<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Jack_Yan</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-29f5fbe8" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/Jack_Yan/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 07:08:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Chrysler Unveils Restructuring Plan - Daily Brief - Portfolio.com</title><link>http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/daily-brief/2009/11/04/chrysler-unveils-restructuring-plan/#comment-21931793</link><description>Indeed, one might even question if the Chrysler Crossfire was an all-new model, being based on the Mercedes-Benz SLK. However, Mr Vella, I agree with the main point of your article. The transparency presented yesterday brings back confidence, too, to buyers, dealers and suppliers. Chrysler can no longer be perceived as aimless, which it has been for a long time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 07:08:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The A-Team: First Official Photo</title><link>http://www.filmshaft.com/the-a-team-first-official-photo/#comment-21833655</link><description>This is a good photo. They seem to have struck a nice balance between modernity and the original look.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:52:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Groups Finally Getting a Makeover</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/19/facebook-groups-finally-getting-a-makeover/#comment-20663592</link><description>It makes even less sense to separate fan pages and groups now. While Facebook has given that explanation, considering group messages (with the caveat you make in the post) and fan messages now both appear on members’ feeds, the distinction is irrelevant. Put simply, messages sent by fans to the fan page should behave in the same way as group messages.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interestingly, this is one of the few surprise Facebook changes that (a) I like and (b) work.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:30:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oneok Sues Twitter For Trademark Infringement</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/17/oneok-sues-twitter/#comment-16807117</link><description>What a waste of time, suing Twitter when a simple email to the company would have solved the matter and kept everyone’s blood pressure down. Talk about overreacting, but I suppose in Oneokland, this is normal behaviour. Most people in most civilized countries would sort the matter out like adults.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:28:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WordPress Responds to Attack: &amp;#8220;Please Upgrade&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/05/wordpress-please-upgrade/#comment-16035763</link><description>Thanks for that, Zedomax. While we’ve now upgraded (with extreme difficulty, because the upgrade process takes hours and not the minutes that Wordpress claims), I have disabled user registrations on one of our installations.&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Like you, I always have huge problems getting these software companies to believe me, then months down the line I get proved right.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 19:20:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wordpress and Curing High Server Load</title><link>http://www.davidrisley.com/2007/07/30/wordpress-and-curing-high-server-load/#comment-15648261</link><description>It seems there is a successor program now, called WP Super Cache (&lt;a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-super-cache" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-super-cache&lt;/a&gt;). Thank you for the lead to the original WP-Cache—thanks to you, I began digging around and found this plug-in.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:08:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube Launches Its Redesign</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/12/youtube-launches-redesign/#comment-14825931</link><description>Never thought too much about it. I’ve had this look for a month or so.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 05:17:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Have You Seen Ashley Summers?</title><link>http://www.dlayphoto.com/post/158776661#comment-14527382</link><description>It is sad that this case has not received the recognition it deserves, and that the media seem biased toward affluent neighbourhoods. I have Tweeted this link today; maybe it will help a little.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 19:05:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2010 Audi A5 Sportback officially revealed with pricing, not coming to the U.S.</title><link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/07/15/2010-audi-a5-sportback-officially-revealed-with-pricing-not-coming-to-the-us/#comment-12978366</link><description>I know the usual excuse for not exporting this to the US is that Americans don’t like hatchbacks, but I think consumer tastes have changed to the point where this model could do well over there. The few comments seem to bear that out and safety-wise, there should be few issues.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 19:00:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/19/digg-twitter-links/#comment-12937070</link><description>Good news: it has made it now, though you have to scroll about half-way. (I was the 338th Digger.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 23:28:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You say legends, I say leg ends</title><link>http://cheekyfrog.me.uk/2009/07/you-say-legends-i-say-leg-ends/#comment-12936836</link><description>I am not sure if Johnny Rotten spits more than Geraldine Halliwell.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 23:23:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/19/digg-twitter-links/#comment-12933126</link><description>Also, I agree with commenters who are saying that Digg has done a lousy job of telling its users. It was the same story when they removed the shouts. Do this enough, and it points to some pretty bad behaviour there—just as Facebook’s ill-advised moves do.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:19:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/19/digg-twitter-links/#comment-12933090</link><description>While I don’t like this move by Digg, it’s been like this for weeks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:18:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spam Invades Twitter Trends, Again</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/02/spam-twitter-trends/#comment-12032955</link><description>The interesting thing is that one can still search for #pussy as a hashtag, just not Mrs Slocombe’s. What a shame for her worldwide fans.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:55:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitterature: 19 Year-Olds Score Twitter Book Deal</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/06/23/twitterature/#comment-11660962</link><description>I am having trouble picturing this. Would it be along the lines of this?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pride &amp; Prejudice: Mum tried to hook Jane up. Darcy can be an SOB, but he does good stuff, cool! Nice ring! Yay Gardiners!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 01:21:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BaAd Placement - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://www.mediabistro.com/agencyspy/what_the/baad_placement_115734.asp#comment-9076114</link><description>This is that German humour we’ve been hearing so much about lately.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 20:01:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oh, Oh My.  - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://www.mediabistro.com/agencyspy/what_the/oh_oh_my__115885.asp#comment-9075919</link><description>Awful. Ford might need to have a little more control over dealer-level advertising.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 19:57:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mashable on Tumblr - Twitter in Plain English

 This video is almost a...</title><link>http://mashable.tumblr.com/post/80530269#comment-6630224</link><description>Funny (to me) how the image of the ‘phone’ is a PDA.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:46:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Morning After - Initial Thoughts</title><link>http://randythomas.org/2008/11/05/the-morning-after-initial-thoughts/#comment-3576898</link><description>Hi Randy! Perhaps this is why the President-elect has chosen a partisan figure as his possible chief of staff. It might stop, meanwhile, any of the senior Democrats from pushing President-elect Obama into certain positions. I am trying to read this as positively as possible, because on the flip side one could say that this choice is a harbinger of the partisanship in an Obama cabinet.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:22:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No Gloating Zone - A Weird Mix of Emotions</title><link>http://randythomas.org/2008/11/05/no-gloating-zone-a-weird-mix-of-emotions/#comment-3561495</link><description>I understand your feelings on the issue, Randy. It is hard not to feel some sympathy for any couple, straight or gay, whose union’s recognition has suddenly changed. I always felt that in the California case, where I have read the judgements, the majority judges were not clever enough. If they had an agenda to legalize gay marriage, then their interpretation of the law left matters open to future attacks. Unlike the precedent that some relied upon (Perez) where the legislature had been clumsy (intentionally?), California law was far clearer. You are right that in the case of California, it gave same-sex couples false expectations over the definition of marriage.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 19:13:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Morning After - Initial Thoughts</title><link>http://randythomas.org/2008/11/05/the-morning-after-initial-thoughts/#comment-3561404</link><description>I want to see if the President-elect can deliver. I worry less about him than Sens. Biden and Reid and Speaker Pelosi. I am not sure if there will be any true bipartisanship in his cabinet yet.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 19:08:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox 3: Fonts and text</title><link>http://www.dria.org/wordpress/archives/2008/06/10/651/#comment-2917559</link><description>I have waited a long time to see these features and they were discussed in the font industry almost a decade ago. Firefox has taken four years to display ligatures and speech marks in the same typeface as the rest of the text—but I am glad it has finally made amends and, in fact, headed even further out in front with kerning and discretionary ligature support. I have found it, so far, to be inconsistent but at least it is occasionally working—so I take my hat off to the developers for caring about typography for a change.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 10:23:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Has a Tough Start to the Week</title><link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/09/facebook-has-a-tough-start-to-the-week/#comment-2650675</link><description>I like the look but it is sluggish. The first load was 56 seconds. I have tried different browsers, different computers (new and old), and it makes no difference. My profile takes around 19 seconds to appear. Comments on the wall take one minute to echo my typing. Many of my applications are incompatible and no longer update. These bugs were around in July, when I first trialled new Facebook; it is sad that in September, nothing has been done about them. I don’t mind a layout change, but there is something seriously wrong with the coding for it to be so inefficient.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:35:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Impact of the New Design on Applications</title><link>http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/09/the-impact-of-the-new-design-on-applications/#comment-2623063</link><description>The user experience is an important one to note. While I like the new design, I am appalled by its sluggishness and incompatibility with my most regularly used applications. Very polite feedback to those developers and to Facebook has not been effective. I don’t know much about programming, but I do know that the dial-up-style speed of new Facebook has forced me to cut down my usage substantially. I have removed about half a dozen applications in the hope it would speed Facebook up, to no avail. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With the changes in privacy settings and two phantom applications appearing since I was forced on to new Facebook, I will likely remove more applications as the site becomes less useful—why allow developers to have access to my information when I hardly use the site any more? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While I sympathize with developers, many of whom provided great tools and games in the days of old Facebook, I am not surprised about the decline in application views and, in fact, very surprised that the drop has been as low as 25 per cent for some. New Facebook is the virtual equivalent of new Coke.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 06:02:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Eight things you probably didn&amp;#8217;t know about me</title><link>http://www.knoizki.net/2008/01/08/eight-things-you-probably-didnt-know-about-me/#comment-3478612</link><description>Thanks for doing the meme, K.!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack_Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:43:26 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>