<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for GeekLad</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-536d3333" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/GeekLad/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:22:44 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Build Your Own Amazon Niche Store</title><link>http://geeklad.com/build-your-own-amazon-niche-store#comment-22983885</link><description>It shouldn't be a problem at all.  Try it out and let me know if you run&lt;br&gt;into any issues.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GeekLad</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:22:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Reasons Google Wave Is Not Ready</title><link>http://geeklad.com/5-reasons-google-wave-is-not-ready#comment-22970202</link><description>I'm right there with you Gordon.  I think you're spot on with the annoyances&lt;br&gt;you mentioned, as well as the way email integration should work.  Being able&lt;br&gt;to receive @googlewave.com would be perfect, because then I we can just&lt;br&gt;forward all mail to that address and have all communication happen in one&lt;br&gt;place.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GeekLad</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:09:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Reasons Google Wave Is Not Ready</title><link>http://geeklad.com/5-reasons-google-wave-is-not-ready#comment-22857425</link><description>I don't know that I would call it a resounding fail. Afterall, it is just a&lt;br&gt;preview.  Assuming that preview is the equivalent to what everyone else&lt;br&gt;calls "alpha", it should eventually move into beta which should be much&lt;br&gt;better.  When it does eventually get there, they will need to include&lt;br&gt;support for email in some fashion if they expect mass adoption.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The good news is that being a federated protocol, someone else may beat&lt;br&gt;Google to reverse compatibility and develop some kind of Wave client/service&lt;br&gt;that integrates both email and Wave.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GeekLad</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:24:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free eBay Store and WordPress Plugin</title><link>http://geeklad.com/free-ebay-store#comment-21893256</link><description>You bet.  Glad that at least it works w/ smart ads.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GeekLad</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:08:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free eBay Store and WordPress Plugin</title><link>http://geeklad.com/free-ebay-store#comment-21890987</link><description>Perhaps if you simplify the code, you can isolate the issue.  How about if&lt;br&gt;you just try [ebay campaignid="YOUR-CAMPAIGN-ID"&lt;br&gt;keywords="YOUR-STORE-KEYWORDS"] and replace YOUR-CAMPAIGN-ID and&lt;br&gt;YOUR-STORE-KEYWORDS appropriately.  Does it still break?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GeekLad</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:40:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free eBay Store and WordPress Plugin</title><link>http://geeklad.com/free-ebay-store#comment-21890564</link><description>That's bizarre.  I'll have to try it out on another WordPress 2.8.5 blog I haven't yet installed it on and see if I get the same issue.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GeekLad</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:33:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free eBay Store and WordPress Plugin</title><link>http://geeklad.com/free-ebay-store#comment-21889893</link><description>It sounds like you're using the visual editor, so that may be the problem.&lt;br&gt; Try clicking the HTML tab and then adding the code.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GeekLad</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:22:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free eBay Store and WordPress Plugin</title><link>http://geeklad.com/free-ebay-store#comment-21887334</link><description>When you save the article/page and re-open, the brackets are converted to&lt;br&gt;braces?  Are you using some kind of article editing plugin perhaps?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GeekLad</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:42:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free eBay Store and WordPress Plugin</title><link>http://geeklad.com/free-ebay-store#comment-21879668</link><description>That's odd, I haven't seen WordPress change square brackets to curly braces.&lt;br&gt; What version of WordPress are you using?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GeekLad</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:44:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Make and Receive Free Telephone Calls on the Internet</title><link>http://geeklad.com/free-phone-calls-with-google-voice-asterisk-and-gizmo#comment-21823597</link><description>Very odd...  Yeah, the IPkall wait period was why I went about using Gizmo.&lt;br&gt; Well, I'm glad you got it working!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GeekLad</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:34:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Make and Receive Free Telephone Calls on the Internet</title><link>http://geeklad.com/free-phone-calls-with-google-voice-asterisk-and-gizmo#comment-21759536</link><description>Yeah, the PBX in a Flash forum may be of better help than I have been.&lt;br&gt; Sorry I wasn't able to help you out.  If you do finally find a fix in the&lt;br&gt;PIAF forums, please feel free to post the solution here.  Best of luck!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GeekLad</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:36:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Make and Receive Free Telephone Calls on the Internet</title><link>http://geeklad.com/free-phone-calls-with-google-voice-asterisk-and-gizmo#comment-21757171</link><description>Something else you can try, is to go into the General Settings screen and&lt;br&gt;setting Allow Anonymous Inbound SIP Calls? to yes.  This could potentially&lt;br&gt;have security implications (for example, if you have an IVR).  I'm somewhat&lt;br&gt;of an Asterisk noobie myself, so use this feature with caution.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It may be a good way to test things out to see if the box is indeed&lt;br&gt;receiving the calls.  Ultimately, I think you want to get things set up&lt;br&gt;properly with the trunks, routes, and extensions so that you are able to&lt;br&gt;properly receive calls without having to set that option.  I'm still a bit&lt;br&gt;fuzzy on setting these things up the right way, which is why I turned to&lt;br&gt;Orgasmatron since he already had all the trunks, routes, and extensions all&lt;br&gt;set up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm still puzzled as to why it isn't working for you though.  Everything&lt;br&gt;should be all set w/ the trunks, routes, and extensions so it shouldn't be&lt;br&gt;necessary to open up the system to anonymous inbound SIP calls.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GeekLad</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:51:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Make and Receive Free Telephone Calls on the Internet</title><link>http://geeklad.com/free-phone-calls-with-google-voice-asterisk-and-gizmo#comment-21751674</link><description>I would check the Asterisk call logs to see if the calls are coming in at&lt;br&gt;all.  Just click on the Reports tab at the top of the FreePBX administration&lt;br&gt;window.  If Gizmo5 is forwarding properly, you should see entries being&lt;br&gt;added to the call log.  If not, then the problem is either with the router&lt;br&gt;port forwarding or with the Gizmo5 forwarding.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've messed it up a few times on the Gizmo5 forwarding, because I would&lt;br&gt;click the SIP radio button but forgot to click on the Forwarding All Calls&lt;br&gt;radio button.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GeekLad</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 07:10:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free eBay Store and WordPress Plugin</title><link>http://geeklad.com/free-ebay-store#comment-21698864</link><description>If you set it up for pagination and page through them, you should see older auctions.  I don't know that there's really any any other way around this at this time.  I may have to add in a sort parameter to show the newest auctions.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GeekLad</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:03:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free eBay Store and WordPress Plugin</title><link>http://geeklad.com/free-ebay-store#comment-21548144</link><description>I still haven't added support for UK and other countries, but I will be&lt;br&gt;soon.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GeekLad</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:47:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disqus vs. Intense Debate</title><link>http://geeklad.com/disqus-vs-intense-debate#comment-21382045</link><description>I'm not sure if JK-kit was around back when I went with Disqus.  I've been&lt;br&gt;using Disqus for some time.  If it was around, it was not as prominent as&lt;br&gt;Disqus and IntenseDebate were.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GeekLad</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:32:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Reasons Google Wave Is Not Ready</title><link>http://geeklad.com/5-reasons-google-wave-is-not-ready#comment-21347501</link><description>They could probably do a bit better than just bringing a gmail inbox into it (although that would be a start).  I envision that &lt;a href="mailto:yourlogin@googlewave.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;yourlogin@googlewave.com&lt;/a&gt; would actually behave as an email address.  Emails could just appear in your inbox just as any other wave does, and you respond by adding response blips.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The big differences would be that of course there would be no real-time interaction, and you wouldn't be able to edit blips, only add new ones.  I suppose some provisions can be made for editing blips.  When the wave user modifies a blip, the email user could receive an email with the modifications.  But of course, the email user will not be able to modify the wave.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GeekLad</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:39:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Reasons Google Wave Is Not Ready</title><link>http://geeklad.com/5-reasons-google-wave-is-not-ready#comment-21000129</link><description>Thanks for the link Mark.  We do seem to share some of the same thoughts,&lt;br&gt;particularly on the lack of email integration.  I think you're spot-on in&lt;br&gt;stating that lack of email integration is going to be a major roadblock for&lt;br&gt;mass adoption.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GeekLad</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 19:13:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Reasons Google Wave Is Not Ready</title><link>http://geeklad.com/5-reasons-google-wave-is-not-ready#comment-20994214</link><description>It would be great if Google Wave were to implement all the access features&lt;br&gt;mentioned in this article.  But at a minimum, you need to be able to set&lt;br&gt;read-only/read-write permissions and the ability to remove people from a&lt;br&gt;wave.  That would allow Wave users to moderate and remove any individuals&lt;br&gt;that are a nuisance with sabotage, graffiti, spam, etc.  Combine that with&lt;br&gt;better contact management groups, and revision control, and you've got a&lt;br&gt;pretty solid real-time collaborative platform.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I still do believe that it needs a two-way interface with email, to gain&lt;br&gt;wide acceptance and usage.  A lot of people will take the stance that "email&lt;br&gt;ain't broke so don't fix it." It will take backward compatability for such&lt;br&gt;individuals to even consider using it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It may not be necessary for someone like you or me that accepts, embraces,&lt;br&gt;and utilizes new technologies with little issue.  Unfortunately, there are a&lt;br&gt;lot of folks out there that need to be eased into it.  They require&lt;br&gt;facilitation with the transition in the form of "legacy support." Besides,&lt;br&gt;it is difficult to deny that it would be very convenient to use email and&lt;br&gt;wave all in the same place.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GeekLad</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 15:50:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Reasons Google Wave Is Not Ready</title><link>http://geeklad.com/5-reasons-google-wave-is-not-ready#comment-20982186</link><description>I think you're right in that version control and email support can be&lt;br&gt;implemented via bots.  I actually started trying to implement my own "Undo&lt;br&gt;Bot", but did not succeed.  It requires duplicating the entire wave&lt;br&gt;structure each time a blip is added/modified and storing it somewhere.  It&lt;br&gt;was a bit more involved than I had initially anticipated, so I stopped&lt;br&gt;trying to develop it.  Hopefully someone much smarter than me will figure it&lt;br&gt;out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The contact management really needs work though as does access control.  Let&lt;br&gt;me give you an example.  Say you work together on a collaborative website&lt;br&gt;with 9 other people.  All 10 of you are essentially contractors for the&lt;br&gt;website owner, and you get paid for content.  The 10 of you write many waves&lt;br&gt;with secret information that is only to be shared between the 10 of you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First of all, if you want to start a new wave with everyone in the group, it&lt;br&gt;is a major pain.  You need to pick and choose the other 9 people and add&lt;br&gt;them to the wave.  You may forget someone and they miss out on important&lt;br&gt;info.  You may accidentally add someone you shouldn't have, and there's no&lt;br&gt;way you can remove them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another situation you may run into is that bad things can happen if someone&lt;br&gt;leaves the team.  That person will remain on all the waves with everyone&lt;br&gt;else, and there's no way to remove him or her.  Plus, without access&lt;br&gt;control, he or she can sabotage the waves, invite others that should not be&lt;br&gt;invited, make them public when they should not, etc...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Certainly using a hosted solution with the federated service would resolve&lt;br&gt;the access control issues, as you stated. But if anyone is to use Google&lt;br&gt;Wave as their client, I think it would be best if some of these features&lt;br&gt;were implemented, particularly for public waves.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some of the public waves in Google Wave have been experiencing a lot of pain&lt;br&gt;due to the lack of access control.  Because anyone can join and do anything&lt;br&gt;they want to the wave, bad things happen.  Of course, even if they do not&lt;br&gt;implement access control, some form of revision control would alleviate some&lt;br&gt;the pain.  It would at least allow reverting to a prior version before the&lt;br&gt;bad things happened.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry, I have no more invites to give out.  :(</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GeekLad</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 09:52:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Make Cross-Domain AJAX Requests with xdRequest</title><link>http://geeklad.com/make-cross-domain-ajax-requests-with-xdrequest#comment-20981792</link><description>The YQL servers will see the IP of the client.  The remote site will see the&lt;br&gt;IP of the YQL servers.  YQL also does pass along some headers that include&lt;br&gt;information about the client (for example, a header called X-Forwarded-For&lt;br&gt;that contains the IP address of the client).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Because of the security measures enforced by browsers, the only way you can&lt;br&gt;make remote requests 100% within a client is with services that provide an&lt;br&gt;API that provide JASONP responses.  Otherwise, you have to use some sort of&lt;br&gt;proxy that will fetch the data for you and provide a JSONP response, as YQL&lt;br&gt;does.  I think YQL is the best solution I've seen out there for doing this.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GeekLad</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 09:32:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Make Cross-Domain AJAX Requests with xdRequest</title><link>http://geeklad.com/make-cross-domain-ajax-requests-with-xdrequest#comment-20947006</link><description>Thanks for the kind words.  Please be aware that the possibility of getting&lt;br&gt;blacklisted still exists.  The requests are made via dynamically inserted&lt;br&gt;scripts to the YQL servers.  YQL servers make the requests to the remote&lt;br&gt;pages and then send the data back to the client, so it is possible that some&lt;br&gt;servers may blacklist the YQL servers.  YQL also provides an opt-out option&lt;br&gt;for content providers: &lt;a href="http://developer.yahoo.com/yql/provider/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://developer.yahoo.com/yql/provider/&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GeekLad</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 18:43:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Make Cross-Domain AJAX Requests with xdRequest</title><link>http://geeklad.com/make-cross-domain-ajax-requests-with-xdrequest#comment-20704839</link><description>I'd be more than glad to add you to the project.  Welcome aboard!  :-D</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GeekLad</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:17:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WordPress PageRank Widget Plugin</title><link>http://geeklad.com/wordpress-pagerank-widget-plugin#comment-20691954</link><description>Agreed.  Some of my pages are top-ranking for some queries, with little more&lt;br&gt;than a 0 PR.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GeekLad</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:10:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Keep Track of New Television Show Episodes with RerunCheck</title><link>http://geeklad.com/keep-track-of-new-television-show-episodes-with-reruncheck#comment-20629867</link><description>Unfortunately it's not quite as easy as just subtracting the time.  It would work for central, but the Pacific and Mountain times differ.  I'm not sure how standard their air-times are with ours (i.e. if it is always the case where a 9pm Eastern show will be 9pm Mountain).  You wouldn't happen to know if this is the case, would you?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do need to get around to writing some code to update the air times.  I think the current air times are simply what they were when I first created RerunCheck.  I have seen two-hour specials throw things a bit off, but you're right, I do need to update the air times.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GeekLad</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:06:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>