<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for ChemSpiderman</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-d88246c0" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/ChemSpiderman/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:37:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: We need a Wikipedia for data - Bret Taylor's blog</title><link>http://bret.appspot.com/entry/we-need-a-wikipedia-for-data#comment-332108</link><description>At ChemSpider we've been working hard to put together a free access website for Chemical structures and related information/data. At present we are close to 20 million structures linked to other websites, data sources and, other than the efforts of the NIH and PubChem ChemSpider has one of the richest (and crowdsource curated) datasets available online. We are working hard to curate the Wikipedia Chemistry dataset, with members of WP:Chem (&lt;a href="http://www.chemconnector.com/chemunicating/dedicating-christmas-time-to-the-cause-of-curating-wikipedia.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.chemconnector.com/chemunicating/dedi...&lt;/a&gt;) at present. I agree that we need more data online and available. It is interesting to note how few are willing to PROVIDE data though, even among the advocates within this domain.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChemSpiderman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:37:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>