Disqus - Latest Comments for CaptainJack

Re: Approaching Women with the Game Dynamics

CaptainJack — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:20:20 -0000

Wow, dude... You have a BOI that is really messing you up... Think about this:

You are on the dance floor with girl (tons of Agreement).
You are GRINDING on each other (tons, tons of SEXUAL agreement)

Now, ask yourself... "What is the purpose of grinding on the dance floor?" -- Isn't it a type of flirting/foreplay/simulated-sex?

A boner is a RESULT of foreplay. A boner is a DESIRED EFFECT!

Haaa! Do you see it?!

You are worried about creeping out a girl with your boner when she is TRYING to give you one!

You have an idea at the top of your Viewpoint pyramid that is limiting you. Find it and remove it.

CJ

Re: Approaching Women with the Game Dynamics

CaptainJack — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:16:39 -0000

> This, to me, explains why direct works better in day game than night.

Explaining things that were mysterious is one sign of a "better" basic organizing idea.

CJ

Re: Approaching Women with the Game Dynamics

CaptainJack — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:15:31 -0000

I consider the "you guys are adorable" to be more Social than direct. Adorable is more Appreciative than Sexual... When I talk about Direct I am talking more about Shark-style where you are saying something like, "I think... you are... absolutely... BEAUTIFUL and I want to get to know you."

"I noticed you from over there and had to come meet you" or "You are adorable, what's your name" is more like a Direct social.

Re: My Blog Disappears?

CaptainJack — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:15:17 -0000

Answered your Approaching Direct question here: http://www.betheseducer.com/735/approaching-wom...

Re: Unexplainable Shit… Now Explained.

CaptainJack — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 03:57:08 -0000

I would start with eCoaching to get the fundamentals... then "Sexual Framing Mastery" 4 audio program... then Master Strategies.

CJ

Re: Back to Back SNLs and a 3some?

CaptainJack — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 03:55:24 -0000

Yes, I know. It sucks.

I also realized that I had only 1 meal on Sunday so that combined with 2 nights of drinking and not much sleep all conspired to fuck things up.

I really wasn't thinking correctly. 999 times out of 1,000 I would turn that into at least a lay.

Sucks! But such is this adventure called Game!

Re: Back to Back SNLs and a 3some?

CaptainJack — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 03:20:51 -0000

Thanks for the traffic!

I don't really post on forums anymore.

I'm glad you have had success with the eCoaching!

CJ

Re: Unexplainable Shit… Now Explained.

CaptainJack — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 01:57:08 -0000

I would start with eCoaching to get the fundamentals... then "Sexual Framing Mastery" 4 audio program... then Master Strategies.

CJ

Re: Back to Back SNLs and a 3some?

CaptainJack — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 01:55:24 -0000

Re: Back to Back SNLs and a 3some?

CaptainJack — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 01:20:51 -0000

Thanks for the traffic!

I don't really post on forums anymore.

I'm glad you have had success with the eCoaching!

CJ

Re: Back to Back SNLs and a 3some?

CaptainJack — Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:16:47 -0000

Yes, dude. That's most nights. Most sets are NO GOs, meaning they just don't go anywhere.

Still, this is pretty good efficiency. If you take my first night 'back' into serious Gaming when I gamed at the college girl venue, I think I've opened about 12-15 total sets (not including Hired Guns at restaurants). 2 SNLs, one date, a makeout and 2 TB's in 12-15 sets is pretty damn efficient... and, I still have 2 active numbers (the date and the makeout girl) so there's still some lay possibility there.

But, think about it like this: Shouldn't most girls like you?

I'm starting to really feel like that... I'm starting to think, "Shit, why wouldn't they?"

CJ

Re: Back to Back SNLs and a 3some?

CaptainJack — Mon, 07 Sep 2009 21:16:47 -0000

Yes, dude. That's most nights.

Re: “I met your twin last night.”

CaptainJack — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:10:16 -0000

Calling them is always the best option.

Re: “I met your twin last night.”

CaptainJack — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 14:10:16 -0000

Calling them is always the best option.

Re: “I met your twin last night.”

CaptainJack — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:32:09 -0000

They always want to know "where?" and that's funny to me. I always picture them arriving at the venue and scoping it out looking for their twin Sherlock Holmes style.

You might be doing the "we should meet up soon..." text after a few more witty exchanges.

Re: “I met your twin last night.”

CaptainJack — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 01:32:09 -0000

They always want to know "where?" and that's funny to me. You might be doing the "we should meet up soon..." text after a few more witty exchanges.

Re: “I met your twin last night.”

CaptainJack — Sun, 23 Aug 2009 23:37:28 -0000

It won't have anything to do with their age if they don't like it. It probably has to do with the initial interaction. Are you playful/teasing with them in the initial meet?

Also, how does the "starting to forget" text go for you?

Re: “I met your twin last night.”

CaptainJack — Sun, 23 Aug 2009 21:37:28 -0000

Re: How to Get the Game Dynamics Audios

CaptainJack — Sat, 22 Aug 2009 21:43:18 -0000

I just clicked the "Buy Now" link and it is working fine.

Re: Make Game Easy by Clarifying on the Game Dynamics

CaptainJack — Sat, 22 Aug 2009 19:43:18 -0000

I just clicked the "Buy Now" link and it is working fine.

Re: 3 in the Works…

CaptainJack — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 02:22:18 -0000

That's certainly very possible since her friend had been competing for me all night... and, we made out easily on the date.

Re: 3 in the Works…

CaptainJack — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:22:18 -0000

That's certainly very possible since her friend had been competing for me all night... and, we made out easily on the date.

Re: Game Dynamics and “Player in the Game” = Elegance

CaptainJack — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:49:09 -0000

That's one of the risks if you totally devalidate it and she feels like it can't be repaired or it would be too hard... But, that usually requires a LOT of that... if you challenge it and she responds with what you consider to be a valid attempt at Clarifying then you accept it and move forward.

Re: Player States of Existence and Nested Games

CaptainJack — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:38:53 -0000

Not the current one... The only way to get info on the Game Dynamics is via the Master Strategies Monthly program:

http://www.betheseducer.com/get-trained/#msm

Re: Game Dynamics and “Player in the Game” = Elegance

CaptainJack — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 23:49:09 -0000