp; time of death.&lt;br&gt;* RHG has broken in before (but MK hasn't noticed and how did RHG move to other rooms to ransack without a key) or after (and MK would have had to lead him to her room for the money - toilet soiling goes against this too cos it's more likely imho he pottied before the ambush).&lt;br&gt;* MK eats mushroom meal on her own (why, if they didn't, did the ILE not find the punnet in the house fridge or in the litter bags, why only in RS fridge).&lt;br&gt;* She goes to her room &amp;amp; is ambushed on the way by RHG.&lt;br&gt;or&lt;br&gt;* she answers the doorbell&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wonder why he went to the house, how he knew or thought it was empty. maybe he came looking for AK. he'd have to have been carrying a knife. or else MK gashed his hand with her dinner or cooking knife, and he later used this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Loz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 03:40:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-39156</link><description>&lt;p&gt;also fran (good luck for today).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;she originally specifically broke down upon being accused of holding MK down while she was assaulted, (and the police giving the fingerprint evidence on the face for their suspicion).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I just posted this on Haloscan:&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;br&gt;and why in her statements did she say she &lt;br&gt;1) watched amelie&lt;br&gt;2) made love &lt;br&gt;3) Ate&lt;br&gt;4) the pipes broke.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;and in this hearing she now says:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;1) watched film&lt;br&gt;2) Ate&lt;br&gt;3) Made love&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;???????&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;oh yeah, cos she's losing track of her lies.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Loz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 02:54:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-39152</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I thought they might be Kermit. Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;could be a genuine tissue drop, could be the bloodied tissue was used to smear the railing on purpose.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Loz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 02:49:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-39149</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it was to keep silent, so he could ambush MK, but I really don't know why she wouldn't assume it was AK/RS.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unless they were with her in her room, or she knew they were in the kitchen &amp;amp; didn't have time to potty, and why not use the bathroom closer to the kitchen?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;More likely he waited in that toilet, heard MK, and abandoned potty in a hurry to attack her.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I also think, wonderful as they are, peoples timelines regarding the mushroom snack are wrong.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;i think she snacked JUST before being attacked. Maybe not a few minutes, maybe 5/10. But not JUST AFTER 9pm/9.15.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Loz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 02:43:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Thread: The Murder of Meredith Kercher</title><link>http://www.truecrimeweblog.com/2007/12/open-thread-murder-of-meredith-kercher.html#comment-39147</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We haven't been, but I did just read it this morning from the post that says his was the most amusing. food for thought.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Loz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 02:39:32 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>