<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for KevanM</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/KevanM/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:26:50 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: CORRECTION: I&amp;#8217;m a victim of SpinVox Spin &amp;#8211; Sorry!</title><link>http://smstextnews.disqus.com/correction_i8217m_a_victim_of_spinvox_spin_8211_sorry/#comment-13386105</link><description>SpinVox Voice Message Conversion System (VMCS™) is now so advanced + efficient it has reduced use of QC agents by 98% in just two years.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This does not mean 98% automation OR 2% manual. It means they have reduced agents by 98%. I am sure they have a level of automation. However ASR technology even with AI attached will not produce 98% automation. These numbers are only achievable with constrained vocabularies. They also have the added challenge that mobile audio is notoriously noisy so even knowing what 99% of people might say does not mean your engine will understand what they have said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This whole debate comes down to less spin and more vox. How many X% of voicemails, not hangups or empty calls require human interaction.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geniestar</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:26:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CORRECTION: I&amp;#8217;m a victim of SpinVox Spin &amp;#8211; Sorry!</title><link>http://smstextnews.disqus.com/correction_i8217m_a_victim_of_spinvox_spin_8211_sorry/#comment-13383823</link><description>Have they not out-spun themselves?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The way they've expressed this 2% suggests that more than 2% of messages require human interaction - otherwise why wouldn't they just say 2% (or less).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If when they started they required 100% intervention then they are now at 2%. Presuming that they never required 100% they must be (after 98% reduction) at less than 2%. Let's call it 1%.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well done Porter Novelli. We're all thinking 'more than 2%' but the actuality must be less than 2%</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KevanM</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:12:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Buy a Coke with your Vodafone Current Account</title><link>http://smstextnews.disqus.com/buy_a_coke_with_your_vodafone_current_account/#comment-6256688</link><description>There was an interesting piece on the BBC World Service programme Digital Planet about the Kenyan operator and their M-pesa payment service. Allows significnat sums ($500 I think) to be sent and received by SMS)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/programmes/digital_planet.shtml" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/programmes/di...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If it looks like a bank, smells like a bank, etc, etc., it is a bank. Seems like a great idea.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KevanM</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 03:29:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The MIR iPhone App is released!</title><link>http://smstextnews.disqus.com/the_mir_iphone_app_is_released/#comment-5163750</link><description>a 3G 16GB with 2.2&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Have restarted but exactly the same issue. Other downloads have worked fine.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Very odd.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KevanM</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:46:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The MIR iPhone App is released!</title><link>http://smstextnews.disqus.com/the_mir_iphone_app_is_released/#comment-5162207</link><description>Have downloaded it but it doesn't want to work. Start it, launch screen appears, wait, wait, crashes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'll try restarting phone see if that helps.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KevanM</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:55:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The MIR iPhone App is released!</title><link>http://smstextnews.disqus.com/the_mir_iphone_app_is_released/#comment-5162390</link><description>Which iPhone/iPod device are you using Kevan?  It works fine with me!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2009/1/16 Disqus &amp;lt;&amp;gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smstextnews</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:38:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jonathan Jensen on Thursday – Mobile as a landline minutes stealer</title><link>http://smstextnews.disqus.com/jonathan_jensen_on_thursday_mobile_as_a_landline_minutes_stealer/#comment-5137158</link><description>There is some conflicting data in the Ofcom statement:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;'... with fixed voice, which still accounted for 148 billion minutes last year, down only 10% from 165 minutes in 2002.'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;'However, fixed-line voice has remained resilient, with overall outbound minutes falling by just 2% to 148 billion minutes in 2007'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe the right number is 10% (of all minutes). For fixed to mobile minutes it is much higher and so value is declining faster.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KevanM</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 06:03:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The 45 year old iPhone lady watching Prison Break on the train</title><link>http://smstextnews.disqus.com/the_45_year_old_iphone_lady_watching_prison_break_on_the_train/#comment-4156700</link><description>I'd normally be on the 'it's all about the user' side of the fence and agree with your normob, promob types, but .....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think this is another iphonemob type. It's lets you do things that everything promises but doesn't really encourage your normob type.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've a three year old 'newmob' that uses mine for Peppa Pig! iTunes is still too much for her, but by the time she's four ...........</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kevan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:14:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The best &amp;#8216;mobile&amp;#8217; handset on the planet</title><link>http://smstextnews.disqus.com/the_best_8216mobile8217_handset_on_the_planet/#comment-3202407</link><description>Ah, a Nokia 2110. In the end we go back to where we started. So much for progress. Looking forward to an 8800!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KevanM</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 11:02:11 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>