<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for CantEvenGo</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/CantEvenGo/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:39:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is Your Feed Reader Becoming Boring?</title><link>http://shegeeks.disqus.com/is_your_feed_reader_becoming_boring/#comment-5150143</link><description>I'm aware of Snackr. Marshall Kirkpatrick wrote about it on ReadWriteWeb. It's a great tool, but I'm not much of a ticker person myself to be honest. It takes up to much screen estate for me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree though that the presentation manner could definitely play a role in the "boringness" of it all. Google Reader isn't the best for finding new content. Feedly would probably be better.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Corvida</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:39:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Your Feed Reader Becoming Boring?</title><link>http://shegeeks.disqus.com/is_your_feed_reader_becoming_boring/#comment-5135959</link><description>Corvida,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think it's the style of presentation.  I've tried lots of RSS readers (mac), and the static style of presentation doesn't work for me - it's too hierarchical, keeps me in a rigid reading pattern, and forces me to do more work to find new content from unexpected sources.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;this isn't for everyone, but i can't live without Snackr.  It's a news-ticker style feed reader that's synced to my Google Reader account, and it helps me discover new stuff every day.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;anytime i come across an interesting blog, i subscribe to it with GR.  i keep snackr open all the time (i'm currently pushing over 200 feeds now) and it scrolls new items from a random selection of blogs across the bottom of my screen.  i see more stuff from blogs i wouldn't usually see, and when i come across good stuff i'll open the post in my browser.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Snackr requires Adobe Air, and some people complain about memory usage, but as a change of pace i'd highly recommend it</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CantEvenGo</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 02:50:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Has Traditional Black Media Missed the Bus?</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/has_traditional_black_media_missed_the_bus/#comment-845883</link><description>BlackPlanet is the 5th largest social network, i agree.  but it is considered a "niche" SN because of its overwhelmingly Black demographic.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i'm not sure i agree with your statement about investments in AA-targeted internet properties, tho.  Whither goest MSBET?  for that matter, &lt;a href="http://BET.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;BET.com&lt;/a&gt; is only now beginning to use its resources to be more than a video-delivery and tv-show promoting website.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Supporting an internet business is decidedly different from supporting brick-and-mortar businesses.  the revenue streams are different and the demands by users of of the medium (for timely AND relevant content) seem to be a major stumbling block in terms of sustainability.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm hopeful for &lt;a href="http://theRoot.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;theRoot.com&lt;/a&gt;, given its backing by WaPo.  But that same backing makes me give the site the side-eye because i'm not entirely convinced of their (WaPo's) ethos w/regard to Black culture.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CantEvenGo</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 13:18:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Has Traditional Black Media Missed the Bus?</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/has_traditional_black_media_missed_the_bus/#comment-844743</link><description>BlackPlanet is the 5th largest social network worldwide (I think). Investments in African-American targeted internet properties have tended to do much better than those for the general public if you take the wide view. I think it's the same as underinvestment in supermarkets, drug stores and services in working class African-American neighborhoods. There's some assumption among some that we can't support businesses which just ain't factual at all.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JillTubman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 11:33:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Has Traditional Black Media Missed the Bus?</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/has_traditional_black_media_missed_the_bus/#comment-842639</link><description>Given the limited local markets many black newspapers serve and the resultant small revenue streams from advertising, i can understand why they were reluctant to invest in the Web at a time when they saw the big dogs (NYTimes, WaPo) go in and lose money hand over fist.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Essence (at least pre-Katrina), and the Johnson Publishing clan were even worse IMHO; they HAD resources but treated the web as a direct-mail service to drive readers to their print issues.  bad move.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Moreover, early attempts at Black information provision online didn't do well - NetNoir, &lt;a href="http://everythingblack.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;everythingblack.com&lt;/a&gt; - because their target audience hadn't yet reached the web in numbers that could support them.  Other properties that reached a moderate level of success were bought up by larger concerns (BlackVoices, Africana) that immediately diluted their message in order to "reach a broader audience".  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; i think that Katrina was a wake up call for Black websites and bloggers - they realized the paucity of Black-oriented news available on the web and stepped up to meet the demand.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CantEvenGo</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 04:08:27 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>