<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Faticia</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/Faticia/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 17:08:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: #405 - From a very short point of view</title><link>http://colbycheese.disqus.com/405_from_a_very_short_point_of_view/#comment-21484392</link><description>:D</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phenoca</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 17:08:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #405 - From a very short point of view</title><link>http://colbycheese.disqus.com/405_from_a_very_short_point_of_view/#comment-9542750</link><description>I adore this page!  I didn't fully realize that Sangwine has died twice!  That's impressive.  Oh, and next character poll you have, make sure that you include the palace mouse as an option.  I think he'll win it. ;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Faticia</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 13:13:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 02/20/2009</title><link>http://colbycheese.disqus.com/02202009/#comment-6718187</link><description>The soothsayer also said that Sangwine would give up his life in the end.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sho</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:51:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 02/24/2009</title><link>http://colbycheese.disqus.com/02242009/#comment-6663711</link><description>I agree.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My pet hypothesis is that when Bactine healed Zedwig, he was then able to heal Sangwine -- maybe channel the healing through Bactine?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sadfulness</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:56:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 02/24/2009</title><link>http://colbycheese.disqus.com/02242009/#comment-6654467</link><description>Yeah, Zedwig said the worst thing he possibly could to Fang.  You know, first Fang pushed Zedwig to his absolute emotional limit when Zedwig was weak.  As a result, he nearly got defeated by Zedwig.  THEN, as if he really couldn't make matters worse for himself, he had Zedwig healed, and not only healed, but healed in a way that would push him even farther past his limit.  I don't know about the rest of you, but I am much stronger as a person when I am healthy.  Fang, that was stupid.  If Zedwig could nearly resist your earing when he was half dead, do you seriously think you even have a chance now?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Faticia</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:04:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 02/20/2009</title><link>http://colbycheese.disqus.com/02202009/#comment-6585998</link><description>I spent a lot of time trying to forget the soothsayer, personally.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Faticia</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:22:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 02/20/2009</title><link>http://colbycheese.disqus.com/02202009/#comment-6467087</link><description>"But grandpa, you don't mean dead!  [Bactine's] just faking it, right?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;...Because yes, a modified version of a Princess Bride quote was seriously the first thing I thought of.  And in that story everything turned out alright!  Now where's the Miracle Man?!  "We [fans] have never taken defeat easily!"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do love how Zedwig looks like a young, strong man again in the last two panels whereas Bactine looks aged.  Hmm... if she did live and did age, then her and Sangwine have even less time together (which is better than none...)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And, of course, Sangwine gets to play the oh-so-wonderful role of the dying man everyone has seemingly forgotten about lying on the floor.  Poor Sang.... (though obviously no one has forgotten about him)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, where be Xylic? (and Derf, and Stump, ...and Sum'melph, and...)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Faticia</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 11:46:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #383 - Fang the merciless</title><link>http://colbycheese.disqus.com/383_fang_the_merciless/#comment-5565953</link><description>Zedwig pushing Fangline off the side seems to anticlimactic to me. &amp;gt;_&amp;gt;  All I can imagine is Fang screaming like a little girl while rag doll physics make him look silly. O_o&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I want to know what's happening to Al'bert. T-T</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lady Nilstria</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:53:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #383 - Fang the merciless</title><link>http://colbycheese.disqus.com/383_fang_the_merciless/#comment-5542207</link><description>Blast him, Bactine!  Blast him!  And then, through the sheer strength of your love for Sangwine, don't faint after blasting Fang, but manage to retain enough composure to heal Sangwine.  Then you can faint because you will most likely have knocked Fang off of the balcony.  If that doesn't kill him, it will at least buy time!  (my advice to Bactine)  Oh, try to not knock Zedwig off the balcony while your at it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(Advice to Zedwig) RESIST!  You can do it!  Take the earing off!  The shock of that much resistance from you will buy Bactine the needed time.  After that, then if can be figured out what to do with Fang (like push him off the side!).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Faticia</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 21:40:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 01/09/2009</title><link>http://colbycheese.disqus.com/01092009/#comment-5048140</link><description>Now that's a fine idea...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">colbycheese</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:39:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 01/09/2009</title><link>http://colbycheese.disqus.com/01092009/#comment-5046282</link><description>Or you could make bookmarks out of them! :D</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Faticia</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:05:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DREAMLESS</title><link>http://dreamless.disqus.com/dreamless/#comment-4943405</link><description>typically the little green book "Pastoral care of the Sick"  or if it's set before 1970, "Rituale Romanum"  or if he were a really astute priest, the formula would be memorized (as we are encouraged to do for emergencies when no book is available!)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fr. Chris Decker</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:19:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DREAMLESS</title><link>http://dreamless.disqus.com/dreamless/#comment-4940949</link><description>@ArtsAngel  Another detail, the priest would most likely be holding a Book of Blessings and would have the container (probably some type of phial) of oil either in his left hand with the book or somewhere near at hand. ( I messed up the link in my earlier post, but I fixed it--sorry about that!)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Faticia</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:10:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DREAMLESS</title><link>http://dreamless.disqus.com/dreamless/#comment-4927320</link><description>@ArtsAngel  One of the awesome parts about Catholicism is that every detail is important.  Most don't change whether the sacrament is valid or not, but they are all filled with a ton of symbolism.  If you want this to be perfect, I would suggest changing it.  I'm sorry I'm not more knowledgeable on this specific sacrament otherwise I would help more.  &lt;a href="http://newadvent.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;newadvent.org&lt;/a&gt; might have something of use for this or the future, if needed.  It's a giant online Catholic encyclopedia.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Faticia</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:46:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 01/02/2009</title><link>http://colbycheese.disqus.com/01022009/#comment-4880581</link><description>:D</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Faticia</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 13:13:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 01/02/2009</title><link>http://colbycheese.disqus.com/01022009/#comment-4880559</link><description>I thoroughly agree with you assessment.  I have a couple of those type of relationships in my life as well, but they are not romantic in the least (I nearly laughed out loud at the idea of them being romantic!).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Faticia</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 13:12:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 01/02/2009</title><link>http://colbycheese.disqus.com/01022009/#comment-4861975</link><description>I read this and found myself yelling at "Bad timing Sangwine!!!" at my computer screen.  lol&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well, maybe it is best all the parties involved are present for this scene since Fang obviously is half-giving in to Zedwig rather than fully agreeing to abjure his reign.  With that type of agreement, he would surely rebel and change his mind the second he saw Sangwine in charge.  Only with a well thought out agreement to hand over the reign will everything be fully solved with Fang (at least, for a somewhat long time).  That is my first take on the situation at any rate.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Faticia</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 00:48:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #376 - Tripping in the Passage</title><link>http://colbycheese.disqus.com/376_tripping_in_the_passage/#comment-4528098</link><description>There is a window in the secret passage.  Do they usually do things like that?  Ok, whatever Sangwine uncovered looks like it should be a picture, but for some weird reason I feel like it probably is a mirror (though a picture would make much more sense).  Maybe it's because I have been watching way too much La Belle et la Bete...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Faticia</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:55:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 12/16/2008</title><link>http://colbycheese.disqus.com/12162008/#comment-4469828</link><description>XD  Somebody should make that in an Al'bert banner using the last panel of this page.  That would be the greatest thing EVARS. :3</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lady Nilstria</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:42:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 12/16/2008</title><link>http://colbycheese.disqus.com/12162008/#comment-4461667</link><description>*riotous laughter*</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rachel</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:34:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 12/16/2008</title><link>http://colbycheese.disqus.com/12162008/#comment-4446979</link><description>"Hallo.  My name is Al'bert Du Fromage.  You cut my hair.  Prepare to die!"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Faticia</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 02:20:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 12/09/2008</title><link>http://colbycheese.disqus.com/12092008/#comment-4304534</link><description>I LOVE this page!!!  Everyone else said what I wanted to say about it so I think I'll just leave it at a "this page is awesome!!!"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Faticia</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:46:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 12/05/2008</title><link>http://colbycheese.disqus.com/12052008/#comment-4210514</link><description>GEEVES!!!  I love the quarterstaff!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is that Sum'melph in the background of panels two and three?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Faticia</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:26:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 11/28/2008</title><link>http://colbycheese.disqus.com/11282008/#comment-4067471</link><description>I never said it was destructive, just that he didn't like doing magic like that. He seemed to me to be the type who likes pretty magic more than... effective magic.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zypher</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 01:57:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 11/28/2008</title><link>http://colbycheese.disqus.com/11282008/#comment-4057561</link><description>Is that destructive magic?  He's not hurting Fang.  He's only holding him captive.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Faticia</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 23:12:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>