<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Jack_Yan</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/Jack_Yan/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 07:08:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Chrysler Unveils Restructuring Plan - Daily Brief - Portfolio.com</title><link>http://portfoliocom.disqus.com/chrysler_unveils_restructuring_plan_daily_brief_portfoliocom_86/#comment-21931793</link><description>Indeed, one might even question if the Chrysler Crossfire was an all-new model, being based on the Mercedes-Benz SLK. However, Mr Vella, I agree with the main point of your article. The transparency presented yesterday brings back confidence, too, to buyers, dealers and suppliers. Chrysler can no longer be perceived as aimless, which it has been for a long time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 07:08:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The A-Team: First Official Photo</title><link>http://filmshaft.disqus.com/the_a_team_first_official_photo/#comment-21833655</link><description>This is a good photo. They seem to have struck a nice balance between modernity and the original look.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:52:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Groups Finally Getting a Makeover</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/facebook_groups_finally_getting_a_makeover/#comment-20678665</link><description>There are other differences between Pages and Groups besides the Wall and New Feeds. See my post above for a few of them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">facebook-1533664925</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:27:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Groups Finally Getting a Makeover</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/facebook_groups_finally_getting_a_makeover/#comment-20663592</link><description>It makes even less sense to separate fan pages and groups now. While Facebook has given that explanation, considering group messages (with the caveat you make in the post) and fan messages now both appear on members’ feeds, the distinction is irrelevant. Put simply, messages sent by fans to the fan page should behave in the same way as group messages.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interestingly, this is one of the few surprise Facebook changes that (a) I like and (b) work.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:30:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oneok Sues Twitter For Trademark Infringement</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/oneok_sues_twitter_for_trademark_infringement/#comment-16807117</link><description>What a waste of time, suing Twitter when a simple email to the company would have solved the matter and kept everyone’s blood pressure down. Talk about overreacting, but I suppose in Oneokland, this is normal behaviour. Most people in most civilized countries would sort the matter out like adults.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:28:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WordPress Responds to Attack: &amp;#8220;Please Upgrade&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/wordpress_responds_to_attack_8220please_upgrade8221/#comment-16036081</link><description>Sure, if you have disabled user registrations, that takes care of 99% of the worms out there.  Of course, Wordpress is a free software, that's why it's very vulnerable, there's not millions of dollars invested in it and it's not a huge team of developers.  You can't blame them but there's ways to protect it by using encrypted passwords and disabling user registrations, which are pointless to visitors for most blogs anyways.  I am not upgrading btw, I am already protected. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">zedomax</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 19:30:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WordPress Responds to Attack: &amp;#8220;Please Upgrade&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/wordpress_responds_to_attack_8220please_upgrade8221/#comment-16035763</link><description>Thanks for that, Zedomax. While we’ve now upgraded (with extreme difficulty, because the upgrade process takes hours and not the minutes that Wordpress claims), I have disabled user registrations on one of our installations.&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Like you, I always have huge problems getting these software companies to believe me, then months down the line I get proved right.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 19:20:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wordpress and Curing High Server Load</title><link>http://davidrisley.disqus.com/wordpress_and_curing_high_server_load/#comment-15648261</link><description>It seems there is a successor program now, called WP Super Cache (&lt;a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-super-cache" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-super-cache&lt;/a&gt;). Thank you for the lead to the original WP-Cache—thanks to you, I began digging around and found this plug-in.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:08:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube Launches Its Redesign</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/youtube_launches_its_redesign/#comment-14825931</link><description>Never thought too much about it. I’ve had this look for a month or so.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 05:17:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Have You Seen Ashley Summers?</title><link>http://dlayphoto.disqus.com/have_you_seen_ashley_summers/#comment-14527382</link><description>It is sad that this case has not received the recognition it deserves, and that the media seem biased toward affluent neighbourhoods. I have Tweeted this link today; maybe it will help a little.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 19:05:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You say legends, I say leg ends</title><link>http://itisi2.disqus.com/you_say_legends_i_say_leg_ends/#comment-13212373</link><description>I like the way you call her Geraldine :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kateblogs</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:06:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You say legends, I say leg ends</title><link>http://itisi2.disqus.com/you_say_legends_i_say_leg_ends/#comment-13212321</link><description>lol</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kateblogs</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:05:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2010 Audi A5 Sportback officially revealed with pricing, not coming to the U.S.</title><link>http://egmcartech.disqus.com/2010_audi_a5_sportback_officially_revealed_with_pricing_not_coming_to_the_us/#comment-12978366</link><description>I know the usual excuse for not exporting this to the US is that Americans don’t like hatchbacks, but I think consumer tastes have changed to the point where this model could do well over there. The few comments seem to bear that out and safety-wise, there should be few issues.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 19:00:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/confirmed_digg_just_hijacked_your_twitter_links/#comment-12937070</link><description>Good news: it has made it now, though you have to scroll about half-way. (I was the 338th Digger.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 23:28:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You say legends, I say leg ends</title><link>http://itisi2.disqus.com/you_say_legends_i_say_leg_ends/#comment-12936836</link><description>I am not sure if Johnny Rotten spits more than Geraldine Halliwell.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 23:23:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/confirmed_digg_just_hijacked_your_twitter_links/#comment-12933126</link><description>Also, I agree with commenters who are saying that Digg has done a lousy job of telling its users. It was the same story when they removed the shouts. Do this enough, and it points to some pretty bad behaviour there—just as Facebook’s ill-advised moves do.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:19:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/confirmed_digg_just_hijacked_your_twitter_links/#comment-12933090</link><description>While I don’t like this move by Digg, it’s been like this for weeks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:18:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spam Invades Twitter Trends, Again</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/spam_invades_twitter_trends_again/#comment-12032955</link><description>The interesting thing is that one can still search for #pussy as a hashtag, just not Mrs Slocombe’s. What a shame for her worldwide fans.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:55:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitterature: 19 Year-Olds Score Twitter Book Deal</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/twitterature_19_year_olds_score_twitter_book_deal/#comment-11660962</link><description>I am having trouble picturing this. Would it be along the lines of this?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pride &amp; Prejudice: Mum tried to hook Jane up. Darcy can be an SOB, but he does good stuff, cool! Nice ring! Yay Gardiners!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 01:21:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BaAd Placement - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://agencyspy.disqus.com/baad_placement_mediabistrocom_agencyspy/#comment-9076114</link><description>This is that German humour we’ve been hearing so much about lately.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 20:01:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oh, Oh My.  - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://agencyspy.disqus.com/oh_oh_my_mediabistrocom_agencyspy/#comment-9075919</link><description>Awful. Ford might need to have a little more control over dealer-level advertising.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 19:57:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mashable on Tumblr - Twitter in Plain English

 This video is almost a...</title><link>http://mashabletumblr.disqus.com/mashable_on_tumblr_twitter_in_plain_english_this_video_is_almost_a/#comment-6630224</link><description>Funny (to me) how the image of the ‘phone’ is a PDA.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:46:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Morning After - Initial Thoughts</title><link>http://randythomas.disqus.com/the_morning_after_initial_thoughts/#comment-3580490</link><description>Given his track record, he has never been one to be a harbinger of bipartisanship.  He says that he wants to be ... we will see.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RThomasETC</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 21:18:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Morning After - Initial Thoughts</title><link>http://randythomas.disqus.com/the_morning_after_initial_thoughts/#comment-3576898</link><description>Hi Randy! Perhaps this is why the President-elect has chosen a partisan figure as his possible chief of staff. It might stop, meanwhile, any of the senior Democrats from pushing President-elect Obama into certain positions. I am trying to read this as positively as possible, because on the flip side one could say that this choice is a harbinger of the partisanship in an Obama cabinet.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:22:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No Gloating Zone - A Weird Mix of Emotions</title><link>http://randythomas.disqus.com/no_gloating_zone_a_weird_mix_of_emotions/#comment-3572389</link><description>And it should be added that the pro-prop 8 folks asked the supreme court to stop any same sex marriages from taking place until after the election, so that this problem would be avoided.  They refused to do so, and the couples that married did so knowing that there was a chance the amendment would pass.  So in that sense they purposefully took a gamble, and it didn't pay off (although it will if previously married couples decide to sue and judges somehow contrive to find in their favor and rule the amendment invalid [yeah, I know it can't happen, but I also don't trust the courts anymore]).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BTCarolus</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 13:05:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>