<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for JGoff</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/JGoff/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/JGoff/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2017 23:02:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Hugh Hefner Wasn't Just a Creep&amp;#8212;He Was Also a Shitty Boss</title><link>http://inthesetimes.com/working/entry/20560/hugh_hefners_legacy_of_exploitation#comment-3544611823</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You...are treating feminism as a dick measuring contest?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J.Goff</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2017 23:02:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Researchers find that female PC gamers outnumber males </title><link>http://www.pcgamer.com/researchers-find-that-female-pc-gamers-outnumber-males/#comment-2348670550</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If your view of gaming can be summed up by a 13 year old or the phrase "Just cuz yur playing Farmville duzn't mean yur a gamer", please stop speaking for the rest of us gamers.  Those of us who have played every console (with females playing at the same time, shocker!) that ever existed have no need of your misogyny.  Just because you are 13 (or you have yet to progress passed a 13-year-old mentality) does not mean you speak for us.  More female gamers is A GOOD THING.  No matter what game they play.  Let us always hope it is true, forever and ever, amen.  More of us means more people who understand why we play.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J.Goff</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2015 09:10:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m Not Your Feminist Mommy &amp;#038; I&amp;#8217;m Tired of Holding Your Hand</title><link>http://feminspire.com/im-not-your-feminist-mommy/#comment-1589857322</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I know for a fact that Jeff didn't understand the article.  I read his first comment.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J.Goff</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 10:12:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m Not Your Feminist Mommy &amp;#038; I&amp;#8217;m Tired of Holding Your Hand</title><link>http://feminspire.com/im-not-your-feminist-mommy/#comment-1589856560</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your first paragraph in your initial comment WAS COMPLETELY addressed in the article.  I can't help it if you can't read.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J.Goff</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 10:12:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m Not Your Feminist Mommy &amp;#038; I&amp;#8217;m Tired of Holding Your Hand</title><link>http://feminspire.com/im-not-your-feminist-mommy/#comment-1587947533</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your statement had nothing in it worth rebutting.  You completely missed the entire point of the article, most likely because you didn't really read it.  And to top it off, you made one of the classic blunders.  Acting like using profanity means someone's point is invalid because reasons.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J.Goff</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2014 17:41:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m Not Your Feminist Mommy &amp;#038; I&amp;#8217;m Tired of Holding Your Hand</title><link>http://feminspire.com/im-not-your-feminist-mommy/#comment-1587081984</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jeff, fuck off.  Go clutch your pearls on your own fainting couch because someone said a dirty word and made you feel bad.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J.Goff</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2014 02:23:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Elliot Rodger's War on Women</title><link>http://inthesetimes.com/duly-noted/entry/16748/elliott_rodgers_war_on_women#comment-1407550526</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You are assuming that all crime has the same intent.  Knocking over mailboxes doesn't have the same destructive power of killing someone, for one thing.  Also, general mayhem that is not directed at a person just doesn't carry the same weight as mass violence directed at one group of people for the express purpose of creating an environment of fear of bodily harm or death.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Terrorists can rob banks, though, depending upon their motives and what they plan to do with the money.  I would posit you would agree that the Joker from "The Dark Knight" was a terrorist.  Robbing the bank was not, in itself, a solely terrorist act.  Terrorism requires more than just a crime, but a directed motive to instill fear in the general populace.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J.Goff</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 20:31:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Elliot Rodger's War on Women</title><link>http://inthesetimes.com/duly-noted/entry/16748/elliott_rodgers_war_on_women#comment-1406701778</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's the truth.  I don't get why one would have a problem telling the truth.  This guy is a terrorist whose goal was to instill terror in the general populace, especially women, and to garner a widespread audience for his views in the midst of the aftermath of his killing spree.  Calling him a terrorist ensures that people will look upon his antifeminist ideology as it should be looked upon, a message of violence and hatred that must be directly opposed by any sane and rational society.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J.Goff</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 12:13:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Final &lt;i&gt;Breaking Bad &lt;/i&gt;Recap Ever. </title><link>http://www.shakesville.com/2013/09/the-final-breaking-bad-recap-ever.html#comment-1064968426</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like that at least Walt admitted the awful truth.  That he was such a terrible person to begin with that he needed to be an evil piece of shit just to feel alive.  That makes it all the more Shakespearean in that Walt's tragic flaw was his monstrously large ego that got burned when he looked at his honestly decent life before and saw nothing but a waste.  His tragic flaw was his inability to accept that his family and friends were enough.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J.Goff</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 16:36:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s Time to Leave Penny Arcade Expo to the Dickwolves</title><link>http://www.wired.com/underwire/2013/09/penny-arcade-expo-dickwolves/#comment-1031523995</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Having your shitty comic called out for being shitty isn't hate speech either.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J.Goff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 19:22:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s Time to Leave Penny Arcade Expo to the Dickwolves</title><link>http://www.wired.com/underwire/2013/09/penny-arcade-expo-dickwolves/#comment-1031520994</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Concern troll is concerned, duly noted.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J.Goff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 19:18:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s Time to Leave Penny Arcade Expo to the Dickwolves</title><link>http://www.wired.com/underwire/2013/09/penny-arcade-expo-dickwolves/#comment-1031461857</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hate speech has a clear definition.  You don't get to act like being called an asshole is hate speech.  Sorry, that's not hate speech.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J.Goff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 18:10:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s Time to Leave Penny Arcade Expo to the Dickwolves</title><link>http://www.wired.com/underwire/2013/09/penny-arcade-expo-dickwolves/#comment-1031460364</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wait.  Wait.  Wait.  You are saying that Louis CK and Patrice O'Neal have been offensive in their humor by saying the words "cunt" and "nigger" and I'm the one who is ignorant?  They've said much much much worse, man.  Their comic acts are basically all about turning offensive words on their head.  The point was that they had context to what they were saying, and their comedic acts are often about subverting the idea of using language to offend.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The context here was that Penny Arcade put up something offensive to rape victims, got criticized for it, then repeatedly went back to the well to dig up that awesome rape-joke humor you people seem to like so much.  Now, the difference here is that some comedians know how to subvert for humor.  You and the Penny Arcade crew seem to know only how to be repetitive.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J.Goff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 18:08:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s Time to Leave Penny Arcade Expo to the Dickwolves</title><link>http://www.wired.com/underwire/2013/09/penny-arcade-expo-dickwolves/#comment-1031453355</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm invested in the destruction of rape culture.  This is a subset of said rape culture.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J.Goff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 18:00:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s Time to Leave Penny Arcade Expo to the Dickwolves</title><link>http://www.wired.com/underwire/2013/09/penny-arcade-expo-dickwolves/#comment-1031452029</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You just equated being a victim of rape with being a victim of criticism.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Well done weenus.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J.Goff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 17:59:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s Time to Leave Penny Arcade Expo to the Dickwolves</title><link>http://www.wired.com/underwire/2013/09/penny-arcade-expo-dickwolves/#comment-1031351993</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Personally, I stopped reading Penny Arcade when they kept making the same jokes about OMG THEY ARE SO OBSESSED WITH VIDEO GAMES LULZ!  As to PAX, it is unfortunate that the actions of the authors of Penny Arcade seem to have driven people off from the Con, but when a boycott is called for, you might look at the people whose actions made the boycott necessary, and not the person who called the boycott.  I think people should boycott things that they do not wish to fund or subscribe to any longer.  That is freedom of speech, which people around here like to act like they support.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J.Goff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 16:16:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s Time to Leave Penny Arcade Expo to the Dickwolves</title><link>http://www.wired.com/underwire/2013/09/penny-arcade-expo-dickwolves/#comment-1031344099</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Which is actually a problem in a world where one in five women have been raped or sexually assaulted.  Then again, you actually would have to care about what people tell you when they say that your actions are demeaning and hurtful.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J.Goff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 16:09:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s Time to Leave Penny Arcade Expo to the Dickwolves</title><link>http://www.wired.com/underwire/2013/09/penny-arcade-expo-dickwolves/#comment-1031342567</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That when faced with rape victims who thought the original comic was in poor taste, Penny Arcade continually mocked what they said, acting like anybody actually made the point that a comic made people rape, created merchandise meant to make money off of their mocking of rape victims, and repeatedly acted like it was no big deal, everyone just lighten up!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J.Goff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 16:07:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s Time to Leave Penny Arcade Expo to the Dickwolves</title><link>http://www.wired.com/underwire/2013/09/penny-arcade-expo-dickwolves/#comment-1031338751</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Louis CK is subversive and at least is intelligent in his humor.  Are you seriously comparing these actual comics with the trash Penny Arcade publishes on a daily basis?  Wow.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J.Goff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 16:05:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s Time to Leave Penny Arcade Expo to the Dickwolves</title><link>http://www.wired.com/underwire/2013/09/penny-arcade-expo-dickwolves/#comment-1031336452</link><description>&lt;p&gt;BAH HAHAHA!  Yes, hate speech towards a cisgendered white male.  That is the real problem here.  All those downtrodden white males getting hate speech thrown at them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J.Goff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 16:04:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s Time to Leave Penny Arcade Expo to the Dickwolves</title><link>http://www.wired.com/underwire/2013/09/penny-arcade-expo-dickwolves/#comment-1031296748</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So what's the point of the argument then, other than to use the word "biased" as a meaningless pejorative.  When reality is biased against you, you don't get to act like that is a problem for reality.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J.Goff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 15:46:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s Time to Leave Penny Arcade Expo to the Dickwolves</title><link>http://www.wired.com/underwire/2013/09/penny-arcade-expo-dickwolves/#comment-1031293331</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your "argument" was that it was a biased article that had "multiple logical fallacies".  The article itself had multiple parts to it, cited itself, and made claims that several other people have long noted in the behavior of the Penny Arcade crew and their little hangers-on.  Rape and death threats seem to come to those who have the temerity to question Penny Arcade for their rape apologia.  Oh, but that's just a coincidence.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Either way, your "argument" was itself a fallacy, in that it cites nothing to show how the author was incorrect in their claims.  Being "biased" might be problematic in scientific research, but when the facts themselves are biased against you, that's not the same as being wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J.Goff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 15:44:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s Time to Leave Penny Arcade Expo to the Dickwolves</title><link>http://www.wired.com/underwire/2013/09/penny-arcade-expo-dickwolves/#comment-1031271521</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, to be fair, your original argument is about how someone called someone names, and is therefore wrong, which is, in itself a logical fallacy.  Why would I care about refuting it?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J.Goff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 15:32:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s Time to Leave Penny Arcade Expo to the Dickwolves</title><link>http://www.wired.com/underwire/2013/09/penny-arcade-expo-dickwolves/#comment-1031269061</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, if your entire point is how funny the original comic was and everyone should lighten up (which I believe was Mike's whole point), I think being called an asshole is probably the least of your concerns.  I would start working on your shitty sense of humor.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J.Goff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 15:30:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s Time to Leave Penny Arcade Expo to the Dickwolves</title><link>http://www.wired.com/underwire/2013/09/penny-arcade-expo-dickwolves/#comment-1031262136</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It isn't ad hominem to state what the person in question did and why it was offensive.  And if it's ad hominem to tell a pathetic little child, who whines about how he's being repressed when he is criticized for his actions, to grow up, then I guess we're all going to be guilty of ad hominem.  Again, better trolls, please.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J.Goff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 15:23:38 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>