<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for ChrisWWW</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-4a1034c5" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/ChrisWWW/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 08:23:18 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Dollar May Be Dropped In Oil Trade (Guest Voice)</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/48665/dollar-may-be-dropped-in-oil-trade-guest-voice/#comment-19025285</link><description>&lt;b&gt;"Against this backdrop America should be strengthening its own economic foundation instead of expanding government entitlements and running up record deficits. "&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course if we cut government spending and welfare now, our economy will plunge to depths not seen since we last tried these Hooverite policies. Not to mention the human suffering that will ensue.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisWWW</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 08:23:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I don’t care who Letterman has sex with.</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/48363/i-don%e2%80%99t-care-who-letterman-has-sex-with/#comment-18391241</link><description>DLS,&lt;br&gt;I forgot, have the "values voters" excommunicated Newt Gingrich, John Ensign, or Mark Sanford yet?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisWWW</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 14:58:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama&amp;#8217;s Odd Olympic Odyssey</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/48054/obamas-odd-olympic-odyssey/#comment-17957072</link><description>And if Obama didn't go, our conservative friends would be on here complaining that Obama wasn't pro-American enough, that he's thrown Chicago "under the bus" and so forth.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How about we just remember that in the grand scheme of things, this trip and the site of the Olympics are unimportant. Move along...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisWWW</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:31:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Defending Polanski; or, How the Hollywood Left Has Completely Lost Its Marbles</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/48033/defending-polanski-or-how-the-hollywood-left-has-completely-lost-its-marbles/#comment-17887955</link><description>AR,&lt;br&gt;Since there are &lt;a href="http://political-thunder.blogspot.com/2006/02/list-of-hollywood-conservatives.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;~25 conservatives in all of Hollywood&lt;/a&gt;, I don't think you're being fair. Rather the burden is on you to explain why this is ideological.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisWWW</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:26:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Defending Polanski; or, How the Hollywood Left Has Completely Lost Its Marbles</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/48033/defending-polanski-or-how-the-hollywood-left-has-completely-lost-its-marbles/#comment-17886285</link><description>I don't think this issue comes down on the Left or Right. It just so happens Hollywood is mostly liberal, but this seems like a matter of entertainment types closing ranks rather than ideology.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisWWW</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:03:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newsmax Calls for a Military Coup in U.S.</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/48019/newsmax-calls-for-a-military-coup-in-u-s/#comment-17838873</link><description>Leonidas,&lt;br&gt;Of course the difference is that Vidal is clearly wary of the idea of a dictatorship, whereas Perry is practically salivating at the idea of a coup. Nice try though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisWWW</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:06:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newsmax Calls for a Military Coup in U.S.</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/48019/newsmax-calls-for-a-military-coup-in-u-s/#comment-17838364</link><description>Leonidas,&lt;br&gt;Other than that single sentence, the author is clearly fantasizing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisWWW</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:52:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It Will Soon Be Time For A New New-Deal</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47401/it-will-soon-be-time-for-a-new-new-deal/#comment-17310115</link><description>mikkel,&lt;br&gt;That's probably true. Not only do big businesses get to write the laws (see the Baucus health care plan and the bankruptcy "reform" from a few years back) but they also have the money to hire the lawyers and accountants that can game the system. The idea that the US government isn't friendly enough to these guys is laughable.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisWWW</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:26:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It Will Soon Be Time For A New New-Deal</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47401/it-will-soon-be-time-for-a-new-new-deal/#comment-17308789</link><description>Leonidas,&lt;br&gt;See my reply to PWT.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;DLS,&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;"Sensible people want spending reductions, or at the very least, critical review of all spending, in addition to seeking better taxes than income or wealth taxes (especially such taxes that are progressive)."&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;I didn't say I didn't want that, but it doesn't make sense to start being fiscal conservatives in the middle of a d*mned recession. Cutting spending and government jobs now, when there is nowhere else for people to go, will only make things worse and increase human suffering.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;"The theory that the federal government needs to spend more now and even borrow now is predicated on its doing these things well"&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;No, it's predicated on things getting worse if we do nothing, or follow your advice and cut spending. No stimulus is going to be perfect, the same as tax cuts, but I would much rather you help me convince the thieves in Washington to do a better stimulus than to do none at all.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisWWW</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:59:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It Will Soon Be Time For A New New-Deal</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47401/it-will-soon-be-time-for-a-new-new-deal/#comment-17305864</link><description>PWT,&lt;br&gt;I very specifically said "effective" tax rate. The GAO puts our "effective" corporate tax rate at 25.2% which is below Germany, China, India and others: &lt;a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200902030003" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://mediamatters.org/research/200902030003&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisWWW</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:23:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It Will Soon Be Time For A New New-Deal</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47401/it-will-soon-be-time-for-a-new-new-deal/#comment-17304174</link><description>Lowering the corporate tax rate is fine, as long as the revenue is captured on the other side through personal income taxes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But by the same token, we already have very low effective corporate tax rates and I'm not sure how effective lowering it further would be.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisWWW</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:50:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It Will Soon Be Time For A New New-Deal</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47401/it-will-soon-be-time-for-a-new-new-deal/#comment-17299882</link><description>Mikkel,&lt;br&gt;It's undeniably true that the deficit spending should be targeted for maximum efficiency. But the choice back in Jan. &amp; Feb. was between no bill and a crappy bill. Without more than 2% of Congress acting in a sane and selfless way, these are the choices we're left with.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisWWW</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:56:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spitting Nails Over Indefinite Detention</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47403/spitting-nails-over-indefinite-detention/#comment-17298107</link><description>Count me among those who think &lt;a href="http://www.whyweworry.com/2009/09/24/obama-embraces-soviet-communism/" rel="nofollow"&gt;this is a major betrayal by Obama and the Democrats&lt;/a&gt;. If you can't prove these detainees are terrorists, then you have to let them go.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisWWW</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:20:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It Will Soon Be Time For A New New-Deal</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47401/it-will-soon-be-time-for-a-new-new-deal/#comment-17298030</link><description>Good post. We have to stop the economic bleeding, even if that means running more deficits. Once we've recovered we should cut back on spending and start building a rainy day fund for when the next recession hits. But that is going to require fiscal discipline from all parties, which seems unlikely...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisWWW</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:18:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My, How Dickensian You Are Looking Tonight, Mr. Cantor!</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47162/my-how-dickensian-you-are-looking-tonight-mr-cantor/#comment-17229414</link><description>DLS and Leonidas,&lt;br&gt;Your so called "moderate" health care reform is nothing but a gift to the odious health insurance industry (mandates with no meaningful check on the quality of insurance we're required to buy). We'd be better off with the more "extreme" reform, be it a rightwing system like Singapore, or a leftwing system like France.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisWWW</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:14:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Eric Cantor and Republican &amp;#8220;Compassion&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47302/eric-cantor-and-republican-compassion/#comment-17229082</link><description>Michael&lt;br&gt;What you wrote seems undeniably true. It's also true that the idea of a government safety net is not unprecedented. After all, we have public police departments, fire departments, and a military all based on the notion that the health and survival of *all* Americans is important regardless of personal wealth.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisWWW</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:07:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Biden Remarks About Democrats and 2010 Midterm Elections Likely To Help Republican Fundraisers</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47079/biden-remarks-about-democrats-and-2010-midterm-elections-likely-to-help-republican-fundraisers/#comment-17114920</link><description>Joe,&lt;br&gt;Seems like you're blowing up the significance of this quote. I don't see how it changes the Republican strategy or gives them anything they don't already have.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I mean come on, it's common sense that winning seats away from the opposition will help your cause or harm theirs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisWWW</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:52:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Obama is Right to Avoid/Ignore Fox News</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47021/why-obama-is-right-to-avoidignore-fox-news/#comment-17049674</link><description>Alright... fair enough.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One bit of info to throw out there, Obama has gone on Fox and faced O'Reilly before.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisWWW</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:41:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Obama is Right to Avoid/Ignore Fox News</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47021/why-obama-is-right-to-avoidignore-fox-news/#comment-17049062</link><description>Fox News long ago abandoned any attempt at being fair source of news. Although maybe I'm wrong to think they ever were one in the first place.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;PWT,&lt;br&gt;Would you consider Bush a coward for never speaking to directly to The Nation?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisWWW</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:27:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are Health Insurance Profits Really A Problem?</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47023/are-health-insurance-profits-really-a-problem/#comment-17046435</link><description>If we force all the health insurance companies to do everything the same way, then what value is there in having private insurance companies? At that point, any profit is a complete waste. Insurance companies aren't offering anything of value in return.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, the profit motive, while not necessarily profits themselves, lead to lovely industry practices like recission,</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisWWW</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:28:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote of the Day: Barack Obama on News and Blogs</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/46999/quote-of-the-day-barack-obama-on-news-and-blogs/#comment-17035949</link><description>Alex,&lt;br&gt;Not always. How would a black slave respectfully disagree with their owner's contention that said slave was sub-human?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisWWW</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:23:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Did Barack Obama Read the Baucus Bill?</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/46989/did-barack-obama-read-the-baucus-bill/#comment-17035640</link><description>*Presses the "like" button on Jazz*</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisWWW</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:15:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Did Barack Obama Read the Baucus Bill?</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/46989/did-barack-obama-read-the-baucus-bill/#comment-17035277</link><description>Fair enough LL. I retract that point.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I still think the question of is this a tax or not obscures the actual policy questions at stake.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisWWW</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:04:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Did Barack Obama Read the Baucus Bill?</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/46989/did-barack-obama-read-the-baucus-bill/#comment-17031833</link><description>Still playing gotcha I see. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One thing, the Baucus Bill is not the only Democratic bill under consideration, and it wasn't written by the President.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisWWW</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:03:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Renewed Controversy Over Patriot Act</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/46944/renewed-controversy-over-patriot-act/#comment-17000299</link><description>Some kind of mechanism to donate to folks that are fighting for the passage of the bill.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisWWW</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 20:24:14 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>