http://disqus.com/people/KeithHanson/enWed, 06 Aug 2008 18:01:27 -0000http://blog.plurker.org/post/44987237#comment-1116725Haha, I'll be sure to post a few in Plurk when I get 'em :)KeithHansonWed, 06 Aug 2008 18:01:27 -0000http://blog.plurker.org/post/41537895#comment-867060Well, regardless of whether or not it's a violation of the terms of service, it's definitely general douchebaggery ;)<br><br>The link in that post has been taken down, but I suspect that it's mostly more of the same issues as this post. :(KeithHansonFri, 11 Jul 2008 13:50:50 -0000http://blog.plurker.org/post/41738193#comment-859274Glad to have you on board @Avatar and @Hopewilbanks! :)KeithHansonThu, 10 Jul 2008 18:06:15 -0000http://blog.plurker.org/post/41738193#comment-855134@RandomNicole: Hahaha. Glad you like the smell?? :) <br><br>@Cuzza: Thanks for the compliments!<br><br>@Semipro: -_- Refer to previous blog posts on this very blog, numerous plurks, as well as other blogs. I've replied to this request dozens of times now, heh. We'll be making a Mac client after the full windows release.KeithHansonThu, 10 Jul 2008 11:28:41 -0000http://blog.plurker.org/post/41738193#comment-854880Woot! :) Thanks Krishanu!KeithHansonThu, 10 Jul 2008 11:03:53 -0000http://blog.plurker.org/post/41738193#comment-854877Glad to have you on board, JD!KeithHansonThu, 10 Jul 2008 11:03:38 -0000http://blog.plurker.org/post/41738193#comment-854762Woot!!KeithHansonThu, 10 Jul 2008 10:52:43 -0000http://blog.plurker.org/post/41738193#comment-854755We're as excited as you Jay!KeithHansonThu, 10 Jul 2008 10:52:06 -0000http://blog.plurker.org/post/41537895#comment-851861Hey Amir! <br><br>Great to see you guys responding to this! I was curious though... isn't it relatively simple to find the IDs? I won't divulge the secret here, of course... but anyone that's at least slightly tech savvy could figure it out. <br><br>It does definitely make it a lot more difficult (having to target specific users). Definitely to the point of it being nearly worthless to any would-be prankster though...<br><br>Hm. I take it back. Awesome man! :) Thanks for stopping by!KeithHansonThu, 10 Jul 2008 00:31:13 -0000http://blog.plurker.org/post/41537895#comment-844123@digitatodd: FYI, I'm not a Plurk developer, and am developing an unofficial Plurk desktop client... <br><br>But I still definitely care :)KeithHansonWed, 09 Jul 2008 10:28:33 -0000http://blog.plurker.org/post/41103000#comment-841101I think that's the first positive comment on this post Avatar! <br><br>You'll be happy to know that we're using the cutting edge :) I love me some 3.5!KeithHansonTue, 08 Jul 2008 21:55:43 -0000http://blog.plurker.org/post/41537895#comment-840982Haha ;) We'll see, thoughtwrong ;)KeithHansonTue, 08 Jul 2008 21:37:30 -0000http://blog.plurker.org/post/41537895#comment-840885Thanks Charlie. I'm glad as well, haha. Was pretty worried for a while last night :)KeithHansonTue, 08 Jul 2008 21:21:38 -0000http://blog.plurker.org/post/40867128#comment-836645:( Once we release the API, I'm sure you'll see a client on the way *crosses fingers*KeithHansonTue, 08 Jul 2008 12:33:19 -0000http://blog.plurker.org/post/40867128#comment-831493Also, all three of us are Mac users. We're keeping you in mind ;)KeithHansonMon, 07 Jul 2008 19:58:30 -0000http://blog.plurker.org/post/40867128#comment-8314681) Have you read any of the alternate discussions on this topic? Or the other blog post? There are many more reasons for our choice. <br><br>2) 'you will just develop a Windows-only client'. Saying 'just' is a bit demeaning to our efforts, Lola. What we're doing isn't all *that* simple. <br><br>3) 'There are good applications being developed for Twitter using AIR...' My argument wasn't that there aren't any good applications written using Adobe AIR.<br><br>I'm not going to go into all the reasons I *already* listed in numerous plurks, posts, or comments (again, have you read them?). I will say, though, that ultimately, it's the team's decision for what we should build this in. And we've decided to use WPF for Windows client, and Cocoa for the Mac client.KeithHansonMon, 07 Jul 2008 19:53:51 -0000http://blog.plurker.org/post/41103000#comment-823949Well, then the blogs and information I'd read was either outdated or just plain wrong :) Thanks for the tips, Joel and Mike ChambersKeithHansonSun, 06 Jul 2008 19:44:59 -0000http://blog.plurker.org/post/41103000#comment-819776Mandel: I think we've moved this conversation to here: <a href="http://www.plurk.com/p/125bv" rel="nofollow">http://www.plurk.com/p/125bv</a><br><br>And though I agree that it'd be great to have it on all three, we're doing some pretty cutting edge things using WPF and want to keep doing those things. Even very low-level, simple things like RoutedEvents in WPF aren't available in Mono, as well as the ability to have Ken handle all the GUI formatting and such using XAML. <br><br>There's just a lot of power when we're dealing with WPF that we don't want to give up. Feel free to take on a Linux app yourself once we release the API :)KeithHansonSat, 05 Jul 2008 18:29:32 -0000http://lindseychen.com/post/40471270#comment-819134ROFLKeithHansonSat, 05 Jul 2008 15:08:41 -0000http://www.inquisitr.com/1113/plurk-keeps-on-going-strong/#comment-719919Just wanted to mention about the Desktop applications that you said you were waiting on... I'll be on the PlurkCast coming up soon, so you'll definitely hear more about it there if you tune in, but in my Plurk feed I post regular updates of an API I've created in C# as well as a desktop application that uses it. Here's a sneak peak:<br><br><a href="http://i31.tinypic.com/2wrev5h.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://i31.tinypic.com/2wrev5h.jpg</a><br><br>Also, the current APIs out there are pretty limited in what they can do with your plurks, as well as not supporting asynchronous calls to Plurk out of the box (mine does and is designed for it). This is something that's really needed for Desktop development. <br><br>Alright :) I'm done now with my shameless plug :)KeithHansonFri, 20 Jun 2008 22:13:38 -0000