<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for DuckofDeath87</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/DuckofDeath87/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/DuckofDeath87/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:34:08 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Playground.js - Essential framework for javascript gamedevelopers.</title><link>http://playgroundjs.com/playground-keyboard#comment-2326613989</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Shouldn't this.keyboard be this.app.keyboard?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DuckofDeath87</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:34:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What I Need is a Universal Receptor Protocol</title><link>http://www.scribkin.com/2008/05/22/what-i-need-is-a-universal-receptor-protocol/#comment-525519</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I did a little more research. If you can find an XMPP server that supports&lt;br&gt;some certain extensions, you would be nearly to your goal of the open&lt;br&gt;receptor!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Namely,&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0060.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0060.html"&gt;http://www.xmpp.org/extensi...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0049.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0049.html"&gt;http://www.xmpp.org/extensi...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0002.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0002.html"&gt;http://www.xmpp.org/extensi...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0030.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0030.html"&gt;http://www.xmpp.org/extensi...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Some of those sound like it would really help your protocol. Especally that&lt;br&gt;subscribe publish one.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DuckofDeath87</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 19:43:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What I Need is a Universal Receptor Protocol</title><link>http://www.scribkin.com/2008/05/22/what-i-need-is-a-universal-receptor-protocol/#comment-523027</link><description>&lt;p&gt;XMPP. It is all about presence. Couple that with offline message retrieval (XEP-0013) and filetransfers (XEP-0096)&lt;br&gt;In theroy, a blog could also have a XMPP account. It could "message" its subscribers. if the server supported it, the server could send one message to a lot of folks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My understanding is that it handles meta data well. I have never heard of it being use like this, but I think it could work. Couple it with a completely different GUI than most normal IM clients and you would be in business!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Best of all, the hard part is already done! There are already xmpp servers running. &lt;br&gt;There would still be a lot of work to get what you want, but I feel that your main thing is the push protocol, and XMPP gets that done.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DuckofDeath87</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 02:05:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>