<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of Don_Quijote</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/Don_Quijote/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 08:03:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Good Old Sixth Amendment Days</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/52984/the-good-old-sixth-amendment-days/#comment-22985183</link><description>Unfortunately, John, that is what Kattenburg lives for...........to read Memeorandum each day to find where some other lefty blogger does all the work for her and finds some form of a truncated sentence or incomplete expression of a thought and then relies on that literal expression to convey a unflattering portrait of her political opponents.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;To any mature mind, the truncated sentence obviously included the thought precedent that the likely certain conviction would come within the setting of a trail.........but it is easier to try and score another cheap point with her TMV peanut gallery than to allow for what would be that likely context.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;But, as tidbits pronounced yesterday, Kattenburg strikes him/her as a "moderate mainstream Democrat."&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">casualobserver</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 08:03:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can We Please Just Tax the Churches Already?</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/52830/can-we-please-just-tax-the-churches-already/#comment-22869029</link><description>Good luck running on that platform, Leo! Your vote total would make Bob Barr look like a formidable POTUS candidate in comparison. No doubt you'd pick up 13,286 lefty blogger and atheist votes and then come to a screeching halt.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And don't forget the CC has had this position just a wee bit longer than you existed on the face of this earth. Just because some would declare this to be a "political" position, hardly changes the fact that millions of others accept this to be a "moral" position, close-minded or otherwise.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By the way, I'm turning in all the liberals here in to the Ebeneezer Baptist Church for suggesting they lose their tax exemption for all the "politiking" they have been indulging in for the past 50 years.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">casualobserver</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:12:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Swine flu vaccine &amp;#8211; the appearance of favoritism towards the wealthy</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51934/swine-flu-vaccine-the-appearance-of-favoritism-towards-the-wealthy/#comment-22034674</link><description>DQ, why don't you do your blood pressure a favor and start learning the lyrics to El Himno de Bayamo? No capitalists are getting swine flu vaccinations there either.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">casualobserver</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:57:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Read It and Weep</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51544/read-it-and-weep/#comment-21811072</link><description>Professor, what does it matter whether we are ALL for that or not?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;What I think matters much more is that if you voted for Obama, then why are you letting the guy ignore your wishes so wantonly?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What is it that a groupthink exercise at TMV is supposed to accomplish that 60 million votes cast for Obama did not?&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">casualobserver</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:23:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Close NJ Race</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51454/the-close-nj-race/#comment-21715768</link><description>Well, I doubt you're going to be able to relate to this, but my ideological beliefs do not always align with my political affiliations. The former is personal and the latter has more to do with business and my more public personna. In a similar, but more lighthearted vein, my comments here at TMV more often reflect the environment established by the editors as opposed to my core beliefs.&lt;br&gt;With that as a backdrop, my comment above (and throughout this forum) is not intended as a defense of the the R party but moreso the population of non-liberal, self-sufficient people who first and formost need to rid themsleves of the burden of another Cozine term. Christie may not be preferable to the 3rd party candidate, but, like it or not, more electable. Your vote and my vote are cast for different reasons.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">casualobserver</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:58:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Political Compass</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51339/political-compass/#comment-21711546</link><description>I'm on the right-hand side of the libertarian quadrant in the quiz2 test, but no bleeding into the conservative quadrant whatsoever.......must have been my selection on the porn question..lol!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">casualobserver</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:18:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Political Compass</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51339/political-compass/#comment-21678935</link><description>Not fully agreed, my double negative scoring friend.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The liberties questions posed can't discern a libertarian from a liberal because it did not link in the economic side into the same issue. There is no individual right on earth I would not grant to you.....abortion, pot smoking, joining the single payer Pelosi health plan.......just don't let any of it have any effect on my rights or my funds. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And what really is the logical demarcation between "agreeing" and "strongly agreeing"? I'm not prone to emotional histrionics, so it seems to me "agreeing" gets the job done.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">casualobserver</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 11:31:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama &amp;#8220;Thesis&amp;#8221; Controversy a Hoax: Limbaugh Gets &amp;#8220;Punked&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51052/obama-thesis-controversy-a-hoax-limbaugh-gets-punked/#comment-21174259</link><description>And I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you could never figure out how to read a dictionary.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Provide us one link where this term is defined in a racial context.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you're going to suggest it is a code word, then I guess when you use the term African American you are really code wording to another derogatory term.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Very weak tea indeed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">casualobserver</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:50:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sex, Silicone, and Suits: Miss California Goes a-Courtin&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/50948/sex-silicone-and-suits-miss-california-goes-a-courtin/#comment-21140947</link><description>@@ I must be "physically repulsive" @@&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please email a recent photo to TSteele to upload here and I will be happy to arbitrate the dispute pro bono.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">casualobserver</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:47:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democrats Increasing Optimistic About Public Option In Health Care Reform</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/50732/democrats-increasing-optimistic-about-public-option-in-health-care-reform/#comment-21005036</link><description>Ironically, those United numbers largely come from their Medicare/Medicaid administration contracts and not their own insurance product margins. Kinda blows the whole liberal meme.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">casualobserver</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:55:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trusting (But Not Registering) Republican</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/50676/trusting-but-not-registering-republican/#comment-20946461</link><description>dagoat, then which is your confidence inspiring polling organization? fivethirtyeight, hardly a conservative backing website, concludes it is at the very top of polls for accuracy over the long haul.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">casualobserver</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 18:19:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rape Victims&amp;#8217; Hobson&amp;#8217;s Choice</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/50553/rape-victims-hobsons-choice/#comment-20892559</link><description>tidbits, if your point to me is there is not enough information presented for me to conclude the woman did not act with reasonable common sense at all times, I will accept that. Do I retain my doubts, yes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No, I am not suggesting at all manner of dress or behavior affects culpability for the crime. Behavior simply affects outcomes.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">casualobserver</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:14:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rape Victims&amp;#8217; Hobson&amp;#8217;s Choice</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/50553/rape-victims-hobsons-choice/#comment-20867748</link><description>tidbits--in a perfect world, the flunitrazepam would not even be involved, but it is not a perfect world. If my daughter gets up and ever leaves her drink behind, I have told her to order a new one upon return......she has been doing so for the last 10 years.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why is streets smarts "over the top"?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">casualobserver</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:11:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When Did Classic Liberalism Die?</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/50251/when-did-classic-liberalism-die/#comment-20632757</link><description>@@differentiate it from modern-day American liberalism, which would more correctly be referred to as progressivism or democratic socialism.@@&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;nic, check out the definition of New Deal Statism and see if that actually isn't a more apt description of the current lefties.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">casualobserver</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:58:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democratic Operation Chaos! Time to Unite Behind&amp;#8230; Palin?</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/50189/democratic-operation-chao/#comment-20586809</link><description>Yes, I heard Huckabee tell his exploratory campaign committee that if elected he will issue an Executive Order that all liberal California women have to go to a convent and take vows of celibacy so that they do not multiply further.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">casualobserver</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:01:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Liberals uneasy with power</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/49988/liberals-uneasy-with-power/#comment-20348871</link><description>Yes, there were deficits in the Bush years.......but Obama deficits in one year are larger than all of Bush's combined...ineffectual deflection&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;· This year, Washington will spend $30,958 per household, tax $17,576 per household, and borrow $13,392 per household. This spending is not just temporary: President Obama would permanently keep annual spending between $5,000 and $8,000 per household higher than it had been under President Bush.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;· The 22 percent spending increase projected for 2009 represents the largest government expansion since the 1952 height of the Korean War (adjusted for inflation). Federal spending is up 57 percent since 2001.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;· The 2009 budget deficit will be larger than all budget deficits from 2002 through 2007 combined. More than 43 cents of every dollar Washington spends in 2009 will have been borrowed.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;· One would expect the post-recession deficit to revert back to the $150 billion to $350 billion budget deficits that were typical before the recession. Instead, by 2019, the President forecasts a $917 billion budget deficit, a public debt of 77 percent of GDP, and annual net interest spending of $774 billion.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;· The White House projects $10.6 trillion in new deficits between 2009 and 2019—nearly $80,000 per household in new borrowing.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;· None of these estimates include the cost of health reform.&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">casualobserver</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:04:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jon Stewart on the &amp;#8216;Franken Anti-Government Contractor Rape Liability Bill&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/49622/jon-stewart-on-the-franken-anti-government-contractor-rape-liability-bill/#comment-20140429</link><description>Yes, OK, I understand your point now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, should not the evaluation of "unenforceable provisions" be handled through the legal system of due process as opposed to Congress?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">casualobserver</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:23:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jon Stewart on the &amp;#8216;Franken Anti-Government Contractor Rape Liability Bill&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/49622/jon-stewart-on-the-franken-anti-government-contractor-rape-liability-bill/#comment-20137723</link><description>Yes, I get the hierarchy argument, but who is talking about some future application?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Here is the real issue again.......if you sign a contract.......and at that time it does not run afoul of any statute.......you seem to be advocating let's have the government break the contract later on because they now think there should be a statute precluding one of the contractual terms. Is my interpretation of your view correct?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I accept it can be changed prospectively.&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">casualobserver</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:02:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Last Republican</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/49427/the-last-republican/#comment-20010399</link><description>Then again, why should anyone pretend posting at TMV is related to living in the real world.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">casualobserver</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:48:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Surprise! Propose Health Insurance Reform Will Raise Premiums</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/49280/surprise-propose-health-insurance-reform-will-raise-premiums/#comment-19927077</link><description>@@The public option is far from dead at this time@@&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Ok, I'm in a betting mood. I'll deliver to you a 1971 lime green AMC Gremlin, the pride of Kenosha, Wisconsin, if there is a public option passed this year beyond just something that possibly triggers in 2013. Should there be something less, you will deliver to me a 1947 Morgan, concours condition.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Sound fair?&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">casualobserver</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:26:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama Gets Surprise 2009 Nobel Peace Prize</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/48997/obama-gets-surprise-2009-nobel-peace-prize/#comment-19675062</link><description>@@Care to set up a pool for the number of news cycles this story eats?@@&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;A much more active cyber pool right now is how many times will he use the words..."I, me, myself" in his acceptance speech. I'm in at 25.&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">casualobserver</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 11:10:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Double Standard on Congressman Grayson ?</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/48068/double-standard-on-congressman-grayson/#comment-17944128</link><description>I guess because I really don't feel I am that much a "tool of the pimps". Each year, I arrange for a manuscript HSA policy for myself and my employees with one of the massive networks. Everyone gets the most competitive network/drug discounts available and I/they set our deductibles, co-pays and oop maximums according to our planned usages and self-insurance appetites. I incent them on healthclub memberships, dental cleanings and annual physicals with a HSA contribution for each one completed. I see our experience results each year as well as our aggregate annual premiums. The math indicates we are not "working the streets" for the insurance carrier given that I have to allow for one or two whopper claims each year.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">casualobserver</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:10:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Defending Polanski; or, How the Hollywood Left Has Completely Lost Its Marbles</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/48033/defending-polanski-or-how-the-hollywood-left-has-completely-lost-its-marbles/#comment-17899295</link><description>There is no room for logic or finesse, such as your point, in the pursuit of the besmerchment of political foes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The crude logic stream of Polanski.....Hollywood.....left....Democrat.........will work well enough with mainstream America to be nonetheless effective.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The invitation to burden the Dems with this pseudo-fitting albatross is too inviting to pass up.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">casualobserver</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:52:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Defending Polanski; or, How the Hollywood Left Has Completely Lost Its Marbles</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/48033/defending-polanski-or-how-the-hollywood-left-has-completely-lost-its-marbles/#comment-17892801</link><description>With all due respect for the victim, the extradition does not seem to pertain to the crime against her per se. It is that of being a fugitive from the justice system.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One would surmise a hero of the working man, the unmoneyed, the unprivileged, such as yourself, would rail against one of the privileged bourgoise walking away from justice, but apparently if he is a Democrat, you make an exception.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">casualobserver</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:17:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: HAPPY HAPPY health care reform for &amp;#8230; pets?</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47925/happy-happy-health-care-reform-for-pets/#comment-17783655</link><description>As absurd as the idea that the government should raise my taxes to pay for other people's healthcare?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I would rather subsidize the animals' care.....after all, their plight is not the result of their own efforts and choices in life.&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">casualobserver</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:14:56 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>